Factors influencing vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean
-
Mi-Hui Cho
Abstract
This study explores the extent to which perceptual and other factors (i.e., orthography and standardization) affect vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean. It also examines whether perceptual variability gives rise to adaptation variability, and it further addresses whether the degree of perceptual influence in vowel adaptation is different from that in consonant adaptation. Data on Korean listeners’ perceptual mapping patterns for English vowels were collected in an English-to-Korean vowel category mapping experiment and compared to the patterns in a loanword database. The results indicate that perceptual factors have a great impact on the adaptation of English vowels into Korean, in line with de Jong and Cho’s (de Jong, Kenneth & Mi-Hui Cho. 2012. Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Language 88. 341–368) findings for the adaptation of English consonants into Korean. Consequently, factors such as orthography and standardization are viewed as deviations from these perceptual influences. The impact of perceptual adaptation is, however, rather limited because the correlation between perceptual mappings and loanword mappings is less robust for English vowel adaptation than for English consonant adaptation possibly due to the less categorical nature of vowels relative to consonants. Additionally, the results show that increased strength of modal perceptual mappings is related to less loanword variability in vowel adaptation.
The averages of F1 and F2 formant frequencies of the vowels recorded by four native speakers of American English are plotted. The formant frequency values are averages for the four speakers.
References
21C: The Latest Loanword Dictionary. 2004. Seoul: Clover Publishing Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Abramson, S. Arthur & Leigh Lisker. 1972. Voice timing in Korean stops. In Proceedings of the VIIth international congress of phonetic sciences, 439–446. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110814750-042Suche in Google Scholar
Avery, Peter & Susan Ehrlich. 1992. Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first language phonological perception. In Andrea Calabrese & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Loan phonology, 11–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.307.02boeSuche in Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui. 2012. A comparison between loanword adaptation and cross-language perception by prosodic position: Cases of English /θ/ in Korean. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 18. 163–183. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2012.18.1.163.Suche in Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui. 2018. English vowel adaptation in Korean: Differential degrees of perceptual influence on individual vowels. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43(1). 155–176. https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2018.43.1.007.Suche in Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui & Soonyong Jeong. 2016. English vowel adaptation in Korean: Cases of loanwords with English /ɛ/ and /æ/. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 22. 361–381. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2016.22.2.361.Suche in Google Scholar
Clements, George Nick. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017Suche in Google Scholar
Daland, Robert, Mira Oh & Syejeong Kim. 2015. When in doubt, read the instructions: Orthographic effects in loanword adaptation. Lingua 159. 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth & Mi-Hui Cho. 2012. Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Language 88. 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0035.Suche in Google Scholar
Dohlus, Katrin. 2005. Phonetics or phonology: Asymmetries in loanword adaptation – French and German mid front rounded vowels in Japanese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 42. 117–135. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.42.2005.275.Suche in Google Scholar
Dong-A’s New Concise English-Korean Dictionary. 1986. Seoul: Dong-A Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fry, D. B., Arthur Abramson, Peter D. Eimas & Alvin M. Liberman. 1962. The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Language & Speech 5. 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500401.Suche in Google Scholar
Han, Meiko-S. & Raymond S. Weitzman. 1970. Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/ and /ph, th, kh/. Phonetica 22. 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259311.Suche in Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. 2005. The principling role of Korean in phonological adaptation. Paper presented at the 30th anniversary meeting of the international circle of Korean linguistics, Seoul National University.Suche in Google Scholar
Jang, Hyejin, Shin Jiyoung & Nam Hosung. 2015. Aspects of vowels by ages in Seoul dialect. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 21. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2015.21.2.341.Suche in Google Scholar
Kagaya, Ryohei. 1974. A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates, and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 2. 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31191-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Kang, Ogmi. 2003. Korean phonology. Seoul: Taehaksa.Suche in Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20. 219–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675703004524.Suche in Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2013. L1 phonotactic restrictions and perceptual adaptation: English affricates in Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22(1). 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9096-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung & Jessamyn Schertz. 2020. The influence of perceived L2 sound categories in on-line adaptation and implications for loanword phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39. 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09477-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, Cin-Wu. 1965. On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word 21. 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1965.11435434.Suche in Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Regine, Pascale Lidji, Isabelle Peretz, Mireille Besson & Jose Morais. 2009. Processing interactions between phonology and melody: Vowels sing but consonants speak. Cognition 112. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.014.Suche in Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Carol Paradis. 2002. Addressing and disconfirming some predictions of phonetic approximation for loanword adaptation. Langues et Linguistique 28. 71–91.Suche in Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Carol Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 223–258. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710666.Suche in Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2006. A course in phonetics, 6th edn. Boston: Wadsworth: Thomson.Suche in Google Scholar
Lee, Sun-Young, Jiyeong Kim, Kichun Nam, Hyeon-Aec Jeon & Kim Youngjoo. 2018. Neurocognitive study on the ongoing merge of Korean vowel /e/ and /ɛ/: Comparing MMNs of younger and older generations. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 24. 209–224. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2018.24.2.209.Suche in Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse & Gordon Peterson. 1961. Transitions, glides, and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33. 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908638.Suche in Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., Katherine S. Harris, Howard S. Hoffman & Belver C. Griffith. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044417.Suche in Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & S. Arthur Abramson. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422.10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830Suche in Google Scholar
Loanword Dictionary. 2006. Seoul: Minjungseokwan.Suche in Google Scholar
Oh, Mira. 1996. Linguistic input to loanword phonology. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 2. 117–126.Suche in Google Scholar
Park, Hanyong & Kenneth de Jong. 2008. Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics 36. 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 376–370. Barcelona: UAB.Suche in Google Scholar
Repp, Bruno H. 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. In Norman J. Lass (ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice, 244–335. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1Suche in Google Scholar
Repp, Bruno H. & David R. Williams. 1985. Categorical trends in vowel imitation: Preliminary observations from a replication experiment. Speech Communication 4. 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(85)90039-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. Marie. 1996. Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99. 3201–3211. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414804.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. 2006. Loan phonology is not all perception: Evidence from Japanese loan doublets. In Timothy J. Vance & Kimberly A. Jones (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 1463–1474. Palo Alto, Cal.: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2001. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms: UCLA.Suche in Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth Noble. 1972. The quantal nature speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In Peter B. Denes & Edward E. DavidJr. (eds.), Human communication: A unified view, 51–61. New York: McGraw Hill.Suche in Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth Noble & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2010. Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap. Journal of Phonetics 38. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth Noble, Alvin M. Liberman, M. Studdert-Kennedy & S. Ohman. 1969. Cross-language study of vowel perception. Language Speech 12. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096901200101.Suche in Google Scholar
Strange, Winifred, Reiko Akahane-Yamada, Rieko Kubo, Sonja A. Trent, Kanae Nishi & James J. Jenkins. 1998. Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics 26. 311–344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0078.Suche in Google Scholar
Toro, Juan M., Mohinish Shukla, Marina Nespor & Ansgar D. Endress. 2008. The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 70(8). 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.8.1515.Suche in Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Sharon Peperkamp. 2006. The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 116. 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24. 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Shedding new light on English loanwords in Croatian: computational-linguistic and corpus linguistic perspectives
- Factors influencing vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean
- From ‘low-class’ and ‘talentless’ to ‘narcissist and pathological liar’: a functional-pragmatic approach to Meghan Markle’s negative evaluation on X
- Can cultural distance be a factor in bilingual processing? Report from primed translation recognition task of Rongmei–Meitei bilinguals
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Shedding new light on English loanwords in Croatian: computational-linguistic and corpus linguistic perspectives
- Factors influencing vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean
- From ‘low-class’ and ‘talentless’ to ‘narcissist and pathological liar’: a functional-pragmatic approach to Meghan Markle’s negative evaluation on X
- Can cultural distance be a factor in bilingual processing? Report from primed translation recognition task of Rongmei–Meitei bilinguals
