Home Factors influencing vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Factors influencing vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean

  • Mi-Hui Cho and Shinsook Lee EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 20, 2024

Abstract

This study explores the extent to which perceptual and other factors (i.e., orthography and standardization) affect vowel adaptation in English loanwords in Korean. It also examines whether perceptual variability gives rise to adaptation variability, and it further addresses whether the degree of perceptual influence in vowel adaptation is different from that in consonant adaptation. Data on Korean listeners’ perceptual mapping patterns for English vowels were collected in an English-to-Korean vowel category mapping experiment and compared to the patterns in a loanword database. The results indicate that perceptual factors have a great impact on the adaptation of English vowels into Korean, in line with de Jong and Cho’s (de Jong, Kenneth & Mi-Hui Cho. 2012. Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Language 88. 341–368) findings for the adaptation of English consonants into Korean. Consequently, factors such as orthography and standardization are viewed as deviations from these perceptual influences. The impact of perceptual adaptation is, however, rather limited because the correlation between perceptual mappings and loanword mappings is less robust for English vowel adaptation than for English consonant adaptation possibly due to the less categorical nature of vowels relative to consonants. Additionally, the results show that increased strength of modal perceptual mappings is related to less loanword variability in vowel adaptation.


Corresponding author: Shinsook Lee, Department of English Language Education, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, 02841 Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, Korea, E-mail:

Appendix

The averages of F1 and F2 formant frequencies of the vowels recorded by four native speakers of American English are plotted. The formant frequency values are averages for the four speakers.

References

21C: The Latest Loanword Dictionary. 2004. Seoul: Clover Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Abramson, S. Arthur & Leigh Lisker. 1972. Voice timing in Korean stops. In Proceedings of the VIIth international congress of phonetic sciences, 439–446. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110814750-042Search in Google Scholar

Avery, Peter & Susan Ehrlich. 1992. Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first language phonological perception. In Andrea Calabrese & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Loan phonology, 11–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.307.02boeSearch in Google Scholar

Cho, Mi-Hui. 2012. A comparison between loanword adaptation and cross-language perception by prosodic position: Cases of English /θ/ in Korean. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 18. 163–183. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2012.18.1.163.Search in Google Scholar

Cho, Mi-Hui. 2018. English vowel adaptation in Korean: Differential degrees of perceptual influence on individual vowels. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43(1). 155–176. https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2018.43.1.007.Search in Google Scholar

Cho, Mi-Hui & Soonyong Jeong. 2016. English vowel adaptation in Korean: Cases of loanwords with English /ɛ/ and /æ/. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 22. 361–381. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2016.22.2.361.Search in Google Scholar

Clements, George Nick. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017Search in Google Scholar

Daland, Robert, Mira Oh & Syejeong Kim. 2015. When in doubt, read the instructions: Orthographic effects in loanword adaptation. Lingua 159. 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

de Jong, Kenneth & Mi-Hui Cho. 2012. Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Language 88. 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0035.Search in Google Scholar

Dohlus, Katrin. 2005. Phonetics or phonology: Asymmetries in loanword adaptation – French and German mid front rounded vowels in Japanese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 42. 117–135. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.42.2005.275.Search in Google Scholar

Dong-A’s New Concise English-Korean Dictionary. 1986. Seoul: Dong-A Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fry, D. B., Arthur Abramson, Peter D. Eimas & Alvin M. Liberman. 1962. The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Language & Speech 5. 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500401.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Meiko-S. & Raymond S. Weitzman. 1970. Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/ and /ph, th, kh/. Phonetica 22. 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259311.Search in Google Scholar

Iverson, Gregory K. 2005. The principling role of Korean in phonological adaptation. Paper presented at the 30th anniversary meeting of the international circle of Korean linguistics, Seoul National University.Search in Google Scholar

Jang, Hyejin, Shin Jiyoung & Nam Hosung. 2015. Aspects of vowels by ages in Seoul dialect. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 21. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2015.21.2.341.Search in Google Scholar

Kagaya, Ryohei. 1974. A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates, and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 2. 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31191-x.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Ogmi. 2003. Korean phonology. Seoul: Taehaksa.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Yoonjung. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20. 219–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675703004524.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Yoonjung. 2013. L1 phonotactic restrictions and perceptual adaptation: English affricates in Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22(1). 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9096-5.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Yoonjung & Jessamyn Schertz. 2020. The influence of perceived L2 sound categories in on-line adaptation and implications for loanword phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39. 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09477-9.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Cin-Wu. 1965. On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification (with special reference to Korean stops). Word 21. 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1965.11435434.Search in Google Scholar

Kolinsky, Regine, Pascale Lidji, Isabelle Peretz, Mireille Besson & Jose Morais. 2009. Processing interactions between phonology and melody: Vowels sing but consonants speak. Cognition 112. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.014.Search in Google Scholar

LaCharité, Darlene & Carol Paradis. 2002. Addressing and disconfirming some predictions of phonetic approximation for loanword adaptation. Langues et Linguistique 28. 71–91.Search in Google Scholar

LaCharité, Darlene & Carol Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 223–258. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710666.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 2006. A course in phonetics, 6th edn. Boston: Wadsworth: Thomson.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sun-Young, Jiyeong Kim, Kichun Nam, Hyeon-Aec Jeon & Kim Youngjoo. 2018. Neurocognitive study on the ongoing merge of Korean vowel /e/ and /ɛ/: Comparing MMNs of younger and older generations. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 24. 209–224. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2018.24.2.209.Search in Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse & Gordon Peterson. 1961. Transitions, glides, and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33. 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908638.Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, Alvin M., Katherine S. Harris, Howard S. Hoffman & Belver C. Griffith. 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044417.Search in Google Scholar

Lisker, Leigh & S. Arthur Abramson. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422.10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830Search in Google Scholar

Loanword Dictionary. 2006. Seoul: Minjungseokwan.Search in Google Scholar

Oh, Mira. 1996. Linguistic input to loanword phonology. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 2. 117–126.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Hanyong & Kenneth de Jong. 2008. Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics 36. 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Peperkamp, Sharon & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 376–370. Barcelona: UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Repp, Bruno H. 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. In Norman J. Lass (ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice, 244–335. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1Search in Google Scholar

Repp, Bruno H. & David R. Williams. 1985. Categorical trends in vowel imitation: Preliminary observations from a replication experiment. Speech Communication 4. 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(85)90039-1.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. Marie. 1996. Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99. 3201–3211. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414804.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer L. 2006. Loan phonology is not all perception: Evidence from Japanese loan doublets. In Timothy J. Vance & Kimberly A. Jones (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 1463–1474. Palo Alto, Cal.: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca. 2001. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Ms: UCLA.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth Noble. 1972. The quantal nature speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In Peter B. Denes & Edward E. DavidJr. (eds.), Human communication: A unified view, 51–61. New York: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth Noble & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2010. Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap. Journal of Phonetics 38. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth Noble, Alvin M. Liberman, M. Studdert-Kennedy & S. Ohman. 1969. Cross-language study of vowel perception. Language Speech 12. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096901200101.Search in Google Scholar

Strange, Winifred, Reiko Akahane-Yamada, Rieko Kubo, Sonja A. Trent, Kanae Nishi & James J. Jenkins. 1998. Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics 26. 311–344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0078.Search in Google Scholar

Toro, Juan M., Mohinish Shukla, Marina Nespor & Ansgar D. Endress. 2008. The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 70(8). 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.8.1515.Search in Google Scholar

Vendelin, Inga & Sharon Peperkamp. 2006. The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 116. 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24. 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-30
Accepted: 2024-03-11
Published Online: 2024-08-20
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2023-0047/html
Scroll to top button