Abstract
This study aims to describe the production of English monophthongs by nonnative Saudi speakers. It acoustically examined the production of English monophthongal vowels by Saudi second language (L2) speakers. Sixteen L2 participants produced twelve English monophthongs in carrier words. Comparable data were obtained in native Saudi Arabic and native Southern Standard British English to aid interpreting the L2 results. Formant frequencies and durations were measured for all vowels. Similar to Saudi Arabic, the English vowels produced by the Saudi L2 speakers occupied a smaller vowel space than the vowels produced by the native English speakers. There was overlap between many of the English vowel categories produced by the L2 speakers. However, the L2 speakers were found to employ similar durational characteristics to those employed by the native English speakers. L1 influence seems to play a major role in the L2 learners’ production of English vowels. The limited vowel space of the L2 speakers’ L1 appears to have limited their ability to produce the more acoustically peripheral English vowels.
Funding source: Taif University Researchers Supporting Project
Award Identifier / Grant number: TURSP-2020/167
-
Research funding: This work was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project (no. TURSP-2020/167).
References
Algethami, Ghazi & Sam Hellmuth. 2023. Methods for investigation of L2 speech rhythm: Insights from the production of English speech rhythm by L2 Arabic learners. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583231152638, In press.Suche in Google Scholar
Alghamdi, Mansour. 1998. A spectrographic analysis of Arabic vowels: A cross-dialect study. Journal of King Saud University 10(1). 3–24.Suche in Google Scholar
Asadi, Ibrahim A. 2017. Reading Arabic with short vowels: Vowelized but not necessarily transparent orthography. Journal of Writing Systems Research 9(2). 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2017.1400493.Suche in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program].Suche in Google Scholar
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & James Flege. 1992. The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14(2). 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100010792.Suche in Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203784969Suche in Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 1997. The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the international Phonetic Association 27. 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005417.Suche in Google Scholar
Evans, Bronwen & Wafaa Alshangiti. 2018. The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 68. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Flege, James. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76(3). 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391256.Suche in Google Scholar
Flege, James. 1987. The instrumental study of L2 speech production: Some methodological considerations. Language Learning 37(2). 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00569.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Flege, James & Ocke-Schwen Bohn. 2021. The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In Ratree Wayland (ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress, 3–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108886901.002Suche in Google Scholar
Flege, James & Robert Port. 1981. Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech 24(2). 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400202.Suche in Google Scholar
Fokes, Joann & Zinny S. Bond. 1989. The vowels of stressed and unstressed syllables in nonnative English. Language Learning 39(3). 341–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00596.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Michael Clark & Robert Houde. 2000. Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(6). 3013–3022. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1323463.Suche in Google Scholar
Hubais, Ali & Stefanie Pillai. 2010. An instrumental analysis of English vowels produced by Omanis. Journal of Modern Languages 20(1). 1–18.Suche in Google Scholar
Ingham, Bruce. 1994. Najdi Arabic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.1Suche in Google Scholar
Khalil, Samar. 2014. Comparative study of the acoustic vowel space of Egyptian English vowels and general American English vowels. Linguistic Portfolios 3(1). 75–90.Suche in Google Scholar
Leung, Keith, Allard Jongman, Yue Wang & Joan Sereno. 2016. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(1). 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4954737.Suche in Google Scholar
Major, Roy. 2008. Transfer in second language phonology. In Jette Edwards & Mary Zampini (eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition, 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.36.05majSuche in Google Scholar
Mitleb, Fares. 1981. Timing of English vowels spoken with an Arabic accent. Research in Phonetics 2. 193–226.Suche in Google Scholar
Mitleb, Fares M. 1984. Voicing effect on vowel duration is not an absolute universal. Journal of Phonetics 12(1). 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30847-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Munro, Murray. 1993. Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech 36(1). 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600103.Suche in Google Scholar
Newman, Daniel & Jo Verhoeven. 2002. Frequency analysis of Arabic vowels in connected speech. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 100. 77–86.Suche in Google Scholar
Roach, Peter. 2004. British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34(2). 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100304001768.Suche in Google Scholar
Roach, Peter. 2009. English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Watson, Janet. 2007. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel & Paola Escudero. 2014. A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(5). 2751–2761. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4896471.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The production of English monophthong vowels by Saudi L2 speakers
- Cartographic architecture of DP
- Parasitic gap patterns and hierarchy preservation in German
- Marking and breaking phraseology in English and Polish: a comparative corpus-informed study
- A tale of two tool(kit)s: from canonical antonymy to non-canonical opposition in the Qur’anic discourse
- The role of lexical context and language experience in the perception of foreign-accented segments
- From verb to epistemic marker: bini in Hamedanian Persian
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The production of English monophthong vowels by Saudi L2 speakers
- Cartographic architecture of DP
- Parasitic gap patterns and hierarchy preservation in German
- Marking and breaking phraseology in English and Polish: a comparative corpus-informed study
- A tale of two tool(kit)s: from canonical antonymy to non-canonical opposition in the Qur’anic discourse
- The role of lexical context and language experience in the perception of foreign-accented segments
- From verb to epistemic marker: bini in Hamedanian Persian