Thematic role mappings in metaphor variation: contrasting English bake and Spanish hornear

References

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1992. Frames, concepts and conceptual fields. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts. New essays in semantic and lexical organization, 21–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2012. Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 195–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 million words, 1990-present. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2016. Corpus del Español: Two billion words, 21 countries. Available at: http://www.corpusdelespanol.org/web-dial/. (Web/Dialects).Suche in Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.6Suche in Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice. 2008. Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 280–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.018Suche in Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice. 2015. MIP, the corpus and dictionaries: what makes for the best metaphor analysis? Metaphor and the Social World 5(1). 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.09dei.Suche in Google Scholar

Deignan, Alice & Elena Semino. 2010. Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In Lynn Cameron & Robert Maslen (eds.), Metaphor analysis. Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, 161–179. London: Equinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar. Part 1. The structure of the clause. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Esbrí-Blasco, Montserrat. 2020. “Cooking in the mind”: A frame-based contrastive study of culinary metaphors in American English and Peninsular Spanish. Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I Doctoral Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2007. A glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, and Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.10.1515/9780748629862Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical relations, 59–81. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368866_005Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00424-7Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6. 222–254.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1999. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In Raymond W. Gibbs & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 145–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.175.09gibSuche in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2013. The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(2). 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2008. Universality and variation in the use of metaphor. In Nils-Lenard Johannesson & David C. Minugh (eds.), Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (SMF), 51–74. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2012. Metaphorical creativity in discourse. In Mario Brdar, Ida Raffaelli & Milena Zic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation, 253–270. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2). 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2019. Some consequences of multi-level view of metaphor. In Ignasi Navarro i Ferrando (ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse, 19–34. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110629460-002Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108859127Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2022. Extended CMT and the dynamic systems theory of metaphor. In Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Dynamism in metaphor and beyond, 131–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/milcc.9.07kovSuche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2019. Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108241441Suche in Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024Suche in Google Scholar

Mischler, James J. 2013. Metaphor across time and conceptual space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.3Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, John. 2011. Corpora and cognitive linguistics. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(2). 521–559. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-63982011000200010.Suche in Google Scholar

Ogarkova, Anna & Cristina Soriano. 2014. Variation within universals: The ‘metaphorical profile’ approach to the study of ANGER concepts in English, Russian and Spanish. In Andreas Musolff, Fiona MacArthur & Giulio Pagani (eds.), Metaphor and intercultural communication, 93–116. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472593610.ch-005Suche in Google Scholar

Pragglejazz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1). 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Alicia Galera Masegosa. 2014. Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.45Suche in Google Scholar

Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson & Jan Scheffczyk. 2010. FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.Suche in Google Scholar

Semino, Elena. 2017. Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 463–476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.029Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2021. Measuring the impact of (non)figurativity in the cultural conceptualization of emotions in the two main national varieties of Portuguese. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Figurative language – intersubjectivity and usage, vol. 11, 387–438. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ftl.11.13silSuche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan T. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy, 1–16. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110199895Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan T. Gries (eds.). 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110199895Suche in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Karen. 2013. Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.14Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tuggy, David. 2007. Schematicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 82–116. NewYork: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. 2006. Semantic macro-roles and language processing. In Ina Bornkessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Bernard Comrie & Angela D. Friederici (eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking, 165–263. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning & function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1974. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY/London, UK: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2008. Metaphor from body and culture. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 247–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2012. Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. In Patrick Hanks & Rachel Giora (eds.), Metaphor and figurative language, (Literary and Cross-Cultural Perspectives 3), 328–359. New York and London: Routledge.10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1Suche in Google Scholar