Separation of CO2/CH4 and O2/N2 by polysulfone hollow fiber membranes: effects of membrane support properties and surface coating materials
-
Rosyiela Azwa Roslan
,
Divya Barathi Sakthivel
Abstract
In this study, six different types of polysulfone hollow fiber membranes were fabricated from the same polymeric dope solution by manipulating several important parameters during the spinning process, aiming to find the best membrane supports for the coating layer in the gas separation process. The experimental results showed that upon the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coating process, the gas pair selectivities of all six types of membranes were significantly increased with respect to carbon dioxide (CO2)/methane (CH4) and oxygen (O2)/nitrogen (N2) separation. However, the membrane support spun at higher air gap and lower dope extrusion rate was found to be the best support for PDMS coating owing to its good structural integrity that led to a good balance between gas permeance and gas pair selectivity. Further investigation showed that the use of poly(ether block amide) (Pebax) as coating material did not certainly improve both gas permeance and the selectivity of hollow fiber membranes, although Pebax was previously reported to exhibit better performance than PDMS in flat sheet membranes. One of the main reasons is the difficulty of forming a defect-free Pebax coating layer on the outer surface of hollow fibers owing to the stickiness issue among fibers upon coating. More research is still needed to optimize the Pebax coating solution and its drying process in order to achieve the full potential of such coating material for hollow fiber membranes.
Acknowledgments
The corresponding author would like to thank Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for providing financial support for this research work under Research University Grant (no. Q.J130000.2546.15H41).
References
[1] Javaid A. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 112, 219–226.10.1016/j.cej.2005.07.010Search in Google Scholar
[2] Ismail AF, Yaacob N. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 275, 151–165.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.014Search in Google Scholar
[3] Chong KC, Lai SO, Thiam HS, Teoh HC, Heng SL. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2016, 11, 1016–1030.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Wahab MSA, Sunarti AR. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2015, 2, 78–84.10.15379/2410-1869.2015.02.02.08Search in Google Scholar
[5] Sadrzadeh M, Amirilargani M, Shahidi K, Mohammadi T. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342, 236–250.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.047Search in Google Scholar
[6] Zhen H, Jang SMJ, Teo WK, Li K. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99, 2497–2530.10.1002/app.22860Search in Google Scholar
[7] Ng BC, Ismail AF, Abdul Rahman WAW, Hasbullah A, Abdullah MS, Hassan AR. Jur. Teknol. 2004, 41, 73–88.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Rahbari-Sisakht M, Ismail AF, Matsuura T. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 88, 99–106.10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.012Search in Google Scholar
[9] Lee S, Lee JS, Lee M, Choi JW, Kim S, Lee S. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452, 311–318.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.044Search in Google Scholar
[10] Zulhairun AK, Subramaniam MN, Samavati A, Ramli MKN, Krishparao M, Goh PS, Ismail AF. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 180, 13–22.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.039Search in Google Scholar
[11] Robeson LM. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030Search in Google Scholar
[12] Kajekar AJ, Dodamani BM, Isloor AM, Karim ZA, Cheer NB, Ismail AF, Shilton SJ. Desalination 2015, 365, 117–125.10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.028Search in Google Scholar
[13] Ovcharova A, Vasilevsky V, Borisov I, Bazhenov S, Volkov A, Bildyukevich A, Volkov V. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 183, 162–172.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.023Search in Google Scholar
[14] Wahab MFA, Ismail AF, Shilton SJ. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 86, 41–48.10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.018Search in Google Scholar
[15] Zulhairun AK, Ng BC, Ismail AF, Surya Murali R, Abdullah MS. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 137, 1–12.10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.014Search in Google Scholar
[16] Kiadehi AD, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A, Ghoreyshi SAA. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2015, 90, 41–48.10.1016/j.cep.2015.02.005Search in Google Scholar
[17] Xueli G, Haizeng W, Jian W, Xing H, Congjie G. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445, 146–155.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.026Search in Google Scholar
[18] Chittrakarn T, Tirawanichakul Y, Sirijarukul S, Yuenyao C. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2016, 296, 157–163.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.018Search in Google Scholar
[19] Suleman MS, Lau KK, Yeong YF. Proc. Eng. 2016, 148, 176–183.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.525Search in Google Scholar
[20] Liu L, Chakma A, Feng X. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 43–51.10.1016/j.cej.2004.08.005Search in Google Scholar
[21] Ismail AF, Dunkin IR, Gallivan SL, Shilton SJ. Polymer 1999, 40, 6499–6506.10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00862-3Search in Google Scholar
[22] Peng F, Liu J, Li J. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 222, 225–234.10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00293-XSearch in Google Scholar
[23] Moradi MR, Pourafshari Chenar M, Noie SH. Polym. Test. 2016, 56, 287–298.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.10.022Search in Google Scholar
[24] Liang CZ, Yong WF, Chung TS. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 367–377.10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.014Search in Google Scholar
[25] Yong WF, Li FY, Xiao YC, Chung TS, Tong YW. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 443, 156–169.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.037Search in Google Scholar
[26] Zulhairun AK, Fachrurrazi ZG, Nur Izwanne M, Ismail AF. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 146, 85 ̶ 93.10.1016/j.seppur.2015.03.033Search in Google Scholar
[27] Wang L, Li Y, Li S, Ji P, Jiang C. J. Energy Chem. 2014, 23, 717–725.10.1016/S2095-4956(14)60204-7Search in Google Scholar
[28] Blume I, Pinnau I. US Patent 4963165, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Kim JH, Ha SY, Lee YM. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190, 179–193.10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00444-6Search in Google Scholar
[30] Ren X, Ren J, Deng M. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 89, 1–8.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.01.004Search in Google Scholar
[31] Ahmadpour E, Shamsabadi AA, Behbahani RM, Aghajani M, Kargari A. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 21, 518–523.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.09.021Search in Google Scholar
[32] Khalilinejad I, Sanaeepur H, Kargari A. J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2015, 1, 124–129.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Kim K, Ingole PG, Kim J, Lee H. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 233, 242–250.10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.030Search in Google Scholar
[34] Esposito E, Clarizia G, Bernardo P, Jansen JC, Sedlakova Z, Izak P, Curcio S, Cindio BD, Tasselli F. Chem. Eng. Proc. 2015, 94, 53–61.10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.016Search in Google Scholar
[35] Chung TS, Xu Z, Lin W. J. App. Pol. Sci. 1999, 72, 379–395.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990418)72:3<379::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar
[36] Zulhairun AK, Ng BC, Ismail AF, Surya Murali R, Abdullah MS. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 137, 1–12.10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.014Search in Google Scholar
[37] Cao C, Chung TS, Chen SB, Dong Z. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 1053–1062.10.1016/j.ces.2003.10.023Search in Google Scholar
[38] Baker RW. Membrane Technology and Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd: UK, 2004, pp 301–353.10.1002/0470020393.ch8Search in Google Scholar
[39] Merkel TC, Bondar VI, Nagai K, Freeman BD, Pinnau I. J. Pol. Sci. 2000, 38, 415–434.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000201)38:3<415::AID-POLB8>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar
[40] Firpo G, Angeli E, Repetto L, Valbusa U. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 481, 1–8.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.043Search in Google Scholar
[41] Omoniyi AL. Master Thesis, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Structure mediation and ductility enhancement of poly(l-lactide) by random copolymer poly(d-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)
- Morphological characterization, thermal, and mechanical properties of compatibilized high density polyethylene/polystyrene/organobentonite ternary nanocomposites
- Preparation and assembly
- Simultaneous toughening and reinforcing of cyanate ester/benzoxazine resins with improved mechanical and thermal properties by using hyperbranched polyesters
- Surface modification of Sb-SnO2/potassium titanate composite and their performance for acrylic coatings
- Poly (vinyl alcohol)/nano-diamond composite films and hydrogels prepared by gamma ray
- Engineering and processing
- Study on structures and properties of ultra-hot drawing UHMWPE fibers fabricated via dry spinning method
- Separation of CO2/CH4 and O2/N2 by polysulfone hollow fiber membranes: effects of membrane support properties and surface coating materials
- Electric field-induced alignment of MWCNTs during the processing of PP/MWCNT composites: effects on electrical, dielectric, and rheological properties
- A molecular modeling study for miscibility of polyimide/polythene mixing systems with/without compatibilizer
- Analysis and quantitative estimation of phenolic antioxidants in polypropylene packaging for fat products
- Effects of ultrasonic injection molding conditions on the plate processing characteristics of PMMA
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Structure mediation and ductility enhancement of poly(l-lactide) by random copolymer poly(d-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)
- Morphological characterization, thermal, and mechanical properties of compatibilized high density polyethylene/polystyrene/organobentonite ternary nanocomposites
- Preparation and assembly
- Simultaneous toughening and reinforcing of cyanate ester/benzoxazine resins with improved mechanical and thermal properties by using hyperbranched polyesters
- Surface modification of Sb-SnO2/potassium titanate composite and their performance for acrylic coatings
- Poly (vinyl alcohol)/nano-diamond composite films and hydrogels prepared by gamma ray
- Engineering and processing
- Study on structures and properties of ultra-hot drawing UHMWPE fibers fabricated via dry spinning method
- Separation of CO2/CH4 and O2/N2 by polysulfone hollow fiber membranes: effects of membrane support properties and surface coating materials
- Electric field-induced alignment of MWCNTs during the processing of PP/MWCNT composites: effects on electrical, dielectric, and rheological properties
- A molecular modeling study for miscibility of polyimide/polythene mixing systems with/without compatibilizer
- Analysis and quantitative estimation of phenolic antioxidants in polypropylene packaging for fat products
- Effects of ultrasonic injection molding conditions on the plate processing characteristics of PMMA
