Home Efficacy of PU foam materials for scientific investigation in footwear research
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Efficacy of PU foam materials for scientific investigation in footwear research

  • Selvaraj Mathivanan EMAIL logo , Ranganathan Mohan and Bhabendra Nath Das
Published/Copyright: July 30, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

People across the world are primarily concerned with the importance of inserts in footwear in terms of their effectiveness to accomplish therapeutic benefits. Body weight has been implicated as a factor in plantar heel pain, and foot orthoses are commonly used in its conservative treatment and are helpful in reducing symptoms of strain in the fascia during standing and ambulation. It is necessary to investigate the effectiveness of footwear inserts and their impact especially for people with high body mass index (BMI). Hence, research on polyurethane (PU) foams is warranted to identify an ideal material that provides comfort for high-BMI individuals. This article presents details on the physical characteristics of PU foam and its efficacy on functional performances as footwear inserts. PU foam materials have been assessed on various physical characteristics such as density, hardness, compression set followed by resilience, and cushioning behaviors. Of the four densities evaluated, D120 has the highest resilience on static and dynamic conditions. The cushion energy behaviors with respect to walking/running on static and dynamic condition were superior, as they possess better cushioning performance on footwear applications. Hence, the D120 PU foam material is concluded to be the best material for footwear insert for alleviating foot and ankle pain-related problems and for providing therapeutic benefits to high-BMI individuals.


Corresponding author: Selvaraj Mathivanan, Shoe Design and Development Centre, Central Leather Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Adyar, Chennai-600020, India, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratefulness to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for providing funds to conduct this study under STRAIT Project of Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI).

References

[1] Hill AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, Bar-or O. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2001, 25, 1674–1679.10.1038/sj.ijo.0801785Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jahss MH. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 1992, 4, 233–240.10.1097/00002281-199204000-00017Search in Google Scholar

[3] Mathivanan S. ICAMS-2014, 2014, 609–614.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Williams A, Nester C. The Pocket Podiatry Guide, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Edelstein JE, Bruckner J. Orthotics – A Comprehensive Clinical Approach, Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Lord M, Hosein R. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 1994, 31, 214–221.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Landorf KB, Keenan A-M, Herbert RD. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1305–1310.10.1001/archinte.166.12.1305Search in Google Scholar

[8] Warren BL, Jones CJ. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 1987, 19, 71–73.10.1249/00005768-198702000-00015Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hill JJ, Cutting PJ. Foot Ankle 1989, 9, 254–256.10.1177/107110078900900509Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, An K-N. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.1997, 341, 250–256.10.1097/00003086-199708000-00036Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, Kura H, An K-N. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008, 83, 876–879.10.1053/apmr.2002.32681Search in Google Scholar

[12] Seligman DA. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003, 84, 1564–1567.10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00363-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kolata G. Close look at orthotics raises a welter of doubts, New York Times, 2011 Jan 17.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wu KK. Foot Orthoses – Principles and Clinical Applications, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990.10.1097/00005131-199103000-00030Search in Google Scholar

[15] Curran SA, Holliday JL, Watkeys L. Foot Ankle J. 2010, 3, 1.10.1186/1757-1146-3-S1-O9Search in Google Scholar

[16] Arthritis and Rheumatism Council. Footwear and Orthoses, Newark: ARC Cards, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Li C, Imaishi K, Shiba N. Kurume Med J. 2000, 47, 211–217.10.2739/kurumemedj.47.211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Kavlak Y, Uygur F, Korkmaz C, Bek N. Foot Ankle Int. 2003, 24, 494–499.10.1177/107110070302400608Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] MacSween A, Brydson GJ, Hamilton J. Foot Int. J. Clin. Foot Sci. 1999, 9, 128–133.10.1054/foot.1999.0529Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kogler GF. J. Bone. Joint. Surg. Am. 1999, 81, 1403–1413.10.2106/00004623-199910000-00005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Lee Y-H. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 335–362.10.1016/j.apergo.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Landorf B. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2004, 94, 542–549.10.7547/0940542Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-3-4
Accepted: 2015-6-11
Published Online: 2015-7-30
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0075/html
Scroll to top button