Home Gray optimization of process parameters of surface modification of coconut sheath reinforced polymer composites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Gray optimization of process parameters of surface modification of coconut sheath reinforced polymer composites

  • Irullappasamy Siva EMAIL logo , Jebas Thangaih Winowlin Jappes , Pandian Pitchipoo , Sandro Campos Amico , Erumaipatty Rajagounder Nagarajan and Nainar Azhagesan
Published/Copyright: August 30, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Surface modification of natural fiber may greatly enhance the mechanical interlocking between fiber and matrix. Although there are many reports on surface modification of natural fibers, little technical information is available to enable the selection of optimized surface modification conditions. In this work, treatment parameters, such as bath temperature, agent concentration, and treatment time, are optimized to achieve higher interfacial adhesion. The effect of these parameters on flexural and impact strength is investigated by applying gray relational techniques. Experimental results show that NaOH concentration and treatment time are significant variables which improve interfacial strength, while NaOH bath temperature appears less important.


Corresponding author: Irullappasamy Siva, Centre for Composite Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam University, Krishnankoil-626126, India, e-mail:

The authors wish to thank the Department of Science and Technology, India for the funding and also the Center for Composite Materials and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam University for their kind permission to carry out the preparation and testing of the composites.

References

[1] Ibraheem SA, Aidy A, Khalina A. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 613–621.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bledzki AV, Gassan J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 224–274.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Onal L, Karaduman Y. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 1751–1768.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ahmad SH, Rasid R, Bonnia NN, Zainol I, Mamun AA, Bledzki AK, Beg MDH. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 45, 203–217.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rout J, Misra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1303–1310.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Park S-J, Kim K-D. Carbon 2001, 39, 1741–1746.10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00305-5Search in Google Scholar

[7] John MJ, Francis B, Varughese KT, Thomas S. Composites: Part A 2008, 39, 352–363.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[8] Park CH, Lee WI. J. Compos. Mater. 2005, 39, 347–374.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kiran Kumar P, Raghavendra NV, Sridhara BK. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 549–556.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Aleksendric D, Senatore A. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 2777–2791.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lin CL. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2004, 19, 209–220.10.1081/AMP-120029852Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chang C-Y, Hourng L-W, Chou T-Y. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2006, 25, 1027–1037.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Das D, Mukhopadhyay S, Kaur H. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 3311–3319.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Qiao P, Davalos JF, Barbero EJ. J. Compos. Mater. 1998, 32, 177–196.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Deng JL. J. Grey System 1989, 1, 1–24.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Silva GG, Souza DD, Machado J, Hourston D. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 76, 1197–1206.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rahman MM, Khan MA. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 2369–2376.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Satapathy BK, Bijwe J, Kolluri DK. J. Compos. Mater. 2006, 40, 483–501.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Rajini N, Jappes JTW, Rajakarunakaran S, Siva I. J. Polym. Eng. 2012, 32, 555–566.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jee D-H, Kang K-J. Mater. Des. 2000, 21, 199–206.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hwang C-L, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Pomerol J-C, Barba-Romero S. Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. Springer: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ahilan C, Kumanan S, Sivakumaran N. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manage. 2010, 5, 171–180.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Narender Singh P, Raghukandan K, Pai BC. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 155–156, 1658–1661.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Brahmakumar M, Pavithran C, Pillai R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 563–569.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Cantero G, Arbelaiz A, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1247–1254.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sinha E, Rout SK. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2009, 32, 65–76.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sinha E, Rout SK. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 2590–2601.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Jannah M, Mariatti M, Bakker A, Khalil A. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 1519–1532.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-11-15
Accepted: 2013-7-30
Published Online: 2013-08-30
Published in Print: 2013-10-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2012-0151/html
Scroll to top button