Metaphorical Idioms in Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory

Zoltán Kövecses

doi:10.1515/phras-2024-0006

Article

Metaphorical Idioms in Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory

Zoltán Kövecses

Published/Copyright: November 9, 2024

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Yearbook of Phraseology Volume 15 Issue 1

Abstract

In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Kövecses, 2020), I offered a comprehensive overhaul of “standard” conceptual metaphor theory. The present paper attempts to demonstrate how the new view of CMT can handle metaphorical idioms. To this end, I analyze four metaphorical idioms from the thematic area of money (throw money about, money slips through someone’s fingers, be a cash cow, money keeps someone/something afloat). The analysis assumes and starts out from the observation that money-related metaphors are based on two generic-level conceptual metaphors: money is a moving entity and money is a force. Extended CMT adds to CMT the notion of “mental space-level metaphors” that were largely ignored in “standard” CMT, but are given an important role in extended CMT. These are the metaphors that represent actual, contextual meanings in a metaphorical usage event. Traditional CMT-type analysis cannot account for the emergence of such idiomatic meanings because the mappings, or correspondences, of standard CMT work on a single, generic level (frame-, domain-, or even image schema level). However, the contextual meanings of naturally used metaphors (including those of metaphorical idioms) are much more information-rich and specific. The conceptual metaphors on the image schema, domain, and frame levels are offline structures in long-term memory, whereas the conceptual metaphors on the mental space level occur only online in working memory. In online communication, speakers mobilize the static image schema-, domain-, and frame-level metaphors at the mental space level, where they create highly specific mental space-level metaphors. Given this framework, it becomes possible to explain how and why the four metaphorical idioms have different contextual meanings (as represented by different mental space-level metaphors), but, at the same time, why they also share certain conceptual metaphors on the frame-, domain-, or image schema-level. Additionally, we gain new insight into how the emergence of novel metaphorical idioms occurs with the help of and constrained by a previously existing large system of hierarchically arranged conceptual metaphors.

Keywords: metaphorical idioms; extended CMT; mental space-level metaphor; contextual meaning; metaphor hierarchies

References

Barsalou, Lawrence. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577–660.10.1017/S0140525X99002149Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2017. Fire metaphors. Discourses of awe and authority. London-New York: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovol’skij, Dmitrij O. & Elisabeth Piirainen. 2005. Figurative language. Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces. Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1977. The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole & Jerrold Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantic, vol. 8, Grammatical relations, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368866_005Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm. 111–135. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre, Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds.). 2000. The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, 499–538. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1251.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2003. Prototypes in dynamic meaning construal. In J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds.), Cognitive Poetics in Practice, 27–40. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., and Lynne Cameron. 2007. Social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research 9. 64–75.10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. 1999. A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs & Gerard Steen (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. 79–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.175.06graSearch in Google Scholar

Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. R. 1995. Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4549.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010a. Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010b. Magyar-angol kifejezéstár. [Hungarian-English Idiom Dictionary]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28. 321–347.10.1515/cog-2016-0052Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2018. The power (and problem) of money. Society and Economy 40. 365–376.10.1556/204.2018.40.3.4Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2019. Idioms of money – in a new light. In Bozena Duda, Robert Kieltyka, & Ewa Konieczna (eds.), Culture, cognition, discourse and grammar, 21–32. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108859127Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. 202–251. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781032633275-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-11-09

Published in Print: 2024-11-26

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2024-0006

Keywords for this article

metaphorical idioms; extended CMT; mental space-level metaphor; contextual meaning; metaphor hierarchies