Unpublished Conjectures by Nicolaus Heinsius on Ovid’s Metamorphoses 1–4

Bibliography

Anthologia veterum Latinorum epigrammatum et poematum ... cura Petri Burmanni Secundi, I, Amstelaedami 1759.Suche in Google Scholar

C. Julii Caesaris De Bellis Gallico et Civili Pompejano, nec non A. Hirtii, aliorumque De Bellis Alexandrino, Africano, et Hispaniensi Commentarii ... Cura et studio F. Oudendorpii, Lugduni Batavorum et Rotterodami 1737.10.1163/9789004581449Suche in Google Scholar

M. Manilii Astronomicon liber quartus, recensuit et enarrauit A. E. Housman, Londini 1920.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Operum tomus II qui XV. Metamorphoseon, sive Transformationum, libros continet, Amstelodami 1652.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Operum tomus I scripta amatoria complexus, Nicolaus Heinsius, Dan. Fil. infinitis locis castigavit ad fidem scriptorum exemplarium, Amstelaedami 1658.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Operum tomus II qui Metamorphoses complectitur, Nicolaus Heinsius D. F. locis infinitis ex fide scriptorum exemplarium castigavit et observationes adiecit, Amstelaedami 1659.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon libri xv cum integris ... notis, quibus et suas adnotationes adiecit Petrus Burmannus, Amstelodami 1727.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon libri XV, mit kritischen und erläuternden Anmerkungen von E. C. Chr. Bach, Erster Band I‒VII, Hannover 1831.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphoses ex iterata R. Merkelii recognitione cum emendationis summario, Lipsiae ²1875.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon libri XV, Lactanti Placidi qui dicitur narrationes fabularum Ovidianarum, ed. H. Magnus, Berolini 1914.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses, rec. R. J. Tarrant, Oxonii 2004.10.1093/oseo/instance.00072622Suche in Google Scholar

P. Virgilii Maronis Opera, cum integris et emendatioribus commentariis Servii, Philargyrii, Pierii. Accedunt ... praecipue Nic. Heinsii notae nunc primum editae; quibus et suas in omne opus animadversiones et variantes in Servium lectiones addidit P. Burmannus, post cuius obitum interruptam editionis curam suscepit et adornavit P. Burmannus junior, Amstelaedami 1746.Suche in Google Scholar

W. S. Anderson, Ovid’s Metamorphoses Books 1‒5, Norman 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Barchiesi (ed.), A Commentary on Ovid’s Metamorphoses, 3 Vols., Cambridge 2024 (Milano ¹2005‒2015).10.1017/9781139047272Suche in Google Scholar

E. Bednara, “De sermone dactylicorum Latinorum quaestiones”, Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik 14, 1906, 317‒360; 532‒604.Suche in Google Scholar

F. F. Blok, Nicolaas Heinsius in dienst van Christina von Zweden, Delft 1949.Suche in Google Scholar

H. Boese, “Zu den Ovidkollationen des N. Heinsius”, Philologus 106, 1962, 155‒173.10.1524/phil.1962.106.12.155Suche in Google Scholar

F. Bömer, P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen. Kommentar, Buch I‒III, Heidelberg 1969.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Bömer, P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen. Kommentar, Buch IV‒V, Heidelberg 1976.Suche in Google Scholar

F. H. Bothe, Vindiciae Ovidianae sive Annotationes in P. Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon libros XV. Accedunt Joannis Henrici Vossii viri celeberrimi lectiones et notae, Gottingae 1818.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Burman, Sylloges epistolarum a viris illustribus scriptarum tomi quique, collecti et digesti per Petrum Burmannum, Tomus III, Leidae 1727.10.1163/9789004582163Suche in Google Scholar

J. G. Capoferreus, Animadversionum in auctores classicos L. L. Liber I qui est in Ovidii Metamorphosin, Lipsiae 1659.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Celato, Nasonis vincere decus. Da Ovidio a Claudiano: gli studi di Nicolaus Heinsius sugli auctores latini, Pisa 2023.Suche in Google Scholar

S. Díez Reboso, Edición crítica y comentario textual del libro XI de las Metamorfosis de Ovidio, Diss. Huelva 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Draeger, Ovid als Sprachbildner, Aurich 1888.Suche in Google Scholar

R. Ellis, A Commentary on Catullus, Oxford ²1889.Suche in Google Scholar

T. Faber, Epistolae, Pars altera, Salmurii 1665.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Fàbregas Salis, “Heinsius’s Vnus meus and Oxoniensis (or Balliolensis)”, ExClass 23, 2019, 65‒108.10.33776/ec.v23i0.3773Suche in Google Scholar

P. Fàbregas Salis, “A note on Ovid, Metamorphoses 11, 17”, MD 84, 2020, 197‒205.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Fàbregas Salis, El libro X de las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: un comentario textual, Huelva 2022.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Fedeli/R. Dimundo/I. Ciccarelli, Properzio. Elegie, Libro IV, Nordhausen 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

N. Heinsius, Adversariorum libri IV, curante Petro Burmanno Juniore, Harlingae 1742.Suche in Google Scholar

N. Heinsius, Commentarius in P. Ovidii Nasonis Opera Omnia, cur. I. F. Fischerus, Lipsiae 1758.Suche in Google Scholar

E. B. Lease, “Neve and Neque with the Imperative and Subjunctive”, AJPh 34, 1913, 418‒436.10.2307/289381Suche in Google Scholar

Ae. Linse, De P. Ovidio Nasone vocabulorum inventore, Lipsiae 1891.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Loewe, Über die Praepositionen A, DE, EX bei Ovid (Beilage zum Programm des königl. Gymnasiums zu Strehlen 197), Strehlen 1889.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Luck, “Emendaturus, si licuisset, erat”, Euphrosyne 36, 2008, 9‒19.10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.124573Suche in Google Scholar

P. Maas, Textkritik, Leipzig ⁴1960.Suche in Google Scholar

J. C. McKeown, Ovid. Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary. Volume III: A Commentary on Book Two, Leeds 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Munari, “Codici Heinsiani degli Amores”, SIFC 24, 1950, 161‒165.10.1038/165161a0Suche in Google Scholar

F. Neue/C. Wagener, Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Erster Band: Das Substantivum, Leipzig ³1902.Suche in Google Scholar

R. Pichon, De sermone amatorio apud Latinos elegiarum scriptores, Paris 1902.Suche in Google Scholar

H. Pinkster, The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: The Simple Clause, Oxford 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

H. Pinkster, The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 2: The Complex Sentence and Discourse, Oxford 2021.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

M. Platnauer, Latin Elegiac Verse, Cambridge 1951.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Ramírez de Verger, Book VI of Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Textual Commentary, Berlin/Boston 2021.10.1515/9783110731781Suche in Google Scholar

A. Ramírez de Verger, “Textual criticism”, in: L. Rivero (coord.), The Metamorphoses of Ovid: 35 Years of Research 1980–2014, Vol. I (Lustrum 62, 2020), Göttingen 2022, 58‒215.Suche in Google Scholar

M. D. Reeve, “Heinsiusʼs Manuscripts of Ovid”, RhM 117, 1974, 133‒166.Suche in Google Scholar

L. Rivero García, Book XIII of Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Textual Commentary, Berlin/Boston 2018.10.1515/9783110612493Suche in Google Scholar

D. A. Slater, Towards a Text of the Metamorphosis of Ovid, Oxford 1927.Suche in Google Scholar

L. Sniehotta, De vocum Graecarum apud poetas Latinos dactylicos ab Enni usque ad Ovidi tempora usu, Vratislaviae 1903.Suche in Google Scholar

Á. Suárez del Río, Edición crítica y comentario textual del libro III de las Metamorfosis de Ovidio, Diss. Huelva 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Szantyr, Lateinische Grammatik. Band II: Syntax und Stilistik, München 1972 (≈ 1965).Suche in Google Scholar

W. S. Watt, “Ovidiana”, MH 52, 1995, 90‒107.10.1001/archneur.1995.00540250115023Suche in Google Scholar

W. S. Watt, “Notes on Ovid”, C&M 50, 1999, 167‒178.Suche in Google Scholar

J. Wills, Repetition in Latin Poetry. Figures of Allusion, Oxford 1996.10.1093/oso/9780198140849.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

U. Winter, Die europäischen Handschriften der Bibliothek Diez. Zweiter Teil: Die Libri impressi cum notis manuscriptis der Bibliotheca Dieziana, Leipzig 1986.Suche in Google Scholar