Oὐ γὰρ ἴσον Κύκλωπι μελίσδεο: Intertextuality, Metalepsis, and Eulogistic Strategies in EB 58–63

Margherita Maria Di Nino

doi:10.1515/phil-2017-0026

Artikel

Oὐ γὰρ ἴσον Κύκλωπι μελίσδεο: Intertextuality, Metalepsis, and Eulogistic Strategies in EB 58–63

Margherita Maria Di Nino

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Februar 2018

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen

Aus der Zeitschrift Philologus Band 162 Heft 1

Abstract

From the second half of the last century onwards, the term ‘metalepsis’ has been in common use in the field of narratology, and has gradually found a place in literary criticism more broadly, to denote the transgression of diegetic boundaries, whether by the narrator or the narratee. The present article provides a thorough analysis of the metaleptic depiction of Bion provided by his anonymous eulogist at lines 58–63 of the Epitaph for Bion. This passage describes Galatea’s reaction to Bion’s demise, with the result that the dead poet, who sang of the Cyclops in fr. 16, himself assumes Polyphemus-like traits. However, the parallelism between the poet and his character proves to be imperfect, because the text hints at a past liaison, and describes Galatea’s newly acquired status as a shepherdess, thus presenting Bion as a successful lover, and, more importantly, one who has been successful precisely where the Cyclops failed. The key to reading this ‘antagonistic’ portrayal of Bion is provided by analysis of the hidden web of intertextual connections that lies beneath this passage (Theoc. Idd. 6, 11, Bion frr. 3, 16), which brings to the fore its strong poetological meaning, revealing it to be a poetic tribute through which the anonymous poet celebrates Bion’s achievements as both a bucolic and an amatory poet.

Keywords: Epitaph for Bion; Post-Theocritean Pastoral; Eulogistic Strategies; Intertextuality; Metapoetic

Acknowledgments

The present article represents the expanded version of a paper I gave in Edinburgh and Frankfurt. I would like to thank the audience for the positive discussion which in both cases followed my presentation, but my deepest gratitude goes to Massimo Di Marco, Marco Fantuzzi, Richard L. Hunter, Raymond Kania, Joseph D. Reed, Alexander Sens, and David Sider, who read and commented on early drafts of this work, and to the two anonymous readers of Philologus for their valuable suggestions.

Bibliography

Bucoliques Grecs, II vols., ed. Ph.-E. Legrand, Paris ⁴1953.Suche in Google Scholar

Carmi di Teocrito e dei poeti bucolici greci minori, ed. O. Vox, Torino 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

Carmina novem illustrium feminarum: Sapphus, Myrtidis, Praxillae, Erinnae, Corinnae, Nossidis, Myrus, Telesillae, Anytae. Et lyricorum Alcmanis, Ibyci, Stesichori, Anacreontis, Alcaei, Simonidis, Bacchylidis. Elegiae Tyrtaei, & Mimnermi. Bucolica Bionis & Moschi. Latino versu à Laurentio Gambara expressa. Cleanthis, Moschionis, aliorumque Fragmenta nunc primum edita. Ex Bibliotheca Fulvii Ursini Romani, ed. F. Ursinus, Antverpiae 1568.Suche in Google Scholar

Philetae Coi Reliquiae, ed. G. Kuchenmüller, Bern 1928.Suche in Google Scholar

Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius (Hellenistic Collection), ed. and transl. by J. L. Lightfoot, Cambridge, MA/London 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

The Greek Bucolic Poets, transl. with brief notes by A. S. F. Gow, Cambridge 1953.Suche in Google Scholar

Theocriti aliorumque poetarum Idyllia. Eiusdem Epigrammata. Simmiae Rhodii Ovum, Alae, Securis, Fistula. Dosiadis Ara. Omnia cum interpretatione Latina. In Virgilianas et Nasonianas imitationes Theocriti, Observationes H. Stephani. Excudebat H. Stephanus, Genevae 1579.Suche in Google Scholar

Theocriti Syracusani Idyllia triginta sex. Latino carmine reddita, Helio Eobano Hesso interprete, ed. J. Camerarius, Haganoae 1530.Suche in Google Scholar

Theocritus, Moschus, Bion, ed. and transl. by N. Hopkinson, Cambridge, MA/London 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

Theokrit und die griechische Bukolik, hg. v. B. Effe, Darmstadt 1986.Suche in Google Scholar

Theokrit, Bion und Moschus. Griechisch mit metrischer Übersetzung und prüfenden und erklärenden Anmerkungen, ed. J. A. Hartung, Leipzig 1858.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Alpers, What is Pastoral?, Chicago/London 1996.10.7208/chicago/9780226015231.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

J. Alsina, “Nota a Teócrito (XI 13)”, Emerita 32, 1964, 15–18.Suche in Google Scholar

P. Anello, “Polifemo e Galatea”, Seia 1, 1984, 11–51.Suche in Google Scholar

W. Arland, Nachtheokritische Bukolik bis an die Schwelle der lateinischen Bukolik, Leipzig 1937.Suche in Google Scholar

S. Barbantani, “I poeti lirici del canone alessandrino nell’epigrammatistica”, Aevum(Ant) 6, 1993, 5–97.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Barigazzi, “Una presunta aporia nel c. 11 di Teocrito”, Hermes 103, 1975, 179–188.Suche in Google Scholar

H. Bernsdorff, “Polyphem und Daphnis: Zu Theokrits sechstem Idyll”, Philologus 138, 1994, 38–51.10.1524/phil.1994.138.1.38Suche in Google Scholar

H. Bernsdorff, Das Fragmentum Bucolicum Vindobonense (P. Vindob. Rainer 29801): Einleitung, Text und Kommentar, Göttingen 1999.10.13109/9783666252204Suche in Google Scholar

H. Bernsdorff, “The Idea of Bucolic in the Imitators of Theocritus, 3rd–1st century BC”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 167–207.10.1163/9789047408536_009Suche in Google Scholar

P. Bing, “The Bios-Tradition and Poet’s Lives in Hellenistic Poetry”, in: R. M. Rosen/J. Farrell (eds.), Nomodeiktes. Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald, Ann Arbor 1993, 619–631.Suche in Google Scholar

L. Bloch, “Nymphen”, in: W. H. Roscher (ed.), Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie, VII vols., Leipzig 1897–1902, III.1, 500–567 (= Bloch, Lex.).Suche in Google Scholar

M. G. Bonanno, “Osservazioni sul tema della ‘giusta’ reciprocità amorosa da Saffo ai comici”, QUCC 16, 1973, 110–120.10.2307/20537690Suche in Google Scholar

B. W. Breed, “Inscribing Dialogue in Pastoral Poetics and Criticism”, in: M. Skoie/S. B. Velázquez (eds.), Pastoral and the Humanities: Arcadia Re-inscribed, Exeter 2006, 89–100 (= Breed 2006a).Suche in Google Scholar

B. W. Breed, Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues, London 2006 (= Breed 2006b).Suche in Google Scholar

N. Van Brock, Recherches sur le vocabulaire médical du grec ancien: Soins et guérison, Paris 1961.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Brooke, “Theocritus’ Idyll 11: A Study in Pastoral”, Arethusa 4, 1971, 73–81.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Buecheler, “De bucolicorum Graecorum aliquot carminibus”, RhM (n.s.) 30, 1875, 33–61.Suche in Google Scholar

W. Bühler, Die Europa des Moschos: Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Wiesbaden 1960.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Cairns, “Theocritus’ First Idyll: The Literary Programme”, WS (n.F.) 18, 1984, 89–113.Suche in Google Scholar

I. Canetta, “Muse e ninfe nella settima ecloga di Virgilio”, Eikasmós 19, 2008, 209–223.Suche in Google Scholar

C. L. Caspers, “The Loves of the Poets; Allusions in Hermesianax Fr. 7 Powell”, in: M. A. Harder/R. F. Regtuit/G. C. Wakker (eds.), Beyond the Canon, Leuven/Paris/Dudley, MA 2006, 21–42.Suche in Google Scholar

Q. Cataudella, “Un’aporia del ‘Ciclope’ teocriteo (XI, 13 sg.)”, REG 66, 1953, 473–478.10.3406/reg.1953.3334Suche in Google Scholar

M. S. Celentano, “L’evidenza esemplare della follia d’amore di Polifemo (Teocrito, Idillio 11)”, in: L. Calboli Montefusco (ed.), Papers on Rhetoric 9, Roma 2008, 53–76.Suche in Google Scholar

M. S. Celentano, “Variazioni sul tema dell’evidenza: Polifemo, Galatea e le schermaglie d’amore (Teocrito, Idillio 6)”, in: L. Calboli Montefusco (ed.), Papers on Rhetoric 10, Roma 2010, 73–87.Suche in Google Scholar

R. Coleman, “Vergil’s Pastoral Modes”, Ramus 4, 1975, 140–162.10.1017/S0048671X00004422Suche in Google Scholar

R. Coleman, Vergil: Eclogues, Cambridge 1977.Suche in Google Scholar

Ch. Cusset, Cyclopodie: Édition critique et commentée de l’Idylle VI de Théocrite, Lyon 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

I. De Jong, “Metalepsis in Ancient Greek Literature”, in: J. Grethlein/A. Rengakos (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, Berlin/New York 2009, 87–115.10.1515/9783110214536.2.87Suche in Google Scholar

V. Di Benedetto, “Omerismi e struttura metrica negli idilli dorici di Teocrito”, ASNP (s. II) 25, 1956, 48–60.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Di Marco, “The Pastoral Novel and the Bucolic Tradition”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 479–497 (= “Fileta praeceptor amoris: Longo Sofista e la correzione del modello bucolico”, SCO 47, 2000, 9–35).10.1163/9789047408536_021Suche in Google Scholar

M. M. Di Nino, “Le ‘verità nascoste’: Consapevole appartenenza a un genere, autoinvestitura e bugie metapoetiche in [Mosco] III”, Philologus 153, 2009, 86–108.10.1524/phil.2009.0006Suche in Google Scholar

M. M. Di Nino, I fiori campestri di Posidippo: Ricerche sulla lingua e lo stile di Posidippo di Pella, Göttingen 2010.10.13109/9783666252921Suche in Google Scholar

M. M. Di Nino, “Lugent Venus Cupidinesque (Note ai vv. 65–69 dell’Epitafio per Bione)”, SemRom (n.s.) 6, 2017 (forthcoming).Suche in Google Scholar

W. Elliger, Die Darstellung der Landschaft in der griechischen Dichtung, Berlin/New York 1975.10.1515/9783110834833Suche in Google Scholar

H. Erbse, “Dichtkunst und Medizin in Theokrits 11. Idyll”, MH 22, 1965, 232–236.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Fabiano, “Fluctuation in Theocritus’ Style”, GRBS 12, 1971, 517–537.Suche in Google Scholar

M. R. Falivene, “Il codice di δίκη nella poesia alessandrina (alcuni epigrammi della Antologia Palatina, Callimaco, Teocrito, Filodemo, il Fragmentum Grenfellianum)”, QUCC (n.s.) 8, 1981, 87–104.10.2307/20538679Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Eros e Muse: Bione, fr. 9 Gow”, MD 4, 1980, 183–186.10.2307/40235744Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, Bionis Smyrnaei Adonidis Epitaphium: Testo critico e commento, Liverpool 1985.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Mythological Paradigms in the Bucolic Poetry of Theocritus”, PCPhS 41, 1995, 16–35 (= Fantuzzi 1995a).10.1017/S0068673500001917Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Variazioni sull’esametro in Teocrito”, in: M. Fantuzzi/R. Pretagostini (eds.), Struttura e storia dell’esametro greco, II vols., Roma 1995, vol. I, 221–264 (= Fantuzzi 1995b).Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Textual Misadventures of Daphnis: The Pseudo-Theocritean Id. 8 and the Origins of the Bucolic ‘Manner’”, in: M. A. Harder/R. F. Regtuit/G. C. Wakker (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry, Groningen 1998, 61–77.10.1163/9789004674677_006Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Theocritus and the ‘Demythologizing’ of Poetry”, in: M. Depew/D. Obbink (eds.), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA/London 2000, 135–151.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Theocritus and the Bucolic Genre”, in: M. Fantuzzi/R. Hunter, Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge 2004, 133–190 (= “Teocrito e il genere bucolico”, in: M. Fantuzzi/R. Hunter, Muse e modelli: La poesia ellenistica da Alessandro Magno ad Augusto, Roma/Bari 2002, 177–262).10.1017/CBO9780511482151.005Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, “Achilles at Scyros, and One of His Fans: The Epithalamium of Achilles and Deidameia (Buc. Gr. 157–158 Gow)”, in: M. Baumbach/S. Bär (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and Its Reception, Leiden/Boston 2012, 283–305 (= Fantuzzi 2012a).10.1163/9789004233058_014Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fantuzzi, Achilles in Love: Intertextual Studies, Oxford 2012 (= Fantuzzi 2012b).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603626.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

C. A. Faraone, “Magic, Medicine and Eros in the Prologue to Theocritus’ Id. 11”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 75–90.10.1163/9789047408536_005Suche in Google Scholar

J. Farrell, Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History, New York/Oxford 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fontanier, Les tropes des Dumarsais. Avec un commentaire raisonné, destiné à rendre plus utile que jamais pour l’étude de la grammaire, de la littérature et de la philosophie, cet excellent ouvrage classique, encore unique dans son genre par M. F., II vols., Paris 1818.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Fontanier, Manuel classique pour l’étude des tropes, ou Éléments de la science du sens des mots, Paris 1821 (= Les figures du discours, Paris 1968).Suche in Google Scholar

Th. Fritzsche, De carmine Moscheo cui inscriptum est Epitaphius Bionis quaestiones criticae, Gustroviae 1867.Suche in Google Scholar

C. Gallavotti, “Il papiro bucolico viennese e la poesia di Bione”, RFIC (n.s.) 19, 1941, 233–258.Suche in Google Scholar

C. Gallavotti, “Bione di Smirne e il suo epitafio”, BCPE 16, 1968, 65–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Th. Gärtner, “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Gedichten des Mailänder Epigrammpapyrus und zum ‘alten Poseidipp’”, ZPE 156, 2006, 75–98.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Genette, Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method (translated by J. E. Lewin; foreword by J. Culler), Ithaca, NY 1980 (= Discours du récit, Paris 1972).Suche in Google Scholar

B. Gentili, Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica: Da Omero al V secolo, Roma/Bari ³1995.Suche in Google Scholar

S. Goldhill, The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature, Cambridge 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511627347Suche in Google Scholar

A. S. F. Gow, Theocritus. Edited with a Translation and Commentary, II vols. (vol. I: Introduction, Text, and Translation; vol. II: Commentary, Appendix, Indexes, and Plates), Cambridge ²1952.Suche in Google Scholar

A. H. F. Griffin, “Unrequited Love: Polyphemus and Galatea in Ovid’s Metamorphoses”, G&R 30, 1983, 190–197.10.1017/S0017383500027145Suche in Google Scholar

F. T. Griffiths, “Poetry as Pharmakon in Theocritus’ Idyll 2”, in: G. W. Bowersock/W. Burkert/M. C. J. Putnam (eds.), Arktouros. Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the Occasion of his 65^thBirthday, Berlin/New York 1979, 81–88 (= Griffiths 1979a).10.1515/9783110837629.81Suche in Google Scholar

F. T. Griffiths, Theocritus at Court, Leiden 1979 (= Griffiths 1979b).10.1163/9789004327726Suche in Google Scholar

B. A. Van Groningen, “Quelques problèmes de la poésie bucolique grecque”, Mnemosyne (s. IV) 11, 1958, 293–317.10.1163/156852558X00320Suche in Google Scholar

K. Gutzwiller, Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre, Madison, WI 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

K. Gutzwiller, “The Evidence for Theocritean Poetry Books”, in: M. A. Harder/R. F. Regtuit/G. C. Wakker (eds.), Theocritus, Groningen 1996, 119–148.Suche in Google Scholar

K. Gutzwiller, “The Herdsman in Greek Thought”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 1–23.10.1163/9789047408536_002Suche in Google Scholar

D. M. Halperin, Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry, New Haven/London 1983.10.2307/j.ctt211qx2wSuche in Google Scholar

S. Heaney, “Eclogues in Extremis: On the Staying Power of Pastoral”, PRIA 103, 2003, 1–12.10.3318/PRIC.2003.103.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

N. Henry, Introduction to and Commentary on [Moschus] III, BPhil. diss. Oxford 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

G. R. Holland, De Polyphemo et Galatea, Leipziger Studien zur classischen Philologie 7, 1884, 139–312.Suche in Google Scholar

E. B. Holtsmark, “Poetry as Self-Enlightenment: Theocritus 11”, TAPhA 97, 1966, 253–259.10.2307/2936009Suche in Google Scholar

N. Hopkinson, A Hellenistic Anthology, Cambridge 1988.Suche in Google Scholar

N. Hopkinson, Ovid: Metamorphoses. Book XIII, Cambridge 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

J. H. Hordern, “The Cyclops of Philoxenus”, CQ (n.s.) 49, 1999, 445–455.10.1093/cq/49.2.445Suche in Google Scholar

J. H. Hordern, “Cyclopea: Philoxenus, Theocritus, Callimachus, Bion”, CQ (n.s.) 54, 2004, 285–292.10.1093/cq/54.1.285Suche in Google Scholar

A. E.-A. Horstmann, Ironie und Humor bei Theokrit, Meisenheim am Glan 1976.Suche in Google Scholar

Th. K. Hubbard, The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton, Ann Arbor 1998.10.3998/mpub.15832Suche in Google Scholar

R. Hunter, Theocritus: A Selection. Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13, Cambridge 1999. Suche in Google Scholar

G. O. Hutchinson, Hellenistic Poetry, Oxford 1988.Suche in Google Scholar

E. Karakasis, Song Exchange in Roman Pastoral, Berlin/New York 2011.10.1515/9783110227079Suche in Google Scholar

E. Kegel-Brinkgreve, The Echoing Woods: Bucolic and Pastoral from Theocritus to Wordsworth, Amsterdam 1990.10.1163/9789004674516Suche in Google Scholar

A. Köhnken, “Theokrits Polyphemgedichte”, in: M. A. Harder/R. F. Regtuit/G. C. Wakker (eds.), Theocritus, Groningen 1996, 171–186.10.1515/9783110911183.127Suche in Google Scholar

J. Latacz, “Das Plappermäulchen aus dem Katalog”, in: Ch. Schäublin (ed.), Catalepton. Festschrift für Bernhard Wyss zum 80. Geburtstag, Basel 1985, 77–95.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Lawall, Theocritus’ Coan Pastorals: A Poetry Book, Cambridge, MA 1967.Suche in Google Scholar

Ph.-E. Legrand, Étude sur Théocrite, Paris 1898.Suche in Google Scholar

A. H. Lushkov, “Watching Daphnis: Frustration of Viewing in Idylls 1 and 6”, available at: http://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/1221.Suche in Google Scholar

E. Magnelli, “Libetridi in Euforione, in Virgilio e altrove”, MD 65, 2010, 167–175.Suche in Google Scholar

F. P. Manakidou, “Ἐπιτάφιος Ἀδώνιδος and Ἐπιτάφιος Βίωνος: Remarks on Their Generic Form and Content”, MD 37, 1996, 27–58.10.2307/40236163Suche in Google Scholar

R. J. H. Matthews, “The Lament for Adonis: Questions of Authorship”, Antichthon 24, 1990, 32–52. 10.1017/S0066477400000526Suche in Google Scholar

P. Mazur, “Theocritus 11.56–9: Polyphemus as Hellenistic Poet?”, available at: http://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/1221.Suche in Google Scholar

V. Mumprecht, Epitaphios Bionos: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Zürich 1964.Suche in Google Scholar

R. Nauta, “Gattungsgeschichte als Rezeptionsgeschichte am Beispiel der Entstehung der Bukolik”, A&A 36, 1990, 116–137.10.1515/9783110241488.116Suche in Google Scholar

R. Nauta, “The Concept of ‘Metalepsis’: From Rhetoric to the Theory of Allusion and to Narratology”, in: U. E. Eisen/P. von Möllendorff (eds.), Über die Grenze: Metalepse in Text- und Bildmedien des Altertums, Berlin/Boston 2013, 469–482.10.1515/9783110331721.469Suche in Google Scholar

C. Neri, Studi sulle testimonianze di Erinna, Bologna 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

U. Ott, Die Kunst des Gegensatzes in Theokrits Hirtengedichten, Hildesheim/New York 1969.Suche in Google Scholar

D. L. Page, Poetae Melici Graeci: Alcmanis, Stesichori, Ibyci, Anacreontis, Simonidis, Corinnae, poetarum minorum reliquias, carmina popularia et convivialia quaeque adespota feruntur, Oxford 1962 (= Page, PMG).Suche in Google Scholar

B. M. Palumbo Stracca, “Ἀπώλετο Δώριος Ὀρφεύς: Riflessioni sull’Epitafio di Bione (37 Gall.)”, QUCC 94, 2010, 121–148.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Pasquali, “Arte allusiva”, in: G. Pasquali, Stravaganze quarte e supreme, Venezia 1951, 11–20 (= Italia che scrive 25, 1942, 185–187).Suche in Google Scholar

M. Payne, Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction, Cambridge 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511483059Suche in Google Scholar

M. Payne, “The Bucolic Fiction of Theocritus”, in: J. J. Clauss/M. Cuypers (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, Malden, MA/Oxford 2010, 224–237.10.1002/9781118970577.ch16Suche in Google Scholar

T. E. V. Pearce, “The Function of the Locus Amoenus in Theocritus’ Seventh Poem”, RhM (n.F.) 131, 1988, 276–304.Suche in Google Scholar

G. A. Privitera, “La rete di Afrodite: Ricerche sulla prima ode di Saffo”, QUCC 4, 1967, 7–58.10.2307/20537552Suche in Google Scholar

J. D. Reed, Bion of Smyrna: The Fragments and the Adonis. Edited with Introduction and Commentary, Cambridge 1997 (= Reed 1997a).Suche in Google Scholar

J. D. Reed, “Ovid’s Elegy on Tibullus and Its Models”, CPh 92, 1997, 260–269 (= Reed 1997b).10.1086/449354Suche in Google Scholar

J. D. Reed, “Continuity and Change in Greek Bucolic between Theocritus and Virgil”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 209–234.10.1163/9789047408536_010Suche in Google Scholar

J. D. Reed, “Idyll 6 and the Development of Bucolic after Theocritus”, in: J. J. Clauss/M. Cuypers (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, Malden, MA/Oxford 2010, 238–250.10.1002/9781118970577.ch17Suche in Google Scholar

E. A. Schmidt, Poetische Reflexion: Vergils Bukolik, München 1972.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Sens, “Asclepiades, Erinna, and the Poetics of Labor”, in: Ph. Thibodeau/H. Haskell (eds.), Being There Together. Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, Afton, MN 2003, 78–87.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Sens, Asclepiades of Samos: Epigrams and Fragments. Edited with Translation and Commentary, Oxford 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

J. Van Sickle, “Epic and Bucolic (Theocritus, Id. VII; Virgil, Ecl. I)”, QUCC 19, 1975, 45–72.10.2307/20537727Suche in Google Scholar

J. Van Sickle, “Theocritus and the Development of the Conception of Bucolic Genre”, Ramus 5, 1976, 18–44.10.1017/S0048671X00004343Suche in Google Scholar

D. Sider, “Hermesianax”, in: D. S. (ed.), Hellenistic Poetry: A Selection, Ann Arbor 2017, 322–338.10.3998/mpub.4748527Suche in Google Scholar

F. Skutsch, Aus Vergils Frühzeit, Leipzig 1901.Suche in Google Scholar

E. W. Spofford, “Theocritus and Polyphemus”, AJPh 90, 1969, 22–35.10.2307/293301Suche in Google Scholar

K.-H. Stanzel, Liebende Hirten: Theokrits Bukolik und die alexandrinische Poesie, Stuttgart/Leipzig 1995.10.1515/9783110950359Suche in Google Scholar

R. Stark, “Theocritea”, Maia 15, 1963, 359–385.10.1007/BF03378244Suche in Google Scholar

S. A. Stephens, “Ptolemaic Pastoral”, in: M. Fantuzzi/Th. Papanghelis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden/Boston 2006, 91–117.10.1163/9789047408536_006Suche in Google Scholar

R. Thomas, “Virgil’s Georgics and the Art of Reference”, HSCPh 90, 1986, 171–198.10.2307/311468Suche in Google Scholar

S. F. Walker, Theocritus, Boston 1980.Suche in Google Scholar

H. White, “Notes on Palladas”, Myrtia 13, 1998, 225–230.10.5840/wcp20-paideia199836641Suche in Google Scholar

U. von Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, Die Textgeschichte der griechischen Bukoliker, Berlin 1906.Suche in Google Scholar

J. Wills, Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion, Oxford 1996.10.1093/oso/9780198140849.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

J. Wills, “Divided Allusion: Virgil and the Coma Berenices”, HSCPh 98, 1998, 277–305.10.2307/311345Suche in Google Scholar

N. Zagagi, “Self-Recognition in Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll”, Hermes 112, 1984, 427–438.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-28

Published in Print: 2018-6-1

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2017-0026

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

Epitaph for Bion; Post-Theocritean Pastoral; Eulogistic Strategies; Intertextuality; Metapoetic