Home Biochemical activity and bioassay on maize seedling of selected indigenous phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from the acid soil ecosystem
Article Open Access

Biochemical activity and bioassay on maize seedling of selected indigenous phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from the acid soil ecosystem

  • Betty Natalie Fitriatin EMAIL logo , Dita Fauziah , Fabira Nur Fitriani , Dewi Nurma Ningtyas , Pujawati Suryatmana , Reginawanti Hindersah , Mieke Rochimi Setiawati and Tualar Simarmata EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 11, 2020

Abstract

Phosphorus availability is the major constraint for plant growth in the acid soil ecosystem, due to high fixation by Al and Fe. Microbial fertilizers such as phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) can increase P availability in soils for root uptake. The objective of the research was to verify the ability of four isolates of PSB isolated from acid soil to solubilize unavailable inorganic phosphate, produce phosphatase, malic acid and indole acetic acid (IAA), as well as increase plant height of maize seedling. The bioassay by growing maize seedling in liquid nutrients has been performed to study the response of seedling to PSB inoculation. The experimental design of bioassay was a randomized block design with five replications. The results showed that the isolates RR 1 and SPR 4 had a relatively high solubilizing index. Moreover, all the PSB isolates had the ability to produce phosphatase and IAA and dissolve P. The performance of PSB-inoculated seedling was better visually and the root length was increased by 66.7–74.5% compared to the control. This result concludes that the species of four isolates needs to be identified by a biomolecular method and formulated as biofertilizers for increasing the maize productivity in the acid soil ecosystem.

1 Introduction

The major growth-limiting factor in tropical soil associated with acid soil infertility includes toxicity of aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn) (Bojorquez et al. 2017). This condition indicates that the soil has a low pH. The pH value indicates the amount of hydrogen ion concentration (H+) in the soil. The higher the levels of hydrogen ions in the soil, the lower the pH value of the soil and the more acidic the soil. Most of the agricultural soils of Indonesia belong to the acid soil ecosystem and face serious problems (Sarno et al. 2004). Generally, soils are acidic with an average pH value of 4.0–5.5. Soil acidity is often the main reason of the decline in productivity of various types of plants. The soil pH greatly affects the growth and reproductive investment of plants (Gentili et al. 2018).

Soil microbes play an important role in enzymatic phosphorus transformation as an integral component of the P cycle in the soil. The release of phosphate from inorganic and organic P through the mechanism of dissolution and mineralization has been reported (Sharma et al. 2013). The phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) are plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that can solubilize insoluble P and release phosphate (PO4) into the soil solution where they were absorbed by plant roots (Kalayu 2019). The various isolates of indigenous PSB are present in the soil and associated with the rhizosphere in various types of plants (Arfarita et al. 2017). Each isolate has the ability to dissolve P and different enzyme activities (Fitriatin et al. 2014). Consequently, selection of PSB isolates is needed to obtain the superior biochemical traits in solubilizing the fixed P, mineralize the organic P and produce plant growth-promoting substances, such as indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellin and other organic acids (Bhatt and Vyas 2014).

The effective isolates that have certain biochemical characteristics of PGPR are needed to increase the availability of P. The ability of each isolate to dissolve P and produce phosphatase can be determined by conducting tests on the Pikovskaya medium and evaluating their effect on plant growth by a bioassay (Pathak et al. 2017). The research objective was to characterize the indigenous PSB isolated from acid soils (Ultisols) and investigate their ability to produce biochemically beneficial metabolite for enhancing the seedling growth in the acid soil ecosystem

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Isolation and characterization of PSB

The four isolates of PSB were isolated from acid soil (Ultisols soil order), in Kentrong Village, Lebak Regency, Banten Province, Indonesia. The physiochemical properties of the area are as follows: pH 4.5; texture clay; Al 50.65%; P2O5 3.45 ppm, N 0.17%; and cation exchange capacity (CEC) 11.34 cmol kg−1. PSB were isolated from several ecosystems including rice rhizosphere (RR), peanut rhizosphere (PR) and sweet potato rhizosphere (SPR).

The composite soil samples were taken from 20 cm depth using rhizosphere probe sample. Isolation of PSB was carried out by a serial dilution plate method using Pikovskaya media. Furthermore, isolates were observed to determine the clear zone of colony diameter and the solubilizing index (SI) was calculated by the formula discussed by Premono et al. (2007):

SI=halozonediameter+colonydiametercolonydiameter.

The isolates that were superior in this testing stage were analyzed for the activity of the enzyme phosphatase that was produced, and the isolates with the highest activity in the liquid medium were selected. Four superior rhizobacteria isolates with best phosphate solubilizing activities were selected and characterized through biochemical identification and phosphatase activity with methods as described by Eiviazi and Tabatabai in Margesin (1996), and malic acid production was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Photodiode Array Detector, Singapore Product Waters 2998). Dissolved phosphate and phytohormone production (IAA) were determined based on the colorimetric method of Gordon and Weber (Sarker and Al-Rashid, 2013).

2.2 Bioassay of PSB on maize seedling

Bioassay test aims to obtain the superior of PSB isolates that are capable to increase the growth of maize seedlings. The experimental design was a randomized block design, which consisted of five treatments (control and four PSB isolates) with five replications.

The bioassay of PSB isolates was carried out using Murphy’s liquid media (0.25 g CaSO4·H2O, 0.25 g KH2PO4·2H2O, 0.25 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.08 g NaCl, 0.52 g KCl, 0.017 g ZnCl2, 0.005 CuSO4·5H2O, 0.025 FeSO4 and 1 L aquadest) in accordance to Murphy and Riley (1962). Before treatment, maize seeds were sterilized with 0.2% HgCl2 and 70% ethanol. Maize seeds were germinated at 30°C for 72 h. The maize seedlings were grown in a 100 mL reaction tube filled with 95 mL of liquid Murphy medium. The plant height (cm), root length (cm) and dry weight (g) were measured at 5, 10 and 15 days after planting.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Data of the bioassay test were collected by analysis of variance, and the mean values of treatment were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of PSB

The PSB isolates were selected from agricultural soils and natural forest, resulting in four potential PSB isolates from rice rhizosphere (RR 1 and RR 2), peanut rhizosphere (PR 1) and sweet potato rhizosphere (SPR 4) as indicated by the largest halozones and SI of PSB on the Pikovskaya agar (Table 1).

Table 1

Selected four PSB isolates from rice rhizosphere (RR 1 and RR 2), peanut rhizosphere (PR 1) and sweet potato rhizosphere (SPR 1)

No.IsolatesColony diameter + halozone diameter a (cm)Colony diameter b (cm)SI (a/b)
1RR 11.630.672.43
2RR 21.130.631.79
3PR 10.430.271.59
4SPR 41.430.632.27

The ability of four PSB isolates to dissolve P from fixed P can be observed from the phosphatase activity, organic acid production and the concentration of P dissolved in the Pikovskaya broth. Table 2 shows that the ability of bacteria to produce phosphatase, malic acid as well as the ability to dissolve phosphate varied. The SPR 4 isolates had the highest ability to produce phosphatase up to 76.59 µg pNP g−1 h−1, followed by isolates RR 2, RR1 and PR 1 that showed the phosphatase activity of 61.20, 58.72 and 21.20 µg pNP g−1 h−1, respectively.

Table 2

Biochemical activity of selected PSB to produce phosphatase enzyme, malic acid, P-dissolve and IAA

No.PSB isolatesPhosphatase (µg pNP g−1 h−1)Malic acid (µg g−1)P-dissolve (ppm)IAA (ppm)
1RR 158.720.3320.0715.3
2RR 261.20.3630.4815.83
3PR 121.20.6623.2415.26
4SPR 476.591.1337.6915.64

The organic acids produced by PSB from acid soil are dominated by organic malic acid. Highest to lowest concentrations of malic organic acids (malic acid) in Pikovskaya broth are produced by isolates SPR 4, PR 1, RR 2 and RR 1.

The ability of PSB to dissolve fixed P might be influenced by the ability of bacterial isolates to produce phosphatase and organic acids that affect the amount of dissolved P in the Pikovskaya broth. The highest to lowest amount of dissolved P produced by bacterial isolates was SPR 4 isolate of 37.69 ppm, RR 2 of 30.48 ppm, PR 1 of 23.24 ppm and the smallest RR 1 of 20.07 ppm.

3.2 Bioassay of PSB

The effect of PSB isolated from acid soil on maize height on days 5, 10 and 15 after inoculation is determined using Bioassay test and is shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Effect of PSB on plant height of maize

TreatmentsPlant height (cm)
Day 5Day 10Day 15
Control8.96a ± 1.5012.38a ± 2.1014.72a ± 2.15
RR 110.42a ± 1.9915.08a ± 3.6219.66a ± 3.39
RR 210.02a ± 3.6114.92a ± 3.6817.66a ± 5.19
PR 110.20a ± 1.5012.70a ± 1.9517.06a ± 2.91
SPR 48.98a ± 2.6613.60a ± 5.0317.20a ± 4.89

Values followed by similar letters under the same column are not significantly different at p = 0.05 according to DMRT.

Although PSB inoculation did not increase the height of maize seedlings at days 5, 10 and 15 significantly by the PSB inoculation, the growth performance (vigor and leaf color) of the PS-inoculated seedling improved compared to that of the control (Figure 1). The difference in growth of maize seedlings between inoculated one and the control can be seen on days 10 and 15. The ability of PSB isolates to increase plant height from the largest and smallest was RR 1, RR 2, SPR 4 and PR 1.

Figure 1 The visual growth performance of maize seedling due to the inoculation with PSB isolates.
Figure 1

The visual growth performance of maize seedling due to the inoculation with PSB isolates.

The effect of PSB was significant on the root length (Table 4 and Figure 2). The ability of PSB isolates increased the root extension of the largest and smallest plants produced by the treatment of isolates RR 2, SPR 4, PR 1 and RR 1 on day 15 after inoculation. The shoot to root (S/R) ratio of each treatment varied. The S/R of the controls was 0.33, while the S/R of maize seedling treated with RR 1, RR 2, PR 1 and SPR 4 was 0.54, 0.43, 0.44 and 0.38, respectively (Table 5).

Table 4

Effect of PSB on root length of maize seedling

TreatmentsDay 5 (cm)Day 10 (cm)Day 15 (cm)
Control 4.60a ± 0.555.10a ± 0.656.26a ± 1.01
RR 17.50b ± 1.468.56b ± 1.2910.10b ± 1.68
RR 27.86b ± 1.518.90b ± 1.6411.06b ± 0.72
PR 17.94b ± 2.008.70b ± 1.9910.66b ± 1.70
SPR 47.40b ± 2.828.50b ± 3.2210.82b ± 2.81

Values followed by similar letters under the same column are not significantly different at p = 0.05 according to DMRT.

Figure 2 The performance and the root length of PSB-inoculated maize seedling.
Figure 2

The performance and the root length of PSB-inoculated maize seedling.

Table 5

Effect of PSB on dry weight of maize and shoot root ratio

TreatmentsRoot dry weight (g)Shoot dry weight (g)Shoot root ratio
Control0.130a ± 0.020.044a ± 0.020.33
RR 10.152a ± 0.010.052a ± 0.020.54
RR 20.144a ± 0.020.064a ± 0.030.43
PR 10.132a ± 0.020.058a ± 0.010.44
SPR 40.152a ± 0.030.056a ± 0.030.38

Values followed by similar letters under the same column are not significantly different at p = 0.05 according to DMRT.

4 Discussion

The ability of four PSB isolates has been tested in terms of the production of enzyme phosphatase, P-dissolved, IAA growth hormone, organic acids and bioassay (bioassay) in maize plants. The SI relates to the ability of PSB to solubilize phosphate qualitatively, which can be seen from the ability of bacteria to form halozones around the colony on Pikovskaya agar (Rodríguez and Fraga, 1999). Each isolate has the ability to form halozones that vary in time and diameter. The halozone indicates the magnitude of the ability of bacteria to solubilize phosphate. The mechanism of P solubilization in Pikovskaya media is that the organic acids produced by bacteria chelate the calcium in Ca3(PO4)2, so that P dissolves and halozone forms in Pikovskaya (Atekan et al. 2014).

The PSB isolated from Ultisols had a lower SI compared to the SI value of PSB isolates from other regions. The PSB from the rhizosphere of potato and tomato grown in California, USA, had a phosphate solubility index between 9.1 and 15.1 (Sharon et al. 2016).

The phosphatase is an enzyme that catalyzed organic P mineralization by PSB to produce PO4, which in turn increases the availability of P for plants. The production of high levels of phosphatase and organic acid will help the process of organic P mineralization (Margalef et al. 2017). This is in line with the ability to produce the highest phosphatase and organic acid compared to other isolates, so they have the highest dissolved P.

Each isolate of PSB from acid soil produces IAA phytohormone. The high concentration of IAA produced by bacterial isolates indicated that the bacterial isolates have a higher ability to synthesize IAA. The average concentration of IAA produced by the PSB isolates from Ultisols was 15.26–15.83 ppm.

The PSB effect towards root elongation was greatly influenced by IAA production. Dawwama et al. (2013) reported that PSB isolated from potato produced IAA up to 3.06–10.73 µg/mL and were able to increase root length significantly. The S/R ratio reflects the photosynthate partitioning in the plant. The R/S more than one indicates higher growth of shoot, whereas if the S/R was less than one the root growth was dominant (Reham and Abogadallah 2016).

The PSB have the potency to increase the shoot and dry weight of maize seedlings (Table 5) and increase in plant dry weight was due to the role of PSB to provide nutrients mainly P and growth-promoting substances (Minaxi et al. 2011). It has also been reported that consortia of PSB increased growth of maize seedling reflected in higher plant dry weight (Khumairah et al. 2018). Simarmata et al. (2017) reported that the application of biofertilizer and bioameliorant increased the rice grain yield by increasing to 42.3%.

5 Conclusion

Four isolates RR1, RR2, PR1 and SPR 4 that have been isolated from acid soil enabled to dissolve P as well as to produce phosphatase malic acid and IAA. The visual growth performance of maize seedling was improved remarkably and the root length was increased by 67.7–74.5% compared to the control. This finding concluded that the four PSB isolates are potential microbes to be developed as biofertilizers for increasing the P availability and maize growth in the acid soil ecosystem. Further molecular identification of selected PSB as well as green house and field trials are needed to obtain the comprehensive information about the effect of PSB on the fertilizer efficiency and crop productivity.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Academic Leadership Grant of Universitas Padjadjaran. The authors are grateful to Chief Laboratory of Soil Biology Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran for their time and valuable advice at all steps of this work.

  1. Conflicts of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Arfarita NMW, Lestari MW, Murwani I, Higuchi T. Isolation of indigenous phosphate solubilizing bacteria from green bean rhizospheres. J Degrad Mining Lands Manage. 2017;4(3):845–85.10.15243/jdmlm.2017.043.845Search in Google Scholar

[2] Atekan A, Nuraini Y, Handayanto E, Syekhfani S. The potential of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from sugarcane wastes for solubilizing phosphate. J Degrad Mining Lands Manage. 2014;1(4):175–82.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bhatt PV, Vyas BRM. Screening and characterization of plant growth and health promoting rhizobacteria. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3(6):139–55.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bojorquez EQ, Escalante CM, Echevarría MI, Martinez EM. Aluminum, a friend or foe of higher plants in acid soils. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1–18.10.3389/fpls.2017.01767Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dawwama GE, Elbeltagyb A, Emaraa HM, Abbasa IH, Hassan MM. Beneficial effect of plant growth promoting bacteria isolated from the roots of potato plant. Ann Agric Sci. 2013;58(2);195–201.10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[6] Fitriatin BN, Yuniarti A, Turmuktini T, Ruswandi FK. The effect of phosphate solubilizing microbe producing growth regulators on soil phosphate, growth and yield of maize and fertilizer efficiency on Ultisol. Eurasian J Soil Sci. 2014;3:101–7.10.18393/ejss.34313Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gentili R, Ambrosini R, Montagnani C, Caronni S, Citterio S. Effect of soil pH on the growth, reproductive investment and pollen allergenicity of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9(1335):1–12.10.3389/fpls.2018.01335Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kalayu G. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers. Int J Agron. 2019;1:1–7.10.1155/2019/4917256Search in Google Scholar

[9] Khumairah FH, Nurbaity A, Fitriatin BN, Jingga A, Simarmata T. In vitro test and bioassay of selected phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) by using maize seedlings. IOP Conf Series Earth Environ Sci. 2018;205;1–9.10.1088/1755-1315/205/1/012019Search in Google Scholar

[10] Margalef O, Sardans M, Fernández-Martínez R, Molowny-Horas IA, Janssens P, Ciais D, et al. Global patterns of phosphatase activity in natural soils. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1337. www.nature.com/scientificreports/.10.1038/s41598-017-01418-8Search in Google Scholar

[11] Margesin R. Acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity with the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate. In: Schinner F, Ohlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R, editor. Methods in Soil Biology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Spinger-Verlag; 1996. p. 213–7.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Minaxi, Nain L, Yadav RC, Saxena J. Characterization of multifaceted Bacillus sp. RM-2 for its use as plant growth promoting bioinoculant for crops grown in semi arid deserts. Appl Soil Ecol. 2011;59:1–12.10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[13] Murphy J and Riley JP. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1962;27:31–6.10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Pathak R, Paudel V, Shrestha A, Lamichhane J, Gauchan DP, et al. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their use for plant growth promotion in tomato seedling and plant. J Sci Eng Technol. 2017;13(II):61–70.10.3126/kuset.v13i2.21284Search in Google Scholar

[15] Premono EP, Moawad M, Vlek AM. Effect of phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas putida on the growth of maize and its survival in the rhizosphere, Indonesian J Crop Sci. 2007;11:13–23.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Reham MN, Abogadallah GM. Restricting the above ground sink corrects the root/shoot ratio and substantially boosts the yield potential per panicle in field-grown rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Plantarum. 2016;156:371–86.10.1111/ppl.12377Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rodríguez H, Fraga R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv Cuban Res Inst. 1999;17:319–39.10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sarker A, Al-Rashid J. 2013. Analytical protocol for determination of indole 3 acetic acid (IAA) production by Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263818523.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sarno, Iijim M, Lumbanraja J, Sunyoto, Yuliadi E, Izumi Y, Watanabe A. Soil chemical properties of an Indonesian red acid soil as affected by land use and crop management. Soil Tillage Res. 2004;76(2):115–24.10.1016/j.still.2003.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[20] Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:587. http://www.springerplus.com/content/2/1/587.10.1186/2193-1801-2-587Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Sharon JA, Hathwaik LT, Glenn GM, Imam SH, Lee CC. Isolation of efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria capable of enhancing tomato plant growth. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2016;16(2):525–36.10.4067/S0718-95162016005000043Search in Google Scholar

[22] Simarmata T, Hersanti, Turmuktini T, Fitriatin BN, Setiawati MR, Purwanto. Application of bioameliorant and biofertilizers to increase the soil health and rice productivity, HAYATI J Biosci. 2017;23(4):181–4.10.1016/j.hjb.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-03
Revised: 2020-05-22
Accepted: 2020-06-13
Published Online: 2020-07-11

© 2020 B. N. Fitriatin et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Synergistic and antagonistic effects of soil applied P and Zn fertilizers on the performance, minerals and heavy metal composition of groundnut
  3. The Analysis of Nutritional Habits of the Third Age Students in Poznań
  4. Biochar, poultry manure and NPK fertilizer: sole and combine application effects on soil properties and ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) performance in a tropical Alfisol
  5. Nutritional and functional properties of maize-oyster mushroom (Zea mays-Pleurotus ostreatus) based composite flour and its storage stability
  6. Rural Folks Perception of Suicide Drivers in rural communities of Delta State, Nigeria: Implications for Societal and Agricultural Security
  7. Evaluation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties for Yield and Some Agronomic Traits
  8. Micropropagation, Callus Induction and Regeneration of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)
  9. The impact of foliar feeding on the yield components of three winter rape morphotypes (Brassica napus L.)
  10. The effect of soil water content and biochar on rice cultivation in polybag
  11. Influence of Azospirillum brasilense associated with silicon and nitrogen fertilization on macronutrient contents in corn
  12. Effect of Christmas Island rock phosphate and rice straw compost application on soil phosphorus availability and maize (Zea mays L.) growth in a tropical acid soil of Kelantan, Malaysia
  13. The evolution of Romanian agritourism and the role of European Union subsidies in rural areas
  14. Assessment of crop farmers coping strategies to pastoralism/nomad activities in Nigeria
  15. Assessing yield stability in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) performance using year effect
  16. Walnut leaf extract-based green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles via microwave irradiation and their characteristics assessment
  17. Evaluating the water productivity by Aquacrop model of wheat under irrigation systems and algae
  18. Micronutrients status of mango (Mangifera indica) orchards in Multan region, Punjab, Pakistan, and relationship with soil properties
  19. Molecular studies for drought tolerance in some Egyptian wheat genotypes under different irrigation systems
  20. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Ulva lactuca as a safe synthetic pesticide (in vitro)
  21. Development of SPE clean-up procedure for acrylamide determination from potato-based products by GC-MS/MS
  22. Insulative effect of plastic mulch systems and comparison between the effects of different plant types
  23. Trends and constraints in the production and utilization of cowpea leaves in the arid and semi-arid lands of Kenya
  24. Microbiome of abandoned agricultural and mature tundra soils in southern Yamal region, Russian Arctic
  25. Method of biochar application affects growth, yield and nutrient uptake of cowpea
  26. Identity gaps and negotiations among layers of young farmers: Case study in Indonesia
  27. Genetically modified crops in India: Experiments with Bt Cotton to explore the road ahead
  28. Effect of phyto-extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica) and garlic (Allium sativum) on leaf spot disease of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
  29. Influence of cellulose fibers on physicochemical properties of biodegradable films based on polysaccharide derivatives
  30. Do the determinants of food security differ in improved rice variety adoption? Evidence from Sierra Leone
  31. Assessment of yield components of some cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) genotypes using multivariate analysis such as path coefficients
  32. Microbiome of post-technogenic soils of quarries in the Republic of Bashkortostan (Russia)
  33. Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores in soils of some legumes and their response to varying concentrations of phosphorus application
  34. Baseline fertility status of a gravelly Alfisol in a derived savannah agro-ecological zone of Nigeria
  35. Effect of strain, sex and slaughter weight on growth performance, carcass yield and quality of broiler meat
  36. Palm oil plantation and cultivation: Prosperity and productivity of smallholders
  37. Seasonal normalized difference vegetation index responses to air temperature and precipitation in Baghdad
  38. Classification and geovisualization process of soil data using a web-based spatial information system
  39. Assessment of stakeholders’ contributions to livestock development in Delta State, Nigeria: Rural infrastructure intervention
  40. Linear and structural changes in rural space – the positive and problematic aspects (case of Latvia)
  41. Farmers’ responses to organic rice farming in Indonesia: Findings from central Java and south Sulawesi
  42. Interactive effects of Potato virus Y and Potato leafroll virus infection on potato yields in Uganda
  43. Adoption of agricultural practices with climate smart agriculture potentials and food security among farm households in northern Nigeria
  44. Green approach in gold, silver and selenium nanoparticles using coffee bean extract
  45. Value chain for agritourism products
  46. Trichoderma asperellum affects Meloidogyne incognita infestation and development in Celosia argentea
  47. Growth, chlorophyll content and productivity responses of maize to magnesium sulphate application in calcareous soil
  48. Gene action in low nitrogen tolerance and implication on maize grain yield and associated traits of some tropical maize populations
  49. Zambian farm blocks: A vehicle for increased private sector investments
  50. Farm size and its impact on land use: The case of the South African private wildlife industry
  51. Characterizing macropore structure of agrosoddy-podzolic soil using computed tomography
  52. Influence of priming on germination, development, and yield of soybean varieties
  53. Review Articles
  54. Zinc biofortification as an innovative technology to alleviate the zinc deficiency in human health: a review
  55. Biological management of allelopathic plant Parthenium sp.
  56. Microbial antagonists against plant pathogens in Iran: A review
  57. Communication
  58. Risk assessment of Ni, Cr, and Si release from alkaline minerals during enhanced weathering
  59. Phylogenetic relationships among accessions in Citrus and related genera based on the insertion polymorphism of the CIRE1 retrotransposon
  60. Gamma radiosensitivity study on wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum)
  61. Special Issue on the 10th Circumpolar Agriculture Conference 2019
  62. Preface to the Special Issue on the 10th Circumpolar Agriculture Conference 2019
  63. Rumen bacterial community of young and adult of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) from Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District of Russia
  64. Carcass weight of Greenlandic lambs in relation to grazing area biomass
  65. Transnational cooperation to develop local barley to beer value chains
  66. Addition of biochar to acidic boreal podzolic soils enhances micronutrient availability and crop productivity
  67. Digitalisation in a local food system: Emphasis on Finnish Lapland
  68. Abandoned agricultural soils from the central part of the Yamal region of Russia: morphology, diversity, and chemical properties
  69. Fishing as an important source of food in the Arctic and subarctic zones of Yakutia
  70. Special Issue on the APA 2019 - 11th Triennial Conference
  71. Yield potential of sandponically produced sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) pre-basic seed for selected genotypes
  72. Monitoring with social media: Experiences from “integrating” WhatsApp in the M&E system under sweet potato value chain
  73. Breeding farmer and consumer preferred sweetpotatoes using accelerated breeding scheme and mother–baby trials
  74. Decentralised sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) vine multiplication in Lake Zone, Tanzania: Five years later
  75. Mineral fertilizer use in land-scarce conditions: Case of Rwanda
  76. Assessment of the roles and farmer-preferred traits of sweetpotato in a crop-livestock farming system in Rwanda: implications for breeding dual-purpose varieties
  77. A public–private partnership to speed up potato breeding
  78. Dietary acrylamide intake by potato crisps consumers: A case of Nairobi County
  79. Special Issue on ICESAT 2019
  80. Biochemical activity and bioassay on maize seedling of selected indigenous phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from the acid soil ecosystem
  81. Identifying best parameters of particleboard bonded with dextrin-based adhesives
  82. Performance of rice paddy varieties under various organic soil fertility strategies
  83. Improved strength properties of LVL glued using PVAc adhesives with physical treatment-based Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis)
  84. Evaluation and possible mechanism of beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hubner) resistance to chlorpyrifos and their sensitivity to neem oil insecticides
  85. Fermented compost and N-fertilizer for enhancing the growth and productivity of purple eggplant on vertisols
  86. Bioactive peptide effect on brain activity identified by 2D brain mapping
  87. Shifting of microbial biodiversity and soil health in rhizomicrobiome of natural forest and agricultural soil
  88. Special Issue on CERNAS 2020
  89. Evaluation of consumer habits and knowledge about dietary fibre and fibre-rich products in Turkish population
  90. Evaluation of texture in jelly gums incorporating berries and aromatic plants
  91. Food choice motivations and perception of a healthy diet in a developing Mediterranean country
  92. The evolution of the milk sector in Portugal: Implications from the Common Agricultural Policy
  93. Energetic and exergetic analysis of a convective drier: A case study of potato drying process
  94. Cluster analysis to the factors related to information about food fibers: A multinational study
  95. Study of the drying kinetics and calculation of mass transfer properties in hot air drying of Cynara cardunculus
  96. Short food supply chains – a growing movement. The case study of the Viseu Dão Lafões Region
  97. Evaluation of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in some edible flowers
  98. Chemical composition and study on liquefaction optimization of chestnut shells
  99. Is organic agriculture a potential public health indicator? Evidence from literature
Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2020-0036/html
Scroll to top button