Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Stylizing Voices, Stances, and Identities Related to Medium of Education in India

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 17, 2014

Abstract

This study analyzes the narrative-based interview data of three Indian women to examine the manner in which they utilize stylization to construct identity-rich, ideological stances related to discriminatory discourses of Hindi and English medium education in the linguistically rich, albeit complex, present-day context of India. Stylization is understood to be a “knowing deployment of culturally familiar styles and identities that are marked as deviating from those predictably associated with the current speaking context” (Coupland 2001a: 345). The three analyzed voices are stylized by devices such as mock Hindi medium English, Hinglish – a local combination of Hindi and English, and an exaggerated theatricality – realized through a hyperbolic manipulation of pace, volume, pitch, and laughing tones. Analysis of these diverse stylization episodes reveals that while English is typically associated with positions of power for speakers, its actual value depends on the speakers’ interactional framing. The analysis illustrates that stylized speech is variously harnessed by participants to reproduce hegemonic linguistic discourses or to enact oblique, if incomplete, critiques of them. The study is based on data collected for larger projects in which 34 Indian women were interviewed in the North Indian city of Dehradun.

Transcription conventions

Italics

used for Hindi words

{}

phonetic representation of stylized words

(())

used for descriptive information

[]

overlapping speech

(.)

micro pauses

following word has a rising intonation

following word has a falling intonation

,

continuing intonation

.

sentence final intonation

°

words within these symbols are spoken quietly

.hhh

in-breath

hhh.

out-breath

-

cut-off utterance

=

latching

“”

used for speech attributed to other speakers

::

prolongation of the previous sound/word

> <

speeded up utterances

< >

slowed down utterances

Laughing tone

underlined words are spoken in a laughing tone

Bold

bold font indicates words spoken louder than surrounding text

References

Alexander, Robin J.2000. Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Annamalai, E.2001. Managing multilingualism in India: Political and linguistic manifestation. New Delhi: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Annamalai, E.2004. Medium of power: The question of English in education in India. In James W.Tollefson & Amy B. M.Tsui (eds.), Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?177194. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Paul & SaraDelamont.2006. Rescuing narratives from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry16(1). 164172.10.1075/ni.16.1.21atkSearch in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail.1981. The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail.1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN & London: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bamberg, Michael. 1997. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History7(1–4). 335342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42posSearch in Google Scholar

Bamberg, Michael & AlexandraGeorgakopoulou.2008. Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk28(3). 377396.10.1515/TEXT.2008.018Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard.1977. Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard.1992. Performance. In RichardBauman (ed.), Folklore, cultural performances, and popular entertainments, 4149. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard & Charles L.Briggs.1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology19. 5988.10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre.1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome.1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome.2002. Making stories. New York: Farr, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & KiraHall.2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5). 585614.10.1177/1461445605054407Search in Google Scholar

Chun, Elaine, W.2009. Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s revoicings of Mock Asian. In AngelaReyes & AdrienneLo (eds.), Beyond Yellow English: Toward a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America, 261287. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327359.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas.2001a. Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society30. 345375.10.1017/S0047404501003013Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas.2001b. Stylization, authenticity and TV news review. Discourse Studies3. 413442.Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas.2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Search in Google Scholar

De Fina, Anna.2006. Group identity, narrative and self-representations. In Annade Fina, DeborahSchiffrin & MichaelBamberg (eds.), Discourse and identity, 351375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584459.018Search in Google Scholar

Dua, Hans Raj. 1985. Language planning in India. New Delhi: Harnam Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope.2000. Linguistic variation as social practice. Maldon, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope.2001. Style and social meaning. In PenelopeEckert & John R.Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 119126. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.008Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman.1992. The appropriacy of “appropriateness.” In NormanFairclough (ed.), Critical language awareness, 3356. Essex: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel.1984. The order of discourse. In Michael J.Shapiro (ed.), Language and politics. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan.1992. Dialect variation and language ideology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & JudithIrvine.1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research62. 9671001.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar

Higgins, Christina.2009. English as a local language: Post-colonial identities and multilingual practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691828Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H.1993. Hasta la vista, baby: Anglo Spanish in the American Southwest. Critique of Anthropology13. 145176.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H.1995. Mock Spanish: The indexical reproduction of racism in American English. Electronic document. University of Chicago Lang-cult Site. Retrieved 2013-11-22, from http://language-culture.binghamton.edu/symposia/2/part1/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H.1998. Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist100(3). 680689.Search in Google Scholar

Holstein, James A. & Jaber F.Gubrium. 1995. The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412986120Search in Google Scholar

Holstein, James A. & Jaber F.Gubrium. 2003. Active interviewing. In Jaber F.Gubrium & James A.Holstein (eds.), Postmodern interviewing, 6780. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984492Search in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda.1985. A theory of parody. New York: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda.1994. Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith I.2001. Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In PenelopeEckert & John R.Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 2142. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.002Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.1978. Sequential aspects of storytelling. In JimSchenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 219248. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Yamuna.2006. Mixers lyricing in Hinglish: Blending and fusion in Indian pop culture. World Englishes25(2). 223233.10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00461.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In GeorgePsathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 7996. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Katherine E.1994. Staging repetition: Parody in postmodern British and American theatre. In BarbaraJohnstone (ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Vol. 1, 5567. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

LaDousa, Chaise. 2006. The discursive malleability of an identity: A dialogic approach to language “medium” schooling in North India. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology16(1). 3657.10.1525/jlin.2006.16.1.036Search in Google Scholar

Li, David C. S.1996. Issues in bilingualism and biculturalism: A Hong Kong case study. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mann, Steve.2011. A critical review of qualitative interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics32(1). 624.10.1093/applin/amq043Search in Google Scholar

Meek, Barbra A.2006. And the Injun goes “How!”: Representations of American Indian English in white public space. Language in Society35. 93128.10.1017/S0047404506060040Search in Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend.2002. Mock languages and symbolic power: The South African radio series Applesammy and Naidoo. World Englishes21(1). 99112.10.1111/1467-971X.00234Search in Google Scholar

Mohanty, Ajit K.2006. Multilingualism of the unequals and predicaments of education in India: Mother tongue or other tongue? In OfeliaGarcia, ToveSkutnabb-Kangas & Maria E.Torres-Guzman (eds.), Imagining multilingual schools, 262283. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598968-014Search in Google Scholar

Moody, Andrew & YukoMatsumoto.2003. Don’t touch my moustache: Language blending and code ambiguation by two J-pop artists. Asian Englishes6(1). 433.10.1080/13488678.2003.10801106Search in Google Scholar

Morson, Gary Saul. 1989. Theory of parody. In Gary SaulMorson & CarlyEmerson (eds.), Rethinking Bakhtin, 6386. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mumby, Dennis K. (ed.). 1993. Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483345277Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Cecil L.2011. Intelligibility in World Englishes: Theory and application. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203832578Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor.1997. Narrative. In Teun A.van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process. (Discourse studies: A multi-disciplinary introduction), 185207. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446221884.n7Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & LisaCapps.2001. Living narratives: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041592Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Yuling.2000. Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta.2007. Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics28(2). 163188.10.1093/applin/amm008Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alistair.2006. Postmodernism in language policy. In ThomasRicento (ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method, 6076. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, Eric E. & Kristin M.Langellier. 2006. The performance turn in narrative studies. Narrative Inquiry16(1). 173180.10.1075/ni.16.1.22petSearch in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan.2010. Contemporary discursive psychology: Issues, prospects, and Corcoran’s awkward ontology. British Journal of Social Psychology49. 657678.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan A. & DerekEdwards. 1990. Nigel Lawson’s tent: discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology20. 405424.Search in Google Scholar

Ramanathan, Vaidehi.2005. The English-vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853597718Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben.1995.Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben.2006. Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486722Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben.2013. Styling in a language learned later in life. The Modern Language Journal97(2). 360382. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12010Search in Google Scholar

Ronkin, Maggie & Helen E.Karn.1999. Mock Ebonics: Linguistic racism in parodies of Ebonics on the Internet. Journal of Sociolinguistics3(3). 360380.10.1111/1467-9481.00083Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey.1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sandhu, Priti.2010. Enactments of Discursive Empowerment in Narratives of Medium of education by North Indian Women. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Second Language Studies Department, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.Search in Google Scholar

Sandhu, Priti.2014a. Constructing normative and resistant societal discourses about Hindi and English in an interactional narrative. Applied Linguistics35(1). 2947.10.1093/applin/ams075Search in Google Scholar

Sandhu, Priti.2014b. “Who does she think she is?” Vernacular medium and failed romance. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education13(1). 1633.Search in Google Scholar

Stanlaw, James.2004. Japanese English: Language and culture contact. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Steven.2010a.Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics30. 128148.10.1017/S0267190510000085Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Steven.2010b. Achieving distinction through Mock ESL: A critical pragmatics analysis of classroom talk in a high school. In GabrieleKasper, Hahn thiNguyen, Dina RudolphYoshimi & Jim K.Yoshioka (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning. Vol. 12, 215254. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Steven & KeithRichards.2011. Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics32(1). 15.10.1093/applin/amq045Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Eric C.2002. Rocking East and West: the USA in Malaysian music (an American remix). In Timothy J.Craig & RichardKing (eds.), Global goes local: Popular culture in Asia, 5879. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tickoo, Makhan L.2006. Language in education. World Englishes25(1). 167176.10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00454.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tsang, Wai King & MatildaWong. 2004. Constructing a shared “Hong Kong Identity” in comic discourses. Discourse and Society15(16). 76785.10.1177/0957926504046504Search in Google Scholar

Wortham, Stanton.2001. Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-10-17
Published in Print: 2015-3-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 10.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/multi-2014-1012/html
Scroll to top button