Home Technology Quality optimization of FDM-printed (fused deposition modeling) components based on differential scanning calorimetry
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Quality optimization of FDM-printed (fused deposition modeling) components based on differential scanning calorimetry

  • Robin Roj ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Aileen Blondrath

    Aileen Blondrath finished her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wuppertal in 2019 and her Master of Science in 2021. Now, she is focusing on her Ph.D. at the RWTH Aachen. Besides her studies, she is working for the FGW.

    , Ralf Theiß and Peter Dültgen
Published/Copyright: October 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling has become the most common 3D printing technology in both the industry and the private sector, due to its easy application and low price. Although some companies provide parameter sets that are perfectly adapted for their machines and filaments, a great variety of materials that can be processed on arbitrary printers are also available. Usually, the operator has to figure out ideal printing parameters in order to achieve high-quality results. In this work, an approach is presented relating the conclusions of differential scanning calorimetry, including the melting and glass transition temperatures and the decomposition points, to the printout quality. To give an overview of the common materials and to correlate the behavior of the printing parameters, 16 different filaments categorized into groups of plastics without additives, metals and carbon, woods, and stones have been investigated. Heat towers have been printed with each filament, whereby the individual floors in 5 °C steps represent the nozzle temperatures and show features for direct comparison. As a main result, it is shown that the optimal printing quality is achieved with temperatures on the colder end of the range between melting and decomposition.


Corresponding author: Robin Roj, Forschungsgemeinschaft Werkzeuge und Werkstoffe e.V., 42859 Remscheid, Germany, E-mail:

About the author

Aileen Blondrath

Aileen Blondrath finished her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wuppertal in 2019 and her Master of Science in 2021. Now, she is focusing on her Ph.D. at the RWTH Aachen. Besides her studies, she is working for the FGW.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] R. Roj, R. Theiß, and P. Dültgen, “Mechanical properties of 16 different FDM-plastic types,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 999–1006, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111413.Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Roj, J. Nürnberg, R. Theiß, and P. Dültgen, “Comparison of FDM-printed and compression molded tensile samples,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, pp. 985–10992, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111575.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Plastics – Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) – Part 1: General Principles, 2017, DIN EN ISO 11357-1 [Online]. Available at: https://www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-en-iso-11357-1/264864949.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Plastics – Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) – Part 2: Determination of Glass Transition Temperature and Step Height, 2020, DIN EN ISO 11357-2 [Online]. Available at: https://www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-en-iso-11357-2/316989707.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Thermal Analysis – Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) – General Principles, 2019, DIN 51007 [Online]. Available at: https://www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-51007/299534496.Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. T. Marques, S. Esteves, J. P. T. Pereira, and L. M. Oliveira, Additive Manufacturing Hybrid Processes for Composites Systems, Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-44522-5Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. S. Park and C. K. Hong, “Relationship between the stereocomplex crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of PLLA/PDLA blends,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1851, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111851.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] M. L. Di Lorenzo, “Calorimetric analysis of the multiple melting behavior of poly(L-lactic acid),” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 3145–3151, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23136.Search in Google Scholar

[9] E. R. Fitzharris, D. W. Rosen, and M. L. Shofner, “Fast scanning calorimetry for semicrystalline polymers in fused deposition modeling,” Polymer, vol. 166, pp. 196–205, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.083.Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. Tambrallimath, R. Keshavamurthy, D. Saravanabavan, P. G. Koppad, and G. S. P. Kumar, “Thermal behavior of PC-ABS based graphene filled polymer nanocomposite synthesized by FDM process,” Compos. Commun., vol. 15, pp. 129–134, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2019.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

[11] NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, DSC 214 Polyma – The System Solution for Efficient Characterization of Polymers, 2021 [Online]. Available at: https://www.netzsch-thermal-analysis.com/en/products-solutions/differential-scanning-calorimetry/dsc-214-polyma/ [accessed: Dec. 22, 2021].Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-07
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2022-0199/pdf
Scroll to top button