Abstract
The identity of a natural kind can be construed in terms of its causal profile. This conception is more appropriate to science than two alternatives. The identity of a natural kind is not determined by one causal role because one natural kind can have many causal roles and several functions and because some functions are shared by different kinds. Furthermore, the microstructuralist thesis is wrong: The identity of certain natural kinds is not determined by their microstructure. It is true that if A and B have the same microstructural composition then a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B. However, the reverse does not hold. It is not the case that if a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B then A and B have the same microstructural composition. This is because a macroscopic NK can be “multiconstituted” by different microstructures.
Acknowledgments
Research for this paper has benefited from funding by ANR (grant ANR-12-BSH3-0009). Thank my auditors at Lille and Newark, and in particular A. Barberousse, for their critical remarks.
A French version of this paper has been published in Lato Sensu.
M. Kistler, « Espèces naturelles, profil causal et constitution multiple », Lato sensu, Vol. 3, No 1 (2016), p. 17–30.
References
Abbott, B. 1997. “A Note on the Nature of “Water”.” Mind 106 (422):311–319.10.1093/mind/106.422.311Search in Google Scholar
Ahn, W.-K., C. Kalish, S.A. Gelman, D.L. Medin, C. Luhmann, S. Atran, J.D. Coley, and P. Shafto 2001. “Why Essences are Essential in the Psychology of Concepts.” Cognition 82 (1):59–69.10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00145-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Aizawa, K. 2007. “The Biochemistry of Memory Consolidation: A Model System for the Philosophy of Mind.” Synthese 155 (1):65–98.10.1007/s11229-005-2566-9Search in Google Scholar
Aizawa, K. 2018. “Multiple Realization, Autonomy, and Integration.” In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, edited by D. Kaplan, 215–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199685509.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2009. “The (Multiple) Realization of Psychological and Other Properties in the Sciences.” Mind and Language 24:181–208.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01359.xSearch in Google Scholar
Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2011. “The Autonomy of Psychology in the Age of Neuroscience.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by P.M. Illari, F. Russo and J. Williamson, 202–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574131.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Anandhi, D. 2014. Introduction to Biochemistry and Metabolism. Noida (India): Dorling Kindersley.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583308Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487552Search in Google Scholar
Barberousse, A., and P. Ludwig 2008. “Models as Fictions.” In Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays in Modeling and Idealizations, edited by M. Suarez, 56–73. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bickle, J. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0237-0Search in Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Laws and Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2015. “The Metaphysics of Natural Kinds.” Synthese doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0833-y.Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, R. 1991. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61:127–148.10.1007/BF00385837Search in Google Scholar
Buller, A.R., and C.A. Townsend 2013. “Intrinsic Evolutionary Constraints on Protease Structure, Enzyme Acylation, and the Identity of the Catalytic Triad.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (8):E653–61.10.1073/pnas.1221050110Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Callender, C. 2011. “Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.” In Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. French and J. Saatsi, 33–54. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487354Search in Google Scholar
Chaplin, M. 2016. Water Structure and Science. http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/Search in Google Scholar
Churchland, P.M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625435Search in Google Scholar
Churchland, P.S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Traduit par M. Siksou. 1999. Neurophilosophie: l’esprit-cerveau. 1999. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.10.7551/mitpress/4952.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
De Jong, W.W., J.A. Leunissen, and C.E.M. Voorter 1993. “Evolution of the Alpha-Crystallin/Small Heat-Shock Protein Family.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 10 (1):103–126.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Dumsday, T. 2013. “Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism.” Erkenntnis 78:869–880.10.1007/s10670-012-9361-zSearch in Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A. 1974. “Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Synthese 28:97–115.10.1007/BF00485230Search in Google Scholar
Gelman, S. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gillett, C. 2003. “The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 100:591–603.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, W. 2011. “Structure, Function, and Protein Taxonomy.” Biology and Philosophy 26:533–545.10.1007/s10539-011-9252-8Search in Google Scholar
Hempel, C.G. 1965. Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 101–122. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hendry, R.F. 2006. “Elements, Compounds and Other Chemical Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 73:864–875.10.1086/518745Search in Google Scholar
Huisman, T.H.J., M.F.H. Carver, and G.D. Efremov 1996. A Syllabus of Human Hemoglobin Variants. Augusta, GA: The Sickle Cell Anemia Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kistler, M. 2002. “The Causal Criterion of Reality and the Necessity of Laws of Nature.” Metaphysica 3:57–86.Search in Google Scholar
Kistler, M. 2004. “Matérialisme et réduction de l’esprit.” In Les matérialismes (et leurs détracteurs), edited by J. Dubessy, G. Lecointre and M. Silberstein, 309–339. Paris: Syllepse. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 919–954.Search in Google Scholar
Kistler, M. 2007. “La réduction, l’émergence, l’unité de la science et les niveaux de réalité.” Matière Première 2:67–97. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 179–212.Search in Google Scholar
Kistler, M. 2012. “Powerful Properties and the Causal Basis of Dispositions.” In Properties, Powers and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, edited by A. Bird, B. Ellis and H. Sankey, 119–137. New York and Oxford: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kistler, M. 2016. L’esprit matériel : réduction et émergence. Paris: Ithaque.Search in Google Scholar
Knobe, J., and S. Nichols 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195323252.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ladyman, J., and D. Ross 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, E.J. 2001. The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199244995.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Manafu, A. 2014. “A Novel Approach to Emergence in Chemistry.” In Philosophy of Chemistry. Growth of a New Discipline, edited by E. Scerri and L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9364-3_4Search in Google Scholar
Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mellor, D.H. 1991. Properties and Predicates, Matters of Metaphysics, 170–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mellor, D.H. 2012. “Nature’s Joints: A Realistic Defense of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 25:387–404.10.1002/9781118627747.ch2Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 2002. Reprise de l’édition de 1891. Honolulu (Hawaii): University Press of the Pacific.Search in Google Scholar
Mills, E. 2014. “Mellor on the Sparseness of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 27:350–355.10.1111/rati.12040Search in Google Scholar
Morris, C., and H. Lecar 1981. “Voltage Oscillations in the Barnacle Giant Muscle Fiber.” Biophysical Journal 35:193–213.10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84782-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Motonori, O., Y. Isogai, and K. Nishikawa 1997. “Structural Requirement of Highly-Conserved Residues in Globins.” FEBS Letters 415 (2):129–133.10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01110-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Okasha, S. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131:191–213.10.1023/A:1015731831011Search in Google Scholar
Prior, E.W., R. Pargetter, and F. Jackson 1982. “Three Theses about Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19:251–257.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1939a. “A Logistical Approach to the Ontological Problem.” Repris In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Revised edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1976, 197–202. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1939b. “Designation and Existence.” Journal of Philosophy 36:701–709.10.2307/2017667Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1948. “On What There Is.” Repris In From A Logical Point of View, Second edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1953. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Saibil, H. 2013. “Chaperone Machines for Protein Folding, Unfolding and Disaggregation.” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 14 (10):630–642.10.1038/nrm3658Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Setoh, P., D. Wu, R. Baillargeon, and R. Gelman 2013. “Young Infants Have Biological Expectations about Animals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 110:15937–15942.10.1073/pnas.1314075110Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, L.A. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1980. “Causality and Properties.” In Identity, Cause and Mind, 206–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Repr. in Mellor, David Hugh, Oliver, Alex (ed.). 1997. Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 228–254.Search in Google Scholar
Slater, M.H. 2015. “Natural Kindness.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375–411.10.1093/bjps/axt033Search in Google Scholar
Sousa, P., S. Atran, and D. Medin 2002. “Essentialism and Folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 2:195–223.10.1163/15685370260225099Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar
Tahko, T. 2015. “Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited.” Mind 124 (495):795–822.10.1093/mind/fzv027Search in Google Scholar
Tobin, E. 2010. “Microstructuralism and Macromolecules: The Case of Moonlighting Proteins.” Foundations of Chemistry 12:41–54.10.1007/s10698-009-9078-5Search in Google Scholar
Tobin, E. 2013. “Are Natural Kinds and Natural Properties Distinct?” In Metaphysics and Science, edited by S. Mumford and M. Tugby, 164–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Tompa, P., C. Szasz, and L. Buday 2005. “Structural Disorder Throws New Light on Moonlighting.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 30:484–489.10.1016/j.tibs.2005.07.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Van Holde, K.E., and I. Miller Karen 1995. “Hemocyanins.” Advances in Protein Chemistry 47:1–81.10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60545-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Vorms, M. 2011. “Formats of Representation in Scientific Theorizing.” In Models, Simulations, and Representations, edited by P. Humphreys and C. Imbert. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Hyper-Russellian Skepticism
- Constitutionalism, Cheap Indeterminism and the Grounding Problem
- Can Universals be Wholly Located where Their Instances are Located?
- Reconsidering the Case for Colour Relativism
- The New Aristotelian Essentialists
- Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime
- Natural Kinds, Causal Profile and Multiple Constitution
- Representation, Consciousness, and Time
- Time as Motion
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Hyper-Russellian Skepticism
- Constitutionalism, Cheap Indeterminism and the Grounding Problem
- Can Universals be Wholly Located where Their Instances are Located?
- Reconsidering the Case for Colour Relativism
- The New Aristotelian Essentialists
- Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime
- Natural Kinds, Causal Profile and Multiple Constitution
- Representation, Consciousness, and Time
- Time as Motion