Home A monoclinic polymorph of 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3
Article Open Access

A monoclinic polymorph of 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3

  • Artem Schröder , Enno Lork and Jens Beckmann EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 17, 2014

Abstract

Monoclinic 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 comprises two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, which are associated by a weak Si···F contact. The previously known orthorhombic modification lacks this structural feature.

In the gas phase, silicon tetrafluoride SiF4 is a tetrahedral compound with four short Si-F bonds [1.555(2) Å] (Beagley et al., 1973). In the solid state, the molecular structure of SiF4 is retained. However, the primary Si-F bonds are slightly shorter [1.540(1) Å] and each molecule is associated with four adjusted molecules in the crystal lattice via four secondary Si···F bonds [3.202(1) Å] (Mootz and Korte, 1984). The shortening of the primary Si-F bond and the increase in the coordination number of the Si atom from 4 to 4+4 can be attributed to the high electronegativity difference of Si and F and the ionic character of the Si-F bond. The title compound m-terphenyltrifluorosilane 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 is a rare example of a simple aryltrifluorosilane that has been fully characterized by X-ray crystallography (Pietschnig et al., 2000) as well as solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy (Helluy et al., 2003; Pietschnig, 2007). Both SiF4 and 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 are Lewis acidic and react with excessive fluoride ions to give the fluorosilicate ions SiF62- and 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF4-, respectively (Pietschnig and Merz, 2001; Spirk et al., 2009). Besides the previously reported orthorhombic modification (space group Pbca, density ρ=1.230 mg m-3), we now describe a new monoclinic modification of 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 (space group P21/c, density ρ=1.264 mg m-3), which is shown in Figure 1. Selected bond parameters are given in the caption of the figure, and crystal and refinement data are collected in Table 1.

Figure 1 Molecular structure of monoclinic 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 showing 30% probability ellipsoids and the crystallographic numbering scheme.Selected bond parameters [Å, °]: Si1-F1 1.545(3), Si1-F2 1.543(2), Si1-F3 1.548(3), Si1···F4 3.422(3), Si1-C10 1.871(4), Si2-F4 1.559(3), Si2-F5 1.552(3), Si2-F6 1.549(3), Si2-C40 1.846(4), F1-Si1-F2 106.5(1), F1-Si1-F3 108.7(2), F2-Si1-F3 107.1(1), F1-Si1-C10 111.4(2), F2-Si1-C10 113.2(2), F3-Si1-C10 109.8(2), F4-Si2-F5 106.8(2), F4-Si2-F6 105.9(2), F5-Si2-F6 104.7(1), F4-Si2-C40 111.2(2), F5-Si2-C40 112.3(2), F6-Si2-C40 115.3(2).
Figure 1

Molecular structure of monoclinic 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 showing 30% probability ellipsoids and the crystallographic numbering scheme.

Selected bond parameters [Å, °]: Si1-F1 1.545(3), Si1-F2 1.543(2), Si1-F3 1.548(3), Si1···F4 3.422(3), Si1-C10 1.871(4), Si2-F4 1.559(3), Si2-F5 1.552(3), Si2-F6 1.549(3), Si2-C40 1.846(4), F1-Si1-F2 106.5(1), F1-Si1-F3 108.7(2), F2-Si1-F3 107.1(1), F1-Si1-C10 111.4(2), F2-Si1-C10 113.2(2), F3-Si1-C10 109.8(2), F4-Si2-F5 106.8(2), F4-Si2-F6 105.9(2), F5-Si2-F6 104.7(1), F4-Si2-C40 111.2(2), F5-Si2-C40 112.3(2), F6-Si2-C40 115.3(2).

Table 1

Crystal data and structure refinement of monoclinic 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3.

FormulaC24 H25 F3 Si
Formula weight, g mol-1398.53
Crystal systemmonoclinic
Crystal size, mm0.1×0.1×0.1
Space groupP21/c
a, Å8.7411(4)
b, Å13.3582(7)
c, Å36.0933(16)
α, °90.00
β, °96.2810(10)
γ, °90.00
V, Å34189.1(3)
Z, Z’8, 4
ρcalcd, mg m-31.264
T, K173
μ (Mo ), mm-10.144
F(000)1680
θ range, deg2.29–21.02
Index ranges-8≤h≤8
-13≤k≤13
-36≤l≤36
No. of reflections collected31 956
Completeness to θmax99.8%
No. of independent reflections4503
No. observed reflections with [I>2σ(I)]3742
No. of refined parameters505
GooF (F2)1.063
R1 (F) [I>2σ(I)]0.0578
wR2 (F2) (all data)0.1503
)max<0.001
Largest diff peak/hole, e Å-30.631/-0.275

The asymmetric unit comprises two crystallographically independent yet similar conformers of 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3, which are associated by an intermolecular Si···F contact. The Si1···F4 distance [3.422(3) Å] is longer than the intermolecular Si···F contact of SiF4 but slightly shorter than the sum of van-der-Waals radii (3.57 Å). In turn, the related Si2-F4 bond length [1.559(3) Å] is slightly longer than the remaining primary Si-F bond lengths [1.543(2)–1.552(3) Å]. These bond lengths and all other bond parameters are very similar to those reported for the orthorhombic modification of 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 (Pietschnig et al., 2000). It is noted that weak intermolecular complexes between SiF4 and σ-donors that represent the onset of hypercoordination were recently studied by computational chemists, who refer to these kinds of interactions to as σ-hole bonding (Politzer et al., 2009; Donald et al., 2010; Donald and Tawfik, 2013; Grabowski, 2014).

Crystallography

Single crystals of orthorhombic 2,6-Mes2 C6 H3 SiF3 were obtained by crystallization from CH2 Cl2/hexane at room temperature. Intensity data were collected on a Bruker Venture D8 diffractometer at 173 K with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα (0.7107 Å) radiation. The structure was solved by direct methods and difference Fourier synthesis using SHELXS-97 and SHELXL-97 implemented in the program WinGX 2002 (Farrugia, 1999). Full-matrix least-squares refinements on F2 were done using all data. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined using anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms were included in geometrically calculated positions using a riding model. Crystal and refinement data are collected in Table 1. Figures were created using DIAMOND (Brandenburg and Putz, 2006). Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structural analyses have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC number 1006957. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).


Corresponding author: Jens Beckmann, Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Bremen, Leobener Straße, 28359 Bremen, Germany, e-mail:

References

Beagley, B.; Brown, D. P.; Freeman, J. M. The Si-F length in SiF4 – a new electron diffraction study. J. Mol. Struct. 1973, 18, 337–338.Search in Google Scholar

Brandenburg, K.; Putz, H. DIAMOND V3.1d, Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Donald, K. J.; Tawfik, M. The weak helps the strong: σ-holes and the stability of MF4·base complexes. J. Phys. Chem. 2013, A117, 14176–14183.Search in Google Scholar

Donald, K. J.; Wittmaack, B. K.; Crigger, C. Tuning σ-holes: charge redistribution in the heavy (group 14) analogues of simple and mixed halomethanes can impose strong propensities for halogen bonding. J. Phys. Chem. A2010, 114, 7213–7222.Search in Google Scholar

Farrugia, L. J. WinGX suite for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr.1999, 32, 837–838.Search in Google Scholar

Grabowski, S. J. Tetrel bond-σ-hole bond as a preliminary stage of the SN 2 reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2014, 16, 1824–1834.Search in Google Scholar

Helluy, X.; Pietschnig, R.; Sebald, A. 29Si and 19F MAS NMR spectra of isolated 29Si(19F)2 and 29Si(19F)3 spin systems: experiments and simulations. Solid State Nucl. Mag. Res. 2003, 24, 286–300.Search in Google Scholar

Mootz, D.; Korte, L. On a disordered solid phase of SF4 and the crystal structures of products of its unintentional hydrolysis in glass apparatus, SiF4 (redetermination) and SOF2. Z. Naturforsch. 1984, 39b, 1295–1299.Search in Google Scholar

Pietschnig, R. Improved 29Si NMR detection of sterically protected fluorosilanes using the 29Si(19F)-INEPT technique J. Fluorine Chem. 2007, 128, 150–152.Search in Google Scholar

Pietschnig, R.; Merz, K. The first polymer with a fluorosilicate backbone and a non-polar shell. Chem. Commun.2001, 1210–1211.10.1039/b102853gSearch in Google Scholar

Pietschnig, R.; West, R.; Powell, D. R. Reduction of terphenyltrifluorosilanes: C-C insertion products and possible formation of a disilyne. Organometallics2000, 19, 2724–2729.Search in Google Scholar

Politzer, P.; Murray, J. S.; Lane, P.; Concha, M. C. Electrostatically driven complexes of SiF4 with amines. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009, 109, 3773–3780.Search in Google Scholar

Spirk, S.; Belaj, F.; Nieger, M.; Köfeler, H.; Rechberger, G. N.; Pietschnig, R. Exploring the anion-cation interactions in the m-terphenyltetrafluorosilicates by using multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and ICR-FT-MS Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9521–9529.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-7-4
Accepted: 2014-8-14
Published Online: 2014-9-17
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2014-0020/html
Scroll to top button