Home Multimodal Aspects of Representation and Interdiscursive Hybridity in Corporate Films
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Multimodal Aspects of Representation and Interdiscursive Hybridity in Corporate Films

  • Carmen Daniela Maier

    Carmen Daniela Maier, PhD, is an Associate Professor, member of the Knowledge Communication Research Group and of Center of Corporate Communication at the Department of Business Communication, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark. Among her latest publications are the chapters “A multimodal analysis of the environment beat” in Critical Multimodal Studies (Routledge, 2013) and “Stretching the multimodal boundaries of professional communication” in The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication (Routledge, 2014). Together with Sigrid Norris, she is the co-editor of Interactions, Images and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality (De Gruyter, 2014). Her research areas include multimodal discourse analysis, social semiotics, knowledge communication, environmental communication and corporate communication. Her main research goal is the theoretical and methodological development of the multimodal analysis of knowledge communication.

Published/Copyright: May 29, 2014

Abstract

This article focuses on the multimodal analysis of the several forms of interdiscursive hybridity that appear in new corporate films uploaded by a variety of companies on their YouTube channels. The article focuses on the multimodal discourse analysis of three corporate films, Powered by the Impossible, Pimp My Pump and The Redwolf Project, uploaded by Grundfos, a major Danish company, on their YouTube corporate film channel. Each of the chosen films is a complex multimodal text mixing pre-existing genres and discourses. These films appropriate and combine conventional corporate film features with entertaining features belonging to other discursive and generic contexts. These new strategies reflect the company’s continuous attempts to minimize the distance between them and their existing and prospective categories of customers.

About the author

Carmen Daniela Maier

Carmen Daniela Maier, PhD, is an Associate Professor, member of the Knowledge Communication Research Group and of Center of Corporate Communication at the Department of Business Communication, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark. Among her latest publications are the chapters “A multimodal analysis of the environment beat” in Critical Multimodal Studies (Routledge, 2013) and “Stretching the multimodal boundaries of professional communication” in The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication (Routledge, 2014). Together with Sigrid Norris, she is the co-editor of Interactions, Images and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality (De Gruyter, 2014). Her research areas include multimodal discourse analysis, social semiotics, knowledge communication, environmental communication and corporate communication. Her main research goal is the theoretical and methodological development of the multimodal analysis of knowledge communication.

References

Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication – Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication, 21(1):3250.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. K. (2012). Creative exploitation of socio-pragmatic space in professional discourse. In: Discourse and Creativity, R.Jones (Ed.), 7593. Harlow: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Edinburgh: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2011). Discourse hybridity and social change in critical discourse analysis. In: Genre(s) on the Move: Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication, S.Sarangi, V.Polese, and G.Caliendo (Eds.), 1127. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Search in Google Scholar

Kilborn, R. and Izod,J. (1997). An Introduction to Television Documentary: Confronting Reality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, C. D. (2012). Mediating multimodal environmental knowledge across animation techniques. In: Multimodality in Practice: Investigating Theory-in-Practice-Through Methodology, S.Norris (Ed.), 206222. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, C. D. (in press a). Multimodal analysis of new corporate genres. In: Interactions, Images and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality, S.Norris and C. D.Maier (Eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, C. D. (2014). Stretching the multimodal boundaries of professional communication. In: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication, V. K.Bhatia and S.Bremner (Eds.). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, K. (2009). Historical changes in the semiotic landscape: From calculation to computation. In: The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, C.Jewitt (Ed.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-5-29
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2014-0005/html
Scroll to top button