Home The Multimodal Dimension of Claims in Food Packaging
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Multimodal Dimension of Claims in Food Packaging

  • Rodney H. Jones

    Rodney Jones is Associate Professor of English and Applied Linguistics at City University of Hong Kong. Heis co-editor (with Sigrid Norris) of Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis (Routledge, 2005). His latest book is Health and Risk Communication: An Applied Linguistic Perspective (Routledge, 2013).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 29, 2014

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of regulations governing health and content claims on food packages, customers continue to be confused and sometimes deceived. One reason for this is that most regulations adopt a rather restricted, language-centric view of what a claim is, a view that focuses on how claims represent reality as opposed to what claims “do”, the kinds of actions and human relationships they make possible. This paper introduces a perspective on package claims that takes account of their performative and multimodal dimensions. The pragmatic force of a food package, it argues, always depends on multiple conditions such as the identities of manufacturers, retailers and customers, the conditions under which packages are encountered, and the way multiple semiotic modes such as language, graphics, colors, fonts, the shape of packages, and even the shape and texture of the food itself interact. The multimodal dimension of claims is not limited to the intratextual links among different modes and different materialities on the package, but also the intertextual links among the elements on the package and other modes and materialities in the environments in which customers make purchasing decisions. A multimodal view of package claims attempts to understand how claims are situated within specific material contexts, specific social actions, and specific social practices, and how they function to index social identities for manufacturers, retailers, customers, and even government officials who make and enforce regulations governing their use.

Funding statement: Funding: This research was made possible by the General Research Fund Grant “The Discourse of Food Labeling in Hong Kong: Public Policy and Discursive Practice” (#CityU144110) from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council.

About the author

Rodney H. Jones

Rodney Jones is Associate Professor of English and Applied Linguistics at City University of Hong Kong. Heis co-editor (with Sigrid Norris) of Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis (Routledge, 2005). His latest book is Health and Risk Communication: An Applied Linguistic Perspective (Routledge, 2013).

References

Austin, J. L. (1976). How to do Things with Words. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, S. K., and Cole, C. (2002). Consumers’ search and use of nutrition information: the challenge and promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. Journal of Marketing, 66:112127.Search in Google Scholar

Chandon, P. (2013). How package design and package based marketing claims lead to overeating. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35(1):7–31.Search in Google Scholar

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2007). Food Labeling. 5th Edition. Rome: The World Health Organization and The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, G. and O’Halloran, K. (1999). Label literacy: factors affecting the understanding and assessment of baby food labels. In: Language and Literacies, BAAL Studies in Applied Linguistics 14, T.O’Brien (Ed.), 145157. London: British Association for Applied Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Cowburn, G. and Stockley, L. (2005). Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labeling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 8(1):2128.Search in Google Scholar

Eden, S. (2011). Food labels as boundary objects. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2):179194.Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, C. M. (1929). Selling Mrs. Consumer. New York: The Business Bourse.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, J. P. (2011). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 4th Edition. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R., Bhatia, V. K., Bhatia, A., and Vyas-Ngarkar, R. (2011a). Nutritional labeling as social interaction. In: A paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference, Manchester, UK, July 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R., Bhatia, V. K., Bhatia, A., and Vyas-Ngarkar, R. (2011b). The definition of “zero”: the negotiation of professional practices and pragmatic expectations in the regulation of food labeling. In: A paper presented at the Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice (ALAPP) Conference, Cardiff, UK, June 23–24.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203422724Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (2007). Nexus analysis: refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5):608625.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Shine, A., O’Reilly, S., and O’Sullivan, K. (1997). Consumer attitudes to nutrition labeling. British Food Journal, 99(8):283289.Search in Google Scholar

Silverglade, B. and Heller, I. R. (2010). Food Labeling Chaos: The Case for Reform. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest.Search in Google Scholar

Star, S. L. and Greisemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations,” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3):387420.Search in Google Scholar

Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vileisis, A. (2010). Kitchen Literacy: How We Lost Knowledge of Where Food Comes from and Why We Need to Get It Back. Washington, DC: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-5-29
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2014-0001/html
Scroll to top button