The principle of cooperation as an application of the cooperative principle in some recent rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding Romania

References

Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon PressSearch in Google Scholar

Bernsen, Niels Ole, Hans Dybkjer, and Laila Dybkjer. 1996. Cooperativity in human-machine and human-human spoken dialogue. Discourse Processes 21. 213–236.10.1080/01638539609544956Search in Google Scholar

Broberg, Morten & Fenger Niels. 2010. Procedura trimiterii preliminare la Curtea Europeană de Justiție [Preliminary ruling procedure before the CJEU.] București: Wolters Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Călin, Dragoș. 2021. The priority of the EU law in Romania: between reality and Fata Morgana in EU Law Journal, UNIO, The priority of the EU law in Romania: between reality and Fata Morgana – Official Blog of UNIO (accessed 10 August 2022).10.2139/ssrn.4003810Search in Google Scholar

Călin, Dragoș. 2021. The Court of Justice of the European Union, ultima ratio for saving the independence of the judges in Romania – a commentary of the CJEU preliminary ruling in C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19 and C-355/19 and C-397/19, AFJR and others, Constitutionalism and Politics | The Court of Justice of the European Union, ultima ratio for saving the independence of the judges in Romania – a commentary of the CJEU preliminary ruling in C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19 and C-355/19 and C-397/19, AFJR and others - Constitutionalism and Politics (eui.eu) (accessed 10 August 2022).10.2139/ssrn.4003808Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Paul & Gráinne de Búrca. 2009. Dreptul Uniunii Europene. Comentarii, jurisprudență și doctrină [European Union law. Text, case-law and materials]. Trans. Georgiana Marcovschi. București: Hamangiu.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Steven (ed.). 1991. Pragmatics. A Reader. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Bethan. 2000. Grice s Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across. In Diane Nelson & Paul Foulkes (eds), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 1–26, Leeds: University of Leeds. Available at: https://www.latl.leeds.ac.uk/languageleeds-working-papers/ (accessed 10 August 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Acts of Religion. New York/London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Dogaru, Ion, Dan Claudiu Dănișor & Gheorghe Dănișor. 2000. Teoria generală a dreptului [The general theory of law]. Pitești: Themis.Search in Google Scholar

Grandy, Richard E. 1989. On Grice on language. The Journal of Philosophy 86. 514–525.10.5840/jphil1989861021Search in Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas C. 1990. Hear the Other Side: Wallace Stevens and Pragmatist Legal Theory. Southern California Law Review 63. 1569–1595.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1968. Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning and word meaning. Foundations of Language 4. 225–242.10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_2Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1969. Utterer’s meaning and intention. The Philosophical Review 78. 147–177.10.2307/2184179Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Phil Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Studies in Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, 183–198. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1986. Reply to Richards. In Grandy, Richard E. & Richard Warner. (eds.), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, 45–106. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Retrospective epilogue in Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words, 339–386. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1991. Logic and Conversation. In Davies, Steven (ed), Pragmatics. A Reader, 305–315. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haack, Susan. 2005. On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does “the Path of the Law” Lead Us? American Journal of Jurisprudence 50. 71–105.10.1093/ajj/50.1.71Search in Google Scholar

Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana. 2003. Limbaj și comunicare. Elemente de pragmatică lingvistică [Language and communication. Elements of linguistic pragmatics] București: ALL.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1994. Critica rațiunii pure [The Critique of Pure Reason]. Trans. Nicolae Bagdasar & Elena Moisuc. București: IRI.Search in Google Scholar

Kochenov, Dimitry Vladimirovich, 2021. Upgrading Rule of Law in Europe in Populist Times. Pravni zapisi, God. XII, br. 1, (PDF) UPGRADING RULE OF LAW IN EUROPE IN POPULIST TIMES (researchgate.net) (accessed 10 August 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Larson Schneider Anne & Helen Ingram. 2003. The Pragmatic Policy Analyst. In Alfonso Morales (ed.), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science, 156–179. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315244525-7Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen. 2021. Le rôle de la Cour de justice et du dialogue des juges dans la consolidation de l’État de droit en Europe, Colloque 21-2-2022-Paris-Étatdedroit-version finale.pdf (courdecassation.fr) (accessed 10 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1999. Al doilea tratat despre cârmuire. Scrisoare despre toleranţă [Two treatises of government. Letter on tolerence]. Bucureşti: Nemira.Search in Google Scholar

Luban, David. 1996. What’s Pragmatic About Legal Pragmatism? Cardozo Law Review 18. 43–73.Search in Google Scholar

Maingueneau, Dominique. 2007. Analiza textelor de comunicare [Analysing of communication texts]. Iași: Institutul European.Search in Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei. 2011. Philosophy of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691141671.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moraru, Mădălina and Raluca Bercea. 2022. The First Episode in the Romanian Rule of Law Saga: Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19, Asociaţia ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România, and their follow-up at the national level. European Constitutional Law Review 18(1). 82–113.10.1017/S1574019622000074Search in Google Scholar

Niemisch, Mihail. 2019. Teoria generală a dreptului [The general theory of law]. București: Hamangiu.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, Dennis. 1990. Law’s Pragmatism: Law as Practice and Narrative. Virginia Law Review 76. 937–998.10.2307/1073154Search in Google Scholar

Șandru, Daniel Mihai. 2019. Caracterul obligatoriu al deciziei preliminare pronunţate de Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene pentru instanţe și autorităţi naţionale [The binding nature of preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union for national courts and authorities]. In Revista română de drept european [The Romanian journal of European law]4. 45–55.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclar, Michael. 1985. Law and Language. The Role of Pragmatic in Statutory Interpretation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46. 373–420.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Steven D. 1990. The Pursuit of Pragmatism. Yale Law Journal 100. 409–449.10.2307/796620Search in Google Scholar

Sorea, Daniela. 2007. Pragmatics: Some Cognitive Perspectives, București: Editura Universității din București.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deidere Wilson. 1986. Relevance : Communication and Cognitions. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Warner, Richard. 1993. Why Pragmatism? The Puzzling Place of Pragmatism in Critical Theory. University of Illinois Law Review 3. 535–563.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deidre & Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370Search in Google Scholar