Typographical iconicity and the communication of impressions: A relevance-theoretic perspective

References

Alonso, Pilar. 2014. The role of cognitive coherence in non-expert processes of literary discourse reception. Journal of Literary Semantics 43(1). 1–23.10.1515/jls-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Blake, William. 1990. Songs of Innocence and of Experience (edited by R. Willmott). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 2008. Apposition and affective communication. Language and Literature 17(1). 37–57.10.1177/0963947007085054Search in Google Scholar

Bohn, Willard. 1986, The Aesthetics of Visual Poetry 1914-1928. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603Search in Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn. 2018. Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol 33. 198–217.10.1080/10926488.2018.1481257Search in Google Scholar

Cave, Terence & Deirdre Wilson (eds.). 2018. Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198794776.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Billy, 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139034104Search in Google Scholar

Cummings, E. E. 1991. r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r. In George James Firmage (ed.), Complete poems: 1904-1962 by E. E. Cummings, p. 396. New York: Liveright.Search in Google Scholar

De Brabanter, Philippe. 2010. Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures. In Belén Soria & Esther Romero (eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, 199–216. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230292352_13Search in Google Scholar

Elleström, Lars. 2016. Visual iconicity in poetry: Replacing the notion of “Visual Poetry”. Orbis Litterarum 71(6). 437–472.10.1111/oli.12112Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Furlong, Anne. 1996. Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation. PhD Thesis, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Furlong, Anne. 2014. Outsourcing: A relevance-theoretic account of the interpretation of theatrical texts. In Siobhan Chapman & Billy Clark (eds.), Pragmatic Literary Stylistics, 70–89. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137023278_5Search in Google Scholar

Furlong, Anne. 2020. The shared communicative act of theatrical texts in performance: A relevance theoretic approach. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 9(3). 1–23.10.15462/ijll.v9i3.121Search in Google Scholar

Green, Keith, 2001. Creative writing, language and evaluation. Working Papers on the Web 2. Available at: https://extra.shu.ac.uk/wpw/value/green.htm (accessed 9^th April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert P. 1957. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66. 377–388.10.2307/2182440Search in Google Scholar

Herbert, George. 2007. Easter Wings. In Helen Wilcox (ed.), The English Poems of George Herbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herbert, George. 2007. The Altar. In Helen Wilcox (ed.), The English Poems of George Herbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Higashimori, Isao & Deirdre, Wilson. 1996. Questions on relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 111:124. Digital version available at: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/96papers/higashi.pdf: 1–14 (accessed 9^th April 2022 – page numbers for digital version used within this article).Search in Google Scholar

Higgins, Dick. 1987. Pattern Poetry: Guide to an Unknown Literature. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hiraga, Masako K. 2000. Iconicity as principle of composition and interpretation: A case study in Japanese short poems. In Patrizia Violi (ed.), Phonosymbolism and Poetic Language, 147–169.Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Hiraga, Masako K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicty: A Cognitive Approach to Analyzing Texts. Houndsmills & New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230510708Search in Google Scholar

Hollander, John, 1991. Types of Shape. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Honegger, Urs. 2002. Wort und Bild in der visuellen Poesie des 20. Jh. Lizenziatsarbeit. Universität Zürich, Schweiz. Philosophische Fakultät. Available at: www.netzliteratur.net/honegger.htm (accessed April^11th 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Jagoe, Caroline & Tim Wharton. 2021. Meaning non-verbally: The neglected corners of the bidimensional continuum communication in people with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics 178. 21–30.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.027Search in Google Scholar

Kilyovski, Vakrilen. 2013. The nude, the grasshopper, and the poet-painter: A reading of E. E. Cummings’ “r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r”. Spring 20, E. E. Cummings Society. 99–109.Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Kim, Anna Katharina Schaffner, Ulrich Weger & Andrew Michael Roberts. 2012. Reading space in visual poetry: New cognitive perspectives. Writing Technologies 4. 75–106.Search in Google Scholar

Menezes, Philadelpho. 1993. Brazilian Visual Poetry. Visible Language [Visual Poetry: An Anthology] 27(4). 394–409.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1955/1902. Logic as semiotic: Theory of signs. In Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce, 98–119. New York: Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pilkington, Adrian. 2000. Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.75Search in Google Scholar

Pinder, Daniel William. 2019. Poetic Effects and Visuospatial Form: A relevance-theoretic perspective. PhD Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.Search in Google Scholar

Pinder, Daniel William. 2021. Poetic effects and visuospatial form: A relevance-theoretic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 178. 211–224.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.019Search in Google Scholar

Pinder, Daniel William. 2022. Line divisions as stylistic devices in poetry: Relevance, procedural encoding and ad hoc concepts. Journal of Pragmatics 190. 45–59.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.020Search in Google Scholar

Rohan, Olivia, Ryoko Sasamoto & Rebecca Jackson. 2018. Argumentation, relevance theory and persuasion: An analysis of onomatopoeia in Japanese publications using manga stylistics. International Review of Pragmatics 10. 219–242.10.1163/18773109-01002005Search in Google Scholar

Rohan, Olivia, Ryoko Sasamoto & Sharon O’Brien. 2021. Onomatopoeia: A relevance-based eye-tracking study of digital manga. Journal of Pragmatics 186. 60–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.018Search in Google Scholar

Sasamoto, Ryoko. 2019. Onomatopoeia and Relevance: Communication of Impressions via Sound. London: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-3-030-26318-8Search in Google Scholar

Sasamoto, Ryoko & Rebecca Jackson. 2016. Onomatopoeia – showing-word or saying-word? Relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions. Lingua 175–176. 36–53.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2011/1916. Course in General Linguistics (trans. Wade Baskin; edited by Perry Meisel & Haun Saussy). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

de Saussure, Louis & Tim Wharton. 2020. Relevance, effects and affect. International Review of Pragmatics 12(2). 183–205.10.1163/18773109-01202001Search in Google Scholar

Schmitz-Emans, Monika. 2020. Playing with forms and with concepts of ‘form’: proportion, symmetry, and seriality in modern visual poetry. European Review 29(2). 285–296.10.1017/S1062798720000423Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Kate & Rebecca Jackson. 2020. When EVERYTHING STANDS OUT, NOTHING Does. Typography, expectations and procedures. In Agnieszka Piskorska (ed.), Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics, 167–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ftl.8.06scoSearch in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A.. 2001. Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics (Second Edition). Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan, Francesco Cara & Vittorio Girotto. 1995. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57. 31–95.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-MSearch in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2^nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 2012. Introduction: Pragmatics. In Deirdre & Dan Sperber (eds.) Relevance and Meaning,1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15(44). 117–149.Search in Google Scholar

Wharton, Tim, 2003. Interjections, language and the ‘showing/saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition 11(1). 39–91.10.1075/pc.11.1.04whaSearch in Google Scholar

Wharton, Tim, 2006. The evolution of pragmatics. In Keith Brown (ed.), The Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 338–345. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04747-7Search in Google Scholar

Wharton, Tim. 2008. ‘Meaning’ and ‘showing’: Gricean intentions and relevance-theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2). 131–152.10.1515/IP.2008.008Search in Google Scholar

Wharton, Tim, 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511635649Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre. 2018. Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Terence Cave & Deirdre Wilson (eds.), Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198794776.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2019. Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 31–38.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Gregory Ward & Lawrence R. Horn (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber (eds.). 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton. 2006. Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1559–1579.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco, 2009. Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor, 145–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.3.147Search in Google Scholar