Startseite Conditional connection explored: the case of Sicilian cusà
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Conditional connection explored: the case of Sicilian cusà

  • Luisa Brucale , Maria Cristina Lo Baido ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Egle Mocciaro
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Juni 2022

Abstract

Stemming from a wh-question, the Sicilian marker cusà (cu sa ‘who knows’) expresses several epistemic meanings, which can also reach the realm of conditionality. The paper explores the discourse profile of cusà as it emerges from the analysis of diachronic data (from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries) and present-day informal Sicilian, namely spoken Sicilian and present-day informal Sicilian as written by speakers on the web. These data suggest a possible path of development leading from the wh-question to new functions. We propose that the origin of this development can be explained in the light of the strategy of the “impossible question”, while the diverse functions of cusà emerged through concomitant processes of desemantization, reanalysis, and subjectification.


Corresponding author: Maria Cristina Lo Baido, University of Cagliari, Department of Lettere, Lingue e Beni Culturali, Cagliari, Italy, E-mail:

Corpora

Artesia, Corpus. 2020. Archivio testuale del siciliano antico. In Mario Pagano, Salvatore Arcidiacono & Ferdinando Raffaele (eds.), Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani. Catania, Università di Catania. http://artesia.ovi.cnr.it/ (accessed 29 May 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

itTenTen16. 2016. Italian web 2016 corpus. https://www.sketchengine.eu/ittenten-italian-corpus/ (accessed 29 May 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Meli, Giovanni. 1839. Poesie siciliane, vol. 1–4. Palermo: Roberti.Suche in Google Scholar

Pitrè, Giuseppe. 1985. Fiabe, novelle e racconti popolari siciliani, vol. 1–4. Sala Bolognese: Arnaldo Forni Editore. (Anastatic reprint of the first edition, published in 1875).Suche in Google Scholar

Tempio, Domenico. 1814. Operi di Domenico Tempio catanisi. Catania: La stamparia di li Regj Studj.Suche in Google Scholar

References

Beeching, Kate. 2017. Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139507110Suche in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina & Silvio Cruschina. 2020. On two discourse particles in (central) Sicilian polar questions. Paper presented at Going Romance 34, Paris, 25–27 November.Suche in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik & Freek Van de Velde. 2013. Serving two masters: Form–function friction in syntactic amalgams. Studies in Language 37(3). 534–565. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.04des.Suche in Google Scholar

Degand, Liesbeth. 2014. “So very fast then”: Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change, 151–178. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004274822_008Suche in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar, part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218374Suche in Google Scholar

Fedriani, Chiara & Piera Molinelli. 2019. Italian ma ‘but’ in deverbal pragmatic markers: Forms, functions, and productivity of a pragma-dyad. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 26. 29–55. https://doi.org/10.5209/cfit.62864.Suche in Google Scholar

Fiorentini, Ilaria & Andrea Sansò. 2017. Reformulation markers and their functions: Two case studies from Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 120. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Fortuna, Antonella. 2002. Grammatica siciliana: Principali regole grammaticali, fonetiche e grafiche (comparate tra i vari dialetti siciliani). Caltanissetta: Terzo Millennio.Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Suche in Google Scholar

Houle, Leah & Rebeca Martínez Gómez. 2011. A closer look at quizá(s): Grammaticalization and an epistemic adverb. In Luis A. Ortiz-López (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 13th hispanic linguistics symposium, 296–304. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar

Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 1999. Grammatica funzionale delle avverbiali italiane. Rome: Carocci.Suche in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Pathways to conditionality: Two case studies from Italian. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 99. 97–121.Suche in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00009-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Piccitto, Giorgio & Giovanni Tropea. 1977. Vocabolario siciliano. Catania: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani, Opera del Vocabolario siciliano.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramat, Paolo & Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 187–285. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.187Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra & Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, 313–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.2.16thoSuche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1985. Conditional markers. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.6.14cloSuche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2020. Is “back to my point” a pragmatic marker? An inquiry into the historical development of some metatextual discourse management markers in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special issue. 13–29. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.307.Suche in Google Scholar

Visconti, Jacqueline. 2000. I connettivi condizionali complessi in italiano e in inglese. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-05
Accepted: 2021-07-13
Published Online: 2022-06-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0033/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen