Startseite Current trends in grammar writing
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Current trends in grammar writing

  • Rigina Ajanki und Arja Hamari EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. Januar 2021

Abstract

Over the last few decades, there has been a tremendous increase in the production of descriptive grammars for languages that had previously been poorly described or lacked description altogether. In most cases, these are minority languages, and many of them are endangered. To enhance the dialogue between grammar-writers and typologists, the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology was held at the University of Helsinki (Finland) at the end of March, 2019. In this paper, we discuss three current trends in grammar writing that emerged from the conference plenaries as well as from many other presentations: (i) the target audience of grammars and the role of language communities in grammar writing, (ii) the digitalization of grammaticography and (iii) themes that have earlier been more or less neglected in grammars but that would bring more insight into typological research as well as into understanding the structures of individual languages: discourse, variation, diachrony and contact effect of languages.


Corresponding author: Arja Hamari, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, Helsingin Yliopisto, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683215.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Akumbu, Pius. 2019. Reflections on a community-based approach to writing grammars of endangered languages. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/akumbu_1.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Aunio, Lotta, Rasmus Bernander, Antti Laine & Tim Roth. 2019. Challenges constructing a multilectal grammar – The case of the Western Serengeti languages. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/aunio_et_al.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Bardagil Mas, Bernat. 2019. Rethinking the documentation trilogy in endangered language research. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/bardagil_mas.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Barlow, Russell. 2019. Detecting grammatical change in a previously undescribed endangered language. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/barlow.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Blokland, Rogier, Marina Fedina, Niko Partanen & Michael Rießler. 2019. Closing the cycle of language documentation, corpus building and corpus-based description of Komi-Zyrian. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blokland_fedina_partanen_ries sler.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Bugaeva, Anna. 2019. ‘Indefinite’ or ‘antipassive’? Matching diachronic and synchronic approaches in the study of Ainu. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/bugaeva.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 1. Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.). 2006. Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 167). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197693Suche in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2019. Grammar writing and language contact. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/forker_0.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren, Barbara Kelly, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Heston Tyler. 2017. Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions. Language Documentation & Conservation 11. 157–189. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24731.Suche in Google Scholar

Hannß, Katja. 2019. Language corpora and the syntax-pragmatic interface: The Chipaya subject clitics. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/hannss.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Framework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 2019. On writing grammars: Selected notes and observations. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/janhunen_0.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Kadanya, James Lokuuda. 2006. Writing grammars for the community. In Thomas E. Payne & David J. Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing. Studies in Language 30(2), 253–257. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.03kadSuche in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise, Marja-Leena Sorjonen & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2007. Discourse structure. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 2, 301–371. Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619434.006Suche in Google Scholar

Kohlberger, Martin. 2019. The challenges and advantages of representing variation in grammars. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/kohlberger.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Kowalik, Richard. 2019. Elder South Saami speaker’s innovative language vs. prescriptive language: The impact of language description. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/kowalik.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2006. Grammars and the community. In Thomas E. Payne & David J. Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing. Studies in Language 30(2), 281–306. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.05mitSuche in Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike. 2006. Grammaticography: The art and craft of writing grammars. In Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 167), 41–68. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197693.41Suche in Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2006. A typology of good grammars. In Thomas E. Payne & David J. Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing. Studies in Language 30(2), 385–415. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.09ricSuche in Google Scholar

Rosés, Labrada & Jorge Emilio. 2019. Grammar writing and diachronic typology: Friends or foes? Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/roses_labrada.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Weber, David J. 2006. Thoughts on growing a grammar. In Thomas E. Payne & David J. Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing. Studies in Language 30(2), 417–444. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.10webSuche in Google Scholar

Wilbur, Joshua. 2019. Fieldwork and Grammaticography in a digital world. Paper presented at the conference Descriptive Grammars and Typology, University of Helsinki, 27–29 March. Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/wilbur_0.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-31
Accepted: 2020-09-28
Published Online: 2021-01-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Editorial Note
  2. Editorial note
  3. Phonetics & Phonology
  4. Fast Track: fast (nearly) automatic formant-tracking using Praat
  5. Acoustic investigation of anticipatory vowel nasalization in a Caribbean and a non-Caribbean dialect of Spanish
  6. Evidence against a link between learning phonotactics and learning phonological alternations
  7. The extent and degree of utterance-final word lengthening in spontaneous speech from 10 languages
  8. Morphology & Syntax
  9. Brand names as multimodal constructions
  10. NP-internal structure and the distribution of adjectives in Mə̀dʉ́mbὰ
  11. A quantitative investigation of the ellipsis of English relativizers
  12. Positional dependency in Murrinhpatha: expanding the typology of non-canonical morphotactics
  13. Semantics & Pragmatics
  14. Multifactorial Information Management (MIM): summing up the emerging alternative to Information Structure
  15. Language Documentation & Typology
  16. Current trends in grammar writing
  17. Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
  18. Experimental filler design influences error correction rates in a word restoration paradigm
  19. Phonological and morphological roles modulate the perception of consonant variants
  20. Language Acquisition and Language Learning
  21. Sounds like a dynamic system: a unifying approach to Language
  22. Sociolinguistics and Anthropological Linguistics
  23. Using hidden Markov models to find discrete targets in continuous sociophonetic data
  24. “It’s a Whole Vibe”: testing evaluations of grammatical and ungrammatical AAE on Twitter
  25. The sociolinguistics of /l/ in Manchester
  26. Computational & Corpus Linguistics
  27. An empirical study on the contribution of formal and semantic features to the grammatical gender of nouns
  28. A computational construction grammar approach to semantic frame extraction
  29. The “negative end” of change in grammar: terminology, concepts and causes
  30. In order that – a data-driven study of symptoms and causes of obsolescence
  31. Cognitive Linguistics
  32. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language
  33. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language
  34. Repetition in Mandarin-speaking children’s dialogs: its distribution and structural dimensions
Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0039/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen