Home Fast Track: fast (nearly) automatic formant-tracking using Praat
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fast Track: fast (nearly) automatic formant-tracking using Praat

  • Santiago Barreda
Published/Copyright: January 25, 2021

Abstract

Fast Track is a formant tracker implemented in Praat that attempts to automatically select the best analysis from a set of candidates. The best track is selected by modeling smooth formant contours across the entirety of the sound, providing the researcher with rich information about static and dynamic formant properties. Fast Track returns text files containing acoustic information (formant frequencies, formant bandwidths, fundamental frequency, etc.) sampled every 2 ms, generates images showing the winning analysis and comparing alternate analyses, and creates log files detailing analysis information for each file. Fast Track features a modular workflow that allows for analysis steps to be run (and re-run) independently as necessary, and is designed to allow for easy correction of tracking errors by allowing the user to override the automatic analysis, or manually edit tracks where necessary. In addition, Fast Track includes tools to aggregate data across tokens, and to easily create vowel plots of mean values or time-varying formant contours. The design and use of Fast Track are outlined using a re-analysis of the Hillenbrand et al. (1995) dataset, which suggests that Fast Track can be very accurate in cases where signal properties allow for reliable formant estimates.


Corresponding author: Santiago Barreda, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA, E-mail:

References

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.16. http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 6 June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Escudero, Paola, Paul Boersma, Andréia Schurt Rauber & Ricardo A. H. Bion. 2009. A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(3). 1379–1393. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321.Search in Google Scholar

Hillenbrand, James, Laura A. Getty, Michael J. Clark & Kimberlee Wheeler. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5). 3099–3111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872.Search in Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler & Charlotte Vaughn. 2020. Exploring vowel formant estimation through simulation-based techniques. Linguistics Vanguard 6(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0060.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ingrid Rosenfelder & Josef Fruehwald. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1). 30–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0015.Search in Google Scholar

Nearey, Terrance M., Peter F. Assmann & James M. Hillenbrand. 2002. Evaluation of a strategy for automatic formant tracking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112(5). 2323. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4779372.Search in Google Scholar

Weenink, David. 2015. Improved formant frequency measurements of short segments. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Cuiling, Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, & Felipe Ochoa 2013. Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison – Female voices. Speech Communication 55(6). 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-28
Accepted: 2020-11-24
Published Online: 2021-01-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial Note
  2. Editorial note
  3. Phonetics & Phonology
  4. Fast Track: fast (nearly) automatic formant-tracking using Praat
  5. Acoustic investigation of anticipatory vowel nasalization in a Caribbean and a non-Caribbean dialect of Spanish
  6. Evidence against a link between learning phonotactics and learning phonological alternations
  7. The extent and degree of utterance-final word lengthening in spontaneous speech from 10 languages
  8. Morphology & Syntax
  9. Brand names as multimodal constructions
  10. NP-internal structure and the distribution of adjectives in Mə̀dʉ́mbὰ
  11. A quantitative investigation of the ellipsis of English relativizers
  12. Positional dependency in Murrinhpatha: expanding the typology of non-canonical morphotactics
  13. Semantics & Pragmatics
  14. Multifactorial Information Management (MIM): summing up the emerging alternative to Information Structure
  15. Language Documentation & Typology
  16. Current trends in grammar writing
  17. Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
  18. Experimental filler design influences error correction rates in a word restoration paradigm
  19. Phonological and morphological roles modulate the perception of consonant variants
  20. Language Acquisition and Language Learning
  21. Sounds like a dynamic system: a unifying approach to Language
  22. Sociolinguistics and Anthropological Linguistics
  23. Using hidden Markov models to find discrete targets in continuous sociophonetic data
  24. “It’s a Whole Vibe”: testing evaluations of grammatical and ungrammatical AAE on Twitter
  25. The sociolinguistics of /l/ in Manchester
  26. Computational & Corpus Linguistics
  27. An empirical study on the contribution of formal and semantic features to the grammatical gender of nouns
  28. A computational construction grammar approach to semantic frame extraction
  29. The “negative end” of change in grammar: terminology, concepts and causes
  30. In order that – a data-driven study of symptoms and causes of obsolescence
  31. Cognitive Linguistics
  32. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language
  33. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language
  34. Repetition in Mandarin-speaking children’s dialogs: its distribution and structural dimensions
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0051/html
Scroll to top button