Three steps forward for predictability. Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory

References

Babel, M. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 177–189.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13. 145–204.10.1017/S004740450001037XSuche in Google Scholar

Berkovits, R. 1993. Progressive utterance-final lengthening in syllables with final fricatives. Language and Speech 36(1). 89–98.10.1177/002383099303600105Suche in Google Scholar

Bowern, C. & S. Babinski. 2018. Mergers in Bardi: Contextual probability and predictors of sound change. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0024Suche in Google Scholar

Brognaux, S., S. Roekhaut, T. Drugman & R. Beaufort. 2012. Automatic phone alignment: A comparison between speaker-independent models and models trained on the corpus to align. In H. Isahara & K. Kanzaki (eds.), Advances in natural language processing (Japtal 2012. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7614), 300–311. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33983-7_30Suche in Google Scholar

Buz, E., M. K. Tanenhaus & T. F. Jaeger. 2016. Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers’ subsequent pronunciations. Journal of Memory and Language 89. 68–86.10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009Suche in Google Scholar

Byrne, C. & P. Foulkes. 2004. The mobile phone effect on vowel formants. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11. 83–102.10.1558/sll.2004.11.1.83Suche in Google Scholar

Chodroff, E. & C. Wilson. 2017. Structure in talker-specific phonetic realization: Covariation of stop consonant VOT in American English. Journal of Phonetics 61. 30–47.10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

Clopper, C. G., R. Turnbull & R. S. Burdin. 2018. Assessing predictability effects in connected read speech. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0044Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6. 243–278.10.1515/lp-2015-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2017. Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language 93(3). 569–597.10.1353/lan.2017.0037Suche in Google Scholar

Daland, R. & K. Zuraw 2018. Loci and locality of informational effects on phonetic implementation. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0045Suche in Google Scholar

Das, R., J. Izak, J. Yuan & M. Liberman 2010. Forced alignment under adverse conditions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, CIS Dept.Suche in Google Scholar

De Decker, P. 2016. An evaluation of noise on LPC-based vowel formant estimates: Implications for sociolinguistic data collection. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). 83–101.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0010Suche in Google Scholar

Deng, L., X. Cui, R. Pruvenok, Y. Chen, S. Momen & A. Alwan. 2006. A database of vocal tract resonance trajectories for research in speech processing. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2006. 369–372.10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1660034Suche in Google Scholar

Duckworth, M., K. McDougall, G. de Jong & L. Shockey. 2011. Improving the consistency of formant measurement. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 18. 35–51.10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.35Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, P. & G. J. Docherty. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34. 409–438.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

Franco-Pedroso, J. & J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez. 2016. Linguistically-constrained formant-based i-vectors for automatic speaker recognition. Speech Communication 76. 61–81.10.1016/j.specom.2015.11.002Suche in Google Scholar

Fromont, R. & K. Watson. 2016. Factors influencing automatic segmental alignment of sociophonetic corpora. Corpora 11. 401–431.10.3366/cor.2016.0101Suche in Google Scholar

Gordon, E., M. Maclagan & J. B. Hay. 2007. The ONZE corpus. In J. Beal, K. Corrigan & H. Mosil (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora (vol. 1), 82–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230223202_4Suche in Google Scholar

Harrington, J. 2010. Phonetic analysis of speech corpora. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Harrison, P. 2013. Making accurate formant measurements: An empirical investigation of the influence of the measurement tool, analysis settings and speaker on formant measurement. York: University of York PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Hawkins, S. 2003. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31. 373–405.10.1016/j.wocn.2003.09.006Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, J. B. & P. Foulkes. 2016. The evolution of medial (-t-) over real and remembered time. Language 92. 298–330.10.1353/lan.2016.0036Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, J. B., J. B. Pierrehumbert, A. L. Walker & P. LaShell. 2015. Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition 139. 83–91.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.012Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, V. 2014. The definition of the relevant population and the collection of data for likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison. York: University of York PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, V. & P. Foulkes. 2015. The relevant population in forensic voice comparison: Effects of varying delimitations of social class and age. Speech Communication 66. 218–230.10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.006Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, K., E. A. Strand & M. D’Imperio. 1999. Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 27. 359–384.10.1006/jpho.1999.0100Suche in Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, D. F. & T. F. Jaeger. 2015. Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review 122. 148–203.10.1037/a0038695Suche in Google Scholar

Künzel, H. J. 2001. Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: The influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics 8. 80–99.10.1558/ijsll.v8i1.80Suche in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 2003. Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Lam, T. Q. & D. G. Watson. 2014. Repetition reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40. 829–843.10.1037/a0035780Suche in Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35(11). 1773–1781.10.1121/1.1918816Suche in Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–439. Amsterdam: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Suche in Google Scholar

Local, J. & G. Walker. 2012. How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42. 255–280.10.1017/S0025100312000187Suche in Google Scholar

Nygaard, L. C., M. S. Sommers & D. B. Pisoni. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science 5. 42–46.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.xSuche in Google Scholar

Olejarczuk, P., V. Kapatsinski & H. Baayen. 2018. Distributional learning is error-driven: The role of surprise in the acquisition of phonetic categories. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0020Suche in Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S., A. Urmanche, S. Wilman & J. Wiener. 2017. Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 79(2). 637–659.10.3758/s13414-016-1226-0Suche in Google Scholar

Rathcke, T., J. Stuart-Smith, B. Torsney & J. Harrington. 2017. The beauty in a beast: Minimising the effects of diverse recording quality on vowel formant measurements in sociophonetic real-time studies. Speech Communication 86. 24–41.10.1016/j.specom.2016.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Schleef, E. & Turton, D. 2016. Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects: Effects of function, context and predictability. English Language & Linguistics 22(1). 35–75.10.1017/S136067431600023XSuche in Google Scholar

Schuppler, B., W. A. van Dommelen, J. Koreman & M. Ernestus. 2012. How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level. Journal of Phonetics 40. 595–607.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. A. & S. Kawahara. 2018. Predictability and phonology: past, present & future. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2018-0042Suche in Google Scholar

Sonderegger, M. & J. Keshet. 2012. Automatic measurement of voice onset time using discriminative structured prediction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(6). 3965–3979.10.1121/1.4763995Suche in Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. 2000. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. 2002. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111(4). 1872–1891.10.1121/1.1458026Suche in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, J., M. Sonderegger, T. Rathcke & R. Macdonald. 2015. The private life of stops: VOT in a real-time corpus of spontaneous Glaswegian. Laboratory Phonology 6. 505–549.10.1515/lp-2015-0015Suche in Google Scholar

Tabachnick, B. G. & L. S. Fidell. 1996. Using multivariate statistics (3rd edn.). New York: Harper Collins.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomaschek, F., B. Tucker, M. Fasiolo & H. Baayen. 2018. Practice makes perfect: The consequences of lexical proficiency for articulation. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0018Suche in Google Scholar

Turk, A. & L. White. 1999. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 27. 171–206.10.1006/jpho.1999.0093Suche in Google Scholar

Turk, A. & S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 42. 444–472.10.1016/j.wocn.2006.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

Walker, A. & J. B. Hay. 2011. Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access. Laboratory Phonology 2. 219–237.10.1515/labphon.2011.007Suche in Google Scholar

Wedel, A., S. Jackson & A. Kaplan. 2013. Functional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Language and Speech 56(3). 395–417.10.1177/0023830913489096Suche in Google Scholar

West, P. 1999. Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties of English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics 27. 405–426.10.1006/jpho.1999.0102Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, C., G. S. Morrison, E. Enzinger & F. Ochoa. 2013. Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison–female voices. Speech Communication 55. 796–813.10.1016/j.specom.2013.01.011Suche in Google Scholar