The interdependence of frequency, predictability, and informativity in the segmental domain

References

Al-Nassir, A. A. 1993. Sibawayh the phonologist: A critical study of the phonetic and phonological theory of Sibawayh as presented in his treatise Al-Kitab. London [u.a.]: Kegan Paul Internat.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, J. E., J. M. Kahn & G. C. Pancani. 2012. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19(3). 505–512.10.3758/s13423-012-0233-ySuche in Google Scholar

Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56.10.1177/00238309040470010201Suche in Google Scholar

Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2006. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Acoustical Society of America Journal 119. 3048–3058.10.1121/1.2188331Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, E. & B. MacWhinney. 1987. Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 157–194. Hillsdale/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, A., J. Brenier, M. Gregory, C. Girand & D. Jurafsky. 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 92–111.10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, A., D. Jurafsky, E. Fosler-Lussier, C. Girand, M. Gregory & D. Gildea. 2003. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(2). 1001–1024.10.1121/1.1534836Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(03). 261–290.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, J., R. J. File-Muriel & R. N. D. Souza. 2016. Special reduction: A usage-based approach. Language and Cognition 8(3). 421–446.10.1017/langcog.2016.19Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. & J. Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37(4). 575–596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575Suche in Google Scholar

Carter, M. G. 2004. Sibawayhi. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.Suche in Google Scholar

Cieri, C., D. Graff, O. Kimball, D. Miller & K. Walker. 2005. Fisher English training part 2, transcripts. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Suche in Google Scholar

Cieri, C., D. Miller & K. Walker. 2004. The Fisher corpus: A resource for the next generations of speech-to-text. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 69–71. Lisbon, Portugal.Suche in Google Scholar

Clopper, C. G., R. Turnbull & R. S. Burdin. 2018. Assessing predictability effects in connected read speech. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0044Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2008. Using information content to predict phone deletion. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 90–98. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2012. Sign and signal: Deriving linguistic generalizations from information utility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation. http://purl.stanford.edu/wg646gh4444.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243–278.10.1515/lp-2015-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2017a. Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language 93(3). 569–597.10.1353/lan.2017.0037Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2017b. Not so fast: Fast speech correlates with lower lexical and structural information. Cognition 160. 27–34.10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. & E. Gleason. 2016. Simpler structure for more informative words: A longitudinal study. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & J. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1895–1900. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2016/papers/0331/index.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Daland, R. & K. Zuraw. 2018. Loci and locality of informational effects on phonetic implementation. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0045Suche in Google Scholar

Ernestus, M. 2014. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 142. 27–41.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

Fenk-Oczlon, G., A. Fenk & P. Faber. 2010. Frequency effects on the emergence of polysemy and homophony. International Journal of Information Technologies and Knowledge 4(2). 103–109.Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, P., G. Docherty, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel & V. Hughes. 2018. Three steps forward for predictability. Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0032Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, A. F. & T. F. Jaeger. 2008. Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Cogsci08), 939–944. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Gahl, S. 2008. Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3). 474–496.10.1353/lan.0.0035Suche in Google Scholar

Gahl, S., Y. Yao & K. Johnson. 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4). 789–806.10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

Godfrey, J. J. & E. Holliman. 1997. Switchboard-1 release 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, S. T. 2010. Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. In A. S. Pérez & M. A. Sánchez (eds.), A mosaic of corpus linguistics, 269–291. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, K., E. Hume, T. F. Jaeger & A. B. Wedel. 2016. The message shapes phonology. Ms. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/T_Florian_Jaeger/publication/309033386_The_Message_Shapes_Phonology/links/57fe71a908ae727564016264/The-Message-Shapes-Phonology.pdf?origin=publication_detail.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, K., E. Hume, T. F. Jaeger & A. B. Wedel. 2018. The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0027Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. 2006. Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23–62.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. 2013. Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 230.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00230Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. & E. Buz. 2017. Signal reduction and linguistic encoding. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 38–81. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118829516.ch3Suche in Google Scholar

Kawahara, S. & S. Lee. 2018. Truncation in message-oriented phonology: A case study using Korean vocative truncation. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0016Suche in Google Scholar

Kuperman, V. & J. Bresnan. 2012. The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4). 588–611.10.1016/j.jml.2012.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

Lewis, J. W. & L. A. Escobar. 1986. Suppression and enhancement in bivariate regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician) 35(1). 17–26.10.2307/2988294Suche in Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Suche in Google Scholar

Pate, J. K. & S. Goldwater. 2015. Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently. Journal of Memory and Language 78. 1–17.10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., H. J. Tily & E. Gibson. 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(9). 3526–3529.10.1073/pnas.1012551108Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 137–157. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.08pieSuche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3). 115–154.10.1177/00238309030460020501Suche in Google Scholar

Pitt, M., L. Dilley, K. Johnson, S. Kiesling, W. Raymond, E. Hume & E. Fosler-Lussier. 2007. Buckeye corpus of conversational speech (2nd release). Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.Suche in Google Scholar

Pluymaekers, M., M. Ernestus & R. H. Baayen. 2005. Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica 62. 146–159.10.1159/000090095Suche in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, S. 2014. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition 133(1). 140–155.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013Suche in Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27. 379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSuche in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. & S. Kawahara. 2018. Predictability and phonology: Past, present & future. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2018-0042Suche in Google Scholar

Tily, H. & V. Kuperman. 2012. Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(6). 3935–3940.10.1121/1.4765071Suche in Google Scholar

Turnbull, R. 2018. Patterns of probabilistic segment deletion/reduction in English and Japanese. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0033Suche in Google Scholar

van Son, R. J. J. H. & L. C. W. Pols. 2003. How efficient is speech? Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 25. 171–184.Suche in Google Scholar

van Son, R. & J. van Santen. 2005. Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication. Speech Communication 47. 100–123.10.1016/j.specom.2005.06.005Suche in Google Scholar

Wedel, A. B. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 247–274.10.1515/TLR.2006.010Suche in Google Scholar

Weide, R. 2008. The CMU pronunciation dictionary, release 0.7a. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Suche in Google Scholar

Zipf, G. K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar

Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner Publisher Company.Suche in Google Scholar