Truncation in message-oriented phonology: a case study using Korean vocative truncation

References

Anderson, S. 1981. Why phonology isn’t “natural”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(4). 493–539.Search in Google Scholar

Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56.10.1177/00238309040470010201Search in Google Scholar

Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2006. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(5). 3048–3059.10.1121/1.2188331Search in Google Scholar

Babinski, S. & C. Bowern. 2018. Mergers in Bardi: Contextual probability and predictors of sound change. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0024Search in Google Scholar

Bach, E. & R. Harms. 1972. How do languages get crazy rules? In R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 2002. Positional neutralization: A phonologization approach to typological patterns. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Blevins, J. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486357Search in Google Scholar

Blevins, J. 2005. The role of phonological predictability in sound change: Previleged reduction in Oceanic reduplicated substraings. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2). 517–526.10.1353/ol.2005.0028Search in Google Scholar

Boomershine, A., K-C. Hall, E. Hume & K. Johnson. 2008. The impact of allophony vs. contrast on speech perception. In P. Avery, E. Dresher & K. Rice (eds.), Contrast in phonology: Perception and acquisition, 143–172. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208603.2.145Search in Google Scholar

Browman, C. & L. Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251.10.1017/S0952675700001019Search in Google Scholar

Casali, R. 1996. Resolving hiatus. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Coetzee, A. W. & S. Kawahara. 2013. Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1). 47–89.10.1007/s11049-012-9179-zSearch in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, U. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243–278.10.1515/lp-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Flemming, E. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Flemming, E. 2001. Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18(1). 7–44.10.1017/S0952675701004006Search in Google Scholar

Foulkes, P., G. Docherty, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel & V. Hughes. 2018. Three steps forward for predictability: Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0032Search in Google Scholar

Gafos, A. 1998. A-templatic reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 515–527.10.1162/002438998553851Search in Google Scholar

Hall, K.-C. 2009. A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, K.-C., E. Hume, F. T. Jaeger & A. Wedel. 2016. The message shapes phonology. Ms. UBC, University of Canterbury, University of Rochester, University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, K.-C., E. Hume, F. T. Jaeger & A. Wedel. 2018. The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0027Search in Google Scholar

Hume, E. & K. Johnson. 2003. The impact of partial phonological contrast on speech perception. Proceedings of ICPhS 2003 XV. 2385–2388.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, E. & F. Mailhot. 2013. The role of entropy and surprisal in phonologization and language change. In A. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound patterns: Approaches to phonologization, 29–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, L. 1977. Phonologization. In A. Juilland (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, 407–418. Saratoga: Alama Libri.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, J. & A. Mester. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese: Theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 49–73.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, J. & A. Mester. 2004. Morphological contrast and merger: Ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 20. 1–19.10.1515/jjl-2004-0103Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, F. T. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23–62.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Jun, J. 2014. Hiatus resolution and opacity in Seoul Korean verbal paradigm. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 20(3). 379–401.10.17959/sppm.2014.20.3.379Search in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, D., A. Bell, M. Gregory & W. Raymond. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.13jurSearch in Google Scholar

Kawahara, S. 2006. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 82(3). 536–574.10.1353/lan.2006.0146Search in Google Scholar

Kawahara, S. 2015. Geminate devoicing in Japanese loanwords: Theoretical and experimental investigations. Language and Linguistic Compass 9(4). 168–182.10.1111/lnc3.12130Search in Google Scholar

Kawahara, S. 2016. Japanese geminate devoicing once again: Insights from Information Theory. Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 8. 43–62.Search in Google Scholar

Keating, P. A. 1988. The phonology-phonetics interface. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 1, 281–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kingston, J. & R. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454.10.1353/lan.1994.0023Search in Google Scholar

Kurisu, K. 2001. The phonology of morpheme realization. Santa Cruz, CA: UCSC dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kurumada, C. & F. T. Jaeger. 2015. Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 83. 152–178.10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Lubowicz, A. 2003. Contrast preservation in phonological mappings. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Maekawa, K. 2003. Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese: Its design and evaluation. Proceedings of ISCA and IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition (SSPR2003) 7–12.Search in Google Scholar

Mahowald, K., E. Fedorenko, S. T. Piantadosi & E. Gibson. 2013. Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts. Cognition 126. 313–318.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.010Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. & A. Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., University of Massachusetts and Rutgers University.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. & A. Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. & A. Prince. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In M. Gonzalez (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24, 333–379. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. & A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Padgett, J. 2009. Systemic contrasts and Catalan rhotics. The Linguistic Review 26(4). 431–463.10.1515/tlir.2009.016Search in Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., H. Tily & E. Gibson. 2012. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122. 280–291.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Pierce, J. R. 1980. An introduction to information theory: Symbols, signals and noise. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, A. & P. Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759400Search in Google Scholar

Revithiadou, A. 1999. Headmost accent wins: Head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, K. 2006. On the patterning of voiced stops in loanwords in Japanese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 26. 11–22.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, C. 2007. Gaps and repairs at the phonology-morphology interface. Journal of Linguistics 43(1). 197–221.10.1017/S0022226706004488Search in Google Scholar

Rice, C. & S. Blaho (eds.). 2010. Modeling ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, D. E., E. Hume & J. Hay. 2015. Morphological predictability shapes the phonetic realization of morphemes. Talk delivered at the Linguistic Society of New Zealand Conference, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, December 14–15th.Search in Google Scholar

Sano, S. 2018. Durational contrast in gemination and informativity. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0011Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, C. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT MA Thesis.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. 2016. The role of predictability in shaping human language sound patterns. Talk presented at “The predictability symposium”, Sydney, December 10th.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. & S. Kawahara. 2017. Effects of Surprisal and Entropy on vowel duration in Japanese. Language and Speech.10.1177/0023830917737331Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. & S. Kawahara. 2018. Predictability and phonology: Past, present and future. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2018-0042Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, J, C. Han & Y. Ma. 2014. Surviving truncation: Informativity at the interface of morphology and phonology. Morphology 24. 407–432.10.1007/s11525-014-9249-5Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, D. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, 313–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, D. 2001/2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (eds.), The nature of the word, 151–179. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262083799.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Turnbull, R. 2018. Patterns of probabilistic segment deletion/reduction in English and Japanese. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0033Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Search in Google Scholar