Historical shifts with the into-causative construction in American English

References

Baker, Paul. 2009. The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3). 312–337.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bakSuche in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2011. Times may change but we’ll always have money: A corpus driven examination of vocabulary change in four diachronic corpora. Journal of English Linguistics 39. 65–88.10.1177/0075424210368368Suche in Google Scholar

Bridgeman, Lorraine, Dale Dillinger, Constance Higgins, P. David Seaman & Floyd A Shank. 1965. More classes of verbs in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Suche in Google Scholar

Christie, Elizabeth. 2011. Investigating the differences between the English way-construction and the fake reflexive resultative construction. In Lisa Armstrong (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference of the Canadian linguistic association. http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cla-acl/actes2011/Christie_2011.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385 + million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (19902008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14. 159–190.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02davSuche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2011. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25. 447–465.10.1093/llc/fqq018Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2012a. Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400 million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7. 121–157.10.3366/cor.2012.0024Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2012b. Examining recent changes in English: Some methodological issues. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), Handbook on the history of English: Rethinking approaches to the history of English, 263–287. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2014. Examining syntactic variation in English: The importance of corpus design and corpus size. English Language and Linguistics 19(3). 1–35.10.17960/ell.2013.19.3.001Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2015. The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar. Linguistic Vanguard 1(1). 305–312.10.1515/lingvan-2014-1001Suche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Stefan Hartmann. 2016. Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). 1–12.10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057Suche in Google Scholar

Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning (eds.). 1996. Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Suche in Google Scholar

Gawlik, Oskar. 2013. On the transitive “out of-ing” complementation pattern in Contemporary Spoken American English: A corpus-based study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49. 167–183.10.1515/psicl-2013-0006Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1997. Making one’s way through the data. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 29–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235392.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: Constructionist approaches in context. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2003. Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 225–236. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2006. Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2). 243–257.10.1515/CLLT.2006.012Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Suche in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Mark Davies. 2016. The into-causative construction in English: A construction-based perspective. English Language and Linguistics 20(1). 55–83.10.1017/S1360674315000271Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1996. Lexical semantics and syntactic structure. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 487–507. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in late modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6. 106–131.10.1017/S1360674302001065Suche in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2012. Making the case for construction grammar. In Hans Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-based construction grammar, 31–69. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2013. Sign-based construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Mondorf, Britta. 2010. Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language Variation and Change 22. 397–421.10.1017/S0954394510000165Suche in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77. 766–797.10.1353/lan.2001.0221Suche in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Gunter. 2007. Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in early and late modern English. English Studies 88(2). 217–233.10.1080/00138380601042824Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 1991. On verbs governing in -ing in present-day English. English Studies 72(1). 55–72.10.1080/00138389108598733Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2000. Corpora and complementation: Tracing sentential complementation patterns of nouns, adjectives, and verbs over the last three centuries. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2002. Complements and constructions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2005. Lexico-grammatical innovation in current British and American English: A case study on the transitive into -ing pattern with evidence from the Bank of English corpus. Studia Neophilologica 77. 171–187.10.1080/00393270500384791Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2006. Emergent alternation in complement selection: The spread of the transitive into -ing construction in British and American English. English Linguistics 34(4). 312–331.10.1177/0075424206293600Suche in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2011. Changes in complementation in British and American English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230305199Suche in Google Scholar

Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. Cognitive complexity and the establishment of -ing constructions with retrospective verbs in modern English. In Marina Dossena & Charles Jones (eds.), Insights into late modern English, 197–220. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Gries. 2007. Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Kӧpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 265–281. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.136.17wulSuche in Google Scholar