Home Syntactic structures of Mandarin purposives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Syntactic structures of Mandarin purposives

  • Wei-wen Roger Liao EMAIL logo and Tzong-hong Jonah Lin
Published/Copyright: January 10, 2019

Abstract

This paper investigates three constructions in Mandarin, all of which convey a purposive/teleological meaning, including the lai purposive, the hao purposive, and the bare purposive. Despite the fact that each type of purposive clause in Mandarin occurs at the right edge of a sentence, it is argued that none of the purposive clause is a genuine right adjunct in the underlying syntactic structure. On the other hand, our analysis shows that the lai purposive employs complementation of a secondary predicate, the hao purposive involves conjunction of two clauses, and the bare purposive should be analyzed as left adjunction that is stranded in the right edge after verb movement. The evidence for our analysis is drawn from subject and object gaps, the ba-construction in Mandarin, agentivity, and linear ordering of multiple purposive clauses. This work thus demonstrates representative cases where a structure that appears to involve right adjunction may in fact employ no right adjunction at all. The conclusion is thus consistent with the prediction of Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA).

Acknowledgements

The authors’ names are listed in alphabetical order. Jonah Lin and Roger Liao contributed equally to this work. An earlier version of this paper has been presented at FOSS at Academia Sinica, and unpublished versions of the paper have been circulated and cited in the Taiwan linguistic circle. We thank the audience in the venue and the colleagues who commented on earlier drafts of our paper. We would also like to thank Kuo-hua Wang for helping us at the early stage of the project. We are deeply grateful for the Editorial Board and four anonymous reviewers of Linguistics for their insightful questions and constructive comments. All errors remain ours alone.

References

Aoun, Joseph & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 2008. Ellipsis and missing objects. In Carlos P. Otero Robert Freidin & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 251–274. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591–656.Search in Google Scholar

Browning, Marguerite. 1987. Null operator constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Cheung, Lawrence. 2009. Dislocation focus construction in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18. 197–232.10.1007/s10831-009-9046-zSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Escribano, José & Luis González. 2004. Head-final effects and the nature of modification. Journal of Linguistics 40(1). 1–43.10.1017/S0022226703002317Search in Google Scholar

Faraci, Robert. 1974. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and for-phrases. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng. 2006. (In)definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23. 135–183.10.1093/jos/ffl001Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan & Lie-jiong Xu. 2001. Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 39. 1117–1148.10.1515/ling.2001.043Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 521–574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64. 274–311.10.2307/415435Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James, Yen-hui Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1991. Purpose clauses: Syntax, thematic and semantics of English purpose. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-3478-1Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–391.10.4324/9780203429204-7Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard & Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 678–720.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1987. Duration phrases: Distributions and interpretations. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 22. 27–65.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2006. Chinese ba. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 1. 374–468. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2014a. Born empty. Lingua 151. 43–68.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2014b. Thematic hierarchy and derivational economy. Language and Linguistics 15. 295–339.10.1177/1606822X14520660Search in Google Scholar

Liao, W.-W. Roger. 2014. Process-related durative phrases as numeral-classifier phrases in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 12(2). 59–80.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: University of California Irvine dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2009. Parametrizing complementation. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 89–105.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2015. Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Syntax 18. 320–342.10.1111/synt.12032Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T.-H. Jonah & Yu-Shan Huang. 2015. Structures of the Mandarin gei constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24. 309–338.10.1007/s10831-015-9132-3Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Fenghsi. 1997. An aspectual analysis of ba. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6. 51–99.10.1023/A:1008287920948Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2009. Ranking the Linear Correspondence Axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2). 239–276.10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.239Search in Google Scholar

Minkoff, Seth. 1994. How some so-called “thematic roles” that select animate arguments are generated, and how these roles inform control. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew & Tanmoy Bhattacharya. 2003. Obligatory overt wh-movement in a wh-in-situ language. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 127–142.10.1162/002438903763255940Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew & Zoe Wu. 2002. IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of sentence-final particles. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 67–99.10.1023/A:1013710111615Search in Google Scholar

Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-9163-8Search in Google Scholar

Takita, Kensuke. 2009. If Chinese is head-initial, Japanese cannot be. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(1). 41–61.10.1007/s10831-009-9038-zSearch in Google Scholar

Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990a. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990b. Finite and nonfinite clauses in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 1. 191–214.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, C-C. Jane. 1994. Conditions on the distribution of postverbal duration and frequency phrases in Chinese revisited. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2. 641–669.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Sze-Wing. 2002. Extraction in control structure in Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale 31(2). 261–272.10.3406/clao.2002.1616Search in Google Scholar

Ting, Jen & Miller Chang. 2004. The category of gei in Mandarin Chinese and grammaticalization. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 2. 45–74.Search in Google Scholar

Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2015. A case of V2 in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 36. 81–108.10.1515/scl-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Whelpton, Matthew. 1995. The syntax and semantics of infinitives of result in English. Oxford: University of Oxford dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Whelpton, Matthew. 2001. Elucidation of a telic infinitive. Journal of Linguistics 37. 313–337.10.1017/S0022226701008842Search in Google Scholar

Whelpton, Matthew. 2002. Locality and control with infinitives of result. Natural Language Semantics 10. 167–210.10.1023/A:1022107429786Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, C.-H. Teresa. 2002. Serial verb construction and verbal compounding. In Sze-Wing Tang & Chen-Sheng Luther Liu (eds.), On the formal way to Chinese languages, 143–162. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 75–94.10.2307/818523Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2001. The structures of depictive and resultative constructions in Chinese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22. 191–221.10.21248/zaspil.22.2001.107Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-01-10
Published in Print: 2019-01-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2018-0032/html
Scroll to top button