Abstract
Objectives
Modern obstetrics confronts a rise in caesarean sections (CS). Prevention of unnecessary primary CS is a global priority. Women face intense psychological and physiological challenges during childbirth. Fear and anxiety during labour reduce women’s self-confidence and empowerment. Yoga is a body-mind practice that lowers maternal fear and anxiety and helps relax pelvic floor muscles during labour. The study examined whether yoga practice in pregnancy influences CS rate in primiparous singleton pregnant women, labour pain intensity and epidural analgesia requests at delivery ward admission.
Methods
We conducted a single-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing yoga to standard obstetric care in pregnancy. A total of 214 participants were randomised, 106 in yoga and 108 in controls. Weekly 90-min yoga classes were led by a certified yoga teacher’s supervision. Every pregnant woman in the interventional group completed 12 yoga sessions.
Results
Yoga group had a lower total CS due to less frequent In-labour CS (p=0.004) and a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal birth (p=0.009). They experienced less pain intensity during labour (p<0.001), and there was no difference in epidural analgesia requests.
Conclusions
Engaging in yoga during pregnancy reduces the rate of In-labour CS, decreases discomfort and encourages spontaneous vaginal birth in primiparous singleton pregnant women.
Introduction
Practicing yoga during pregnancy provides many benefits and helps pregnant women develop their mental and physical health and build a connection with their unborn babies [1], [2], [3].
Childbirth is physically and mentally demanding. Yoga in pregnancy reduces maternal fear and anxiety during labour and allows women to labour without epidurals or drugs. Yoga may relieve discomfort and assist pregnant women to control their labour, improving satisfaction [4], 5].
Yoga is a body and mind practice. It is a system of various poses (asana) and stretching exercises combined with breathing (pranayama) and meditation (dharana) [6].
Yoga’s relaxation component helps women work and manage labour pain without medication. Anxiety and fear lower women’s self-confidence and empowerment, which is crucial during labour [7].
Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising globally, including 57.55 % in Turkey and 55.8 % in Brazil, posing a challenge to modern obstetrics [8]. CS rates in Europe rose from 11.2 to 25 %. Better neonatal and maternal outcomes do not support a significant rise in operative delivery [9]. CS increases global maternal morbidity due to abnormal placentation, peripartum hysterectomy, and obstetric haemorrhage [10], 11].
In 2015, the WHO recommended that CS rates not exceed 10–15 per 100 live births to improve foetal and mother outcomes [12]. Molina et al. revised WHO guidelines. They observed that WHO member states with a national CS rate of 19 % had lower maternal and newborn mortality. Hence, the limitations (15 %) were set too low [13].
Preventing needless CS remains a global priority. Various strategies have been implemented to reduce the proportion of CS to a reasonable level. Evidence shows that yoga during pregnancy is safe and may be better for physical and mental health than walking and typical prenatal workouts [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Pharmacological control of labour pain using invasive techniques like epidural analgesia is helpful but can cause difficulties, and adverse effects and prolong the second stage of labour [23], [24], [25]. Some pregnant women are hesitant to use epidural analgesia, therefore non-pharmacological labour pain treatment is preferable.
This study examined how yoga during pregnancy affects the CS rate. The secondary outcomes evaluated if prenatal yoga reduced labour pain intensity and the request for epidural analgesia.
Materials and methods
Study setting
This prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial ran from May 2019 to September 2023. The Ethics Committee of the Maribor University Clinical Centre gave written consent and approval under Number UKC-MB-KME-29/17. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier no. NCT03941041. All women gave informed, signed consent for the study. The study comprised healthy primiparous women 18 or older with singleton pregnancies up to 14 weeks. We selected only pregnant women between 20 and 35 years old who were “yoga naive” and had a BMI of 18–30 kg/m2 and a height of 160 cm or more to ensure group homogeneity. Multiple pregnancies, foetal malformations, vaginal bleeding, cervical insufficiency, cerclage, placenta previa, chronic diseases (hypertension, type 1 and 2 diabetes, epilepsy, heart and lung diseases, haematological diseases), reproductive system anomalies, and pregnant women who practice yoga outside of pregnancy were excluded. In Maribor, patients were recruited at their gynaecologist during antenatal visits. The study included singleton primiparas. After receiving thorough study information and signed informed consent, the chief researcher’s assistants randomised participants.
Randomisation
Randomisation was done by drawing closed, opaque envelopes with group allocations. A sequential code was given to pregnant women after consent. Afterwards, participants drew an envelope and were assigned to the research yoga or control group. Researchers had no control over group selection. The delivery room staff and data evaluators were blind to the group selection.
Clinical parameters
Demographic data included maternal age, BMI at randomisation, BMI at delivery, increased BMI during pregnancy, and maternal education. Labour criteria included gestational age at birth, foetal presentation, onset, mode, operative birth, episiotomy rate, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd and 4th-degree perineal laceration rate. Oxytocin use in the early and/or second stages of labour, maximal doses utilised at delivery, rate of epidural analgesia requests during maternity unit admission, and rate of intravenous or epidural analgesia use. We also recorded the Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS) for labour pain at the end of the latent phase of the first stage of labour before administering epidural and/or intravenous analgesia when the cervix was 3–6 cm dilated. VAS rates pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain possible). We measured the duration of labour in minutes from the beginning of regular uterine contraction until the delivery of the baby.
Birth records were used to determine the indication for In-labour CS, cervix uteri dilatation before CS, rates of induced labour that ended within CS, and pathological cardiotocograph (CTG) rates according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification [26].
Data on neonates included birth weight, length, head circumference, gender, Apgar scores <7 in the first and fifth minutes, and NICU admission rate.
Study intervention
Interventional and control volunteers were randomly assigned to this study. Control group women received routine prenatal care. An internationally licensed and experienced prenatal yoga teacher led weekly yoga. The teacher was certified in Hatha Yoga’s “Yoga in daily life” curriculum [6]. The exercise plan was strict. One yoga session lasted 90 min. Physical activity began in the 14th week of pregnancy and lasted until birth. Every pregnant woman completed 12 yoga sessions.
Deep relaxation, yoga postures, breathing exercises, and meditation comprise prenatal yoga practice. The first 7–10 min were spent relaxing on their left side, followed by yoga postures, stretching and 20–30 min of breathing and meditation. Selected yoga postures strengthen core and pelvic floor muscles. A 2–3-min relaxation was done between yoga poses and before meditation. Visualisation, which visually and acoustically strengthens mother-child attachment, was part of the meditation. The Yoga intervention included selected postures (Asana) from the “Yoga in Daily Life system” [6].
Postures have names written in the Sanskrit language:
Sarva hitta asanas:
rolling on the floor with bent legs,
shoulder rotation,
shoulder raising,
lateral bending,
chest expansion,
swimming movements,
hand and palm exercises, and
tug of war.
Marjari (cat position)
Hasta uttanasana (arms across head)
Akarna Dhanurasana (bow tension pose)
Meru prishthasana (forward, left, right flexion)
Sumeru asana (upward stretch)
Sasang asana (rabbit pose)
Meru akaranasana (spine stretch)
Skarandasana (shoulder pose)
Virasana (sitting on bent knees)
Trikonasana (triangle pose)
Tadasana (palm).
Statistics
Analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28 on study data in an electronic database. We estimated the sample size by comparing the proportion of CS from two years of retrospective observations at our perinatal department. The study has 95 % confidence and 80 % power. For the projected 22 % of CS in the control group and 12 % in the yoga group, 218 samples are needed. Visualisation and Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests were used to examine numerical variables for normality distribution. Proportions, median with first and third quartile range, and mean with standard deviation were descriptive metrics. Categorical variables were analysed using the χ2-test and Fisher’s Exact test. Numerical continuous variables with normal distribution were tested using a parametric Independent-samples t-test. Non-parametric numerical variables and ordinal variables were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was determined at p<0.05. A binary logistic regression study examined how variables affect the chance of a CS. The analysis examined linearity, marker relationships, and multi collinearity.
Results
Between May 2019 and September 2023, 236 pregnant women were recruited. Five women were eliminated before randomisation: three for not fulfilling recruitment criteria and two for not participating. Two hundred thirty-one women were randomly assigned; 214 (92 %) finished the trial. One hundred sixteen were allocated for yoga and 115 for the control group. Figure 1 shows the CONSORT study flowchart.

CONSORT flowchart of the study.
Demographic data demonstrates that both study groups share identical characteristics. In the Yoga group, the average age was 29.6 ± 3.9 years, whereas in the Control group, it was 28.4 ± 4.5 years, and the remaining features of both groups were comparable (Table 1).
Demographic data.
| Yoga (n=106) | Control (n=108) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 29.6 ± 3.9 | 28.4 ± 4.5 | 0.051 |
| BMI-entry | 22.8 ± 2.9 | 23.6 ± 3.4 | 0.237 |
| BMI-delivery | 27.7 ± 3.8 | 28.0 ± 5.6 | 0.254 |
| Weight-entry, kg | 64.8 ± 9.4 | 66.6 ± 10.0 | 0.256 |
| Weight-delivery, kg | 78.7 ± 11.5 | 80.5 ± 12.1 | 0.192 |
| Change of weight, % | 13.8 ± 5.8 | 12.4 ± 11.4 | 0.063 |
| <College graduate | 71 | 82 | 0.147 |
| ≥College graduate | 35 | 26 | 0.147 |
-
The data are mean and standard deviation, BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); n, number of cases.
Our study included 196 NTSV (nulliparous term singleton vertex) women and two control group preterm vertex vaginal deliveries. All 16 women with breech-presented babies had CS. The overall CS rate was 22 %, and among NTSV women 17 % (Table 2).
Labour statistics.
| All n=214 |
Control n=108 |
Yoga n=106 |
p-Value | Relative risk [95 % CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All CS – NSTV | 34 n=196 | 24 n=98 (27 %) | 10 n=9 (10 %) | 0.008 | 0.417 [0.211, 0.780] |
| Birth outcome | |||||
| Spontaneous vaginala | 108 | 45 (42 %) | 63 (59 %) | 0.009 | 1.426 [1.086, 1.874] |
| In-labour CSb | 31 | 23 (21 %) | 8 (8 %) | 0.004 | 0.354 [0.166, 0.757] |
| Prelabour CS | 16 | 6 (6 %) | 10 (9 %) | 0.281 | |
| Vacuum delivery | 13 | 7 (6 %) | 6 (6 %) | 0.801 | |
| Vaginal birth after induction | 46 | 27 (25 %) | 19 (17 %) | 0.208 | |
| Labour onset | |||||
| Spontaneous | 135 | 62 (57 %) | 73 (69 %) | 0.082 | |
| Induced | 65 | 40 (37 %) | 25 (24 %) | 0.032 | |
| Episiotomy | 80 | 39 (36 %) | 41 (38 %) | 0.720 | |
| Perineal laceration | |||||
| 1st and 2nd degree | 55 | 32 (30 %) | 23 (22 %) | 0.049 | |
| 3rd and 4th degree | 5 | 4 (4 %) | 1 (1 %) | 0.214 | |
| Gestational age | |||||
| ≤36 weeks | 2 | 2 (2 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.159 | |
| ≥37 weeks | 175 | 84 (78 %) | 91 (86 %) | 0.126 | |
| ≥41 weeks | 37 | 22 (20 %) | 15 (14 %) | 0.229 | |
| Oxytocin max. dosagec, mE/min | 6.59 ± 5.69 | 6.25 ± 5.42 | 6.94 ± 6.00 | 0.375 | |
| Pain management | |||||
| Epidural | 77 | 44 (41 %) | 33 (31 %) | 0.171 | |
| Intravenous | 101 | 48 (44 %) | 53 (50 %) | 0.332 | |
| Request for epidural analgesia | 102 | 54 (50 %) | 48 (45 %) | 0.327 | |
| VASd | 6.49 ± 2.00 | 7.02 ± 1.91 | 5.95 ± 2.04 | <0.001 | |
| Length of birthf, min | 165 | n=77 292.8 ± 124.5 |
n=88 312.47 ± 147.3 |
0.169 | |
| Pathological CTG | 47 | 30 (28 %) | 17 (16 %) | 0.038 |
-
NTSV, nulliparous term singleton vertex; n, number of cases. The Effect Size (Cohen’s d) for VAS is 0.555. a,bRelative risk as a measure of the effect size for the Chi-squared test is presented only for primary outcome variables, cCI, confidence interval. Oxytocin in mE/min; mean and standard deviation, dVAS, visual analogue scale at the end of the latent phase of the first stage of labour; mean and standard deviation. fLength of labour in minutes. CTG, cardiotocography; CS, caesarean section.
Most CSs were In-labour CSs (66 %). The yoga group had a significantly reduced NTSV CS rate (p=0.008) and less frequent In-labour CS (p=0.004) across all participants. Prelabour-CS were primarily performed due to breech presentation in both groups, with no significant difference in Prelabour-CS rates between them.
The control group underwent more labour induction (p=0.032). Yoga significantly increased spontaneous vaginal birth (p=0.009). The yoga group experienced no preterm births. A few third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations were noted in both groups, whereas the control group had more first- and second-degree lacerations (p=0.049). Both groups demonstrated the same episiotomy rate. The groups showed similar birth lengths. Epidural analgesia requests were similar at birth ward admission (Table 2).
The mean pain intensity indicated by VAS was significantly different at the end of the latent phase first stage of labour when the cervix was 3–6 cm dilated (p<0.001). Pathological CTG was more common in controls (p=0.038).
Table 3 shows indications for In-labour CS, cervical dilation at CS, and rates of induced vaginal birth that ended with CS. Given the limited number of patients with In-labour CS (n=31) in both the yoga (n=8) and control (n=23) groups, we applied Fisher’s Exact test to analyse the difference (Table 3).
In-labour CS statistics.
| All n=31 |
Control n=23 |
Yoga n=8 |
p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicationa | ||||
| Non-reassuring foetal statusb | 11 | 6 (26 %) | 5 (63 %) | 0.094 |
| Dystocia | 17 | 14 (60 %) | 3 (37 %) | 0.412 |
| Breech + regular contractions | 3 | 3 (13 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.549 |
| Dilatation of cervix at CSa | ||||
| ≤6 cm | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.433 |
| ≥7 cm | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0.432 |
| Induced labour ended with ILCS | 19 | 13 (32 %) | 6 (32 %) | 0.433 |
-
aFisher exact test. bNon-reassuring foetal status: pathological CTG according to FIGO classification (27) or pre-acidosis–foetal blood pH between 7.20 and 7.25 or acidosis – foetal blood pH<7.20. n, number of cases.
Further investigation found that dystocia in 60 % of the control group necessitated In-labour CS, while yoga practitioners experienced in 37 %. We found no difference in induced labour ended with In-labour CS among the groups (Table 3).
Certain variables’ effects on CS termination were examined using binary logistic regression (Table 4). Linearity, marker association, and multicollinearity were examined. The analysis covered 212 participants. The model was significant (χ2=20.566; p=0.002), explaining 16.4 % (Nagelkerke R2) of the variation in In-labour CS. Only group membership and pathological CTG affected In-labour CS.
Binary logistic regression of individual variable predictions for CS.
| B | SE | Wald | df | p-Value | Exp (B) | 95 % CI za Exp (B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Gestational age | 0.021 | 0.129 | 0.026 | 1 | 0.872 | 1.021 | 0.793 | 1.314 |
| Neonatal weight | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.859 | 1 | 0.354 | 1.001 | 0.999 | 1.002 |
| Head circumference | −0.006 | 0.110 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.959 | 0.994 | 0.801 | 1.234 |
| Pathological CTG | 1.619 | 0.492 | 10.835 | 1 | 0.001 | 5.050 | 1.925 | 13.246 |
| Labour induction | 0.427 | 0.427 | 1.003 | 1 | 0.317 | 1.533 | 0.664 | 3.537 |
| Groups | −0.981 | 0.455 | 4.641 | 1 | 0.031 | 0.375 | 0.154 | 0.915 |
| Constant | −3.801 | 3.959 | 0.922 | 1 | 0.337 | 0.022 | ||
| R2=0.093 (Cox & Snell), 0.164 (Nagelkerke R2). Model χ2 (1)=20.566, p=0.002. | ||||||||
-
B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom; p, statistical probability; CI, confidence interval.
Analysis of neonatal data revealed no variations (Table 5).
Neonatal statistics.
| All n=214 |
Control n=108 |
Yoga n=106 |
p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight, ga | 3.421 ± 396 | 3.406 ± 402 | 3.436 ± 391 | 0.583a |
| Length, cma | 50.45 ± 1.94 | 50.3 ± 1.8 | 50.6 ± 2.0 | 0.263 |
| Head circumferencea | 34.5 ± 1.9 | 43.4 ± 1.4 | 34.6 ± 2.4 | 0.095 |
| Gender, m/f | 98/116 | 47/61 | 51/55 | 0.500 |
| APGAR≤7 at 1 min | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0.221 |
| APGAR≤7 at 5 min | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0.636 |
| NICU admission | 27 | 17 | 10 | 0.164 |
-
n, number of cases; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; amean and standard deviation data.
Discussion
Our research indicates that yoga decreases the need for CS in healthy singleton primiparous women. We discovered a connection between pregnant women who engage in yoga and an increased probability of experiencing a spontaneous vaginal birth (p=0.009). Additionally, these women had a reduced possibility of undergoing a CS due to a lower occurrence of In-labour CS (p=0.004).
A Caesarean section is a surgical procedure that is performed when there is a medical need to protect the life and well-being of both the baby and the mother. Operative delivery is recommended when it is deemed to be a safer option than vaginal birth [27]. CS can be performed before or during labour. Several studies have examined the impact of yoga practice on delivery outcomes; however, they have not precisely specified whether prelabour or in labour CS were considered [17], [18], [19], [20]. Ostrovsky pointed out that existing evidence on prenatal yoga and birth outcomes lacks information regarding the timing and indications for CS [28].
One-third of CS was conducted before labour in our study, with similar rates in both groups.
The majority of CS was done during labour (66 %). CS were rare in the intervention group but common in the control group. Yoga during pregnancy reduces In-labour CS rates, as shown by our research.
No published studies have evaluated the association between yoga practice and In-labour CS, making it impossible to compare our results.
The analysis of indications for In-labour CS reveals that pregnant women from the control group saw a higher number of deliveries attributable to dystocia. However, the disparity was not statistically significant. Labour dystocia, characterised by slow cervical dilatation and foetal descent, is caused by a multitude of reasons. The pathophysiology of labour dystocia is not well-studied, creating opportunities for translational research focused on personalised labour management, specifically examining uterine metabolism and foetal position. Improved diagnostic methods and personalised therapy for labour dystocia could potentially result in enhanced results [29].
Yoga and midwifery care were combined in a randomised controlled trial by Jahdi et al. on pregnant women in their second trimester [17]. This study found a significant decrease in CS in yoga-practicing women. CS time: before or during labour is not mentioned in their report.
Thirty pregnant women practised yoga, and 30 received regular midwifery care. This calls into question these findings’ interpretation. Tripepi et al. emphasise the significance of sample size in the design of studies and the subsequent interpretation of findings in clinical medicine [30]. Our study included 214 pregnant women – 108 in the control group and 106 in the yoga group.
We found 27 % of control underwent CS, while Jahdi et al. reported 50 %. In their trial, there was a high rate of induction (57 % in the control group and 29 % in the interventional group). This may have influenced the CS result.
Apart from Jahdi et al., 37 % of the control and 24 % of women in the yoga group had induced labour in our experiment. Our study examined how labour induction influences CS using regression. While induction rates varied widely between groups, we found no correlation between induction and caesarean termination.
Induction of labour is one of the most frequently performed procedures during labour. The percentage of newborns after labour induction is 25 % in high-income nations but lower in low- and middle-income countries [31]. The WHO recommends 10 % birthing inductions, whereas Poland has above 43 % [32]. Our study’s labour induction rate for young, healthy primiparous women from both groups is too high.
Labour requires conscious maternal expulsive efforts, especially during the second stage. Inadequate mother participation can contribute to an increase in CS and interventional deliveries [33]. Mohyadin et al. found that the presence of fear and anxiety related to labour pain is associated with higher rates of CS in multiple countries [19]. Therefore, yoga, meditation, and breath-awareness assume greater significance throughout pregnancy and childbirth. A meta-analysis found that prenatal yoga had a substantial impact on reducing labour pain [34].
Pregnant women who engage in yoga have more abilities in managing labour pain, are skilled in relaxing and calming methods, have reduced stress and anxiety during childbirth, and show improved regulation of plasma cortisol release through the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis [15], 35].
Primiparous women have three times the risk of CS as multiparous women [36], 37]. In a meta-analysis of 10 trials on CS rate decrease, Chaillet and Dumont found a significant reduction [38]. The delivery hospital also affects the CS rate [39]. Slovenia has the second-lowest neonatal mortality rate in Europe (0.7 per 1,000 live birth deliveries) without CS at the mother’s request and a 21.4 % CS rate. Still, CS rates increased by 7.5 % between 2016 and 2021 [40].
Due to our nation’s rising number of CS, we intend to develop a new antenatal exercise that could minimise primary CS in healthy primiparas. We strictly selected pregnant women to ensure group homogeneity and avoid recognised risk factors for CS. One criterion for exclusion in our study was a BMI of 30 or higher. Among the research pregnant women, none, irrespective of the group, had a BMI of 30. This sample may not truly represent most pregnant women, especially in the America. The European Health Survey found 28.4 % of EU women overweight. Malta had 24 % obese women, Latvia 23.4 %, and Slovenia 21 % [41]. Our participants’ BMI may be related to women’s increased awareness of obesity’s negative impacts on health and life expectancy in our society.
While yoga can have many benefits during pregnancy, its specific impact on birth length might not be as significant as anticipated. In contrast to Corrigan et al. [2] we found similar birth lengths between the groups which is most likely due to group homogeneity. The benefits of yoga manifest in other areas, such as reduced stress or improved maternal health.
Physical activity is essential for pregnancy and is supported by research. According to the recommendations given by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG), healthy pregnant women should exercise 150 min each week. Exercise during pregnancy reduces CS, premature birth, and increases vaginal delivery [42], 43]. Our study found that yoga during pregnancy has the same benefits as ACOG-recommended moderate-intensity physical exercise and should be promoted as a safe, effective antenatal activity. Yoga helped pregnant women gain self-confidence, competence, empowerment, and physical benefits. These skills keep pregnant women calm and in control during labour [15].
Limitations
This study identified the positive effects of yoga, yet it is important to acknowledge its limitations. We carefully chose the groups to monitor various aspects of caesarean deliveries. Hence, further investigation is required to extend the generality to a broader cohort of expectant mothers. Another constraint is the utilization of VAS, a subjective pain indicator, as the measure of the result.
Strengths
First-pregnancy yoga is safe and foetal-tolerant.
Conclusions
Engaging in yoga during pregnancy reduces the rate of In-labour CS, decreases discomfort and encourages spontaneous vaginal birth in primiparous singleton women.
Funding source: University Medical Centre Maribor
Award Identifier / Grant number: IRP-2018/01-03
Acknowledgments
We want to thank all the pregnant women who participated in this study for supporting us with their time at yoga and regular checks. We would like to express our gratitude to the midwife Melita Špoljar, Dr Maša Brumec, Urška Jodl Skalicky and the administration team Bernarda Unger and Alenka Ferk for their technical and administrative support.
-
Research ethics: The study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by University Medical Centre Maribor’s Medical Ethic Committee, number UKC-MB-KME-29/17, date of approval: 10 November 2017.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study or their legal guardians or wards.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia, grant number IRP-2018/01-03, funded this research.
-
Data availability: The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
-
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03941041.
References
1. Babbar, S, Shyken, J. Yoga in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016;59:600–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000210.Search in Google Scholar
2. Corrigan, L, Moran, P, McGrath, N, Eustace-Cook, J, Daly, D. The characteristics and effectiveness of pregnancy yoga interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04474-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Rong, L, Dai, LJ, Ouyang, YQ. The effectiveness of prenatal yoga on delivery outcomes: a meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020;39:101157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101157.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Smith, CA, Levett, KM, Collins, CT, Armour, M, Dahlen, HG, Suganuma, M. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD009514. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Lin, IH, Huang, CY, Chou, SH, Shih, CL. Efficacy of prenatal yoga in the treatment of depression and anxiety during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022;19:5368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095368.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Maheshwarananda, SP. The system yoga in daily life harmony for body, mind and soul. IberaVerlag/European University Press; 2000. https://www.yogaindailylife.org/system/en/ [Accessed 22 Aug 2024].Search in Google Scholar
7. Committee Opinion No. 766. Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e164–73.10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Ulgu, MM, Birinci, S, Altun Ensari, T, Gözükara, MG. Cesarean section rates in Turkey 2018–2023: overview of national data by using Robson ten group classification system. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2023;20:191–8. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.68235.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Betran, AP, Ye, J, Moller, AB, Souza, JP, Zhang, J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6:e005671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Ye, J, Zhang, J, Mikolajczyk, R, Torloni, MR, Gülmezoglu, AM, Betran, AP. Association between caesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016;123:745–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13592.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Saleh, GS, Essén, B, Fallahian, M, Mulic-Lutvica, A, Mohammadi, S. Auditing the appropriateness of cesarean delivery using the Robson classification among women experiencing a maternal near miss. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;144:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12698.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. WHO statement on cesarean section rates. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/who-statement-on-caesarean-section-rates-frequently-asked-questions [Accessed 22 Aug 2024].Search in Google Scholar
13. Molina, G, Weiser, TG, Lipsitz, SR, Esquivel, MM, Uribe-Leitz, T, Azad, T, et al.. Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA 2015;314:2263–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15553.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. WHO recommendations. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.Search in Google Scholar
15. Campbell, V, Nolan, M. ‘It definitely made a difference’: a grounded theory study of yoga for pregnancy and women’s self-efficacy for labour. Midwifery 2019;68:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Chuntharapat, S, Petpichetchian, W, Hatthakit, U. Yoga during pregnancy: effects on maternal comfort, labor pain and birth outcomes. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2008;14:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.12.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Jahdi, F, Sheikhan, F, Haghani, H, Sharifi, B, Ghaseminejad, A, Khodarahmian, M, et al.. Yoga during pregnancy: the effects on labor pain and delivery outcomes (A randomized controlled trial). Complement Ther Clin Pract 2017;27:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.12.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Bolanthakodi, C, Raghunandan, C, Saili, A, Mondal, S, Saxena, P. Prenatal yoga: effects on alleviation of labor pain and birth outcomes. J Alternative Compl Med 2018;24:1181–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0079.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Mohyadin, E, Ghorashi, Z, Molamomanaei, Z. The effect of practicing yoga during pregnancy on labor stages length, anxiety and pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Complement Integr Med 2020;18:413–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2019-0291.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Yekefallah, L, Namdar, P, Dehghankar, L, Golestaneh, F, Taheri, S, Mohammadkhaniha, F. The effect of yoga on the delivery and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous pregnant women in Iran: a clinical trial study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03794-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Karlsdottir, SI, Sveinsdottir, H, Olafsdottir, OA, Kristjansdottir, H. Pregnant women’s expectations about pain intensity during childbirth and their attitudes towards pain management: findings from an Icelandic national study. Sex Reprod Healthc 2015;6:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.05.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Lindholm, A, Hildingsson, I. Women’s preferences and received pain relief in childbirth – a prospective longitudinal study in a northern region of Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc 2015;6:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2014.10.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Czech, I, Fuchs, P, Fuchs, A, Lorek, M, Tobolska-Lorek, D, Drosdzol-Cop, A, et al.. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of labour pain relief-establishment of effectiveness and comparison. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018;15:2792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122792.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. Jones, L, Othman, M, Dowswell, T, Alfirevic, Z, Gates, S, Newburn, M, et al.. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2012:CD009234. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Anim-Somuah, M, Smyth, RM, Cyna, AM, Cuthbert, A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;5:CD000331. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Ayres-de-Campos, D, Spong, CY, Chandraharan, E. FIGO intrapartum fetal monitoring expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Berghella, V, Baxter, JK, Chauhan, SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1607–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.063.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Ostrovsky, DA. Yoga in the third trimester may reduce labor pain, duration of labor, and risk of cesarean section. Explore 2018;14:163–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2017.12.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Kissler, K, Hurt, KJ. The pathophysiology of labor dystocia: theme with variations. Reprod Sci 2023;30:729–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01018-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Tripepi, G, Chesnaye, NC, Dekker, FW, Zoccali, C, Jager, KJ. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in clinical trials. Nephrology 2020;25:513–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13709.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Na, ED, Chang, SW, Ahn, EH, Jung, SH, Kim, YR, Jung, I, et al.. Pregnancy outcomes of elective induction in low-risk term pregnancies: a propensity-score analysis. Medicine 2019;98:e14284. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000014284.Search in Google Scholar
32. Bączek, G, Rzońca, E, Rzońca, P, Rychlewicz, S, Budner, M, Bień, A. Retrospective analysis of the factors affecting the induction of childbirth in 4350 women from a single center in Warsaw, Poland. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022;19:9540. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159540.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. Yilmaz Esencan, T, Rathfisch, G. Effects of yoga and meditation on the birth process. Altern Ther Health Med 2023;29:6–14.Search in Google Scholar
34. Zhang, L, Wang, S. The efficacy of prenatal yoga on labor pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Altern Ther Health Med 2023;29:121–5.Search in Google Scholar
35. Sandman, CA, Glynn, L, Schetter, CD, Wadhwa, P, Garite, T, Chicz-DeMet, A, et al.. Elevated maternal cortisol early in pregnancy predicts third trimester levels of placental corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH): priming the placental clock. Peptides 2006;27:1457–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2005.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Betrán, AP, Ye, J, Moller, AB, Zhang, J, Gülmezoglu, AM, Torloni, MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
37. Fairley, L, Dundas, R, Leyland, AH. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980–2000. BMC Publ Health 2011;11:330. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-330.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
38. Chaillet, N, Dumont, A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Birth 2007;34:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2006.00146.x.Search in Google Scholar
39. Price, BB, Amini, SB, Kappeler, K. Exercise in pregnancy: effect on fitness and obstetric outcomes-a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:2263–9. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318267ad67.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Zdravstveni statistični letopis Slovenije. Zdravstveno stanje prebivalstva 2; 2021. https://nijz.si/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2.2_Porodi_in_rojstva_2021_koncna_1.pdf [Accessed 22 Aug 2024].Search in Google Scholar
41. Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo. Europska zdravstvena anketa u Hrvatskoj 2014.–2015. Životne navike. Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo. https://www.hzjz.hr/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/EHIS-%C5%Zivotnenavike.pdf [Accessed 22 Aug 2024].Search in Google Scholar
42. Di Mascio, D, Magro-Malosso, ER, Saccone, G, Marhefka, GD, Berghella, V. Exercise during pregnancy in normal-weight women and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
43. Syed, H, Slayman, T, DuChene Thoma, K. ACOG committee opinion, number 804: physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:375–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004266.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- AI and early diagnostics: mapping fetal facial expressions through development, evolution, and 4D ultrasound
- Investigation of cardiac remodeling and cardiac function on fetuses conceived via artificial reproductive technologies: a review
- Commentary
- A crisis in U.S. maternal healthcare: lessons from Europe for the U.S.
- Opinion Paper
- Selective termination: a life-saving procedure for complicated monochorionic gestations
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Exploring the safety and diagnostic utility of amniocentesis after 24 weeks of gestation: a retrospective analysis
- Maternal and neonatal short-term outcome after vaginal breech delivery >36 weeks of gestation with and without MRI-based pelvimetric measurements: a Hannover retrospective cohort study
- Antepartum multidisciplinary approach improves postpartum pain scores in patients with opioid use disorder
- Determinants of pregnancy outcomes in early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
- Copy number variation sequencing detection technology for identifying fetuses with abnormal soft indicators: a comprehensive study
- Benefits of yoga in pregnancy: a randomised controlled clinical trial
- Atraumatic forceps-guided insertion of the cervical pessary: a new technique to prevent preterm birth in women with asymptomatic cervical shortening
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Impact of screening for large-for-gestational-age fetuses on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective observational study
- Impact of high maternal body mass index on fetal cerebral cortical and cerebellar volumes
- Adrenal gland size in fetuses with congenital heart disease
- Aberrant right subclavian artery: the importance of distinguishing between isolated and non-isolated cases in prenatal diagnosis and clinical management
- Short Communication
- Trends and variations in admissions for cannabis use disorder among pregnant women in United States
- Letter to the Editor
- Trisomy 18 mosaicism – are we able to predict postnatal outcome by analysing the tissue-specific distribution?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- AI and early diagnostics: mapping fetal facial expressions through development, evolution, and 4D ultrasound
- Investigation of cardiac remodeling and cardiac function on fetuses conceived via artificial reproductive technologies: a review
- Commentary
- A crisis in U.S. maternal healthcare: lessons from Europe for the U.S.
- Opinion Paper
- Selective termination: a life-saving procedure for complicated monochorionic gestations
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Exploring the safety and diagnostic utility of amniocentesis after 24 weeks of gestation: a retrospective analysis
- Maternal and neonatal short-term outcome after vaginal breech delivery >36 weeks of gestation with and without MRI-based pelvimetric measurements: a Hannover retrospective cohort study
- Antepartum multidisciplinary approach improves postpartum pain scores in patients with opioid use disorder
- Determinants of pregnancy outcomes in early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
- Copy number variation sequencing detection technology for identifying fetuses with abnormal soft indicators: a comprehensive study
- Benefits of yoga in pregnancy: a randomised controlled clinical trial
- Atraumatic forceps-guided insertion of the cervical pessary: a new technique to prevent preterm birth in women with asymptomatic cervical shortening
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Impact of screening for large-for-gestational-age fetuses on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective observational study
- Impact of high maternal body mass index on fetal cerebral cortical and cerebellar volumes
- Adrenal gland size in fetuses with congenital heart disease
- Aberrant right subclavian artery: the importance of distinguishing between isolated and non-isolated cases in prenatal diagnosis and clinical management
- Short Communication
- Trends and variations in admissions for cannabis use disorder among pregnant women in United States
- Letter to the Editor
- Trisomy 18 mosaicism – are we able to predict postnatal outcome by analysing the tissue-specific distribution?