Article
Publicly Available
Frontmatter
Published/Copyright:
May 24, 2021
Published Online: 2021-05-24
Published in Print: 2021-10-26
©2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Some historical and general considerations on NIPT – great progress achieved, but we have to proceed with caution
- Articles
- The implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands
- Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): does the practice discriminate against persons with disabilities?
- Moral ambivalence. A comment on non-invasive prenatal testing from an ethical perspective
- Should prenatal screening be seen as ‘selective reproduction’? Four reasons to reframe the ethical debate
- Making use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): rethinking issues of routinization and pressure
- Do non-invasive prenatal tests promote discrimination against people with Down syndrome? What should be done?
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPD) in the system of medical care. Ethical and legal issues
- Awareness of maternal stress, consequences for the offspring and the need for early interventions to increase stress resilience
- First trimester screening with biochemical markers and ultrasound in relation to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
- Reproductive genetic screening for information: evolving paradigms?
- How genomics is changing the practice of prenatal testing
- Postnatal gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases – opportunities and limitations
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Some historical and general considerations on NIPT – great progress achieved, but we have to proceed with caution
- Articles
- The implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands
- Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): does the practice discriminate against persons with disabilities?
- Moral ambivalence. A comment on non-invasive prenatal testing from an ethical perspective
- Should prenatal screening be seen as ‘selective reproduction’? Four reasons to reframe the ethical debate
- Making use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): rethinking issues of routinization and pressure
- Do non-invasive prenatal tests promote discrimination against people with Down syndrome? What should be done?
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPD) in the system of medical care. Ethical and legal issues
- Awareness of maternal stress, consequences for the offspring and the need for early interventions to increase stress resilience
- First trimester screening with biochemical markers and ultrasound in relation to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
- Reproductive genetic screening for information: evolving paradigms?
- How genomics is changing the practice of prenatal testing
- Postnatal gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases – opportunities and limitations