Startseite Medizin Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging

  • Christian Bamberg EMAIL logo , Jan Deprest , Nikhil Sindhwani , Ulf Teichgräberg , Felix Güttler , Joachim W. Dudenhausen , Karim D. Kalache und Wolfgang Henrich
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. Mai 2016

Abstract

Aim:

Fetal skull molding is important for the adaptation of the head to the birth canal during vaginal delivery. Importantly, the fetal head must rotate around the maternal symphysis pubis. The goals of this analysis were to observe a human birth in real-time using an open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and describe the fetal head configuration during expulsion.

Methods:

Real-time cinematic MRI series (TSE single-shot sequence, TR 1600 ms, TE 150 ms) were acquired from the midsagittal plane of the maternal pelvis during the active second stage of labor at 37 weeks of gestation. Frame-by-frame analyses were performed to measure the frontooccipital diameter (FOD) and distance from the vertex to the base of the fetal skull.

Results:

During vaginal delivery in an occiput anterior position, the initial FOD was 10.3 cm. When expulsion began, the fetal skull was deformed and elongated, with the FOD increasing to 10.8 cm and 11.2 cm at crowning. In contrast, the distance from the vertex to the base of the skull was reduced from 6.4 cm to 5.6 cm at expulsion.

Conclusions:

Fetal head molding is the change in the fetal head due to the forces of labor. The biomechanics of this process are poorly understood. Our visualization of the normal mechanism of late second-stage labor shows that MRI technology can for the first time help define the changes in the diameters of the fetal head during active labor.


Corresponding author: PD Dr. Christian Bamberg, Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany

  1. Funding: The project was supported by a public grant (TSB Technologiestiftung Berlin-Zukunftsfonds Berlin). The funding source had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing support, and the decision to submit the article for publication.

References

[1] Lindgren L. The influence of pressure upon the fetal head during labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:303–9.10.3109/00016347709154983Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Baxter J. Moulding of the foetal head; a compensatory mechanism. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1946;53:212–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1946.tb03903.xSuche in Google Scholar

[3] Graham JM Jr, Kumar A. Diagnosis and management of extensive vertex birth molding. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006;45:672–8.10.1177/0009922806291023Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Kriewall TJ, Stys SJ, McPherson GK. Neonatal head shape after delivery: an index of molding. J Perinat Med. 1977;5:260–7.10.1515/jpme.1977.5.6.260Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Lindgren L. The causes of foetal head moulding in labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1960;39:46–62.10.3109/00016346009157836Suche in Google Scholar

[6] McPherson GK, Kriewall TJ. Fetal head molding: an investigation utilizing a finite element model of the fetal parietal bone. J Biomech. 1980;13:17–26.10.1016/0021-9290(80)90004-4Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Lapeer RJ, Prager RW. Fetal head moulding: finite element analysis of a fetal skull subjected to uterine pressures during the first stage of labour. J Biomech. 2001;34:1125–33.10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00070-7Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Pu F, Xu L, Li D, Li S, Sun L, Wang L, et al. Effect of different labor forces on fetal skull molding. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:620–5.10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.12.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Yan X, Kruger JA, Nielsen PM, Nash MP. Effects of fetal head shape variation on the second stage of labour. J Biomech. 2015;48:1593–9.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.062Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation, Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:333–40.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318180a505Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Kawabata I, Takahashi Y, Iwagaki S, Tamaya T. MRI during pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2003;31:449–58.10.1515/JPM.2003.070Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Hailey D. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006;1–4.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] McPherson GK, Kriewall TJ. The elastic modulus of fetal cranial bone: a first step towards an understanding of the biomechanics of fetal head molding. J Biomech. 1980;13:9–16.10.1016/0021-9290(80)90003-2Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Rosenberg K, Trevathan W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution, Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:1199–206.10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.00010.xSuche in Google Scholar

[15] Sorbe B, Dahlgren S. Some important factors in the molding of the fetal head during vaginal delivery–a photographic study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983;21:205–12.10.1016/0020-7292(83)90081-4Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Bamberg C, Rademacher G, Guttler F, Teichgraber U, Cremer M, Buhrer C, et al. Human birth observed in real-time open magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:505. e501–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Silva ME, Oliveira DA, Roza TH, Brandao S, Parente MP, Mascarenhas T, et al. Study on the influence of the fetus head molding on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor muscles, during vaginal delivery. J Biomech. 2015;48:1600–5.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

  1. The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2016-2-1
Accepted: 2016-4-18
Published Online: 2016-5-24
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Intrapartum care
  4. Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
  5. Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations
  6. Review article
  7. Obstetric analgesia – update 2016
  8. Highlight articles
  9. Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study
  10. Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study
  11. Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging
  12. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure
  13. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp lactate for intrapartum acidosis compared with scalp pH
  14. Reference values for Lactate Pro 2™ in fetal blood sampling during labor: a cross-sectional study
  15. Linear and non-linear analysis of uterine contraction signals obtained with tocodynamometry in prediction of operative vaginal delivery
  16. Evaluation of simparteam – a needs-orientated team training format for obstetrics and neonatology
  17. Transient fetal blood redistribution associated with maternal supine position
  18. Original articles
  19. Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States
  20. Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria
  21. Hematological changes in severe early onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery
  22. Breast milk feeding in infants with inherited metabolic disorders other than phenylketonuria – a 10-year single-center experience
  23. Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index
  24. Obituary
  25. Obituary – Edward Ogata (1945–2017)
  26. Congress Calendar
  27. Congress Calendar
Heruntergeladen am 15.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0005/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen