Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study
-
Jorge Burgos
,
Itziar Arana
Abstract
Objective:
To compare the outcome of two methods of labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor in breech presentation at term.
Material:
A retrospective study between 2003 and 2012. We compare obstetric (indication of induction, Bishop score, cesarean rate) and perinatal outcomes (Apgar score, umbilical artery pH, base excess ≤−12 mmol/L, admission to neonatal unit) between prostaglandins and oxytocin. We also compare labor induction versus spontaneous onset of labor.
Results:
Of the 1684 breech deliveries, we carried out labor induction in 221 cases (76% with prostaglandins, 24% with oxytocin). The prostaglandins group had significantly lower Bishop scores and the time for induction phase was significantly higher. There were no differences in cesarean rate between both methods of induction or spontaneous onset of labor. The prostaglandins group had higher rates of base excess ≤−12 mmol/L. Compared with spontaneous onset of labor in breech presentation, induction had significant lower rates of newborn weight and higher rates of admission to the neonatal unit.
Conclusions:
Induction of labor in breech presentation at term is a reasonable and effective option after a careful selection of cases. It was not associated with an increase of perinatal morbidity or cesarean rate compared with spontaneous onset of labor.
References
[1] Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:205–9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.xSuche in Google Scholar
[3] Sullivan EA, Moran K, Chapman M. Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Australia 1991–2005. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:456–60.10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01050.xSuche in Google Scholar
[4] Hartnack Tharin JE, Rasmussen S, Krebs L. Consequences of the term breech trial in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:767–71.10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01143.xSuche in Google Scholar
[5] Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:917–27.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:864–71.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.056Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Daviss BA, Johnson KC, Lalonde AB. Evolving evidence since the term breech trial: Canadian response, European dissent, and potential solutions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32: 217–24.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34447-4Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, van Loon AJ, Van Hemel OJ, Visser GH. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:604–9.10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.xSuche in Google Scholar
[9] Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:20–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.039Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1002–11.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] The management of breech presentation. RCOG Guidelines, 2006. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:235–7.10.1097/00006250-200607000-00058Suche in Google Scholar
[13] Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H, et al. SOGC clinical practice guideline: Vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no. 226, June 2009. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107:169–76.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.002Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Parto en la presentación de nalgas a término. Protocolos SEGO, 2011. Available from: http://www.sego.es/.Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Burgos J, Rodríguez L, Cobos P, Osuna C, Del Mar Centeno M, Larrieta R, et al. Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience. J Perinatol. 2015;35:803–8.10.1038/jp.2015.75Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Marzouk P, Arnaud E, Oury JF, Sibony O. Induction of labour and breech presentation: experience of a French maternity ward. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2011;40:668–74.10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.03.008Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Rojansky N, Tsafrir A, Ophir E, Ezra Y. Induction of labor in breech presentation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;74:151–6.10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00424-6Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Fait G, Daniel Y, Lessing JB, Bar-Am A, Gull I, Shenhav M, et al. Can labor with breech presentation be induced? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;46:181–6.10.1159/000010029Suche in Google Scholar
[19] O’Herlihy C. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1981;11: 299–303.10.1016/0028-2243(81)90030-7Suche in Google Scholar
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Intrapartum care
- Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
- Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations
- Review article
- Obstetric analgesia – update 2016
- Highlight articles
- Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study
- Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study
- Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging
- Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure
- Diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp lactate for intrapartum acidosis compared with scalp pH
- Reference values for Lactate Pro 2™ in fetal blood sampling during labor: a cross-sectional study
- Linear and non-linear analysis of uterine contraction signals obtained with tocodynamometry in prediction of operative vaginal delivery
- Evaluation of simparteam – a needs-orientated team training format for obstetrics and neonatology
- Transient fetal blood redistribution associated with maternal supine position
- Original articles
- Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States
- Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria
- Hematological changes in severe early onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery
- Breast milk feeding in infants with inherited metabolic disorders other than phenylketonuria – a 10-year single-center experience
- Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index
- Obituary
- Obituary – Edward Ogata (1945–2017)
- Congress Calendar
- Congress Calendar
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Intrapartum care
- Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
- Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations
- Review article
- Obstetric analgesia – update 2016
- Highlight articles
- Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study
- Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study
- Evaluating fetal head dimension changes during labor using open magnetic resonance imaging
- Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure
- Diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp lactate for intrapartum acidosis compared with scalp pH
- Reference values for Lactate Pro 2™ in fetal blood sampling during labor: a cross-sectional study
- Linear and non-linear analysis of uterine contraction signals obtained with tocodynamometry in prediction of operative vaginal delivery
- Evaluation of simparteam – a needs-orientated team training format for obstetrics and neonatology
- Transient fetal blood redistribution associated with maternal supine position
- Original articles
- Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States
- Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria
- Hematological changes in severe early onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery
- Breast milk feeding in infants with inherited metabolic disorders other than phenylketonuria – a 10-year single-center experience
- Clinical significance of a false positive glucose challenge test in patients with a high body mass index
- Obituary
- Obituary – Edward Ogata (1945–2017)
- Congress Calendar
- Congress Calendar
