Home Can routine laboratory parameters predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Can routine laboratory parameters predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?

  • Efser Oztas EMAIL logo , Kudret Erkenekli , Sibel Ozler , Ali Ozgur Ersoy , Mevlut Kurt , Erkin Oztas , Dilek Uygur and Nuri Danisman
Published/Copyright: October 8, 2014

Abstract

Aim: Our aim was to investigate whether any hematological changes readily detectable by simple complete blood count (CBC), as well as fasting and postprandial total serum bile acid (SBA) levels, have diagnostic values for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP).

Methods: A prospective, case control study was carried out including 217 pregnant women (117 women with ICP and 100 healthy controls). The main outcome measures investigated were preterm delivery, APGAR scores, and neonatal unit admission. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the independent risk factors of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Results: Compared with controls, women with ICP had significantly higher mean platelet volume (MPV) (mean 10.2±1.0 vs. 11.0±1.3; P<0.001) and platelet distribution width (PDW) (mean 13.1±2.3 vs. 14.7±2.8; P<0.001) values. Analysis with logistic regression revealed that the probability of preterm delivery did not increase until MPV levels exceeded 11.2 fL [odds ratio (OR)=2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13–6.32, P=0.025], and total bilirubin levels exceeded 0.6 mg/dL (OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.21–8.09, P=0.019). Considering the low APGAR scores, only increased postprandial total SBA levels of ≥51 μmol/L were found to be predictive significantly (OR=3.02, 95% CI=1.07–8.53, P=0.037).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that increased MPV and total bilirubin levels are associated with preterm delivery, and increased postprandial total SBA levels are predictive for low APGAR in ICP patients.


Corresponding author: Efser Oztas, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, Tel.: +90 0 31 23 06 50 00, Fax: +90 0 31 23 12 49 31, E-mail:

References

[1] Alsulyman OM, Ouzounian JG, Ames-Castro M, Goodwin TM. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: perinatal outcome associated with expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:957–60.10.1016/S0002-9378(96)80031-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] Binder T, Salaj P, Dyr EJ, Vanifkova M, Hrachovinova I. Hematological aspects of gestational cholestatic hepatosis (ICP). Ceska Gynecol. 2006;71:99–102.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Brenner B. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2004;114:409–14.10.1016/j.thromres.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Cho SY, Lee HJ, Park TS. Mean platelet volume in patients with increased γ-glutamyl transferase. Platelets. Feb 10, 2014 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3109/09537104.2014.881467.10.3109/09537104.2014.881467Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Fisk NM, Storey GN. Fetal outcome in obstetric cholestasis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95:1137–43.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06791.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Fisk NM, Bye WB, Storey GN. Maternal features of obstetric cholestasis: 20 years experience at King George V Hospital. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;28:172–6.10.1111/j.1479-828X.1988.tb01657.xSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Geenes V, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:2049–66.10.3748/wjg.15.2049Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Geenes V, Chappell LC, Seed PT, Steer PJ, Knight M, Williamson C. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology. 2014;59:1482–91.10.1002/hep.26617Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Gioia S, Piazze J, Anceschi MM, Cerekja A, Alberini A, Giancotti A, et al. Mean platelet volume: association with adverse neonatal outcome. Platelets. 2007;18:284–8.10.1080/09537100601078448Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Glantz A, Marschall HU, Mattsson LA. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates. Hepatology. 2004;40:467–74.10.1002/hep.20336Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Howard PJ, Murphy GM. Bile acid stress in the mother and baby unit. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:317–21.10.1097/00042737-200303000-00016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Juan P, Stefano G, Antonella S, Albana C. Platelets in pregnancy. J Prenat Med. 2011;5:90–2.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kebapcilar AG, Taner CE, Kebapcilar L, Bozkaya G. High mean platelet volume, low-grade systemic coagulation, and fibrinolytic activation are associated with pre-term delivery and low APGAR score in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1205–10.10.3109/14767051003653278Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kondrackiene J, Kupcinskas L. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-current achievements and unsolved problems. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5781–88.10.3748/wjg.14.5781Search in Google Scholar

[15] Laatikainen T, Ikonen E. Serum bile acids in cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50:313–8.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lammert F, Marschall HU, Glantz A, Matern S. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Hepatol. 2000;33:1012–21.10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80139-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lee RH, Kwok KM, Ingles S, Wilson ML, Mullin P, Incerpi M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes during an era of aggressive management for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25:341–5.10.1055/s-2008-1078756Search in Google Scholar

[18] Oztekin D, Aydal I, Oztekin O, Okcu S, Borekci R, Tinar S. Predicting fetal asphyxia in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:975–9.10.1007/s00404-009-1052-xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Pata O, Vardareli E, Ozcan A, Serteser M, Unsal I, Saruc M, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: correlation of preterm delivery with bile acids. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22:602–5.10.4318/tjg.2011.0427Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pathak B, Sheibani L, Lee RH. Cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2010;37:269–82.10.1016/j.ogc.2010.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[21] Piazze J, Gioia S, Cerekja A, Larciprete G, Argento T, Pizzulo S, et al. Doppler velocimetry alterations related to platelet changes in third trimester pregnancies. Platelets. 2007;18: 11–15.10.1080/09537100600800347Search in Google Scholar

[22] Pihusch R, Rank A, Gohring P, Pihusch M, Hiller E, Beuers U. Platelet function rather than plasmatic coagulation explains hypercoagulable state in cholestatic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2002;37:548–55.10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00239-8Search in Google Scholar

[23] Pusl T, Beuers U. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:26.10.1186/1750-1172-2-26Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Reid R, Ivey KJ, Rencoret RH, Storey B. Fetal complications of obstetric cholestasis. Br Med J. 1976;1:870–72.10.1136/bmj.1.6014.870Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Rook M, Vargas J, Caughey A, Bacchetti P, Rosenthal P, Bull L. Fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Northern California cohort. PLos One. 2012;7:e28343.10.1371/journal.pone.0028343Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Sheik Abdul Kadir SH, Miragoli M, Abu-Hayyeh S, Moshkov AV, Xie Q, Keirel V, et al. Bile-acid induced arrhytmia is mediated by Muscarinic M2 receptors in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9689.10.1371/journal.pone.0009689Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Shemer EW, Marschall HU, Ludvigsson JF, Stephansson O. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12-year population-based cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:717–23.10.1111/1471-0528.12174Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Uchikova EH, Ledjev II. Changes in haemostasis during normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119:185–8.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Vagdatli E, Gounari E, Lazaridou E, Katsibourlia E, Tsikopoulou F, Labrianou I. Platelet distribution width: a simple, practical and specific marker of activation of coagulation. Hippokratia. 2010;14:28–32.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Zecca E, De Luca D, Barbato G, Marras M, Tiberi E, Romagnoli C. Predicting respiratory distress syndrome in neonates from mothers with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84:337–41.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.09.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Zecca E, De Luca D, Marras M, Caruso A, Bernardini T, Romagnoli C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1669–72.10.1542/peds.2005-1801Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2014-6-17
Accepted: 2014-9-15
Published Online: 2014-10-8
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Maternal risk: assessment and management
  4. Original articles – Obstetrics
  5. Ebola virus screening during pregnancy in West Africa: unintended consequences
  6. Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at ≤34 weeks of gestation
  7. Can routine laboratory parameters predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?
  8. Pulmonary edema in pregnancy and the puerperium: a cohort study of 53 cases
  9. Incidence and outcomes of women with Hodgkin’s lymphoma in pregnancy: a population-based study on 7.9 million births
  10. Differential utilization of expanded genetic screening tests in patients of reproductive ages from private and academic practices
  11. Association of maternal blood pressure in pregnancy with blood pressure of their offspring through adolescence
  12. Oxytocin utilization for labor induction in obese and lean women
  13. Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance
  14. Position at birth as an important factor for the occurrence of anal sphincter tears: a retrospective cohort study
  15. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and risk factors by mode of delivery and obstetric history: a 10-year review from Helsinki University Central Hospital
  16. Delivery outcomes after day and night onset of labour
  17. Original articles – Fetus
  18. Perinatal outcome of congenital heart disease in a population with high consanguinity
  19. Complex and irregular heart rate dynamics in fetuses compromised by maternal anemia as a high-risk pregnancy
  20. Clinical application of fetal left modified myocardial performance index in the evaluation of fetal growth restriction
  21. First-trimester fetal growth discordance and development of preeclampsia in dichorionic twin pregnancies
  22. Original articles – Newborn
  23. Neonatal outcome in pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome
  24. A longitudinal study of brainstem auditory response from birth to late term in late preterm babies and abnormal findings in high-risk babies
  25. Suctioning habits in the delivery room and the influence on postnatal adaptation – a video analysis
  26. Short communications
  27. Management of vasa previa during pregnancy
  28. Uterine rupture after the uterine fundal pressure maneuver
  29. Congress Calendar
  30. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2014-0207/html
Scroll to top button