Oxytocin utilization for labor induction in obese and lean women

Meg Hill; Kathryn L. Reed; Wayne R. Cohen

doi:10.1515/jpm-2014-0134

Article

Oxytocin utilization for labor induction in obese and lean women

Meg Hill , Kathryn L. Reed and Wayne R. Cohen

Published/Copyright: September 13, 2014

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Journal of Perinatal Medicine Volume 43 Issue 6

Abstract

To determine if oxytocin dosage used for labor induction differed in obese and lean women, we analyzed records of patients who underwent term labor induction and delivered vaginally. Each of a cohort of 27 patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m² was matched with a patient with a BMI <28 kg/m² for gestational age, for birth weight, and for cervical dilatation and fetal station at admission. The oxytocin dose administered during first stage labor was calculated for each patient. In addition to the matched characteristics, there was no difference between groups in parity, frequency of diabetes, epidural anesthesia use, or pharmacologic cervical ripening. Oxytocin utilization was significantly greater in obese women than in lean women. The maximum administration rate was 17.7±4.7 and 13.1±5.0 mU/min, respectively (P=0.001). Oxytocin administered per minute during the first stage of labor was greater in the obese group (11.6±4.8 vs. 8.6±4.1 mU/min; P=0.020). Neither active phase duration nor the maximum rate of dilatation differed significantly between the groups. That obese parturients required more oxytocin than lean women during the first stage of successful labor induction could not be explained by group differences in parity, birth weight, dysfunctional labor, pre-induction dilatation and station, or epidural use.

Keywords: Labor; labor induction; obesity; oxytocin

Corresponding author: Meg Hill, MBBS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, 8th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA, Tel.: +520-626-6174, Fax: +520-626-6190, E-mail: meghanhill@obgyn.arizona.edu

References

[1] Barau G, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC, Dedecker F, Laffite A, Gerardin P, et al. Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:1173–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01038.xSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Bowers D, Cohen WR. Obesity and related pregnancy complications in an inner city clinic. J Perinatol. 1999;19:216–9.10.1038/sj.jp.7200143Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cedergren MI. Non-elective caesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labour in relation to maternal body mass index. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:163–6.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.022Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Labor and delivery care: a practical guide. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2011.10.1002/9781119971566Search in Google Scholar

[5] Davies GA, Maxwell C, Mcleod L, Gagnon R, Basso M, Bos H, et al. Obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:165–73.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34432-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Denison FC, Price J, Graham C, Wild S, Liston WA. Maternal obesity, length of gestation, risk of postdates pregnancy and spontaneous onset of labour at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:720–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01694.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Ehrenberg HM, Dierker L, Milluzzi C, Mercer BM. Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1189–93.10.1067/mob.2002.127125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Fisher SC, Kim SY, Sharma AJ, Rochat R, Morrow B. Is obesity still increasing among pregnant women? Prepregnancy obesity trends in 20 states, 2003–2009. Prev Med. 2013;56:372–8.10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Friedman EA. Labor: clinical evaluation and management. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Garabedian MJ, Hansen WF, McCord LA, Manning MA, O’Brien JM, Curry TE Jr. Up-regulation of oxytocin receptor expression at term is related to body mass index. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:491–7.10.1055/s-0032-1329179Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Grotegut CA, Gunatilake RP, Feng L, Heine RP, Murtha AP. The influence of maternal body mass index on myometrial oxytocin receptor expression in pregnancy. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:1471–7.10.1177/1933719113488446Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Hehir MP, Morrison JJ. The adipokine apelin and human uterine contractility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:359.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Heslehurst N, Rankin J, Wilkinson JR, Summerbell CD. A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619,323 births, 1989–2007. Int J Obes. 2010;34:420–8.10.1038/ijo.2009.250Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Hilliard AM, Chauhan SP, Zhao Y, Rankins NC. Effect of obesity on length of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:127–32.10.1055/s-0031-1295653Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Lowe NK, Corwin EJ. Proposed biological linkages between obesity, stress, and inefficient uterine contractility during labor in humans. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76:755–60.10.1016/j.mehy.2011.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Moynihan AT, Hehir MP, Glavey SV, Smith TJ, Morrison JJ. Inhibitory effect of leptin on human uterine contractility in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;196:504–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.106Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:452–6.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Pevzner L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Effects of maternal obesity on duration and outcomes of prostaglandin cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1315–21.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bfb39fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Phaneuf S, Rodriguez Liñares B, TambyRaja RL, MacKenzie IZ, López Bernal A. Loss of myometrial oxytocin receptors during oxytocin-induced and oxytocin-augmented labor. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;120:91–7.10.1530/jrf.0.1200091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Ray A, Hildreth A, Essen UI. Morbid obesity and intrapartum care. J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;28:301–4.10.1080/01443610802042548Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Roman H, Goffinet F, Hulsey TF, Newman R, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low-risk pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:163–70.10.1080/00016340701762975Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Sheiner E, Levy A, Menes TS, Silverberg D, Katz M, Mazor M. Maternal obesity as an independent risk factor for caesarean delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004;18:196–201.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00557.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Sherrard A, Platt RW, Vallerand D, Usher RH, Zhang X, Kramer MS. Maternal anthropomorphic risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114:1088–96.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01275.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Smith RD, Babiychuk EB, Noble K, Draeger A, Wray S. Increased cholesterol decreases uterine activity: functional effects of cholesterol alteration in pregnant rat myometrium. Am J Cell Physiol. 2005;288:C982–8.10.1152/ajpcell.00120.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Soni S, Chavan N, Cohen WR. Effect of maternal body mass index on oxytocin treatment for arrest of dilatation. J Perinat Med. 2013;21:1–5.10.1515/jpm-2013-0024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Stotland NE, Washington AE, Caughey AB. Prepregnancy body mass index and the length of gestation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:378.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:943–51.10.1097/01.AOG.0000142713.53197.91Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Verdiales M, Pacheco C, Cohen WR. Effect of maternal obesity on the course of labor. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:651–5.10.1515/JPM.2009.110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Wray S. Insights into the uterus. Exp Physiol. 2007;92:621–31.10.1113/expphysiol.2007.038125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Zhang J, Kendrick A, Quenby S, Wray S. Contractility and calcium signaling of human myometrium are profoundly affected by cholesterol manipulation: implications for labor? Reprod Sci. 2007;14:456–66.10.1177/1933719107306229Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2014-4-22

Accepted: 2014-8-11

Published Online: 2014-9-13

Published in Print: 2015-11-1

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0134

Keywords for this article

Labor; labor induction; obesity; oxytocin