Home Anxious and depressive components of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in maternal postpartum psychological problems1)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Anxious and depressive components of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in maternal postpartum psychological problems1)

  • Angela Petrozzi and Luigi Gagliardi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2013

Abstract

Background: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely used instrument for screening for postpartum depression, but it might also detect anxiety symptoms.

Objective: To investigate the factor structure of the EPDS administered immediately after delivery and to understand which factors predict a high EPDS score 3 months later.

Methods: A cohort of 594 Italian mothers delivering a healthy baby at Versilia Hospital completed the EPDS at two points in time: 2 days after delivery (T0) and 3 months later (T1) by telephone interview.

Results: EPDS scores were higher at T0 than at T1. Overall, 15.7% of women at 2 days postpartum and 7.6% at 3 months later reported a score >9. The factor analysis of EPDS at T0 indicated a three-factor structure: “depression” (items 7–10), “anxiety” (items 3–6) and “anhedonia” (items 1–2). Anxious symptoms were quantitatively more important than depressive ones (mean 3.9 vs. 1.2) but tended to spontaneously ameliorate at T1, whereas total EPDS score at T1 was better predicted by depressive symptoms at T0 (discriminative ability 0.75 vs. 0.68).

Conclusions: This study suggests that EPDS subscales immediately after delivery help understand the spectrum of maternal postpartum psychological problems. Anxious symptoms immediately after delivery are frequent but transient, linked probably to maternity blues or atypical depression, whereas the presence of depressive symptomatology at T0 suggests higher risk of later depressive disorders.


Corresponding author: Dr Luigi Gagliardi, Pediatrics and Neonatology Division, Woman and Child Health Department, Ospedale Versilia, Via Aurelia 335, I-55043 Lido di Camaiore (LU), Italy, Tel.: +39 0584 6057161, Fax: +39 0584 6059764

“This study was supported by a grant from Piccole Stelle Onlus to AP.” [Piccole stelle is a non-profit organization].

  1. 1)

    These data were presented in part at the 48th meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Research, Prague, Czech Republic, October 6–8, 2007.

References

[1] Adouard F, Glangeaud-Freudenthal N, Golse B. Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Arch Women Ment Health. 2005;8:89–95.10.1007/s00737-005-0077-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] Benvenuti P, Ferrara M, Niccolai C, Valoriani V, Cox J. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation for an Italian sample. J Affect Disord. 1999;53:137–41.10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00102-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Brockington I, Macdonald E, Wainscott G. Anxiety, obsessions and morbid preoccupations in pregnancy and the puerperium. Arch Women Ment Health. 2006;9:253–63.10.1007/s00737-006-0134-zSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Brouwers E, VanBaar A, Pop VJ. Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? J Psychosom Res. 2001;51:659–63.10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00245-8Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chabrol H, Teissendre F. Relation between EPDS score at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks post-partum. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2004;22:33–9.10.1080/02646830310001643067Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cooper P, Murray L. Effects of postnatal depression on infant development. Arch Dis Child. 1997;77:99–101.10.1136/adc.77.2.99Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatr. 1987;150:782–6.10.1192/bjp.150.6.782Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Fabrigar L, Wegener D, MacCallum R, Strahan E. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psych Med. 1999;4:272–99.10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gagliardi L, Petrozzi A, Rusconi F. Symptoms of maternal depression immediately after delivery predict unsuccessful breastfeeding. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:355–7.10.1136/adc.2009.179697Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Goodyer I, Herbert J, Secher S, Pearson J. Short-term out-come of major depression. Comorbidity and severity at presentation as predictors of persistent disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:179–87.10.1097/00004583-199702000-00008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Guedeney N. Les enfants de parents dèprimès. Psychiatrie de l’Enfant 1989;32:269–309.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Guedeney N, Fermanian J. Validation study of the French version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): new results about use and psychometric properties. Eur Psychiatry. 1998;13:83–9.10.1016/S0924-9338(98)80023-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] Heron J, O’Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord. 2004;80:65–73.10.1016/j.jad.2003.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[14] Horowitz J, Damato E, Duffy M, Solon L. The relationship of maternal attributes, resources and perceptions of postpartum experiences to depression. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28:159–71.10.1002/nur.20068Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jomeen J, Martin C. Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2005;23:143–54.10.1080/02646830500129297Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lloyd-Williams M, Friedman T, Rudd N. Criterion validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for depression in patients with advanced metastatic cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20:259–65.10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00182-2Search in Google Scholar

[17] Matthey S. Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for anxiety disorders. Depr Anx. 2008;25: 926–31.10.1002/da.20415Search in Google Scholar

[18] Matthey S, Barnett B, Howie P, Kavanagh D. Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: whatever happened to anxiety? J Affect Disord. 2003;74:139–47.10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00012-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Miller R, Pallant J, Negri L. Anxiety and stress in the postpartum: Is there more to postnatal distress than depression? BMC Psychiatry. 2006;24:6–12.10.1186/1471-244X-6-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Montazeri A, Tirkan B, Omidvari S. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Psychiatry. 2007;7:11.10.1186/1471-244X-7-11Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Murray L, Carotheres A. The validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression. Scale on a community sample. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;157:288–90.10.1192/bjp.157.2.288Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] O’Connor TG, Heron J, Golding J, Glover V. Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: a test of a programming hypothesis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44:1025–36.10.1111/1469-7610.00187Search in Google Scholar

[23] O’Hara M. Post-partum depression: causes and consequences. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[24] O’Hara M, Swain A. Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatr. 1996;8:37–54.10.3109/09540269609037816Search in Google Scholar

[25] Parsons C, Young K, Rochat T, Kringelbach M, Stein A. Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: a review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:57–79.10.1093/bmb/ldr047Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pitt B. Atypical depression following childbirth. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114:1325–35.10.1192/bjp.114.516.1325Search in Google Scholar

[27] Pop V, Komproe I, VanSon M. Characteristics of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord. 1992;26:105–10.10.1016/0165-0327(92)90041-4Search in Google Scholar

[28] Raphael-Leff J. Psychological processes of childbearing. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Reck C, Struben K, Backenstrass M, Stefenelli U, Reinig K, Fuchs T, et al. Prevalence, onset and comorbidity of postpartum anxiety and depressive disorders. Acta Psychiatry.Scand. 2008;118:459–68.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ross L, Gilbert S, Sellers E, Romach M. Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: Anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Arch Women Ment Health. 2003;6:51–7.10.1007/s00737-002-0155-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Stein A, Craske M, Lehtonen A, Harvey A, Savage-McGlynn E, Davies B, et al. Maternal cognitions and mother-infant interaction in postnatal depression and generalized anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121:795–809.10.1037/a0026847Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Tuohy A, McVey C. Subscales measuring symptoms of nonspecific depression, anhedonia, and anxiety in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Clin Psychol. 2008;47:153–69.10.1111/j.2044-8260.2008.tb00463.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Zelkowitz P, Milet T. Screening for post-partum depression in a community sample. Can Psychiatry. 1995;40:80–6.10.1177/070674379504000205Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article

Received: 2012-10-20
Accepted: 2013-1-11
Published Online: 2013-02-21
Published in Print: 2013-07-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Review article
  4. Anxious and depressive components of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in maternal postpartum psychological problems1)
  5. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  6. Isolated low-normal amniotic fluid volume in the early third trimester: association with adverse perinatal outcomesa
  7. Trends in twin pregnancies and mode of delivery during the last 30 years: inconsistency between guidelines and clinical practice
  8. Prenatal care in adult women exposed to childhood sexual abuse
  9. Maternal and fetal adropin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus
  10. Ethnic disparities in perinatal mortality at 40 and 41 weeks of gestation
  11. Polymorphisms in the activin A receptor type 2A gene affect the onset time and severity of preeclampsia in the Turkish population
  12. Outcome of isolated fetal renal pyelectasis diagnosed during midtrimester screening ultrasound and cut-off value to predict a persistent or progressive pyelectasis in utero
  13. A polymorphism in an autophagy-related gene, ATG16L1, influences time to delivery in women with an unfavorable cervix who require labor induction
  14. Management of gestational hypertension – the impact of HYPITATa
  15. Reliability of quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix in at-term pregnancies
  16. Congenital anomalies, prematurity, and low birth weight rates in relation to nuclear power plant proximity1)
  17. Original Articles – Fetus
  18. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lymphangiomas
  19. Original Articles – Newborn
  20. Brainstem dysgenesis during the neonatal period: diagnosis and management
  21. Improving admission temperature in extremely low birth weight infants: a hospital-based multi-intervention quality improvement project
  22. Short Communication
  23. Periconceptional use of folic acid and risk of miscarriage – findings of the Oral Cleft Prevention Program in Brazil
  24. Congress Calendar
  25. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2012-0258/html
Scroll to top button