Home Factors determining choice of complementary and alternative medicine in acute and chronic diseases
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Factors determining choice of complementary and alternative medicine in acute and chronic diseases

  • Praheli Dhar Chowdhuri ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Kaushik Kundu
Published/Copyright: September 23, 2020

Abstract

Background

Systematic analysis of the determinants of choice of a treatment modality aids to the understanding of decision process of healthcare utilization. The revealed preference of a single modality may differ according to the nature of disease. Existing studies have not integrated possible causal factors in a model with respect to diseases. This study identifies major determinants and formulates their integral effect on choice of a particular modality on acute and chronic diseases in accordance to socio-behavioural model.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study on 300 samples using a 30-point questionnaire, developed in Likert scale and dichotomous scale. Possible determinants are tested on choice of CAM in case of acute disease and of chronic disease separately.

Results

Revealed single modality treatment preference (of CAM) varies widely between acute disease (13%) and chronic disease (58.67%). Bivariate associations are significant for gender (For, overall CAM preference, p=0.001, acute disease, p<0.001, chronic disease, p=0.024), Disease burden (overall and chronic: p<0.001, acute: p=0.008) and previous CAM usage (overall and chronic: p<0.001, acute: p=0.016). Social factor individually has significant influence on choosing CAM both acute (OR=1.096, p<0.001) and chronic disease (OR=1.036, p<0.001). Ideation of philosophical need factor, guided by philosophical congruence with CAM (OR=1.047, p<0.001) is a novel finding of this study. While with multiple logistic regression male gender (p=0.03), social factor (p<0.001), perception of CAM efficacy (p=0.02) and negative ideation about CAM cost-effectiveness (p=0.002) are found to be important in Acute disease; choosing CAM in chronic disease is guided by female gender (p=0.001), making decision in-group (p=0.001), low disease burden (p<0.001), philosophical need factor (p=0.001), and perception of CAM efficacy (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Demographic, social, cognitive and philosophical factors are important determinants of choosing CAM as a treatment modality over conventional medicine, but they act differently on CAM preference in acute and chronic diseases.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

[1] Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ 2002;80:981–981.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sigerist HE. Civilization and disease. NY: Cornell University Press, 2018.10.7591/9781501723452Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chandra S. Status of Indian medicine and folk healing: with a focus on integration of AYUSH medical systems in healthcare delivery. Ayu 2012;33:461.10.4103/0974-8520.110504Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Harris P, Rees R.The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among the general population: a systematic review of the literature. Complement Ther Med 2000;8:88–96.10.4324/9780203698372-10Search in Google Scholar

[5] Spigelblatt L, Laîné-Ammara G, Pless IB, Guyver A. The use of alternative medicine by children. Pediatrics 1994;94:811–14.10.1542/peds.94.6.811Search in Google Scholar

[6] Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. Jama 1998;279:1548–53.10.1001/jama.279.19.1548Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Sirois FM, Purc-Stephenson RJ. Consumer decision factors for initial and long-term use of complementary and alternative medicine. Complement Health Pract Rev 2008;13:3–19.10.1177/1533210107310824Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hunt KJ, Coelho HF, Wider B, Perry R, Hung SK, Terry R, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in England: results from a national survey. Int J Clin Pract 2010;64:1496–502.10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02484.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Wapf V, Busato A. Patients’ motives for choosing a physician: comparison between conventional and complementary medicine in Swiss primary care. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007;7:41.10.1186/1472-6882-7-41Search in Google Scholar

[10] McFadden KL, Hernández TD, Ito TA. Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine influence its use. Explore J Sci Heal 2010;6:380–8.10.1016/j.explore.2010.08.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:1–10.10.2307/2137284Search in Google Scholar

[12] O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in Health Care: shared decision making using patient decision aids: a review of the evidence base for shared decision making. Health Aff 2004;23:VAR-63.10.1377/hlthaff.var.63Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Singh V, Raidoo DM, Harries CS. The prevalence, patterns of usage and people’s attitude towards complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among the Indian community in Chatsworth, South Africa. BMC Complement Altern Med 2004;4:3.10.1186/1472-6882-4-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Ryan M, Johnson MS. Use of alternative medications in patients with neurologic disorders. Annals Pharmacother 2002;36:1540–5.10.1345/aph.1A455Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Evans M, Shaw A, Thompson EA, Falk S, Turton P, Thompson T, et al. Decisions to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by male cancer patients: information-seeking roles and types of evidence used. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007;7:25.10.1186/1472-6882-7-25Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Eisenberg DM, Post DE, Davis RB, Connelly MT, Legedza AT, Hrbek AL, et al. Addition of choice of complementary therapies to usual care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007;32:151–8.10.1097/01.brs.0000252697.07214.65Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Egede LE, Ye X, Zheng D, Silverstein MD. The prevalence and pattern of complementary and alternative medicine use in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:324–9.10.2337/diacare.25.2.324Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Cochran WG. Sampling techniques, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977:374.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Taylor SL, Cosenza RM. A conceptual choice model for hospital services. J Marketing Theory Practice 1999;7:20–32.10.1080/10696679.1999.11501848Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ranstad K, Midlöv P, Halling A. Importance of healthcare utilization and multimorbidity level in choosing a primary care provider in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 2014;32:99–105.10.3109/02813432.2014.929819Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Fouladbakhsh JM, Stommel M. Comparative analysis of CAM use in the US cancer and noncancer populations. J Complement Integ Med 2008;5. Article 19.10.2202/1553-3840.1140Search in Google Scholar

[22] Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat report 2008;10:1–23.10.1037/e623942009-001Search in Google Scholar

[23] Shere-Wolfe KD, Tilburt JC, D'Adamo C, Berman B, Chesney MA. Infectious diseases physicians’ attitudes and practices related to complementary and integrative medicine: results of a national survey. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;294381:1–8.10.1155/2013/294381Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Sparber A, Wootton JC.Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part V. Use of alternative and complementary therapies for psychiatric and neurologic diseases. J Altern Comp Med 2002;8:93–6.10.1089/107555302753507230Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Guendelman S. Health care users residing on the Mexican border. What factors determine choice of the US or Mexican health system? Med Care 1991;29:419–29.10.1097/00005650-199105000-00003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Wolinsky FD, Johnson RJ. The use of health services by older adults. J Gerontol 1991;46:S345–S357.10.1093/geronj/46.6.S345Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Lim MK, Sadarangani P, Chan HL, Heng JY. Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore. Complement Ther Med 2005;13:16–24.10.1016/j.ctim.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] MacLennan AH, Myers SP, Taylor AW. The continuing use of complementary and alternative medicine in South Australia: costs and beliefs in 2004. Medl J Au 2006;184:27.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00092.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] van der Sluijs C, Lombardo FL, Lesi G, Bensoussan A, Cardini F. Social and cultural factors affecting complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use during menopause in Sydney and Bologna. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;836234:1–6.10.1155/2013/836234Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Shim JM. The influence of social context on the treatment outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine: the case of acupuncture and herbal medicine in Japan and the US. Global Health 2015;11:17.10.1186/s12992-015-0103-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Zörgő S, Purebl G, Zana Á. A qualitative study of culturally embedded factors in complementary and alternative medicine use. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018;18:25.10.1186/s12906-018-2093-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Flynn KE, Smith MA, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1158–69.10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-04-15
Accepted: 2019-09-27
Published Online: 2020-09-23

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Reviews
  2. Hammam-i-Bukhari (Turkish bath): A promising regimenal mode of Unani treatment
  3. Assessment the studies on the concept of Mizaj (temperament) in Persian Medicine
  4. Phytotherapy in endometriosis: an up-to-date review
  5. Research Articles
  6. Preclinical
  7. Exploring the phytochemical and nutraceutical potentials of dasapatrachurnam
  8. Evaluation of Moroccan microalgae: Spirulina platensis as a potential source of natural antioxidants
  9. The Metabolomic study of Calotropis procera Ait. from Burkina Faso, based on chemical functional groups profiling using FTIR
  10. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effect of Adiantum lunulatum Burm. F. leaf in alcohol-induced rat model
  11. Protective effect of Matricaria chamomilla extract against 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal cancer in mice
  12. Synergistic action of propolis with levodopa in the management of Parkinsonism in Drosophila melanogaster
  13. Clinical
  14. Factors determining choice of complementary and alternative medicine in acute and chronic diseases
  15. Morbidity profile of patients seeking Naturopathy and Yoga treatment in South India: A descriptive study
  16. A randomized trial of the effect of peer education on the sexual quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction
  17. Effectiveness of nurse-led intervention on self-management, self-efficacy and blood glucose level among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  18. Antimicrobial activity of selected plants against fungal species isolated from South African AIDS patients and their antigonococcal activity
  19. Compare the effect of aromatherapy using lavender and Damask rose essential oils on the level of anxiety and severity of pain following C-section: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial
  20. Effectiveness of yogic visual concentration (Trataka) on cognitive performance and anxiety among adolescents
  21. Effect of pre-cesarean foot reflexology massage on anxiety of primiparous women
  22. Effect of abdominal massage on prevention of aspiration in intubated and enterally fed patients: A randomized controlled trial
  23. Short Communications
  24. Effect of bilateral needling at an acupuncture point, ST-36 (Zusanli) on blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A pilot randomized placebo controlled trial
  25. Oxidative stress in Vitiligo patients and administration of Munzij and Mushil therapy, a poly herbal Unani formulation – hospital-based study
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2019-0105/html
Scroll to top button