Home Comparative evaluation of hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activity of various extract of Anogeissus latifolia bark in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparative evaluation of hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activity of various extract of Anogeissus latifolia bark in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

  • Subramaniam Ramachandran EMAIL logo , Thekkin Kattil Faisal , Jose Anjumary , Aiyalu Rajasekaran , Kuppusamy Asokkumar , Kuppusamy Annadurai , Ramasamy Arivukkarasu , Rajeev Kumar Sharma and Madhira Bhavani Shankar
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2017

Abstract

Background

Anogeissus latifolia Wall. (A. latifolia) bark has been traditionally used in the treatment of various diseases which includes diabetes and general debility. The present study was aimed to investigate the comparative hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activity of various extracts of A. latifolia bark in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats.

Methods

Acute toxicity was carried out at 2 g/kg dose of petroleum ether extract of A. latifolia bark (PEALB), chloroform extract of A. latifolia bark (CEALB) and methanol extract of A. latifolia bark (MEALB) in rats. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (STZ, 60 mg/kg, i.p.) and it was confirmed at 72 h. Diabetic rats received above extracts at 100 and 200 mg/kg doses for 28 days. Body weight and blood glucose level were determined at every week after the treatment schedule. Serum biochemical parameters and lipid profile levels were estimated at the end of the study.

Results

PEALB, CEALB and MEALB were non-toxic and no death was observed at 2 g/kg dose. Administration of MEALB at 100 and 200 mg/kg showed significant (p< 0.01, p< 0.05) improvement in body weight and reduction in blood glucose at third and fourth week of treatment. Altered serum biochemical parameters and lipid profiles level were brought to near normal level significantly (p<0.001) compared to diabetic control rats after the administration of both doses of MEALB. However, PEALB and CEALB did not exhibit significant hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activity.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that long-term (28 days) treatment of MEALB possesses significant hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activity compared to PEALB and CEALB in type 1 diabetic rats and given evidence to the traditional use of A. latifolia bark in diabetes.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kumar V, Abbas K, Fausto N. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of diseases. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunder, 2004:1189.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature. 2001;414:782–787.10.1038/414782aSearch in Google Scholar

3. Aissaoui A, Zizi S, Israili ZH, Lyoussi B. Hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effect of Coriandrum sativum L. in Meriones shawi rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:652–661.10.1016/j.jep.2011.06.019Search in Google Scholar

4. Patel DK, Prasad SK, Kumar R, Hemalatha S. An overview on antidiabetic medicinal plants having insulin mimetic property. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2012;2:320–330.10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60032-XSearch in Google Scholar

5. Warrier PK, Nambiar VPK, Ramankutty C. Indian medicinal plants: A compendium of 500 species. Chennai: Orient Longman, 1994:163.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rajender A, Suresh A, Suresh V, Saker G, Varaprasad N. Evaluation of antiulcer activity of methanolic extract of Anogeissus latifolia leaves in albino rats. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2011;2:677–680.Search in Google Scholar

7. Govindarajan R, Vijayakumar M, Singh M, Chandana VR, Shirwaikar A, Ajay KS. Antiulcer and antimicrobial activity of Anogeissus latifolia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;106:57–61.10.1016/j.jep.2005.12.002Search in Google Scholar

8. Hemamalini K, Naik OPK, Peddi A. Study of phytochemical and diuretic potential of methanol and aqueous extracts of leaf parts of Anogiessus latifolia. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci. 2011;2:136–139.Search in Google Scholar

9. Saleemulla K, Pradeep HA, Ashok Kumar BS, Anil Kumar M, Manimaran S, Raghu C. Chemoprotective effect of Anogeissus Latifolia bark extract on paracetamol- induced hepatotoxicity. Pharmacologyonline. 2008;2:303–327.Search in Google Scholar

10. Veeresh SV, Deeparani KU, Veeresh B, Naveen P. Anogeissus latifolia prevents gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Int J Ph Sci. 2011;3:1091–1095.Search in Google Scholar

11. Udaysing HP, Gaikwad DK. Phytochemical profile and antibacterial activity of stem bark of Anogeissus latifolia. Phcog J. 2010;2:70–73.10.1016/S0975-3575(10)80014-8Search in Google Scholar

12. Veenavamsheea R, Nusrath Y, Kishorea DV, Sujatha KC. Evaluation of renal protective effects of Anogeissus latifolia in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2011;11:58–63.Search in Google Scholar

13. Govindarajan R, Chandana V, Venkateshwara R, Shirwaikar A, Mehrotra S, Pushpangadan P. Healing potential of Anogeissus latifolia for dermal wounds in rats. Acta Pharm. 2004;54:331–338.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mazzone T. Intensive glucose lowering and cardiovascular disease prevention in diabetes: Reconciling the recent clinical trial data. Circulation. 2010;122:2201–2211.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.913350Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Khandelwal KR. Practical pharmacognosy. Pune: Nirali Prakashan, 2004:149–155.Search in Google Scholar

16. OECD 423. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals: Acute oral toxicity-Acute toxic class method. December 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ramachandran S, Asokkumar K, Umamaheswari M, Ravi TK, Sivashanmugam AT, Saravanan S. Investigation of antidiabetic, antihyperlipidemic, and in vivo antioxidant properties of Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. in type 1 diabetic rats: An identification of possible biomarkers. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:571721.10.1155/2011/571721Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Vogel HG, Vogel WH. Drug discovery and evaluation. Berlin: Springer, 2002:772–773.10.1007/3-540-29837-1Search in Google Scholar

19. Sabitha V, Ramachandran S, Naveen KR, Paneerselvam K. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic potential of Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3:397–402.10.4103/0975-7406.84447Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Wintrobe MM. Clinical haematology. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

21. Jeppsson JO, Kobold U, Barr J, Finke A, Hoelzel W, Hoshino T. Approved IFCC reference method for the measurement of HbA1c in human blood. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40:78–89.10.1515/CCLM.2002.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lopes-Virella MF, Stone P, Ellis S, Colwell JA. Cholesterol determination in high density lipoproteins separated by three different methods. Clin Chem. 1977;23:882–884.10.1093/clinchem/23.5.882Search in Google Scholar

23. Cole TG, Klotzsch SG, Mcnarmara J. Measurement of triglyceride concentration. In Handbook of lipoprotein testing. Washington: AACC Press, 1997:115–126.Search in Google Scholar

24. Deeg R, Ziegenhorn J. Kinetic enzyme method for automated determination of total cholesterol in serum. Clin Chem. 1983;29:1798–1802.10.1093/clinchem/29.10.1798Search in Google Scholar

25. Weis WA. Estimation of albumin and total protein. Klin Wochenschr. 1965;43:273.10.1007/BF01482250Search in Google Scholar

26. Michael P, Malcolm W. Measurement of serum creatinine-current status and future goals. Clin Biochem Rev. 2006;27:173–184.Search in Google Scholar

27. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Company, 1999:1838.Search in Google Scholar

28. Thomas L. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. Frankfurt: TH- books Verlagsgesellschaft, 1998:208–214.Search in Google Scholar

29. Weichselbaum TE. An accurate and rapid method for the determination of proteins in small amounts of blood serum and plasma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1946;10:40–49.10.1093/ajcp/16.3_ts.40Search in Google Scholar

30. Moss DW, Henderson AR. Clinical enzymology. In Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Company, 1999:1788–1846.Search in Google Scholar

31. Friedewald WT, Warnick GR, Dominiczak MH. Estimation of VLDL and LDL cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499Search in Google Scholar

32. Mediha S, Hamadi F, Nadya L, Adil T, Badiaa L, Tahia B. Cetaurium erythrea (Gentianaceae) leaf extract alleviates streptozotocin- induced oxidative stress and β- cell damage in rat pancrease. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;135:243–250.10.1016/j.jep.2011.02.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Vivek KS. Streptozotocin: An experimental tool in diabetes and alzheimers disease. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2010;2:1–7 .Search in Google Scholar

34. Arulmozhi S, Mitra PM, Lhidasan S, Prasad T. Antidiabetic activity of Alstonia scholaris Linn. R. Br. Eur J Integ Med. 2010;2:23–32.10.1016/j.eujim.2009.12.001Search in Google Scholar

35. Chait A, Bornfeldt KE. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: Is there a role for hyperglycemia?. J Lip Res. 2009;50:S333–S335.10.1194/jlr.R800059-JLR200Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Manohar SM, Vaikasuvu SR, Deepthi K, Sachan A, Narasimha SRPVL. An association of hyperglycemia with plasma malondialdehyde and atherogenic lipid risk factors in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18:89–93.Search in Google Scholar

37. Lenzen S. The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin induced diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008;51:216–226.10.1007/s00125-007-0886-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Aurell M, Bjorck S. Determination of progressive renal disease in diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int Suppl. 1992;36:S38–S42.Search in Google Scholar

39. Kaleem M, Medha P, Ahmed QU, Asif M, Bano B. Beneficial effect of Annona squamosa extract in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:800–804.Search in Google Scholar

40. Khaw KT, Wareham N, Luben R, Bingham S, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk). BMJ. 2001;322:15–18.10.1136/bmj.322.7277.15Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Govindrajan R, Madhavan V, Rao CV, Shirwaikar A, Rawat AKS, Pushpagadan P. Antioxidant potential of Anogenissus latifolia. Biol Pharm Bull. 2004;27:1266–1269.10.1248/bpb.27.1266Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Govindrajan R, Vijayakumar M, Rao CV, Mehrotra S. Activity guided isolation of antioxidant tannoid principles from Anogenissus latifolia. Nat Prod Sci. 2005;11:174–178.Search in Google Scholar

43. Reddy KK, Rajadurai S, Nayudamma Y. Studies on Dhava (Anogeissus latifolia) tannins: Part III – Polyphenols of bark, sapwood and heartwood of Dhava. Indian J Chem. 1965;3:308–310.Search in Google Scholar

44. Ananth PH, Khan S, Chandrasekhar R, Ibrahim M. Development of validated HPTLC method for simultaneous quantification of rutin and quercetin from bark of Anogeissus latifolia. Int J Pharm. 2012;2:33–38.Search in Google Scholar

45. Deshpande VH, Patil AD, Rao AVR, Venkatraman K. Chemical constituents of Anogeissus latifolia heartwood: Isolation of 3,3ʹ-di-O-methylellagic acid-4ʹ-N-D-glucoside. Indian J Chem. 1976;14B:641–643.Search in Google Scholar

46. Rahman MS, Rahman MZ, Ahaduddin ANM, Rashid MA. Steroids and triterpenoids from Anogeissus latifolia. Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci. 2007;6:47–50.10.3329/dujps.v6i1.343Search in Google Scholar

47. Dias AS, Porwski M, Alonso M, Marroni N, Collado PS, Gonzalez-Gallego J. Quercetin decreases oxidative stress, NF-κB activation, and iNOS over expression in liver of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Nutr. 2005;135:2299–2304.10.1093/jn/135.10.2299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Latha RCR, Daisy P. Insulin-secretagogue, antihyperlipidemic and other protective effects of gallic acid isolated from Terminalia bellerica Roxb. in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2011;189:112–118.10.1016/j.cbi.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Prasad CN, Anjana T, Banerji A, Gopalakrishnapillai A. Gallic acid induces GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake activity in 3T3-L1 cells. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:531–536.10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.092Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Sameermahmood Z, Raji L, Saravanan T, Vaidya A, Mohan V, Balasubramanyam M. Gallic acid protects RINm5F beta-cells from glucolipotoxicity by its anti-apoptotic and insulin-secretagogue actions. Phytother Res. 2010;24:S83–S94 –.10.1002/ptr.2926Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Malini P, Kanchana G, Rajadurai M. Antidiabetic efficacy of ellagic acid in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in albino Wistar rats. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2011;4:124–128.Search in Google Scholar

52. Naowaboot J, Chung CH, Choi R. Rutin stimulates adipocyte differentiation and adiponectin secretion in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98:S1–S6.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-27
Accepted: 2017-2-14
Published Online: 2017-6-22

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2016-0130/html
Scroll to top button