The Food Safety Fence: Gaps and Consequences
-
Patrick Rippy
Abstract
In this world, there are many potential hazards that could lead to a nationwide biosecurity threat. On the one hand, there are the unintended perils that result from natural outbreaks, such as with domestic food contamination. On the other hand, there are the intentional actions that lead to incidents of agroterrorism, which can reap significant economic loss, widespread destruction of crops and livestock, as well as increased human illness and death. For these reasons, the United States government has implemented various mechanisms over time in order to combat the food-borne threats imposed by both intentional and unintentional biosecurity hazards. For the purpose of this paper, these mechanisms will be referred to as the “food safety fence.”
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Introduction
- Introduction to Volume XI
- Articles
- Vaccines and the Armed Forces: There “AIN’T” NO “Anti-vaxxers” in the Military
- Mandatory Incident Reporting as a Means to Counter C/B Terrorism: Moving from Accident-based to Incident-based Systems
- DIY Science: A Cure for Cancer of the Next Plague
- The Constitutionality of Mandatory Vaccinations: Eliminating Exemptions
- The Food Safety Fence: Gaps and Consequences
- Biosurveillance: A Modern Look
- The 2014 Global Health Security Agenda
- Let’s Make a (Smart) Deal: Biodiplomacy in the Age of Trump
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Introduction
- Introduction to Volume XI
- Articles
- Vaccines and the Armed Forces: There “AIN’T” NO “Anti-vaxxers” in the Military
- Mandatory Incident Reporting as a Means to Counter C/B Terrorism: Moving from Accident-based to Incident-based Systems
- DIY Science: A Cure for Cancer of the Next Plague
- The Constitutionality of Mandatory Vaccinations: Eliminating Exemptions
- The Food Safety Fence: Gaps and Consequences
- Biosurveillance: A Modern Look
- The 2014 Global Health Security Agenda
- Let’s Make a (Smart) Deal: Biodiplomacy in the Age of Trump
