Home Emotion labor in response to supervisor feedback: is feedback a burden or a blessing?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Emotion labor in response to supervisor feedback: is feedback a burden or a blessing?

  • Mostafa Nazari EMAIL logo and Mohammad Nabi Karimi
Published/Copyright: April 3, 2024

Abstract

In recent years, research on the emotional side of language teachers’ work has grown exponentially. One progressively-developing subset of this line of inquiry concerns how institutional discourses/expectations interact with teachers’ internal feelings, which bears on how they manage their emotions in response to such an interaction and is known as emotion labor. One type of institutional expectation of concern to the present study is the feedback that institutional supervisors provided for the teachers and could be a source of emotion labor. Motivated by this consideration, this study explored 12 Iranian EFL teachers’ emotion labor in relation to supervisor feedback on their classroom instruction. The context of the study was a language school governed by mostly top-down policies, especially those of classroom observation, realized mainly through providing post-class feedback by school supervisors, with little interaction between them and the teachers. Drawing on data from interviews and narrative frames, we report on how supervisor feedback on the teachers’ classroom instruction functioned as a source of emotional tension for the teachers and how they engaged in surface- and deep-acting management of their emotions to navigate the supervisory feedback. Based on the findings, we provide implications for teacher educators and school supervisors to reconsider their post-class supervisory feedback so that teachers experience less emotional tension.


Corresponding author: Mostafa Nazari, Department of English and Communication, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to cordially thank the participating teachers and reviewers of the paper.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Research ethics: We declare that all of the ethical considerations in data collection and analysis, especially in relation to participants, have been observed.

  3. Author contributions: Mostafa Nazari designed the study and the collected the data. Mohammad Nabi Karimi engaged in checking the themes and together with Mostafa, and both wrote the manuscript.

  4. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

Ary, Donald, Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Christine Sorenson & David A. Walker. 2010. Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Babaii, Esmat, Khazar Molana & Mostafa Nazari. 2021. Contributions of assessment-related critical incidents to language teacher identity development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 15(5). 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1824234.Search in Google Scholar

Baleghizadeh, Sasan. 2015. Feedback type preferred by Iranian EFL teachers in postobservation meetings. In C. Kennedy (ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges, 151–161. Cham: Spring Gardens.Search in Google Scholar

Barkhuizen, Gary & Rosemary Wette. 2008. Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System 36. 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

Benesch, Sarah. 2017. Emotions in English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9781315736181Search in Google Scholar

Benesch, Sarah. 2018. Emotions as agency: Feeling rules, emotion labor, and English language teachers’ decision-making. System 79. 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

Benesch, S. & Matthew Prior. 2023. Rescuing “emotion labor” from (and for) language teacher emotion research. System 113. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102995.Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, Caroline. 2008. Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal 62(1). 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm076.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, Nathan. 2009. Negotiating authority in undergraduate teacher education course: A qualitative investigation. Teacher Education Quarterly 36. 99–118.Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, Nathan. 2012. Negotiating authority through jointly constructing course curriculum. Teachers and Teaching 18. 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.632273.Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, Nathan. 2015. Critical moments in negotiating authority: Grading, accountability, and teacher education. Teaching Education 26(2). 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.996742.Search in Google Scholar

Copland, Fiona. 2010. Causes of tension in post-observation feedback in pre-service teacher training: An alternative view. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(3). 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

De Costa, Peter I. 2015. Re-envisioning language anxiety in the globalized classroom through a social imaginary lens. Language Learning 65(3). 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12121.Search in Google Scholar

De Costa, Peter I., Hima Rawal & Wendy Li. 2018. Broadening the second language teacher education agenda: International perspectives on teacher emotions. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 41(4). 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2018-0030.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2019. The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38(4). 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x19864996.Search in Google Scholar

Ebadijalal, Marjan & Shahab Moradkhani. 2022. Understanding EFL teachers’ wellbeing: An activity theoretic perspective. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221125558.Search in Google Scholar

Gkonou, Christina & Elizabeth R. Miller. 2021. An exploration of language teacher reflection, emotion labor, and emotional capital. Tesol Quarterly 55(1). 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.580.Search in Google Scholar

Greenier, Vincent, A. Derakhshan & J. Fathi. 2021. Emotion regulation and psychological well-being in teacher work engagement: A case of British and Iranian English language teachers. System 97. 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102446.Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85. 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049.Search in Google Scholar

Kocabaş-Gedik, P. & Ortaçtepe Hart, Deniz. 2021. “It’s not like that at all”: A poststructuralist case study on language teacher identity and emotional labor. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 20(2). 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726756.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Wendy. 2022. Unpacking the complexities of teacher identity: Narratives of two Chinese teachers of English in China. Language Teaching Research 26(4). 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820910955.Search in Google Scholar

Meidl, Christopher, Christine Vanorsdale, Kristen Mahony & Jason Ritter. 2023. Examining how power is used in instructor feedback to preservice teachers to encourage asset-based thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education 123. 104007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.104007.Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, Sara. 2020. The wellbeing of language teachers in the private sector: An ecological perspective. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820973510.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Elizabeth & Christina Gkonou. 2018. Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System 79. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

Nazari, Mostafa & Sedigheh Karimpour. 2022. The role of emotion labor in English language teacher identity construction: An activity theory perspective. System 107. 102811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102811.Search in Google Scholar

Nazari, Mostafa & Sedigheh Karimpour. 2023. “Teacher, man mitoonam…?”: Translanguaging and English language teacher emotion labor. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2167206.Search in Google Scholar

Nazari, Mostafa & Khazar Molana. 2022. “Predators of emotions”: The role of school assessment policies in English language teachers’ emotion labor. Tesol Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3188.Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta. 2013. The affective turn in SLA: From ‘affective factors’ to ‘language desire’ and ‘commodification of affect. In D. Gabryś-Barker & J. Bielska (eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition, 3–28. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Skovholt, Karianne. 2018. Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter. Teaching and Teacher Education 69. 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.012.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Juyoung. 2021. Emotional labour and professional development in ELT. ELT Journal 75(4). 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab036.Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, Camilla & Randi Reppen. 2007. Transforming practice: Changing patterns of participation in post-observation meetings. Language Awareness 16(3). 153–172. https://doi.org/10.2167/la454.0.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Kira Elena, Bernadette Gold, Christopher Neil Prilop & Marc Kleinknecht. 2018. Promoting pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management during practical school training: Effects of a structured online-and video-based self-reflection and feedback intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education 76. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Dominik & Peter I. De Costa. 2017. Expanding the language teacher identity landscape: An investigation of the emotions and strategies of a NNEST. The Modern Language Journal 101(S1). 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12370.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-15
Accepted: 2024-03-16
Published Online: 2024-04-03
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0081/html
Scroll to top button