Developing L2 learners’ metaphoric competence: a case study of figurative motion constructions

References

Achard, Michel & Susanne Niemeier (eds.). 2008. Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Acquaroni Muñoz, Rosana & Laura Suárez-Campos. 2019. El desarrollo de la competencia metafórica en la enseñanza del español LE/L2. In Iraide Ibarretxe, Teresa Cadierno & Alejandro Castañeda (eds.), Lingüística cognitiva y español LE/L2, 371–391. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315622842-17Suche in Google Scholar

Alghamdi, Amani, Michael Daller & James Milton. 2019. The persistence of L1 patterns in SLA: The boundary crossing constraint and incidental learning. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16. 81–106. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i16.94.Suche in Google Scholar

Andria, Maria & Alberto Hijazo-Gascón. 2018. Deictic motion verbs in Greek as a Foreign Language by Spanish and Catalan L1 learners: A preliminary approach. Glossologia 26. 121–135.Suche in Google Scholar

Bachman, Lyle. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Benedict, Helen. 1979. Early lexical development: Comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6(2). 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900002245.Suche in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank. 2014. Cognitive Linguistics and language pedagogy: Finding ways forward. 9th AELCO international conference, Badajoz, Spain. AELCO.Suche in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg (eds.). 2008. Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199161Suche in Google Scholar

Bylund, Emanuel & Panos Athanasopoulos. 2015. Introduction: Cognition, motion events, and SLA. The Modern Language Journal 99. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12175.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In Michel Achard & Susanne Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching, 13–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199857.13Suche in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa. 2017. Thinking for speaking about motion in a second language. In Iraide Ibarretxe (ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications, 279–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59.12cadSuche in Google Scholar

Calle-Bocanegra, Rosalía. 2019. Acquisition of deictic movement verbs by Czech learners of Spanish as a foreign language. Language Design 21. 83–106.Suche in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2002. Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics 23(1). 104–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.104.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheikh-Khamis, Fátima. 2019. Los verbos de cambio en materiales de enseñanza de ELE: un análisis crítico. Revista Nebrija: de lingüística aplicada a la Enseñanza de las lenguas 14(28). 152–173.Suche in Google Scholar

Colasacco, Marina Anna. 2019. A cognitive approach to teaching deictic motion verbs to German and Italian students of Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57(1). 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2007.Suche in Google Scholar

Craighero, Laila, Valentina Ghirardi, Marco Lunghi, Fiorenza Panin & Francesca Simion. 2020. Two-day-old newborns learn to discriminate accelerated-decelerated biological kinematics from constant velocity motion. Cognition 195. 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104126.Suche in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gómez Vicente, Lucía. 2012. Conceptualización y expresión lingüística del evento emocional en español (L1/L2) y francés: un enfoque cognitivo. Análisis lingüístico y proposición didáctica. Granada, España y Grenoble, Francia: Universidad de Granada y Université Grenoble Tesis de Magíster.Suche in Google Scholar

Gómez Vicente, Lucía. 2020. Aportes de la polisemia para la descripción y la enseñanza de los verbos de cambio. Análisis del uso de poner y volver en L1 y L2. RLA 58(2). 15–40. https://doi.org/10.29393/rla58-8aplg10008.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoang, Ha & Frank Boers. 2018. Gauging the association of EFL learners’ writing proficiency and their use of metaphorical language. System 74. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide & Fátima Cheikh-Khamis. 2019. “How to become a woman without turning into a Barbie”: Change-of-state verbconstructions and their role in Spanish as a Foreign Language. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57(1). 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide & Alberto Hijazo-Gascón. 2012. Variation in motion events. In Luna Filipovic & Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity, 349–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.36.19ibaSuche in Google Scholar

Jeannette, Littlemore & Juchem-Grundm ann Constanze (eds.). 2010. Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Janice. 1991. Developmental versus language-based factors in metaphor interpretation. Journal of Educational Psychology 83(4). 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.470.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. Emotion concepts in a new light. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio (Special Issue). 42–54.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán, Gary B. Palmer & René Dirven. 2003. Language and emotion: The interplay of conceptualisation with physiology and culture. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 133–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219197.133Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Journal of Pragmatics 34(12). 1903–1909. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium20004110.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P. & Larysa Bobrova. 2014. Metaphor instruction in the L2 Spanish classroom: Theoretical argument and pedagogical program. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 1(1). 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2014.898515.Suche in Google Scholar

Laws, Jacqueline, Anthony Attwood & Jeanine Treffers-Daller. 2021. Unlearning the boundary-crossing constraint: Processing instruction and the acquisition of motion event construal. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60(4). 1089–1118.10.1515/iral-2020-0147Suche in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2001. Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly 35. 459–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588031.Suche in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette & Graham Low. 2006. Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics 27(2). 268–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml004.Suche in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2010. Metaphoric competence in the first and second language. In Martin Pütz & Laura Sicola (eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisiton: Inside the learner’s mind, 293–316. John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.13.20litSuche in Google Scholar

Llopis-García, Reyes. 2018. ¿Qué apunta la investigación empírica? In 11th International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association. Córdoba, Spain: AELCO.Suche in Google Scholar

Llopis-García, Reyes. 2019. Cognitive approaches to L2 pedagogy: Challenges and shortcomings of empirical testing. In Internacional Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Japan, ICLC 15.Suche in Google Scholar

Llopis-García, Reyes. 2021. Applied cognitive linguistics for meaningful–and successful!–L2 language teaching. In 2nd Young Researchers of Cognitive Linguistics Conference (YRCL, Online).Suche in Google Scholar

Llopis-García, Reyes. 2023. Applied cognitive linguistics and L2 instruction (provisional title). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009128094Suche in Google Scholar

Low, Graham D. 1988. On teaching metaphor. Applied Linguistics 9(2). 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.2.125.Suche in Google Scholar

MacArthur, Fiona & Jeannette Littlemore. 2011. On the repetition of words with the potential for metaphoric extension in conversations between native and non-native speakers of English. Metaphor and the Social World 1(2). 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.05mac.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsden, Emma & Carole J. Torgerson. 2012. Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education 38(5). 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208.Suche in Google Scholar

Martín Bosque, Adelaida. 2012. Los verbos de cambio en los diccionarios monolingües de E/LE. In Antonio Nomdedeu Rull, Esther Forgas Berdet & María Bargalló Escrivà (eds.), Avances en lexicografía hispánica, 233–244. Tarragona: Universitat Rovira i Virgili.Suche in Google Scholar

Martín-Gascón, Beatriz. 2022a. An English analysis of the ponerse construction. In Beatriz Martín-Gascón (ed.), Cognitive linguistics and its application in Spanish/L2 teaching: towards a more meaningful learning of the expression of emotion, 161–173. Cordoba: Universidad de Córdoba.Suche in Google Scholar

Martín-Gascón, Beatriz. 2022b. Why in Spanish “Nos ponemos contentos” but not “satisfechos”: A cognitive-linguistic review of the “change-of-state verb ponerse + adjective” construction. Studia Linguistica 76(2). 552–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12188.Suche in Google Scholar

Martín-Gascón, Beatriz. 2023a. Building bridges between conceptual metaphor theory, L2 speakers’ perception, and pedagogical practice. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, In press.10.1080/03740463.2023.2187989Suche in Google Scholar

Martín-Gascón, Beatriz. 2023b. The effects of cognitive-based instruction on figurative constructions comprehension and production. Porta Linguarum, In press.10.30827/portalin.vi41.26121Suche in Google Scholar

Martín-Gascón, Beatriz, Reyes Llopis-García & Irene Alonso-Aparicio. 2023. Testing the empirical validity of applied cognitive linguistics: A study for the psych-verb construction in L2. Language Teaching research, In press.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, George & Philip Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674421288Suche in Google Scholar

Montero-Melis, Guillermo & Emanuel Bylund. 2017. Getting the ball rolling: The cross-linguistic conceptualization of caused motion. Language and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language and Cognitive Science 9(3). 446–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.22.Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Meritxell & Teresa Cadierno. 2019. Mr Bean exits the garage driving or does he drive out of the garage? Bidirectional transfer in the expression of Path. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57(1). 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2006.Suche in Google Scholar

Nacey, Susanne. 2013. Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/milcc.2Suche in Google Scholar

Niemeier, Susanne. 2017. Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.10.1515/east-2018-0048Suche in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, David & Emma Marsden. 2021. Elicited metaphoric competence in a second language: A construct associated with vocabulary knowledge and general proficiency? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Ahead of Print). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0054, In press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pawełczyk, Agnieszka, Emilia Łojek & Tomasz Pawełczyk. 2017. Metaphor processing in schizophrenia patients: A study of comprehension and explanation of metaphors. Psychology of Language and Communication 21(1). 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2017-0014.Suche in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2013. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4). 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12001495.Suche in Google Scholar

RahYangon & Hyunwoo Kim. 2018. Construction-based approach to teaching the English resultative construction to Korean EFL learners. System 72(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.027.Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez-Campos, Laura & Alberto Hijazo-Gascón. 2019. La metáfora conceptual y su aplicación a la enseñanza del español LE/L2. In Iraide Ibarretxe, Teresa Cadierno & Alejandro Castañeda (eds.), Lingüística cognitiva y español LE/L2, 235–252. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315622842-11Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Woodward, Amanda L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition 69(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00058-4.Suche in Google Scholar