Low-level visual processing of motion events as a window into language-specific effects on perception

References

Brainard, David. 1997. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10. 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00357.Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald, Douglas Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4). 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale, Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera. 2010. How the languages we speak shape the ways we think: The FAQs. In Michael Spivey, Marc Joanisse & Ken McRae (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics, 615–632. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139029377.032Suche in Google Scholar

Boutonnet, Bastien, Panos Athanasopoulos & Guillaume Thierry. 2012. Unconscious effects of grammatical gender during object categorisation. Brain Research 1479. 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.044.Suche in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa & Lucas Ruiz. 2006. Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4(1). 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad.Suche in Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel. 2008. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language and learning 58. 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00462.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Liang & Jiansheng Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9). 1749–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Dehaene, Stanislas, Jean-Pierre Changeux, Lionel Naccache, Jérôme Sackur & Claire Sergent. 2006. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Den Ouden, Hanneke, Peter Kok & Floris De Lange. 2012. How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology 3. 548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548.Suche in Google Scholar

Duncan, Susan. 2001. Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: Manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 27(1). 353–370. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.3181.Suche in Google Scholar

Engemann, Helen, Anne-Katharina Harr & Maya Hickmann. 2012. Caused motion events across languages and learner types: A comparison of bilingual first and adult second language acquisition. In Luna Filipović & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures, 263–288. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.36.15engSuche in Google Scholar

Firestone, Chaz & Brian Scholl. 2014. “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science 25. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613485092.Suche in Google Scholar

Flecken, Monique, Panos Athanasopoulos, Jan Rouke Kuipers & Guillaume Thierry. 2015. On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition 141. 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Forrin, Noah, Brianna Groot & Colin MacLeod. 2016. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42(7). 1090–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000214.Suche in Google Scholar

Francken, Jolien, Peter Kok, Peter Hagoort & Floris De Lange. 2015. The behavioral and neural effects of language on motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(1). 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00682.Suche in Google Scholar

Gao, Shan, Ondrej Zika, Robert Rogers & Guillaume Thierry. 2015. Second language feedback abolishes the “hot hand” effect during even-probability gambling. Journal of Neuroscience 35. 5983–5989. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3622-14.2015.Suche in Google Scholar

Gayet, Surya, Stefan van der Stigchel & Chris Paffen. 2014. Breaking continuous flash suppression: Competing consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield. Frontiers in Psychology 5(460). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00460.Suche in Google Scholar

Gennari, Silvia, Steven Sloman, Barbara Malt & Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83. 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00166-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Gleitman, Lila & Anna Papafragou. 2005. Language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gray, Katie, Wendy Adams, Nicholas Hedger, Kristiana Newton & Matthew Garner. 2013. Faces and awareness: Low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance. Emotion 13. 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031403.Suche in Google Scholar

Hickmann, Maya & Henriëtte Hendriks. 2010. Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2). 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Hickmann, Maya, Helen Engemann, Efstathia Soroli, Henriëtte Hendriks & Coralie Vincent. 2017. Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications, 61–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59.04hicSuche in Google Scholar

January, David & Edward Kako. 2007. Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky. Cognition 104. 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ji, Yinglin. 2017. Motion events similarity judgments in one or two languages: An exploration of monolingual speakers of English and Chinese vs. L2 Learners of English. Frontiers in Psychology 8(909). 1–12.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00909Suche in Google Scholar

Ji, Yinglin & Jill Hohenstein. 2014. The syntactic packaging of caused motion components in a second language: English learners of Chinese. Lingua 140. 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.11.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Ji, Yinglin, Henriëtte Hendriks & Maya Hickman. 2011. The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics 45(5). 1041–1077. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.029.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Yi, Patricia Costello & Sheng He. 2007. Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science 18. 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01902.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kersten, Alan, Christian Meissner, Julia Lechuga, Bennett Schwartz, Justin Albrechtsen & Adam, Iglesias. 2010. English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to Manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139(4). 638–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020507.Suche in Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary & Emily Ward. 2013. Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110. 14196–14201. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303312110.Suche in Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary & Andy Clark. 2015. Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(4). 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415570732.Suche in Google Scholar

Lurito, Joseph & Mario Dzemidzic. 2001. Determination of cerebral hemisphere language dominance with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 11(2). 355–363.Suche in Google Scholar

Montero-Melis, Guillermo & Emanuel Bylund. 2017. Getting the ball rolling: The cross-linguistic conceptualization of caused motion. Language and Cognition 9(3). 446–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.22.Suche in Google Scholar

Mudrik, Liad, Hagar Gelbard-Sagiv, Nathan Faivre & Christof Koch. 2013. Knowing where without knowing what: Partial awareness and high-level processing in continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision 13. 1103. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.1103.Suche in Google Scholar

Naigles, Letitia, Ann Eisenberg, Edward Kako, Melissa Higher & Nancy McGraw. 1998. Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(5). 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386429.Suche in Google Scholar

Noorman, Samuel, David Neville & Irina Simanova. 2018. Words affect visual perception by activating object shape representations. Scientific Reports 8(1). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32483-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Paffen, Chris, Frans Verstraten & Zoltán Vidnyánszky. 2008. Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. Journal of Vision 8(4). 25. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.4.25.Suche in Google Scholar

Pelli, Denis. 1997. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10. 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00366.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Collins.10.1037/e412952005-009Suche in Google Scholar

Pournaghdali, Ali & Bennett Schwartz. 2020. Continuous flash suppression: Known and unknowns. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27(6). 1071–1103. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01771-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Shore, David & Raymond Klein. 2000. The effects of scene inversion on change blindness. The Journal of General Psychology 127. 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300009598569.Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Timo. 2019. The breaking continuous suppression paradigm, review, evaluation and outlook. In Guido Hesselmann (ed.), Transition between consciousness and unconsciousness, 1–38. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429469688-1Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Timo, Martin Hebart & Philipp Sterzer. 2011. Breaking continuous flash suppression: A new measure of unconscious processing during interocular suppression? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5(167). 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167.Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Timo, Kiley Seymour, Martin Hebart & Philipp Sterzer. 2014. Rapid fear detection relies on high spatial frequencies. Psychological Science 25(2). 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512509.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Thierry, Guillaume. 2016. Neurolinguistic relativity: How language flexes human perception and cognition. Language Learning 66(3). 690–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12186.Suche in Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, Jeanine & Françoise Tidball. 2015. Can L2 learners learn new ways to conceptualise events? Evidence from motion event construal among English-speaking learners of French. In Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Katrin Schmitz & Natascha Müller (eds.), The acquisition of French in multi-lingual contexts, 145–184. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783094530-009Suche in Google Scholar

Vanek, Norbert. 2020. Changing event categorization in second language users through perceptual learning. Language Learning 70(2). 309–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12377.Suche in Google Scholar

Vanek, Norbert & Artem Tovalovich. 2022. Emotionality ratings and electrodermal responses to university-related expressions in a native and a non-native language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25(8). 2817–2833. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1978924.Suche in Google Scholar

Wade, Nicholas & Peter Wenderoth. 1978. The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect. Vision Research 18. 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(78)90123-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Yi & Li Wei. 2021. Cognitive restructuring in the multilingual mind: Language-specific effects on processing efficiency of caused motion events in Cantonese–English–Japanese speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24(4). 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728921000018.Suche in Google Scholar