Startseite Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive -ing in spoken English
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive -ing in spoken English

  • Xiaoyan Zeng EMAIL logo , Yasuhiro Shirai und Xiaoxiang Chen
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Juli 2019

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of learners’ first language (L1), lexical aspect of verbs, and proficiency levels on their use of the English progressive aspect. It analyzed spoken data from learners of three different L1s (Chinese, German, and Spanish) in an international learner corpus (LINSEI), in comparison with native speech in a comparable native speaker corpus (LOCNEC). The analysis reveals that regardless of learners’ L1 and proficiency levels, their use of progressive markings is predominantly associated with activity verbs (prototypes), supporting the association prediction of the Aspect Hypothesis (Andersen, Roger W. & Yasuhiro Shirai. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2). 133–156). Contrary to the fourth prediction of the Aspect Hypothesis, both intermediate and advanced learners use stative progressives, and especially intermediate L1 Spanish learners overuse stative progressives, indicating a complex interaction between L1 and proficiency on non-prototypical form-meaning associations. The results suggest that L1 effect, lexical aspect of verbs, and proficiency levels jointly drive tense-aspect acquisition.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewer and Kevin Gregg for their helpful comments on an early version of the paper. We also thank Case Western Reserve University for hosting the first author to spend a year as a visiting scholar in the Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, which made it possible for the authors to work on the research reported in this paper. This research was financially supported by the Hunan Social Science Fund (17WLH09).

References

Ahmadi, Newsha. 2016. The effects and effectiveness of contrastive form-focused instruction on mastering tense-aspect. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13. 9–30.Suche in Google Scholar

Andersen, Roger W. 1984. The one to one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning 34(4). 77–95.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00353.xSuche in Google Scholar

Andersen, Roger W. 1993. Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Kenneth Hyltenstam & Ake Viborg (eds.), Progression and regression in language, 309–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Andersen, Roger W. & Yasuhiro Shirai. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2). 133–156.10.1017/S0272263100012845Suche in Google Scholar

Andersen, Roger W. & Yasuhiro Shirai. 1996. Primacy of aspect in language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 527–570. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50018-9Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, John R. 1980. Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.Suche in Google Scholar

Axelsson, Margareta Westergren & Angela Hahn. 2001. The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal 25. 5–30.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(4). 471–508.10.1017/S0272263198004021Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2000. Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2012a. After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In Emmanuelle Labeau & Inès Saddour (eds.), Tense, aspect and mood in first and second language acquisition, 131–151. Amsterdam: New York.10.1163/9789401207188_008Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2012b. Second language acquisition. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 481–503. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0016Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Anna Bergström. 1996. Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and FFL. Canadian Modern Language Review 52(2). 308–330.10.3138/cmlr.52.2.308Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Dudley W. Reynolds. 1995. The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29(1). 107–131.10.2307/3587807Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2008. Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 216–236. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sl.13.1.03bybSuche in Google Scholar

Collins, Laura. 2002. The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning 52(1). 43–94.10.1111/1467-9922.00177Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

De Cock, Sylvie. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, New Series 2. 225–246.Suche in Google Scholar

Dose-Heidelmayer, Stefanie & Sandra Götz. 2016. The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54(3). 229–256.10.1515/iral-2016-9982Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2013. Frequency-based grammar and the acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 learning. In Rafael Salaberry & lorenç Comajoan (eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect, 89–118. Boston & Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167.89Suche in Google Scholar

Gabriele, Alison, José Alemán Bañón, Beatriz López Prego & Alonso Canales. 2015. Examining the influence of transfer and prototypes on the acquisition of the present progressive in L2 Spanish. In Dalila Ayoun (ed.), The acquisition of the present, 113–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196.05gabSuche in Google Scholar

Gavruseva, Elena. 2002. Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(2). 109–130.10.1017/S1366728902000226Suche in Google Scholar

Giacalone-Ramat, Anna. 2002. How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In Rafael Salaberry & Yasuhiro Shirai (eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, 221–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.11giaSuche in Google Scholar

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Sylvie de Cock & Sylviane Granger (eds.). 2010. Louvain international database of spoken English interlanguage (LINDSEI). Handbook and CD–ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Suche in Google Scholar

Housen, Alex. 2002. A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In Hung Granger & Petch-Tyson (eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 77–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.6.08houSuche in Google Scholar

Huang, Chiung-chih. 1999. Tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of English and native English speakers: Inherent lexical aspect and unitary vs. repeated situation types. Issues in Applied Linguistics 10(2). 113–129.10.5070/L4102005017Suche in Google Scholar

Kellerman, Eric. 1977. Towards a characterization of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 2(1). 58–145.Suche in Google Scholar

Kleinmann, Howard H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 27(1). 93–107.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00294.xSuche in Google Scholar

Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. A functional reference grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Chicago, IL: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Ping & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2000. The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800715Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, Jo-Wang. 2005. Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23(1). 1–53.10.1093/jos/ffh033Suche in Google Scholar

McManus, Kevin. 2013. Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the aspect hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(3). 299–322.10.1515/iral-2013-0013Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen & Roger Gilabert. 2011. More evidence concerning the aspect hypothesis: The acquisition of English progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(3). 241–263.10.1515/iral.2011.014Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramsay, Violeta. 1990. Developmental stages in the acquisition of the perfective and the imperfective aspects by classroom L2 learners of Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter & Nick C. Ellis (eds.). 2008. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.10.4324/9780203938560Suche in Google Scholar

Robison, Richard E. 1990. The primacy of aspect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(3). 315–330.10.1017/S0272263100009190Suche in Google Scholar

Robison, Richard E. 1995a. The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16(3). 344–370.10.1093/applin/16.3.344Suche in Google Scholar

Robison, Richard E. 1995b. Verb inflections in native speaker speech: Do they mean what we think? In Hanna Pishwa & Karl Maroldt (eds.), The development of morphological systematicity: A cross-linguistic perspective, 199–224. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Rocca, Sonia. 2002. Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: A bi-directional study. In Rafael Salaberry & Yasuhiro Shirai (eds.), The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, 249–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.12rocSuche in Google Scholar

Rocca, Sonia. 2007. Child second language acquisition: A bi-directional study of English and Italian tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.35Suche in Google Scholar

Rogatcheva, Svetlomira I. 2012. Measuring learner misuse: Tense and aspect errors in the Bulgarian and German components of ICLE. In James Thomas & Alex Boulton (eds.), Input, process and product: Developments in teaching and language corpora, 258–272. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rohde, Andreas. 1996. The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34(5). 1115–1138.10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.1115Suche in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute. 2005. Progressives, patterns, pedagogy: A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.18Suche in Google Scholar

Salaberry, M. Rafael. 1998. The development of aspectual distinctions in L2 French classroom learning. Canadian Modern Language Review 54(4). 508–542.10.3138/cmlr.54.4.508Suche in Google Scholar

Salaberry, M. Rafael. 1999. The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 20(2). 151–178.10.1093/applin/20.2.151Suche in Google Scholar

Salaberry, M. Rafael. 2011. Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2). 184–202.10.1017/S1366728910000052Suche in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12(1). 40–72.10.1177/026765839601200103Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1991. Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California.Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1992. Conditions on transfer: A connectionist approach. Issues in Applied Linguistics 3(1). 91–120.10.5070/L431005153Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1994. On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First Language 14. 67–82.10.1177/014272379401404205Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2002. The prototype hypothesis of tense-aspect acquisition in second language. In Rafael Salaberry & Yasuhiro Shirai (eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, 455–478. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.18shiSuche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2004. A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, Susanne Rott & Mark Overstreet (eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, 91–112. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2012. Second language acquisition research and Japanese language teaching: A functionalist approach. Japanese Studies 32(3). 317–334.10.1080/10371397.2012.729207Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2013. Defining and coding data: Lexical aspect in L2 studies. In Rafael M. Salaberry & Lorenç Comajoan (eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect, 271–308. Boston & Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167.271Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2016. The acquisition of linguistic categories in second language acquisition: A functionalist approach. In Kabata Kaori & Kiyoko Toratani (eds.), Cognitive-functional approaches to the study of Japanese as a second language, 13–32. Boston & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614515029-004Suche in Google Scholar

Shirai, Yasuhiro & Roger W. Andersen. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71(4). 743–762.10.2307/415743Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 1157–1249. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 1983. A theory of aspectual choice. Language 59(3). 479–501.10.2307/413899Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6Suche in Google Scholar

Sugaya, Natsue & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(1). 1–38.10.1017/S0272263107070015Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2005. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv26070v8Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Xiner & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2016. L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and –Le. Chinese as a Second Language Research 5(1). 1–25.10.1515/caslar-2016-0001Suche in Google Scholar

Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Florence Myles. 2015. The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1). 58–95.10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03traSuche in Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus. 2014. Progressive aspect and stative verbs in outer circle varieties. World Englishes 33(2). 157–172.10.1111/weng.12079Suche in Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Bertus & Haidee Kruger. 2016. The innovative progressive aspect of Black South African English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2). 205–228.10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04vanSuche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501743726Suche in Google Scholar

Von Stutterheim, Christiane & Ralf Nüse. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5). 851–882.10.1515/ling.2003.028Suche in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis, Ute Römer, Kathleen Bardovi–Harlig & Chelsea J. Leblanc. 2009. The acquisition of tense–Aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal 93(3). 354–369.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.xSuche in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie & Ute Römer. 2009. Becoming a proficient academic writer: Shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora 4(2). 115–133.10.3366/E1749503209000276Suche in Google Scholar

Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.73Suche in Google Scholar

Zobl, Helmut. 1985. Grammars in search input and intake. In Susan. M. Gass & Carolyn. G. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 329–344. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Suche in Google Scholar

Zydatiß, Wolfgang. 1976. Learning problem expanded form: A performance analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 14(4). 351–371.10.1515/iral.1976.14.4.351Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-07-18
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2017-0078/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen