Topicality, accessibility, and causality in anaphora resolution: An eye-tracking study of null and overt pronouns in Italian
-
Maria Vender
Maria Vender is an Associate Professor in Educational Linguistics at the University of Verona. She obtained a PhD in Linguistics at the University of Verona. She coordinates the PRIN 2022 PNRR REACH project (Verona Unit) on reading comprehension in fragile populations. Her research interests cover the domain of language acquisition and language teaching in both typical and atypical contexts.
,
Andrea Nardon
Andrea Nardon is a Research Fellow within the REACH project at the University of Verona and PhD candidate at the University of Barcelona. His research interests focus on L2 vocabulary acquisition and testing and the impact of out-of-school exposure on L2 development.
Ilaria Venagli is a Research Fellow within the REACH project at the University of Verona and a PhD candidate at the University of Konstanz (in cotutelle de thèse with the University of Verona). Her research interests mainly focus on L1 and L2 reading in learners with and without dyslexia, as well as on task development.
Abstract
It has been argued that the distribution of pronominal forms in pro-drop languages is shaped by a complex interplay of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors. Null pronouns are typically interpreted as co-referring with the most prominent antecedent, whereas overt pronouns often signal a topic shift, co-referring with less prominent antecedents. Although many frameworks have been proposed to explain the division of labor between null and overt pronouns, empirical studies on anaphora resolution in causative sentences remain scarce. In this study, 41 Italian native speakers completed a referential selection task involving subject-biased or object-biased complex causative sentences with either a null or an overt pronoun. Results revealed a strong reliance on discourse-level factors, with participants consistently selecting the pragmatically appropriate antecedent regardless of pronoun type. However, eye-tracking data showed higher processing costs in accommodating violations of the typical pronoun-antecedent combinations. This was especially true in subject-biased sentences with an overt pronoun but was also observed in object-biased sentences with a null pronoun. These findings suggest that, while pragmatic factors largely drive anaphoric resolution in causative sentences, pronoun type leads to different processing costs in contexts where the pragmatic antecedent does not align with the expected pronoun type.
About the authors
Maria Vender is an Associate Professor in Educational Linguistics at the University of Verona. She obtained a PhD in Linguistics at the University of Verona. She coordinates the PRIN 2022 PNRR REACH project (Verona Unit) on reading comprehension in fragile populations. Her research interests cover the domain of language acquisition and language teaching in both typical and atypical contexts.
Andrea Nardon is a Research Fellow within the REACH project at the University of Verona and PhD candidate at the University of Barcelona. His research interests focus on L2 vocabulary acquisition and testing and the impact of out-of-school exposure on L2 development.
Ilaria Venagli is a Research Fellow within the REACH project at the University of Verona and a PhD candidate at the University of Konstanz (in cotutelle de thèse with the University of Verona). Her research interests mainly focus on L1 and L2 reading in learners with and without dyslexia, as well as on task development.
Acknowledgments
The research leading to this work was financed by the European Union - (Next Generation EU) within the project PRIN 2022 PNRR: “REAding CompreHension for inclusion (REACH)”. Our special thanks go to Denis Delfitto for his fundamental input in the development of the research program and his constant feedback. Chiara Melloni and Massimiliano Canzi are also gratefully acknowledged for their valuable comments and discussions. We also wish to thank all the participants who took part in our research.
-
Author contributions: The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows. Study conception and design: M.V. and A.N.; data collection: A.N.; statistical analysis: I.V.; interpretation of results: M.V., A.N., I.V.; funding acquisition and project administration: M.V.; manuscript preparation: M.V., A.N., I.V. For academic purposes, M.V. takes responsibility for sections 1 and 4; A.N. for sections 2 and 5, I.V. for sections 2.3 and 3. All authors reviewed the paper and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
Almor, Amit. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106(4). 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.748.Suche in Google Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Susana Fernández-Solera & Charles Clifton. 2002. Null vs. Overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Italian Journal of Linguistics 14. 151–169.Suche in Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Ted J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2013. Centering, accessibility and the next mention. Theoretical Linguistics 39(1–2). 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0002.Suche in Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2010. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00193.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Suche in Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Elisa Bennati & Antonella Sorace. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(4). 657–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9026-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, Ellen Grober, Catherine Garvey & Jack Yates. 1977. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16(5). 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80022-4.Suche in Google Scholar
Carminati, Maria N. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst.Suche in Google Scholar
Chamorro, Gloria, Antonella Sorace & Patrick Sturt. 2016. What is the source of L1 attrition? The effect of recent L1 re-exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(3). 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728915000152.Suche in Google Scholar
Crawley, Rosalind A., Rosemary J. Stevenson & David Kleinman. 1990. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19(4). 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01077259.Suche in Google Scholar
Fedele, Emily & Elsy Keiser. 2015. Resolving null and overt pronouns in Italian: An experimental investigation of syntax-semantics interactions. In Proceedings of the 15th Texas Linguistic Society. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.Suche in Google Scholar
Filiaci, Francesca, Antonella Sorace & Manuel Carreiras. 2014. Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(7). 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.801502.Suche in Google Scholar
Garvey, Catherine & Alfonso Caramazza. 1974. Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 5(3). 459–646.Suche in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3.01givSuche in Google Scholar
Goikoetxea, Edurne, Gema Pascual & Joana Acha. 2008. Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods 40(3). 760–772. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.760.Suche in Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., Weinstein Scott & Joshi K. Aravind. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2). 203–225.10.21236/ADA324949Suche in Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Register variation, truncation and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics 1. 233–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674300000526.Suche in Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Joshua K. & Jesse Snedeker. 2013. Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(10). 1474–1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.689305.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235293.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3(1). 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & John Trueswell. 2008. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Languages and Cognitive Processes 23(5). 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701771220.Suche in Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, reference, and theory of grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2008. Rethinking the SMASH approach to pronoun interpretation. In Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 95–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew & Hannah Rohde. 2013. A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation. Theoretical Linguistics 39(1–2). 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0001.Suche in Google Scholar
Koornneef, Arnout W. & Ted J. M. Sanders. 2013. Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence of implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(8). 1169–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.699076.Suche in Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell. 2024. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka Least-SquaresMeans. R package version 1.10.0. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.Suche in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23. 379–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700011324.Suche in Google Scholar
Montesano, Lorena, Antonella Valenti & Cesare Cornoldi. 2020. LSC-SUA prove di lettura, comprensione del testo, scrittura e calcolo. Batteria per la valutazione dei DSA e altri disturbi in studenti universitari e adulti. Gardolo (TN): Edizioni Erickson.Suche in Google Scholar
Schumacher, Petra, Leah Roberts & Juhani Jarvikivi. 2016. Agentivity drives real-time pronoun resolution: Evidence from German er and der. Lingua 185. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.07.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Smyth, Ron. 1994. Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23(3). 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02139085.Suche in Google Scholar
Stevenson, Rosemary J., Rosalind A. Crawley & David Kleinman. 1994. Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(4). 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402130.Suche in Google Scholar
Stewart, Andrew J., Martin J. Pickering & Anthony J. Sanford. 2000. The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 42(3). 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2691.Suche in Google Scholar
Vogelzang, Margreet, Francesca Foppolo, Maria Teresa Guasti, Hedderik Van Rijn & Petra Hendriks. 2020. Reasoning about alternative forms is costly: The processing of null and overt pronouns in Italian using pupillary responses. Discourse Processes 57(2). 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1591127.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolna, Agata, Joanna Durlik & Zofia Wodniecka. 2022. Pronominal anaphora resolution in Polish: Investigating online sentence interpretation using eye-tracking. PLoS One 17(1). e0262459. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262459.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Thematic issue in pragmatics and philosophy (TIPP)
- Research Articles
- The cultural evolution of speech act norms
- On the unification of which-interrogatives and alternative-interrogatives
- A functional theory of proper names: Insights from quasi-proper names
- The foundational role of sound quality for understanding demonstratives
- Problems for a uniform analysis of ancora in Italian
- Speech act theory of quotation: Quotation indirect quotation and Japanese quasi-quotation
- Topicality, accessibility, and causality in anaphora resolution: An eye-tracking study of null and overt pronouns in Italian
- Clause-level coordination and discourse continuity in Tohono O’odham
- Obituary
- Istvan Kecskes, Distinguished Professor of the State University of New York, affectionate friend and mentor
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Thematic issue in pragmatics and philosophy (TIPP)
- Research Articles
- The cultural evolution of speech act norms
- On the unification of which-interrogatives and alternative-interrogatives
- A functional theory of proper names: Insights from quasi-proper names
- The foundational role of sound quality for understanding demonstratives
- Problems for a uniform analysis of ancora in Italian
- Speech act theory of quotation: Quotation indirect quotation and Japanese quasi-quotation
- Topicality, accessibility, and causality in anaphora resolution: An eye-tracking study of null and overt pronouns in Italian
- Clause-level coordination and discourse continuity in Tohono O’odham
- Obituary
- Istvan Kecskes, Distinguished Professor of the State University of New York, affectionate friend and mentor
