The foundational role of sound quality for understanding demonstratives
-
Jack Wilson
Jack Wilson is a lecture in English Language at the University of Salford. His research focusses on the limits of linguistic communication, exploring how non-linguistic communicative behaviors fit within traditional semantic and pragmatic frameworks. His recent publications include
Pragmatics, Utterance Meaning, and Representational Gesture (2024).
Abstract
This paper explores the role of sound quality in the interpretation of demonstratives, arguing that their function is deeply connected to acoustic properties and human auditory perception. Drawing on research from psychoacoustics, sound localization, and philosophical and linguistic theories, I suggest that demonstratives are rooted in fundamental mechanisms of auditory cognition. The discussion begins with an examination of echolocation in bats, introducing the concept of meta-acoustic awareness – an ability to adjust vocal signals based on expected environmental interactions. I contend that what is special about echolocation is that it is self-directed. The vocal calls of humans, however, are fundamentally other-directed. I argue that other-directed meta-acoustic awareness is the basis for demonstrative reference. Demonstratives, such as “this” and “that,” function as indexicals requiring contextual information to be meaningful. However, their phonetic properties exhibit a universal pattern: proximal demonstratives tend to feature higher-frequency vowels, while distal demonstratives contain lower-frequency vowels. I argue that this contrast is not arbitrary but reflects an evolved sensitivity to acoustic cues that facilitate spatial orientation. By revisiting Bertrand Russell’s theory of egocentric particulars, I demonstrate that his insights on perception and reference anticipated key aspects of modern psychoacoustics. His emphasis on the physical reality of verbal utterances aligns with findings in sound symbolism, which suggest that the frequency of speech sounds conveys spatial relationships. Additionally, I explore evidence from child language acquisition and animal communication, showing that sound frequency influences reference and localization across species. Ultimately, I propose that demonstratives evolved within an auditory framework that exploits human sensitivity to spatially distributed sound patterns. This perspective challenges traditional semantic theories by grounding demonstratives in an embodied, perceptual system that integrates speech with spatial cognition. Understanding demonstratives as products of sound-based reference provides a new lens for analyzing linguistic structure and its cognitive underpinnings.
About the author
Jack Wilson is a lecture in English Language at the University of Salford. His research focusses on the limits of linguistic communication, exploring how non-linguistic communicative behaviors fit within traditional semantic and pragmatic frameworks. His recent publications include Pragmatics, Utterance Meaning, and Representational Gesture (2024).
References
Braun, David. 2017. Indexicals. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University Summer 2017 edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/indexicals/.Search in Google Scholar
Bregman, Albert. 1990. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Carlini, Alessandro, Camille Bordeau & Maxime Ambard. 2024. Auditory localization: A comprehensive practical review. Frontiers in Psychology 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408073.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2015. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Eve & C. J. Sengul. 1978. Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of Child Language 5. 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900002099.Search in Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Éditions Payot.Search in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.42Search in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger & Kenny Coventry. 2020. Demonstratives in spatial language and social interaction: An interdisciplinary review. Frontier in Psychology 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265.Search in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger & Sergei Monakhov. 2022. Acquisition of demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 50(4). 922–953. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500092200023x.Search in Google Scholar
Dunlop, Rebecca, William L. Gannon, Marthe Kiley-Worthington, Peggy Sergei Hill, Andreas Wessel & Jeanette Thomas. 2022. Vibrational and acoustic communication in animals. In Christine Erbe & Jeanette Thomas (eds.), Exploring animal behavior through sound: Volume 1: Methods, 389–417. Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-97540-1_11Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2001. Lip-pointing: A discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture 1(2). 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf.Search in Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik. Translated as ‘On sense and reference. In Peter Geach & Max Black (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Glocker, Melenie, Daniel Langleben, Kosha Ruparel, James Loughead, Ruben Gur & Norbert Sachser. 2009. Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology 115(3). 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01603.x.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar
Grothe, Benedikt, Michael Pecka & David McAlpine. 2010. Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiological Reviews 90(3). 983–1012. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2009.Search in Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 2011. Deixis and indexicality. In Wolfram Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Foundations of pragmatics, 315–346. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214260.315Search in Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 2021. Sense data. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University Fall 2021 edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/sense-data/.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected writings: Word and language, vol. 2, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.130Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, Niklas & Jordan Zlatev. 2013. Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. Public Journal of Semiotics 5(1). 3–20. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2013.5.9668.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, Niklas, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24(2). 253–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth. 2005. Echolocation. Current Biology 15(13). 484–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.051.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989a. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989b. Afterthoughts. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 565–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 2001. Dthat. In Aloysius Martinich (ed.), The philosophy of language, 381–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2011. A course in phonetics, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar
Larom, David, Michael Garstang, Katharine Payne, Richard Raspet & Malan Lindeque. 1997. The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations. Journal of Experimental Biology 200(3). 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.3.421.Search in Google Scholar
Lengagne, Thierry & Peter J. B. Slater. 2002. The effects of rain on acoustic communication: Tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269(1505). 2121–2125. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2115.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2004. Deixis and pragmatics. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631225485.2005.00007.xSearch in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2018. Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–42. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108333818.002Search in Google Scholar
Liszkowski, Ulf, Penny Brown, Tara Callaghan, Akira Takada & Conny de Vos. 2012. A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science 36(4). 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01228.x.Search in Google Scholar
Moll, Henrike & Andrew Meltzoff. 2011. Perspective taking and its foundation in joint attention. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, causation, and objectivity, 286–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692040.003.0016Search in Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83(4). 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.Search in Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1998. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, 1893–1913, vol. 1. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pössel, Markus. 2011. Waves, motion and frequency: The Doppler effect. Einstein Online 5(1001).Search in Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula. 2021. Pragmatic markers: The missing link between language and theory of mind. Synthese 199(1). 1125–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02768-z.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1911. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11. 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The analysis of matter. Nottingham: Spokesman.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1940. An inquiry into meaning and truth. Middlesex: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London: George Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Saxton, Matthew. 2017. Child language: Acquisition and development, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich. 1973. Control of Doppler shift compensation in the greater horseshoe bat, rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology 82(1). 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00714171.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi. 2022. Phonological derivation from proximal to distal demonstratives in Chinese. Linguistics 60(2). 579–615. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0074.Search in Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack & Nick Enfield. 2017. Deixis and the interactional foundations of reference. In Yan Huang (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, 217–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.27Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, Graham. 2011. The theory of descriptions: Russell and the philosophy of language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230343191_8Search in Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2010. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut. 2000. Sound symbolism in deictic words. In Hans Aili & Peter Trampe (eds.), Tongues and texts unlimited: Studies in honour of tore Jansson on the occasion of his sixtieth anniversary, 213–234. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Search in Google Scholar
van Opstal, John. 2016. The auditory system and human sound-localization behavior. London: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-801529-2.00006-4Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Jack. 2024. Pragmatics, utterance meaning, and representational gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009031080Search in Google Scholar
Woodworth, Nancy. 1991. Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics 29(2). 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.2.273.Search in Google Scholar
Yorzinski, Jessica & Jacob Miller. 2020. Sclera color enhances gaze perception in humans. PLoS One 15(2). e0228275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228275.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Thematic issue in pragmatics and philosophy (TIPP)
- Research Articles
- The cultural evolution of speech act norms
- On the unification of which-interrogatives and alternative-interrogatives
- A functional theory of proper names: Insights from quasi-proper names
- The foundational role of sound quality for understanding demonstratives
- Problems for a uniform analysis of ancora in Italian
- Speech act theory of quotation: Quotation indirect quotation and Japanese quasi-quotation
- Topicality, accessibility, and causality in anaphora resolution: An eye-tracking study of null and overt pronouns in Italian
- Clause-level coordination and discourse continuity in Tohono O’odham
- Obituary
- Istvan Kecskes, Distinguished Professor of the State University of New York, affectionate friend and mentor
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Thematic issue in pragmatics and philosophy (TIPP)
- Research Articles
- The cultural evolution of speech act norms
- On the unification of which-interrogatives and alternative-interrogatives
- A functional theory of proper names: Insights from quasi-proper names
- The foundational role of sound quality for understanding demonstratives
- Problems for a uniform analysis of ancora in Italian
- Speech act theory of quotation: Quotation indirect quotation and Japanese quasi-quotation
- Topicality, accessibility, and causality in anaphora resolution: An eye-tracking study of null and overt pronouns in Italian
- Clause-level coordination and discourse continuity in Tohono O’odham
- Obituary
- Istvan Kecskes, Distinguished Professor of the State University of New York, affectionate friend and mentor
