Actuality, indexicality, and knowledge

References

Adams, Robert M. 1974 [1979]. Theories of actuality. Noûs 8. 211–231. Reprinted in The Possible and the Actual, ed. M. Loux, pp. 190–209. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214751.Search in Google Scholar

Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceeding of SALT XIV, 20–37. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publication10.3765/salt.v14i0.2913Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, Thomas. 2001. On considering a possible world as actual II. Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 75. 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00084.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Michael. 1978. Demonstratives and indexicals in Montague grammar. Synthese 39. 1–80.10.1007/BF00485407Search in Google Scholar

Braun, David. 2017. Indexicals. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1–60. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/indexicals/.Search in Google Scholar

Bricker, Phillip. 2006. Absolute actuality and the plurality of worlds. Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives 20. 41–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00102.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, Herman & John Hawthorne. 2009. Relativism and monadic truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1996. The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, John N. & Lloyd Humberstone. 1977. The logic of “actually”. Reports on Mathematical Logic 8. 11–29.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Martin. 1981. Meaning, quantification, necessity: Themes in philosophical logic. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Martin. 1983. Actuality and context-dependence II. Analysis 43. 128–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/3327429.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Martin & Lloyd Humberstone. 1980. Two notions of necessity. Philosophical Studies 38. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00354523.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Wayne A. 2015. The semantics of actuality terms: Indexical vs. descriptive theories. Noûs 49. 470–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12046.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Wayne A. 2021. Knowledge claims and the context of assessment. In Chrystos Kyriacou & Kevin Wallbridge (eds.), Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered, 298–318. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429353468-20Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Wayne A. 2022. Quotational reports. Linguistics and Philosophy 45. 1063–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-021-09342-x.Search in Google Scholar

Deal, Amy 2020. Theory of indexical shift. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/12374.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75. 281–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth. 1979. Reference and contingency. Monist 62. 161–189. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197962220.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth. 1985. Does tense logic rest on a mistake? In Antonia Phillips (ed.), Collected Papers, 343–363. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236276.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Forbes, Graeme. 1983. Actuality and context-dependence I. Analysis 43. 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/43.3.123.Search in Google Scholar

Forbes, Graeme. 2003. Indexicals. In Dov M. Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn. vol. 10, 87–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-4524-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Gale, Richard M. 1964. The Egocentric particular and token-reflexive analysis of tense. Philosophical Review 43. 213–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183337.Search in Google Scholar

Gale, Richard M. 1989. Lewis’ indexical argument for world-relative actuality. Dialogue (Canada) 28. 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/s001221730001578x.Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, William H. 2006. Actuality, necessity, and logical truth. Philosophical Studies 130. 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5750-8.Search in Google Scholar

Haraldsen, Fredrik. 2015. On what actually is. Erkenntnis 80. 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9667-0.Search in Google Scholar

Hazen, Allen. 1979. One of the truths about actuality. Analysis 39. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3327296.Search in Google Scholar

Hossack, Keith. 2007. Actuality and modal rationalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107. 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00232.x.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, Julie. 2013. Presuppositional indexicals. Journal of Semantics 30. 381–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs013.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1977 [1989]. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Afterthoughts. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 565–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and necessity. In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, 253–355, 763–769. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 2011. The first person. In Philosophical troubles: Collected papers, volume I, 292–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Leezenberg, Michiel. 1994. Indexicals. In Ronald E. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 1648–1651. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Deixis. In William J. Frawley (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol. 2, 423–424. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1968. Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65. 113–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024555.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1970. Anselm and actuality. Noús 4. 175–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214320.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1980. Index, context, and content. In Stig Kanger & Sven Ohman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, 79–100. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9012-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1983. Postscripts to “Anselm and actuality”. In Philosophical Papers, volume I, 21–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195032047.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Linsky, Leonard & Edward Zalta. 1991. Is Lewis a Meinongian? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69. 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409112344871.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2008. Truth in the garden of forking paths. In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth, 81–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234950.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2009. Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese 166. 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2.Search in Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2011. Simplicity made difficult. Philosophical Studies 156. 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9626-9.Search in Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. 2014. Assessment sensitivity: Relative truth and its applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682751.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Michael & Edward Zalta. 2012. A defense of contingent logical truths. Philosophical Studies 157. 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9624-y.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214792.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1997. Indexicals and demonstratives. In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 586–612. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 2003. Predelli’s threatening note: Contexts, utterances, and tokens in the philosophy of language. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00141-8.Search in Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. The nature of necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 1998. I am not here now. Analysis 58. 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00110.Search in Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1968. Modal logic and the logic of applicability. Theoria 34. 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1968.tb00350.x.Search in Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bruce. 2020. A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/apriori/.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1987 [2005]. Existence. In James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 1: Metaphysics, 49–108. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeway Publishing Co.10.2307/2214143Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. 2011. Indexicality and De Se reports. In Klaus Von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1561–1604. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. 2018. Indexicals. In Sven O. Hansson & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), Handbook of Formal Philosophy, 297–321. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_14Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Quentin. 1989. The multiple uses of indexicals. Synthese 78. 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869371.Search in Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 2007. Actually. Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 81. 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2007.00158.x.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1976 [1979]. Possible worlds. Noûs 10. 65–75. Reprinted in The Possible and the Actual, ed. Michael J. Loux, pp. 225-234. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214477.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368873_013Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2001. On considering a possible world as actual I. Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 75. 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00083.Search in Google Scholar

Stephanou, Yannis. 2010. The meaning of ‘actually’. Dialectica 64. 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01222.x.Search in Google Scholar

Stephanou, Yannis. 2022. ‘Actually’ again. Ratio 35. 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12332.Search in Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter. 1980. Indexicality and actuality. Philosophical Review 89. 403–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184396.Search in Google Scholar

White, Michael J. 1977. Plantinga and the actual world. Analysis 37. 97–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/3327508.Search in Google Scholar

White, Michael J. 1983. Could Rossini actually have written “Don Giovanni?” Philosophical Studies 43. 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00372370.Search in Google Scholar

Yalcin, Seth. 2015. Actually, actually. Analysis 75. 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anv021.Search in Google Scholar

Zalta, Edward. 1988. Logical and analytic truths that are not necessary. Journal of Philosophy 85. 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026992.Search in Google Scholar