Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A contextual theory of fictional names

  • Gaetano Fiorin is a tenure-track research fellow in Linguistics at the University of Trieste. His research focuses on theoretical linguistics (particularly model-theoretic semantics and the syntax-semantics interface), experimental linguistics (language development, language impairments, and multilingualism) and the philosophy of language (in particular, the metaphysics of meaning and the interface between language and cognition).

    EMAIL logo
    and

    Denis Delfitto is Professor of Linguistics at the University of Verona. His publications – in international scientific journals and peer-reviewed volumes – span from the syntax of reference and quantification in natural language – including issues of comparative syntax and semantics – to issues of language change and language impairment. His core interest is the investigation of the human capacity for language from a broad cognitive and philosophical perspective.

Published/Copyright: May 15, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

We review some of the most prominent challenges in the semantics and pragmatics of fictional names and propose a pragmatic theory of fictional names whereby understanding a fictional name requires imagining possible contexts of interpretation of the name. Similarly to other pragmatic approaches to fiction and fictional contexts, we maintain that fictional texts require that the interpreter engages in a game of pretense of sort and are, therefore, prescriptions to imagine a state of affairs that is not the real one. In contrast to these approaches, however, we propose that interpreting a fictional text does not require imagining a set of possible state of affairs where the text would be true but, rather, requires imagining a set of possible contexts where the text would be meaningful. In order to apply this framework to fictional names, we adopt a contextual theory of proper names, which we have proposed and defended in previous work.


Corresponding author: Gaetano Fiorin, Department of Humanities, University of University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy, E-mail:

About the authors

Gaetano Fiorin

Gaetano Fiorin is a tenure-track research fellow in Linguistics at the University of Trieste. His research focuses on theoretical linguistics (particularly model-theoretic semantics and the syntax-semantics interface), experimental linguistics (language development, language impairments, and multilingualism) and the philosophy of language (in particular, the metaphysics of meaning and the interface between language and cognition).

Denis Delfitto

Denis Delfitto is Professor of Linguistics at the University of Verona. His publications – in international scientific journals and peer-reviewed volumes – span from the syntax of reference and quantification in natural language – including issues of comparative syntax and semantics – to issues of language change and language impairment. His core interest is the investigation of the human capacity for language from a broad cognitive and philosophical perspective.

References

Adams, Fred & Laura Dietrich. 2004. What’s in a(n empty) name? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85. 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00191.x.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, Fred & Robert Stecker. 1994. Vacuous singular terms. Mind & Language 9. 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00314.x.Search in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511793936Search in Google Scholar

Bonomi, Andrea & Sandro Zucchi. 2003. A pragmatic framework for truth in fiction. Dialectica 57(2). 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00259.x.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, David. 1993. Empty names. Noûs 27. 449–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215787.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, David. 2005. Empty names, fictional names, mythical names. Noûs 39. 596–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00541.x.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, Alex. 1993. Truth in fiction: The story continued. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71(1). 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345022.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2021. On being trivial: Grammar vs. logic. The semantic conception of logic. In Gil Sagi & Jack Woods (eds.), The semantic conception of logic: Essays on consequence, invariance, and meaning, 227–248. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781108524919.012Search in Google Scholar

Currie, Gregoy. 1990. The nature of fiction. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511897498Search in Google Scholar

Delfitto, Denis & Gaetano Fiorin. 2023. Inside names: A contextualist approach to the syntax and semantics of direct reference. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 4(2). 153–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00041.del.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100(1). 25–50.Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2007. Fictional characters. Philosophy Compass 2(2). 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00059.x.Search in Google Scholar

Friend, Stacie. 2011. The great beetle debate: A study in imagining with names. Philosophical Studies 153(2). 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9485-4.Search in Google Scholar

Gajewski, Jon. 2002. L-analyticity and natural language. University of Connecticut Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Gajewski, Jon. 2008. More on quantifiers in comparative clauses. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18. 340–357. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v0i0.2494.Search in Google Scholar

Haas-Spohn, Ulrike. 1995. Versteckte Indexikalität und subjektive Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783050071695Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, Peter. 1977. Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 14. 299–308.Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, Peter. 2003. Existence, ontological commitment, and fictional entities. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics, 131–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kamp, Hans, Josef Van Genabith & Uwe Reyle. 2003. Discourse representation theory. In Dov Gabbay & Frank H. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. 10, 125–394. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-0485-5_3Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Jospeh Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. 2011. Vacuous names and fictional entities. In Saul Kripke (ed.), Philosophical troubles, 52–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Lamarque, Peter. 2003. How to create a fictional character. In Berys Gaut & Paisley Livingston (eds.), The creation of art: New essays in philosophical aesthetics, 33–52. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Lamarque, Peter & Stein H. Olsen. 1994. Truth, fiction, and literature: A philosophical perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1978. Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15(1). 37–46.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2017. Fictional names in psychologistic semantics. Theoretical Linguistics 43. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Del Pinal, Guillermo. 2019. The logicality of language: A new take on triviality, “ungrammaticality”, and logical form. Noûs 53(4). 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12235.Search in Google Scholar

Panizza, Chiara. 2017. Fictional names and fictional discourse. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1990. Self-notions. Logos 11. 17–31.10.2307/1208634Search in Google Scholar

Proudfoot, Diane. 2006. Possible worlds semantics and fiction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35(1). 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-005-9005-8.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard V. O. 1948. On what there is. Review of Metaphysics 2. 21–38.Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2018. Fictional, metafictional, parafictional. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118. 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy001.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14(56). 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xiv.4.479.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 1998. Nonexistence. Noûs 32. 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00101.Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Nathan. 2002. Mythical objects. In Joseph K. Campbell, Michael O’Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and truth: Investigations in philosophical semantics, 105–123. New York: Seven Bridges.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9. 315–332.10.1163/9789004368873_013Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Kenna C. 2000. Emptiness without compromise. In Anthony Everett & Thomas Hofweber (eds.), Empty names, fiction and the puzzles of nonexistence, 17–36. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Thomasson, Amie. 1999. Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511527463Search in Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/2108134Search in Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and worlds of art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zalta, Edward N. 1988. Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-05-15
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2024-3003/html
Scroll to top button