Startseite Higher education nursing students’ literacy skills: a scoping review
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Higher education nursing students’ literacy skills: a scoping review

  • Mira Palonen , Minna Elomaa-Krapu und Pia Keiski EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. September 2025
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
Aus der Zeitschrift International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship Band 22 Heft 1

Abstract

Objectives

The study aims to identify and summarize existing knowledge on how information literacy (IL) is demonstrated among health students in higher education.

Methods

A scoping review approach with a systematic search of scholarly databases.

Results

Of the 3,770 results obtained, 14 studies were included in this review. Two main approaches to IL were identified: (1) perceived, and (2) applied IL among health education students. IL was commonly measured using eight previously validated instruments and three purpose-designed instruments. Perceived IL skills ranged from moderate to high levels, while applied skills appeared to be moderate. Perceived IL was significantly associated with students’ self-perception of importance; whereas, applied IL was significantly associated with age and academic seniority in nursing.

Conclusions

The IL of higher education health students seems to range from moderate to high levels. However, the vast number of IL instruments used indicates the need for further scale standardization and validation.

Implications for international audience

In education, greater emphasis should be placed on integrating (IL) aspects into the curriculum across all levels, rather than treating it as a separate, conceptual entity.

Keywords: nursing education; information literacy; evidence-based practice; critical thinking; scoping review
Corresponding author: Pia Keiski, PhD, Principal Lecturer, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Applied Research Center, Tampere, Finland; and Doctoral Research Fellow, Tampere University, School of Social Sciences, Tampere, Finland, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Flanagin, A, Metzger, M. Digital media and youth: unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In: Metzger, MJ, Flanagin, AJ, editors. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Series on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008:5–28 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Sørensen, K, Van den Broucke, S, Fullam, J, Doyle, G, Pelikan, J, Slonska, Z, et al.. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012;12:Article 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. McCaskill, A, Gasch-Gallen, A, Montero-Marco, J. The effect of nurse health literacy interventions on patient health literacy scores in specialty consultations: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nurs 2024;23:786. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02447-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Berkman, ND, Sheridan, SL, Donahue, KE, Halpern, DJ, Crotty, K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:97–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Bent, M, Stubbings, R. The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: core model; 2011. https://senseandreference.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/coremodel.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Saunders, H, Corrigan, M, Wilks, L, Kia, H, Macdonald, S. Supporting the development of information literacy skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2020;93:104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104541.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Speros, C. Health literacy: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2005;50:633–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03448.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Wilandika, A, Pandin, MGR, Yusuf, A. The roles of nurses in supporting health literacy: a scoping review. Front Public Health 2023;11:1022803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1022803.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Armstrong, C, Boden, D, Town, J, Woolley, M, Webber, S. CILIP defines information literacy for the United Kingdom; 2004. Available from: https://eprints.rclis.org/7459/1/Article_Update_25102004.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Riddell, T. Critical assumptions: thinking critically about critical thinking. J Nurs Educ 2007;46:121–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20070301-06.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). The essentials: core competencies for professional nursing education; 2021. Available from: https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Scott, K, McSherry, R. Evidence-based nursing: clarifying the concepts for nurses in practice. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1085–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02588.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Farokhzadian, J, Jouparinejad, S, Fatehi, F, Falahati-Marvast, F. Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program. BMC Nurs 2021;20:Article 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00599-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Macabasco-O’Connell, A, Fry-Bowers, EK. Knowledge and perceptions of health literacy among nursing professionals. J Health Commun 2011;16:295–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.604389.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Lafuente-Lafuente, C, Leitao, C, Kilani, I, Kacher, Z, Engels, C, Canouï-Poitrine, F, et al.. Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2019;9:Article e025224. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025224.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Altun, I. The perceived problem-solving ability and values of student nurses and midwives. Nurse Educ Today 2003;23:575–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00096-0.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Leu, DJ, Kinzer, CK, Coiro, J, Castek, J, Henry, LA, Unrau, NJ, et al.. New literacies: a dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In: Theoretical models and processes of literacy, 7th ed. Routledge; 2013:319–46 pp.10.4324/9781315110592-19Suche in Google Scholar

18. Knapp, M, Brower, S. The ACRL framework for information literacy in higher education: implications for health sciences librarianship. Med Ref Serv Q 2014;33:460–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2014.957098 Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Schulte, S. Integrating information literacy into an online undergraduate nursing informatics course: the librarian’s role in the design and teaching of the course. Med Ref Serv Q 2008;27:158–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763860802114272.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. American Library Association (ALA), Association for College and Research Libraries (ACRL). Information literacy competency standards for higher education; 2000. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10150/105645.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Aromataris, E, Munn, Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Munn, J, Small, J. What is the best way to develop information literacy and academic skills of first year health science students? A Systematic Review. Evid Based Library Inform Pract 2017;12:56–94. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8QS9M.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Purnell, M, Royal, B, Warton, L. Supporting the development of information literacy skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today 2020;95:104585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104585.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Curran, A, Brown Wilson, C, McCutcheon, K, Slade, C. A systematic review protocol exploring digital literacy education for pre-registration nursing students, in higher education, nursing curricula. PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019143130; 2019. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019143130.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Wang, S, Yan, H. Application effect of different teaching methods in information literacy training of medical students: a network meta-analysis. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023416632; 2023. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416632.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Fei, M, Xiaoming, W, Xiaomin, H. Digital literacy among medical College Students. PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024526196; 2024. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024526196.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Tricco, AC, Lillie, E, Zarin, W, O’Brien, KK, Colquhoun, H, Levac, D, et al.. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Lawless, J, Toronto, GE, Grammatica, CL. Health literacy and information literacy: a concept comparison. Ref Serv Rev 2016;44:144–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2016-0013.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 2021;372:Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Allari, RS, Hamdan, K, Albgoor, MA, Shaheen, A. Information literacy: assessment of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Ref Serv Rev 2021;50:211–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2021-0052.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Brettle, A, Raynor, M. Developing information literacy skills in pre-registration nurses: an experimental study of teaching methods. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:103–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Hanik, B, Stellefson, M. E-health literacy competencies among undergraduate health education students: a preliminary study. Int Electron J Health Educ 2011;14:46–58.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Jacobsen, HE, Andenæs, R. Third-year nursing students’ understanding of how to find and evaluate information from bibliographic databases and internet sites. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31:898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Jelsness-Jørgensen, L-P. Does a 3-week critical research appraisal course affect how students perceive their appraisal skills and the relevance of research for clinical practice? A repeated cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Today 2014;35:e1–e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Karimi, Z, Ashrafi-Rizi, H, Papi, A, Shahrzadi, L, Hassanzadeh, A. Effect of information literacy training course on information literacy skills of undergraduate students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on ACRL standards. J Educ Health Promot 2015;30:1–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.171789.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Khademian, F, Roozrokh, M, Aslani, A. Web-based health information seeking and eHealth literacy among college students. A self-report study. Invest Educ Enfermería 2020;38:e08. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v38n1e08.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Kim, S, Jeon, J. Factors influencing eHealth literacy among Korean nursing students: a cross‐sectional study. Nurs Health Sci 2020;22:667–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12711.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Kingsley, K, Galbraith, GM, Herring, M, Stowers, E, Stewart, T, Kingsley, KV. Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-17.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Park, H, Lee, E. Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in South Korea: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:408–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Özbıçakçı, S, Gezer, N, Bilik, Ö. Comparison of effects of training programs for final year nursing students in Turkey: differences in self-efficacy with regard to information literacy. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:e73–e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Robertson, SD, Felicilda-Reynaldo, RFD. Evaluation of graduate nursing students’ information literacy self-efficacy and applied skills. J Nurs Educ 2015;54:S26–30. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150218-03.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Shamsaee, M, Shahrbabaki, PM, Ahmadian, L, Farokhzadian, J, &Fatehi, F. Assessing the effect of virtual education on information literacy competency for evidence-based practice among the undergraduate nursing students. BMC Med Inf Decis Making 2021;21:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01418-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Sharma, S, Oli, N, Thapa, B. Electronic health–literacy skills among nursing students. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019;10:527–32. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S207353.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Beile O’Neil, P. Development and validation of the Beile test of information literacy for education (b-tiled) [Electronic Theses and Dissertations], 2004–2019; 2005:530 p. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0000749.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Norman, CD, Skinner, HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Marshall, RK. An instrument to measure information competency. J Literacy Technol 2006;6:1–27.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Kurbanoğlu, S, Akkoyunlu, B, Umay, A. Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. J Doc 2006;62:730–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610714949.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Davarphanah, M, Ghasemi, A, Siamak, M. Information literacy assessment of students. Tehran: Dabizesh Publication; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

49. Mokhtar, IA, Majid, S, Foo, S, Zhang, X, Theng, Y-L, Chang, Y-K, et al.. Evidence-based practice and related information literacy skills of nurses in Singapore: an exploratory case study. Health Inf J 2012;18:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458211434753.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Ivanitskaya, L, Laus, R, Casey, AM. Research readiness self-assessment: assessing students’ research skills and attitudes. J Libr Adm 2004;41:124–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v41n01_13.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Svensson, T, Wilk, J, Gustafsson Åman, K. Information literacy skills and learning gaps–Students’ experiences and teachers’ perceptions in interdisciplinary environmental science. J Acad Librariansh 2022;48:102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102465.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Grigas, V, Mierzecka, A, Mierzecka, A, Fedosejevaitė, R. School librarians’ attitudes towards teaching information literacy. Commun Comput Inform Sci 2018;810:703–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_72.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Dann, BJ, Drabble, A, Martin, J. Reading between the lines: an examination of first-year university students’ perceptions of and confidence with information literacy. J Inform Literacy 2022;16:50–69. https://doi.org/10.11645/16.1.3106.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Cooke, L, Stroup, C, Harrington, C. Operationalizing the concept of critical thinking for student learning outcome development. J Nurs Educ 2019;58:214–20. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190321-05.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Perez-Stable, MA, Arnold, JM, Guth, LF, Meer, PFV. From service role to partnership: faculty voices on collaboration with librarians. portal. Libr Acad 2020;20:49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0004.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Peters, MDJ, Godfrey, C, McInerney, P, Khalil, H, Larsen, P, Marnie, C, et al.. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth 2022;20:953–68. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-11-10
Accepted: 2025-08-29
Published Online: 2025-09-15

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Association between admission criteria to nurse practitioner program in Israel and academic success: a retrospective study analysis
  2. Literature Reviews
  3. Higher education nursing students’ literacy skills: a scoping review
  4. Predictors of classroom exams, standardized exams, and nursing licensure exams in U.S. and international undergraduate RN and PN nursing programs: a scoping review
  5. Transfer of learning in baccalaureate nursing education: a systematic scoping review
  6. Research Articles
  7. A computer-based educational program for promoting student cultural competence
  8. 10.1515/ijnes-2025-0037
  9. Immersive virtual reality simulation: engagement and clinical judgment
  10. Exploring nurse faculty perceptions of notetaking
  11. Exploring the link of educational environment and self-esteem with critical thinking in undergraduate nursing university students: a cross-sectional study
  12. Navigating global mobility: a comparative study of nursing education in Nepal and Australia
  13. The impact of simulation-based ethical education on nursing students’ moral distress levels
  14. Affective learning assessment of beginning nursing students
  15. Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process – a qualitative inquiry
  16. The Doctoral Seminar in nursing: an exploration of the literature and trends found in Canadian syllabi
  17. Deliberate practice of medication administration among nursing students: a pilot study
  18. Canadian nursing students and education in medical and recreational cannabis: a preliminary evidence
  19. Flourishing in nursing: positive factors that contributed to mental wellbeing of nursing students in Thailand
  20. Exploring the perceptions of practical nursing students on caring for the older person
  21. Nurse educators’ experience in implementing concept-based curriculum: a phenomenology study
  22. Perception of nursing students on nursing teamwork in hospitals in Slovakia: a cross-sectional study
  23. Lived experiences of international nursing students regarding the studying challenges: a phenomenology study
  24. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  25. Nursing student needs assessment and preferences for faculty-led mentoring
  26. Pedagogical matters: a dialogue of diverse persons, perspectives, and programs
  27. Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduate nursing students: a quasi- experimental study
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0096
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
nursing education; information literacy; evidence-based practice; critical thinking; scoping review

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Association between admission criteria to nurse practitioner program in Israel and academic success: a retrospective study analysis
  2. Literature Reviews
  3. Higher education nursing students’ literacy skills: a scoping review
  4. Predictors of classroom exams, standardized exams, and nursing licensure exams in U.S. and international undergraduate RN and PN nursing programs: a scoping review
  5. Transfer of learning in baccalaureate nursing education: a systematic scoping review
  6. Research Articles
  7. A computer-based educational program for promoting student cultural competence
  8. 10.1515/ijnes-2025-0037
  9. Immersive virtual reality simulation: engagement and clinical judgment
  10. Exploring nurse faculty perceptions of notetaking
  11. Exploring the link of educational environment and self-esteem with critical thinking in undergraduate nursing university students: a cross-sectional study
  12. Navigating global mobility: a comparative study of nursing education in Nepal and Australia
  13. The impact of simulation-based ethical education on nursing students’ moral distress levels
  14. Affective learning assessment of beginning nursing students
  15. Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process – a qualitative inquiry
  16. The Doctoral Seminar in nursing: an exploration of the literature and trends found in Canadian syllabi
  17. Deliberate practice of medication administration among nursing students: a pilot study
  18. Canadian nursing students and education in medical and recreational cannabis: a preliminary evidence
  19. Flourishing in nursing: positive factors that contributed to mental wellbeing of nursing students in Thailand
  20. Exploring the perceptions of practical nursing students on caring for the older person
  21. Nurse educators’ experience in implementing concept-based curriculum: a phenomenology study
  22. Perception of nursing students on nursing teamwork in hospitals in Slovakia: a cross-sectional study
  23. Lived experiences of international nursing students regarding the studying challenges: a phenomenology study
  24. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  25. Nursing student needs assessment and preferences for faculty-led mentoring
  26. Pedagogical matters: a dialogue of diverse persons, perspectives, and programs
  27. Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduate nursing students: a quasi- experimental study
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 1.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0096/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen