Home Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process – a qualitative inquiry
Article Open Access

Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process – a qualitative inquiry

  • Meltem Özduyan Kılıç ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Fatoş Korkmaz ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: April 23, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to systematically explore the perspectives of nursing instructors and students concerning the pedagogical aspects of patient care plan instruction.

Methods

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted between October 10, 2022, and January 17, 2023, at a public university in Ankara, Turkey. Data were gathered through seven focus group interviews involving eight instructors and 27 students, employing semi-structured interview questions. Thematic analysis was used.

Results

The average age of the nurse educators was 36.87 years; all were female, 75 % had a Ph.D. degree, and the average number of years of professional experience was 10.12. The average age of the students was 20.40 years; 66.67 % were female, and 40.74 % were second-year students. After examining interview data, three overarching themes emerged for instructors and students: Clinical Teaching Conditions of the Nursing Process, Engaging with Care Plans in Practice, and Strengthening Care Plan Teaching.

Conclusions

The findings underscored a notable challenge: instructors struggled to provide optimal interaction with students due to overwhelming group sizes during care plan activities. Concurrently, students faced difficulties across all phases of the nursing process when formulating patient care plans. To strengthen the teaching of specific patient care planning, it is recommended that the number of faculty members be increased and that information and communication technologies be used in clinical education.

Implications for an international audience

This study’s findings can help nursing faculties understand the various dimensions of the needs of nursing process education. Furthermore, nurse instructors’ and students’ opinions can promote technology integration in nursing education.

Introduction

The nursing process, as a methodological framework grounded in scientific inquiry and characterized by the application of critical thinking and problem-solving skills [1], 2], relies heavily on care plans as instrumental tools for inter-professional communication within healthcare settings [3]. These care plans, serving as comprehensive guides, ensure the evaluation of patient care outcomes [4] and provide transparency in the nursing care process, thereby ensuring the delivery of high-quality and safe healthcare. Given the consequential nature of these care plans, both their structural formulation and the pedagogical approaches used in their instruction must align with the rigor of scientific principles.

In foundational nursing courses, students are systematically instructed on formulating care plans grounded in the nursing process, encompassing theoretical and practical dimensions. Theoretical instruction includes the fundamental principles and stages of the nursing process, with students, under the guidance of instructors, engaging in the analysis of case studies to synthesize their theoretical knowledge into written patient care plans. During clinical practicum, students apply their theoretical foundations and case analysis skills to discern and prioritize patient care problems, formulating and executing interventions. Instructors are pivotal in guiding students through interpreting patient data, linking data to nursing diagnoses, prioritizing diagnoses, applying interventions, and offering individualized feedback on written care plans.

However, to mitigate the global shortage of nursing professionals, the escalating enrollment of students in nursing programs, both domestically and internationally, poses substantial challenges [5], 6]. This surge in enrollment constrains the time instructors can allocate to each student, impeding their ability to provide timely and personalized feedback [7], 8]. Given the established positive correlation between individualized feedback and learning outcomes, the deficiency in this aspect of instruction may impede students’ mastery of the formulation of patient care plans structured around the nursing process. The research underscores students’ constrained access to diverse patient data sources and the complexities of data collection due to the varying formats utilized in clinical practice [9], 10]. Additionally, studies illuminate challenges encountered by students in nursing diagnosis, including difficulty in identifying etiological factors, distinguishing nursing diagnoses from medical diagnoses, and prioritizing diagnoses [9], [11], [12], [13]. Students also face challenges in planning, implementing, and assessing nursing interventions [14], [15], [16].

These findings underscore students’ impediments in fully integrating the nursing process into their patient care practices. This study comprehensively explores instructors’ and students’ perspectives regarding the pedagogy surrounding patient care plans structured around the nursing process in clinical settings. The anticipated outcome is the generation of insights that will inform and enhance the instructional processes associated with patient care plan formulation, thereby contributing to a more profound comprehension and effective implementation of the nursing process in patient care.

Methods

Aim

This study aims to systematically explore the perspectives of both nursing instructors and students concerning the pedagogical aspects of patient care plan instruction.

Study design

A qualitative descriptive approach was used. This study seeks to comprehensively explore the perspectives of both instructors and students regarding the pedagogy associated with teaching patient care plans structured around the nursing process within a clinical context.

Setting and recruitment

The study was conducted at a university in Ankara, Turkey, from October 10, 2022, to January 17, 2023. The institution had 819 students and 25 instructors in the Fall Semester of the 2022–2023 Academic Year. Purposive sampling, widely employed in qualitative research, was utilized to select participants [17]. Consequently, sophomore, junior, and senior students who had completed the clinical practice component of at least one introductory nursing vocational course were included alongside instructors actively engaged in teaching clinical theory and practice. Instructors who were not actively involved in clinical teaching and students who had never participated in clinical teaching were not included in the study. In this context, during this study, 623 student nurses and 22 instructors met the inclusion criteria. A total of 11 instructors and 40 students voluntarily participated in the research. Data saturation was achieved after seven focus-group interviews with eight instructors and 27 students, prompting the conclusion of data collection.

Data collection

Research data were gathered through face-to-face focus group interviews employing semi-structured interview questions (Table 1). Questions were developed based on a comprehensive literature review to illuminate perspectives on the teaching of patient care plans structured around the nursing process in a clinical setting and solicit recommendations [18], [19], [20]. Four questions were posed during the interviews.

Table 1:

Semi-structured interview questions.

  • 1.

  • Could you elucidate the components of your clinical teaching process?

  • 2.

  • Would you be willing to recount your interactions with your student/instructor while engaged in the process of preparing a care plan during clinical teaching?

  • 3.

  • Could you elaborate on the experiences of your students in preparing a care plan within the context of the clinical teaching process?

  • 4.

  • What measures do you propose to enhance the experience of preparing a care plan within the clinical teaching process?

Instructors were briefed about the study and interviewed face-to-face, while students were informed through a scheduled meeting, where the study was explained. After obtaining informed consent from participating students, separate WhatsApp groups were established for instructors and students to facilitate communication. Focus group meetings were scheduled through these WhatsApp groups based on participant availability. Interviews were conducted in a suitable classroom at the research institution, preceded by a posted warning sign and closed-door sessions. Audio recordings captured participant responses, and the interviews varied in duration, lasting between 40 and 80 min.

Data analysis

As [21] outlined, thematic analysis constituted this study’s methodological approach to data analysis. Initially, audio recordings were transcribed, followed by iterative readings to cultivate familiarity with the data. Subsequently, a systematic coding process was undertaken to distill meaningful patterns. These codes were then organized into overarching themes, with iterative refinement to ensure accurate representation. Maxqda 2022 software facilitated the data analysis by providing essential support while editing codes and themes.

Ethical considerations

Ethics committee approval (Number: GO 22/27) was secured from the Hacettepe University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee on March 1, 2022. Permission to conduct the research was obtained from the institution and informed written consent was obtained from participating instructors and students after they provided detailed information about the study.

Rigor

Lincoln and Guba [22] qualitative research approach, encompassing credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability criteria, guided the establishment of the study’s rigor. Credibility was fortified through the utilization of purposive sampling and the generation of audio recordings to document participant-researcher interactions. To uphold dependability, we shared the interview transcripts with the participants for verification against the original recordings. The confirmability criterion was met by securely preserving all original materials, including audio recordings, written texts, and data analysis records, allowing for scrutiny and reference. For transferability, thick description was used to provide detailed accounts of the participants’ perspectives on the pedagogical aspects of patient care plan instruction, enabling readers to assess the applicability of the findings to similar nursing education environments. Verbatim quotes from participants were incorporated under respective sub-themes to enhance transferability.

Results

The mean age of nursing instructors was 36.87 years (33–41). All were female, and 75 % held a Ph.D. The average duration of professional experience as an instructor was 10.12 years (range: 9–13). In contrast, students had an average age of 20.40 years (range: 19–23), with 66.67 % female and 40.74 % classified as sophomore students.

After examining interview data, three overarching themes emerged for both instructors and students: Clinical Teaching Conditions of the Nursing Process, Engaging with Care Plans in Practice, and Strengthening Care Plan Teaching (Table 2). Table 2 also includes data-driven codes (i.e., codes for instructors and codes for students) derived through thematic analysis, as outlined by [21]. These codes represent meaningful patterns identified from the transcribed interviews and were systematically categorized into overarching themes and sub-themes. The following paragraphs include participant quotes. Instructor quotes are labeled as INS, along with their years of experience (e.g., 8 years of experience – INS), while student quotes are labeled as NS, along with their level of education – sophomores as second grade, juniors as third grade, and seniors as fourth grade (e.g., Second grade – NS).

Table 2:

Themes and sub-themes obtained from instructors and students.

Themes Sub-themes Codes of instructor Codes of students
Clinical teaching conditions of the nursing process Challenges experienced in practice Supporting outside the field of expertise High number of students
High number of students Attitude of nurses
High number of clinics in charge Duration of clinical practice
Working with mentors
Duration of clinical practice
Student-instructor interaction in practice Availability Availability
Communication Communication
Engaging with care plans in practice Care plan preparation resources Number of prepared care plans Number of prepared care plans
Resources used Resources used
Difficulties in implementing the nursing process Assessment Assessment
Diagnosis Diagnosis
Planning Planning
Implementation Implementation
Evaluation Evaluation
Preferences for delivery of care plans Face-to-face Face-to-face
Online (e-mail, upload to system) Online (e-mail, upload to system)
Feedback methods and perceived limitations Feedback Feedback
Grading Grading
Strengthening care plan teaching Increasing clinical readiness Reducing the number of students Case study
Case study Clinic preparation training
Concept map
Demand for technology use in teaching Feature Feature
Benefits Benefits

Main theme 1: clinical teaching conditions of the nursing process

Within the scope of main theme 1, it was determined that instructors and students emphasized the limitations in the teaching conditions of the nursing process and the importance of instructor-student communication in terms of learning. The statements of both instructors and students about the theme of clinical teaching were systematically organized under the following sub-themes: Challenges experienced in practice and Student-instructor interaction in practice.

Sub-theme 1.1: challenges experienced in practice

Instructors highlighted challenges associated with clinical practice, emphasizing the significant strain of managing large student groups across diverse clinical settings. The demand becomes particularly pronounced when guiding new mentors, adding an extra workload layer.

We operate within clinical settings with notably large student cohorts across diverse clinics. As instructors, our rotations can entail up to 30 students. Considering the two rotations, we oversee approximately 60 students in a single semester. (9 years of experience-INS)

When orienting new mentors, we face additional responsibilities. To avoid compromising the clinical learning experiences of students, we must also monitor those under the guidance of new mentors. (Eight years of experience-INS)

Students perceived instructors as constrained by the large student-to-instructor ratio during clinical practice. They expressed a need for support from nurses to navigate clinical work and effectively prepare care plans.

Clinic nurses do not consistently offer support, hindering our ability to acclimate to the clinical setting and gather sufficient patient information. Consequently, our ability to prepare care plans is compromised. (Second grade-NS)

Ideally, we would prefer more direct guidance from our instructors, but regrettably, the sheer number of students makes continuous supervision impractical. Following our arrival at the clinic, we are at the discretion of the nurses, absorbing whatever knowledge they impart. (Fourth grade-NS)

Both instructors and students acknowledged that the duration of clinical practice was insufficient to achieve the objectives of clinical teaching.

Our exposure to the clinic spans merely 11 or 12 days in a single semester. Given the rotation structure, the maximum duration of interaction with a student group is limited to 6 days. Six days for acclimating students to the clinical environment is insufficient for imparting the skills required to formulate patient care plans. (Nine years of experience-INS)

With our weekly clinic visits and the constrained time within the hospital, our ability to follow up on the patients for whom we have prepared care plans is compromised. Establishing communication with the patient or ascertaining their needs becomes challenging. (Fourth grade-NS)

Sub-theme 1.2: student-instructor interaction in practice

Instructors asserted their constant accessibility during clinical practice, emphasizing open and facile communication with students.

We are consistently present during practice, actively engaged in data collection, problem identification, and translating care plans into written form. Accessibility is a priority during practice hours, with students accessing my contact details, including phone number and e-mail address. (Ten years of experience-INS)

Students indicated that positive student-instructor communication positively impacted their learning experiences. Contrary to the instructors’ view, students perceived inconsistent accessibility among instructors during clinical practice.

Accessibility varies among teachers and mentors. The reality is this: I can reach some teachers, but the effort is not reciprocated. There are instances where I inquire about a care plan I’ve prepared, and my instructor declines to address the question, citing potential effects on my evaluation. If my teacher doesn’t provide the needed clarification, where do I turn for guidance on a crucial aspect that could influence my evaluation? (Fourth grade-NS)

Main theme 2: engaging with care plans in practice

Within the scope of the main theme 2, it was determined that there may be limitations in the reliability of some of the resources used by the students, that there are difficulties in all stages of the nursing process while structuring the care plans, that the use of electronic media is preferred by the students at the point of preparing the care plan, and that there are limitations in the monitoring/evaluation of the student. The statements from both instructors and students concerning the theme “Engaging with Care Plans in Practice” were systematically categorized under the following sub-themes: Care plan preparation resources, Difficulties in implementing the nursing process, Preferences for delivery of care plans, and Feedback methods and perceived limitations.

Sub-theme 2.1: care plan preparation resources

Instructors preferred students to prepare care plans for an average of two patients during clinical practice. Students received multifaceted support from instructors, books, clinic nurses, and their own past care plans and peer interactions, often supplemented by online resources.

Students draw support from diverse outlets during care plan preparation, including peer interactions, our instructional discussions, Internet resources, books, and guidance from clinic nurses. (Twelve years of experience-INS)

Students revealed variations in the number of care plans assigned based on the clinical setting. They emphasized that an excessive number of care plans negatively impacted course success. Students utilized various resources such as books, prior care plans, institution-provided care plans, and online sources, with the Internet being the predominant choice.

The quantity of care plans required varies depending on the clinic. I prepared care plans for five patients in the first rotation this year. Managing weekly submissions proved challenging, leading to incomplete assignments. Some peers opted to prepare only one plan, allocating more time to exam preparation. Unfortunately, I had to divert exam preparation time to care plans, impacting my overall exam readiness. If restricted to one care plan, I could have dedicated more time to exam study. (Second grade-NS)

I observe my patient for two or three weeks when crafting my care plan. I draw insights from the ready-made care plans utilized by hospital nurses, consult the NANDA nursing diagnoses book for precise expression of diagnoses, and reference care plans from previous years. Articles containing patient reviews detail nursing interventions and care plans, providing valuable insights for my assignments. (Fourth grade-NS)

Sub-theme 2.2: difficulties in implementing the nursing process

Instructors identified challenges encountered by students at various stages of the nursing process when formulating patient care plans. Notably, students struggled with posing practical questions during data collection, encountered problem identification difficulties, hesitated in taking the initiative, and faced challenges in making assessments.

They encounter challenges due to a lack of proficiency in formulating questions during data collection. We observe significant difficulties, especially in problem identification. There is also a deficiency in initiative and assessment skills. (Ten years of experience-INS)

Students encounter challenges in completing paper-based data collection forms within the clinical setting, perceiving the preparation of care plans as burdensome. Consequently, care plans are submitted as less meticulous assignments. (Eight years of experience-INS)

Students acknowledged difficulties across all stages of the nursing process, with a particular emphasis on challenges during the planning phase of care plan development.

We encounter challenges in prioritizing care plans, especially when diagnoses closely resemble each other. (Fourth grade NS)

While making a diagnosis isn’t overly challenging for me, I struggle to elaborate on the planning section afterward. I constantly attempt to add content, as I feel something is missing. (Second grade-NS)

Sub-theme 2.3: preferences for delivery of care plans

Instructors exhibited varied preferences regarding the submission of care plans. One instructor emphasized the importance of handwritten submissions for freshman and sophomore students, believing it enhances learning. Another instructor allowed flexibility, permitting both online and in-person submissions, with a preference for computer-prepared sections to improve readability.

I attend the practices of freshman and sophomore students, advising them to handwrite their care plans for better learning. The submissions are received in person on the predetermined date. (Ten years of experience-INS)

Submission methods include both online and in-person options. However, handwritten submissions can pose readability challenges. Hence, I encourage computer preparation before in-person delivery, especially for diagnosis and intervention sections. (Eight years of experience-INS)

Students expressed the flexibility to submit care plans either in person or online. However, most advocated for computer-based preparation due to its ease and reduced stress. They emphasized the convenience of preparing the plan on a computer, printing it, and then delivering it by hand, citing issues with online submission systems and legibility concerns with handwritten submissions.

Having experienced handwritten in-person and online submissions, I find that preparing a care plan on a computer, printing it, and delivering it in person is the easiest and least stressful method. One care plan I submitted online encountered delivery issues due to system problems. Another care plan, submitted in person in handwritten form, couldn’t be graded due to illegibility. Hence, I believe computer preparation followed by in-person delivery is optimal. (Fourth grade-NS)

Sub-theme 2.4.: feedback methods and perceived limitations

Instructors were committed to providing individualized feedback for care plans but acknowledged challenges due to the large student cohorts. Collective feedback, often conveyed through case modeling or addressing common errors, was identified as the prevailing method. Instructors disclosed the utilization of distinct assessment tools for each lesson in clinical practice, emphasizing a fair evaluation system.

As the supervisor for a considerable number of students in clinical practice, the opportunity for individual feedback is limited. Hence, feedback is typically delivered collectively. (Twelve years of experience-INS)

We employ a clinical evaluation guide, allotting 100 points. The initial 50 points stem from our assessment of care plans based on the nursing process approach. The remaining 50 points evaluate the student’s demeanor and conduct within the clinical setting. (Nine years of experience-INS)

Students noted receiving limited verbal or written feedback on their care plan submissions. The perceived inadequacy of feedback was deemed detrimental to their learning process, with concerns about perceived unfair grading practices impacting motivation.

The feedback is restricted, leaving us unaware of our mistakes and points deduction. Knowledge of these aspects would enable improvement efforts, but absent specific feedback leads to repetitive errors. (Fourth grade-NS)

Despite investing significant effort in care plan preparation, instances arise where individuals who exhibit less diligence receive higher grades. This perceived lack of fairness diminishes the value of care plans, leading to a perception that they are merely obligatory tasks for academic success rather than valuable learning experiences. (Fourth grade-NS)

Main theme 3: strengthening care plan teaching

Within the scope of the last theme, faculty members’ and students’ suggestions for strengthening the nursing process and care plan preparation education were determined. In this context, students and faculty members suggested improving clinical conditions. In addition, participants stated that they wanted to use more technology-based methods instead of traditional paper-based education. The statements from both instructors and students regarding recommendations were systematically categorized under the following sub-themes: Increasing Clinical Readiness and Demand for Technology Use in Teaching.

Sub-theme 3.1: increasing clinical readiness

Instructors highlighted the need for an improved student-to-instructor ratio to enhance the effectiveness of clinical theory and practice. They also recommended incorporating more case studies and utilizing concept maps to reinforce the practical application of care plans.

Enhancing students’ readiness for the clinic can be achieved through the implementation of additional case studies. (Twelve years of experience-INS)

The creation of disease-specific concept maps, particularly in surgical, internal medicine, and pediatric areas, could prove beneficial. (Eight years of experience-INS)

Students expressed a desire for more comprehensive information about clinic procedures, patients’ medical diagnoses, and the opportunity to engage in case studies to enhance their preparation for care plan development.

Before commencing practice, obtaining knowledge about the clinic, diseases, treatments, interventions, and diagnoses is crucial. Current practices often delay understanding diagnoses and interventions, hindering our interaction with patients. (Second grade-NS)

Preparing a care plan with sample patient data assisted by our instructor before practical sessions could significantly enhance our ability to create detailed care plans for real patients in the clinic. (Third grade-NS)

Sub-theme 3.2: demand for technology use in teaching

Instructors underscored the potential benefits of leveraging mobile/web-based technologies to enhance the clinical teaching aspect of the nursing process. They proposed developing a comprehensive system resembling the hospital information management system, allowing close interaction between instructors and students. The envisioned system would encompass all stages of the nursing process, facilitating effective monitoring and assessment while contributing to environmental sustainability by reducing paper usage.

I advocate for the electronic preparation of care plans, aligning with hospital practices. The current reliance on paper-based care plans hampers our chronological tracking of students’ experiences. A clinical practice software could enable students to record daily interventions and patient assessments, enhancing our ability to monitor and assess them closely. (Seven years of experience-INS)

A system or software designed to guide student decision-making, prompt critical thinking, and facilitate instructor-student interactions would be beneficial. Such a system would allow me to review the data entered by students, including diagnoses. (Ten years of experience-INS)

Transitioning to electronic media not only addresses paper waste concerns but also enhances the legibility and accessibility of care plans during evaluation. (Eight years of experience-INS)

Students expressed a positive outlook on the potential utilization of mobile/web-based technologies, envisioning enhanced patient data recording and increased interaction with instructors. Embracing digital solutions was seen as a means to streamline care plan preparation, manage time more efficiently, and receive timely feedback for continuous improvement.

I firmly believe that care plans should evolve beyond paper forms. An app could encompass digital versions of all paper forms used for patient data collection, thereby revolutionizing care plan preparation. (Third grade-NS)

A software or system facilitating interaction with instructors and enabling online feedback on care plans would be invaluable. Accessing our instructors’ assessments and feedback online would contribute to more effective preparation of subsequent care plans. (Second grade-NS)

The use of electronic media could expedite care plan creation, allowing us to allocate more time to our academic pursuits. (Third grade-NS)

Discussion

This study investigated the perspectives of nursing instructors and students regarding the instructional aspects of care plans aligned with the nursing process within a clinical setting. The opinions of both students and instructors were categorized into three primary themes: Clinical Teaching Conditions of the Nursing Process, Engaging with Care Plans in Practice, and Strengthening Care Plan Teaching.

Recognizing clinical practice as the pivotal milieu for students to acquire and apply patient care skills, our study identified a unanimous view among all instructors and a majority of students regarding the brief duration of clinical practice and the high student-to-instructor ratio as pivotal constraints limiting effective interaction between the instructor and the student. Due to the small number of faculty members in the institution where the study was conducted, support is received from mentors in clinical teaching. However, specific instructors indicated that working with them in clinical education augmented their workload because mentors do not undergo training like instructors. Students desired frequent and effective communication with instructors to enhance their proficiency in crafting a qualified and accurate care plan. Consistent with existing literature, our study found that instructors faced challenges in providing sufficient guidance to students due to time constraints during clinical practice [7], 8], 23]. Other studies have similarly underscored students’ expressed need for increased support in the clinical field, particularly from instructors during patient care practices, anticipating a more active role from instructors in their educational journey [23], 24]. The burgeoning number of nursing students in response to the healthcare workforce shortage in Turkey has necessitated instructors to engage with considerably larger student cohorts during clinical practice, with observed instances of 20–60 students per instructor in some institutions. [6]. Consequently, certain educational institutions have support from clinical nurses as mentors for clinical education. However, these mentors predominantly contribute to clinical education without formal training, lack a structured preparatory stage, and assume responsibility for a similar number of students as instructors. This may affect the student’s quality and satisfaction with clinical teaching.

The study found that students derive insights from diverse sources when formulating patient-specific care plans when working with a care plan. However, challenges arise in data collection, formulating nursing diagnoses, and planning, implementing, and evaluating the nursing process. Both instructors and students underscored the significance of feedback in developing individualized care plans. Nevertheless, instructors stated they did not have enough time to provide individual feedback to each student during clinical practices because they were responsible for many students. Similar to our study findings, other studies in the literature also show that instructors had limited time to provide feedback to students due to working with large groups [7], 8], 25]. Additional research also corroborates the assertion that students encounter difficulties at all stages of preparing care plans structured around the nursing process [13], 14], 26]. Patient care plans play a pivotal role in ensuring quality, safe, and sustainable patient care, with mandatory recording requirements in our country since 2010 and internationally since the 1980s [27]. Typically, nurses document patient care using standardized forms their respective institutions provide. These written care plan documents are frequently completed on the patient’s first day of admission to the clinic or during discharge procedures, often lacking timely updates. Consequently, students are deprived of the opportunity to observe the preparation of qualified and accurate care plans. This may explain why students encounter challenges internalizing care plans, perceiving them primarily as obligatory homework assignments necessary for academic success.

Within the overarching theme of “Engaging with Care Plans in Practice,” students articulated concerns regarding the perceived lack of fairness in instructors’ grading practices, which, in turn, adversely influenced their motivation to craft patient-specific and comprehensive care plans. This observation underscores the inherent challenges associated with objectivity in clinical evaluations within nursing, aligning with existing literature findings [8], 23]. In clinical practices, instructors strive to assess students’ competencies across cognitive, psychomotor, and emotional domains. This evaluation examines how these competencies manifest in the formulation of care plans. Several factors may have contributed to the nuanced nature of student evaluations, including the shortened duration of clinical practices in our study, time constraints that prevented instructors from individually observing each student, and the involvement of evaluators with diverse qualifications and educational backgrounds.

Within this study’s theme of strengthening care plan teaching, instructors underscored the necessity of improving student-instructor ratios. Therefore, the number of instructors can be increased to enhance clinical education’s effectiveness. Additionally, both instructors and students advocated for increased implementation of case studies, concept maps, and clinic readiness training to augment the preparedness process for clinical environments. A unanimous sentiment among all instructors and most students asserted the viability of leveraging mobile/web-based technologies similar to Hospital Information Management Systems (HIMS) used in medical institutions. This adoption was anticipated to amplify the interaction between instructors and students during clinical practices, facilitating the electronic preparation of care plans. During clinical practices, instructors and students, through supervised exposure to the HIMS software while accessing patient data, gained firsthand experience with its functionalities [28]. The escalating interest in integrating information and communication technologies into educational activities within nursing schools has garnered global attention [29]. Findings from educational software development studies indicate a notable increase in the frequency of documented patient-related data [30] and an enhancement in the comprehensiveness of nursing documentation, ensuring the thorough recording of data without omissions [19]. Consequently, incorporating technology into the clinical teaching paradigm promises to foster ubiquitous interaction between students and instructors, transcending temporal and spatial constraints, thereby cultivating a more enriched learning milieu.

Strengths and limitations

One of this study’s strengths is its comprehensive evaluation of the clinical teaching of the nursing process, both for students and nurse instructors. In addition, the fact that all faculty members participating in the study have been educators for a long time (an average of 10 years) is another strength in terms of comprehensive evaluation of clinical teaching.

The study has several limitations. First, it is limited to the opinions and suggestions of nurse instructors and students at the Faculty of Nursing in Ankara, Turkey. Therefore, caution should be exercised regarding its generalizability. The study was conducted through face-to-face focus group interviews. Therefore, participants’ opinions may have been influenced by each other.

Implications for an international audience

When creating patient care plans for the nursing process, nurses/nursing students need a comprehensive conceptual framework, intense theoretical knowledge, and best practice skills. When interacting with actual patients in the clinical area, nurses and nursing students have difficulty preparing a care plan using the nursing process approach. Therefore, a comprehensive comprehension of the instructional methods employed for care plans is imperative, and areas for improvement must have been identified. This study is robust in systematically exploring the perspectives of both nursing instructors and students, providing valuable insights into the pedagogical aspects of patient care plan instruction. This study’s findings can help nursing faculties understand the various dimensions of the needs of nursing process education. Furthermore, nurse instructors’ and students’ opinions can promote technology integration in nursing education.

Conclusions

In this study, the experiences and recommendations of instructors and students on teaching patient care plans structured with the nursing process in clinical settings are presented in detail. The findings underscored a notable challenge: instructors struggled to provide optimal interaction with students due to overwhelming group sizes during care plan activities. Concurrently, students faced difficulties across all phases of the nursing process when formulating patient care plans. The shared sentiment among students and instructors emphasized enhancing pre-clinical practice initiatives. It advocated integrating mobile/web-based technologies to foster robust student-instructor engagement during clinical experiences. The authors advocate for integrating mobile/web-based applications into teaching practices in light of these outcomes. They offer a solution to fortify instructor-student interaction and better equip students for the technologically driven landscape of their future professional endeavors.


Corresponding author: Meltem Özduyan Kılıç, RN, PhD, Ankara University Faculty of Nursing, 06080, Ankara, Türkiye, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 222S244

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere thanks to the nurse educators and student nurses who participated in this study.

  1. Research ethics: Ethics committee approval (Number: GO 22/27) was secured from the Hacettepe University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee on March 1, 2022.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: Meltem Özduyan Kiliç played a key role in conceptualizing and designing the study, collecting and assessing data saturation, transcribing the interviews, analyzing and interpreting the data, and drafting and critically revising the manuscript. Fatos Korkmaz contributed significantly to the conception and design of the study, supervised the data collection, assessed data saturation, supervised and participated in data analysis, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: This study was supported by Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (Project No: 222S244).

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Wagoro, MCA, Rakuom, CP. Mainstreaming Kenya-nursing process in clinical settings: the case of Kenya. Int J Africa Nurs Sci 2015;3:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2015.07.002.Search in Google Scholar

2. Williams, L, Wilkins, A. Nursing care planning-incredibly easy, 2nd ed.. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Berman, A, Snyder, S, Frandsen, G. Kozier & Erb’s fundamentals of nursing: concepts, process and practice, 11th ed., Global Edition ed. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited; 2022.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jessup, RL, Tacey, M, Glynn, M, Kirk, M, McKeown, L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a comprehensive care plan to reduce hospital acquired complications in an Australian hospital: protocol for a mixed-method preimplementation and postimplementation study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e034121. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034121.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Courtney-Pratt, H, FitzGerald, M, Ford, K, Marsden, K, Marlow, A. Quality clinical placements for undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional survey of undergraduates and supervising nurses. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:1380–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05851.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Kocaman, G, Yurumezoglu, HA. Situation analysis of nursing education in Turkey: nursing education with numbers (1996-2015). J High Education Sci 2015;5:255. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.127.Search in Google Scholar

7. Adamson, E, King, L, Foy, L, McLeod, M, Traynor, J, Watson, W, et al.. Feedback in clinical practice: enhancing the students’ experience through action research. Nurse Educ Pract 2018;31:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kol, E, Ince, S. Determining the opinions of the first-year nursing students about clinical practice and clinical educators. Nurse Educ Pract 2018;31:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Akansel, N, Palloş, A. Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Bakım Planı Hazırlamada Yaşadıkları Güçlüklerin Kök Nedenlerinin İncelenmesi [difficulties experienced by nursing students in the development of nursing care plans: Root cause analysis]. Acibadem Univ Saglik Bilim Derg 2020;11:269–75. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2020.265.Search in Google Scholar

10. Yilmaz, AA, Gençer, E, Seçkin, Ç, Yilmaz, H, Güven, KT, Yildirim, S. Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Hemşirelik Sürecinin Veri Toplama Aşamasina İlişkin Görüşleri ve Yaşadiklari Güçlükler [difficulties experienced by nursing students on the data collection step of the nursing process]. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2019;22:231–9. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunihem/issue/50763/439074.10.17049/ataunihem.439074Search in Google Scholar

11. Abed El-Rahman, M, Al Kalaldeh, MT, Malak, MZ. Perceptions and attitudes toward NANDA-I nursing diagnoses: a cross-sectional study of Jordanian nursing students. Int J Nurs Knowl 2017;28:13–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Yilmaz, FT, Sabanciogullari, S, Aldemir, K. The opinions of nursing students regarding the nursing process and their levels of proficiency in Turkey. J Caring Sci 2015;4:265–75. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Yönt, GH, Korhan, EA, Erdemir, F, Müller-Staub, M. Nursing diagnoses determined by first year students: a vignette study. Int J Nurs Knowl 2014;25:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ardahan, M, Özsoy, S, Şimşek, H, Savan, F, Taşkıran, G, Konal, E. The difficulties experienced by nursing students during the use of NANDA diagnoses in care management. Int J Caring Sci 2019;12:1130–8. https://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/60_ardahan_original_12_2.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

15. Durgun Ozan, Y, Duman, M, Çiçek, Ö. Nursing students’ experiences on assessing the sexuality of patients: mixed method study. Sex Disabil 2019;37:613–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09567-6.Search in Google Scholar

16. Keski, Ç, Karadağ, A. Hemşirelik Son Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Hemşirelik Süreci Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi [investigation of knowledge levels of final year nursing students regarding nursing process]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Derg 2010;1:41–52. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hemarge/issue/52707/695098.Search in Google Scholar

17. Merriam, SB. Qualitative research-a guide to design and application, 3rd ed. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

18. Parvan, K, Hosseini, FA, Jasemi, M, Thomson, B. Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Med Inf Decis Making 2021;21:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01378-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Ranjbar, K, Sabetsarvestani, R, Oghlaee, H, Sarvestani, PS, Dehghan, A, Shirazi, ZH. Using electronic software for nursing documentation in nursing students. Flor Nightingale J Nurs 2021;29:128–36. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2021.20077.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Warboys, I, Mok, WY, Frith, KH. Electronic medical records in clinical teaching. Nurse Educ 2014;39:298–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Braun, V, Clarke, V, Hayfield, N, Terry, G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong, P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2018.10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1Search in Google Scholar

22. Lincoln, YS, Guba, EG. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage; 1985.10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8Search in Google Scholar

23. Gunay, U, Kilinc, G. The transfer of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice by nursing students and the difficulties they experience: a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today 2018;65:81–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Jack, K, Hamshire, C, Harris, WE, Langan, M, Barrett, N, Wibberley, C. “My mentor didn’t speak to me for the first four weeks”: perceived Unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings. J Clin Nurs 2018;27:929–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Miles, DA. Simulation learning and transfer in undergraduate nursing education: a grounded theory study. J Nurs Educ 2018;57:347–53. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180522-05.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Aydın, N, Akansel, N. Determination of accuracy of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students in their nursing care plans. Int J Caring Sci 2013;6:252–7. https://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/15.%20Aydin%20nursing%20diagnoses.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

27. Hemşirelik Yönetmeliği [Nursing regulation]. (2010). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/04/20110419-5.htm [Accessed 28 November 2023].Search in Google Scholar

28. Kaplan, E, Korkmaz, F. Nurse educators’ and students’ experiences on electronic patient records: a multiple-methods study. Nurse Educ Today 2023;121:105684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105684.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Hwang, GJ, Tang, KY, Tu, YF. How artificial intelligence (AI) supports nursing education: profiling the roles, applications, and trends of AI in nursing education research (1993–2020). Interact Learn Environ 2022:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2086579.Search in Google Scholar

30. Morris, M, Fernandez, A. Quantity of documentation by nursing students using paper and educational electronic medical record system. Nurse Educ 2019;44:293–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000651.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0079).


Received: 2024-09-04
Accepted: 2025-04-09
Published Online: 2025-04-23

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Association between admission criteria to nurse practitioner program in Israel and academic success: a retrospective study analysis
  2. Literature Reviews
  3. Predictors of classroom exams, standardized exams, and nursing licensure exams in U.S. and international undergraduate RN and PN nursing programs: a scoping review
  4. Transfer of learning in baccalaureate nursing education: a systematic scoping review
  5. Research Articles
  6. Exploring nurse faculty perceptions of notetaking
  7. Exploring the link of educational environment and self-esteem with critical thinking in undergraduate nursing university students: a cross-sectional study
  8. Navigating global mobility: a comparative study of nursing education in Nepal and Australia
  9. The impact of simulation-based ethical education on nursing students’ moral distress levels
  10. Affective learning assessment of beginning nursing students
  11. Examining perspectives of instructors and students on the instruction of care plans within the nursing process – a qualitative inquiry
  12. The Doctoral Seminar in nursing: an exploration of the literature and trends found in Canadian syllabi
  13. Deliberate practice of medication administration among nursing students: a pilot study
  14. Canadian nursing students and education in medical and recreational cannabis: a preliminary evidence
  15. Flourishing in nursing: positive factors that contributed to mental wellbeing of nursing students in Thailand
  16. Exploring the perceptions of practical nursing students on caring for the older person
  17. Nurse educators’ experience in implementing concept-based curriculum: a phenomenology study
  18. Perception of nursing students on nursing teamwork in hospitals in Slovakia: a cross-sectional study
  19. Lived experiences of international nursing students regarding the studying challenges: a phenomenology study
  20. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  21. Nursing student needs assessment and preferences for faculty-led mentoring
  22. Pedagogical matters: a dialogue of diverse persons, perspectives, and programs
  23. Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduate nursing students: a quasi- experimental study
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0079/html
Scroll to top button