Startseite Making the Case for Simulation-Based Assessments to Overcome the Challenges in Evaluating Clinical Competency
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Making the Case for Simulation-Based Assessments to Overcome the Challenges in Evaluating Clinical Competency

  • Gwen Leigh EMAIL logo , Frances Stueben , Deedra Harrington und Stephen Hetherman
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Mai 2016

Abstract

The use of simulation in nursing has increased substantially in the last few decades. Most schools of nursing have incorporated simulation into their curriculum but few are using simulation to evaluate clinical competency at the end of a semester or prior to graduation. Using simulation for such high stakes evaluation is somewhat novel to nursing. Educators are now being challenged to move simulation to the next level and use it as a tool for evaluating clinical competency. Can the use of simulation for high-stakes evaluation add to or improve our current evaluation methods? Using patient simulation for evaluation in contrast to a teaching modality has important differences that must be considered. This article discusses the difficulties of evaluating clinical competency, and makes the case for using simulation based assessment as a method of high stakes evaluation. Using simulation for high-stakes evaluation has the potential for significantly impacting nursing education.

References

Adamson, K. A., Jeffries, P. R., & Rogers, K. J. (2012). Evaluation: A critical step in simulation practice and research. In P. R. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 131–162) New York: National League of Nursing.Suche in Google Scholar

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (n.d.). Essential clinical resources for nursing’s academic mission. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/ClinicalEssentials99.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

American Colleges of Surgeons (2014). About the ATLS program and courses. Retrieved from https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/atls/coursesSuche in Google Scholar

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Research in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Suche in Google Scholar

American Student Dental Association. (2014). Retrieved from http://wbuchanww.asdanet.org/licensure.Suche in Google Scholar

Ballangrud, R., Persenius, M., Hedelin, B., & Hall-Lord, M. L. (2014). Exploring intensive care nurses’ team performance in a simulation-based emergency situation,-expert raters’ versus assessment self-assessments: an explorative study. BMC Nursing, 13, 47. doi:10.1186/s12912-014-0047-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bensfield, L. A., Olech, M. J., & Horsley, T. L. (2012). Simulation for high-stakes evaluation in nursing. Nurse Educator 37(2), 71–74. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182461b8cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Bhanji, F., Mancini, M. E., Sinz, E., Rodgers, D. L., McNeil, M. A., Hoadley, T. A. Hazinski, M. F. (2010). Education, implementation, and teams: American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122(18), s920–s946.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971135Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Bonnel, W. (2012). Clinical performance evaluation. In D. M. Billings, & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (4th ed., pp. 485–502). St. Louis: MO: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Brink, Y., & Louw, Q. A. (2012). Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1126–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01707Suche in Google Scholar

Buyske, J. (2010). The role of simulation in certification. Surgical Clinics of North America, 90(3), 619–621.10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Collins, S., & Callanhan, M. F. (2014). A call for change: Clinical evaluation of student registered nurse anesthetists. AANA Journal, 82(1), 65–72. Eiland v. Wolf, 764 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Ct. App. 1989).Suche in Google Scholar

Gaberson, K. B., Oermann, M. H., & Shellenbarger, T. (2015). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing. New York, NY: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

General Medical Council (2014). License to practice. Retrieved from http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/licensing.aspSuche in Google Scholar

Gore, T., VanGele, P., Ravert, P., & Mabire, C. (2012). A 2010 survey of the INACSL membership about Simulation use. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(4), 2125–2133. doi: 10.1016/ecns.2012.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

Heaslip, V., & Scammell, J. E. (2012). Failing underperforming students: The role of grading in practice assessment. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(2), 95–100. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2011.08.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Holmboe, E., Rizzolo, M. A., Sachdeva, A. K., Rosenberg, M., & Ziv, A. (2011). Simulation-based assessment and the regulation of healthcare professionals. Simulation in Healthcare, 6(7), 58–62. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182283bd7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Hovancsek, M., Jeffries, P. R., Escudero, E., Foulds, B. J., Husebo, S. E., … Iwamoto Wang, A. (2009). Creating simulation communities of practice: An international perspective. Nursing Education Perspectives, 20(30), 121–125.Suche in Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health care system for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm/Quality%20Chasm%202001 %20 %20report%20brief.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Ironside, P. M., & McNelis, A. M. (2011). Transforming clinical education. Journal of Nursing Education 50(3): 123–124. doi:10.3928/01484834–20110216–01Suche in Google Scholar

Isaacson, J., & Stacy, A. (2009). Rubrics for clinical evaluation: Objectifying the subjective experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 134–140. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Kardon-Edgen, S., Adamson, K. A., & Fitzgerald, C. (2010). A review of currently published evaluations for human patient simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6, e25–e35.10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

Larocque, S., & Luhanga, F. (2013). Exploring the issue of failing to fail in a nursing program. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Lasater, K. (2011). Clinical Judgment: The last frontier for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 11, 86–92. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Levine, A. I., Schwartz, A. D., Bryson, E. O., & DeMaria Jr, S. (2012), Role of Simulation in US Physician Licensure and Certification. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 79, 140–153. doi: 10.1002/msj.21291asdaSuche in Google Scholar

Li, S. (2007). The role of simulation in nursing education: A regulatory perspective. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/The_Role_of_Simulation_in_Nursing_Education (1).pdfSuche in Google Scholar

McGarry, D. E., Cashin, A., & Fowler, C. (2014). Survey of Australian schools on nursing use of human patent (mannequin) simulation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35(11), 815–823. doi: 10.3109/016162840.2014.917348Suche in Google Scholar

Medical Council of Canada (2014). Examinations. Retrieved from http://mcc.ca/examinations/Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, C. (2010). Literature review: Improving and enhancing performance in the affective domain of nursing students: Insights from the literature for clinical educators. Contemporary Nurse 35(1), 2–7. doi:10.5172/conu.2010.35.1.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

National Board for Registered Care (2015). Retrieved from http://www.nbrc.org/rrt/pages/default.aspxSuche in Google Scholar

National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nremt.org/nremt/about/nremt_news.aspSuche in Google Scholar

National League of Nursing. (2010). National League for Nursing Task Force Tackles High Stakes Testing. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/newsreleases/highstakes_testing_061110.htmSuche in Google Scholar

National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nremt.org/nremt/about/nremt_news.aspSuche in Google Scholar

O’Conner, A. B. (2015). Clinical instruction and evaluation: A teaching resource (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Jones and BartlettSuche in Google Scholar

Objectivity Plus (2013). Technical Manual for Quantum, A SimComplete System Retrieved from http://objectivityplus.comSuche in Google Scholar

Oermann, M. H., & Gaberson, K. B. (2014). Evaluation and testing in nursing education (4th ed.). New York: SpringerSuche in Google Scholar

Oermann, M. H., Saewert, K. J., Charasika, M., & Yarbrough, S. S. (2009). Assessment and grading practices in schools of nursing: National Survey Findings Part I. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(5), 274–278.Suche in Google Scholar

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses Institute (2014). QSEN Competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/Suche in Google Scholar

Richardson, K. J., & Claman, F. (2014). High-fidelity simulation in nursing education: A change in clinical practice. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(2), 125–127. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-35.2.125Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzolo, M. A., Barnes, L, & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2014, June). The realities of high stakes testing from a nursing and emergency medical technician perspective. Presented at the 2014 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Conference, Orlando, FL. Rossomando v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, 2 F.Supp.2d 1223 (1998).Suche in Google Scholar

Rowles, C. J. (2012). Strategies to promote critical and thinking and active learning. In D. M. Billings, & J. A. Halstead (Eds.). Teaching in nursing: A guide to faculty (4th ed., pp. 258–284). New York NY: SpringerSuche in Google Scholar

Roy, Y. S., Kim, S. S., & Kim, S. H. (2014). Effects of an integrated problem-based learning and simulation course for nursing students. Nursing and Health Sciences, 16, 91–96. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12069Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Shipman, D., Roa, M., Hoooten, J., & Wang, Z. J. (2012). Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: The positive and the negative. Nurse Education Today 32, 246-249. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Spencer, N. (2012). Clinical education and regulation. In N. Ard, & T. M. Valiga (Eds.), Clinical Nursing Education: Current Reflections (pp. 182–184). New York NY: National League of Nursing.Suche in Google Scholar

Tanicala, M., Scheffer, B., & Roberts, M. (2011). Defining pass/fail nursing student clinical behaviors phase I: Moving toward a culture of safety. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(3), 155–161. doi:10.54801/1536-5026-32.3.155Suche in Google Scholar

United States Medical Licensing Examination. (2014). US Medical Licensing Examination. Retrieved from http://www.usmle.org/LevineSuche in Google Scholar

Walsh, M., Bailey, P. H., & Koren, I. (2009). Objective structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(8), 1584–1595. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05054.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Weaver, A. (2011). High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education: An integrative review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(1), 37–40. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.1.37Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Willhaus, J., Burleson, G., Palaganas, J., & Jeffries, P. (2014). Authoring simulations for high-stakes student evaluation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(4), e177–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

Yanhua, C., & Watson, R. (2011). A review of clinical competence assessment in nursing. Nursing Education Today 31(8), 832–836.10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Yonge, O. J., Anderson, M., Profetto-McGrath, J., Olson, J. K., Skillen, D. L., Boman, J., Day, R. (2005). An inventory of nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2(1), article 11, 1–11.10.2202/1548-923X.1095Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-7-13
Revised: 2016-1-28
Accepted: 2016-2-26
Published Online: 2016-5-13
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2015-0048/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen