Startseite A study of melting temperatures in bismuth and antimony
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A study of melting temperatures in bismuth and antimony

  • Piyush Kuchhal ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Narsingh Dass
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. November 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Informationen für Autor*innen
International Journal of Materials Research
Aus der Zeitschrift International Journal of Materials Research Band 113 Heft 12

Abstract

We studied the melting temperatures of bismuth and antimony as a function of pressure in this paper because, unlike other solids, melting temperatures are found to fall with increasing pressure. A phenomenological model is proposed to represent the melting temperature as a function of pressure in both solids using Lindemann’s criterion. The computed results are found to be very close to the experimental data. The average absolute percentage relative deviation (AARD%) in bismuth is 0.012, 0.038 in antimony (set-1) and 0.128 in antimony (set-2). Furthermore, the minimum condition is obtained, which gives the pressure at the minimum melting temperature.

Keywords: Antimony; Bismuth; Melting temperature; Pressure; Simon relation
Corresponding author: Piyush Kuchhal, Department of Applied Sciences, UPES, Dehradun, 248007, India, E-mail:

Funding source: University of Petroleum and Energy Studies

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Acknowledgment

One of the authors, PK is thankful to the University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, for providing the infrastructure for this work.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research received no external funding.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Anzellini, S., Burakovsky, L., Turnbull, R., Bandiello, E., Errandonea, D. Crystals 2021, 11, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11040452.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Baty, S. R., Burakovsky, L., Errandonea, D. Crystals 2021, 11, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11050537.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Errandonea, D., Burakovsky, L., Preston, D. L., MacLeod, S. G., Santamaría-Perez, D., Chen, S., Cynn, H., Simak, S. I., McMahon, M. I., Proctor, J. E., Mezouar, M. Commun. Mater. 2020, 1, 60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-00058-2.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Burakovsky, L., Preston, D. L. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 2004, 65, 1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2003.10.076.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Tammann, G. Crystallization and Fusion; J. A. Barth Verlag: Leipzig, 1903; p. 90.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Shigeaki, O. High Pressure Res. 2018, 38, 414–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2018.1541456.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Bridgman, P. W. Phys. Rev. 1941, 60, 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.60.351.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Akahama, Y., Kawamura, H., Singh, A. K. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 5892–5897. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1515378.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Coleman, A. L., Stevenson, M., McMahon, M. I., Macleod, S. G. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 144107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.144107.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Crawford, R. K., Daniels, W. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 5651. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1675734.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hardy, W. H.II, Crawford, R. K., Daniels, W. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 1005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674931.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Akella, J., Vaidya, S. N., Kennedy, G. C. J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 40, 2800. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1658078.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Lahr, P. H., Eversole, W. G. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1962, 7, 42. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60012a011.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Simon, F. E., Glatzel, G., Anorg, Z. Allgem. Chem. 1929, 178, 309. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19291780123.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Babb, S. E. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1963, 35, 400. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.35.400.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Kumari, M., Dass, N. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 1988, 146, 105. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221780234.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Dass, N. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, 3023. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.3023.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Kraut, E. K., Kennedy, G. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1966, 16, 608. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.608.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Kraut, E. K., Kennedy, G. C. Phys. Rev. 1966, 151, 668. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.151.668.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Reynolds, C. L., Faughnan, K. A., Barker, R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 2943. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1680427.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Lindemann, F. A. Phys. Z. 1910, 11, 609. https://doi.org/10.3109/07357909309011680.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Schlosser, H., Vineet, P., Ferrante, J. Phys. Rev. 1989, 40, 5929. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.6405.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Degtyareva, O., MCMahon, M. I., Nelmes, R. J. High Pressure Res. 2004, 24, 319–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957950412331281057.Suche in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-01-15
Accepted: 2022-07-11
Published Online: 2022-11-16
Published in Print: 2022-12-16

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Papers
  3. Predicted interfacial thermal conductance and thermal conductivity of graphite flakes/Al composites with different alloy composition
  4. Tribological behaviour of nano-sized beta phase silicon nitride: effects of the contact conditions
  5. Experimental assessment on the contact characteristics of 3D printed flexible poly lactic acid (PLA) soft fingertips
  6. Efficient natural dye sensitized solar cell from PVDF based polymer electrolyte filled with layered graphite
  7. Regulation of the photovoltaic performance of TiO2@MAPbI3 core–shell nanowire arrays
  8. Hydrothermal synthesis of CoAl2O4 spinel: effect of reaction conditions on the characteristic and morphological features
  9. Peroxymonosulfate oxidation process activated with heterogeneous amorphous Co78Si8B14 alloy for degradation of Orange II
  10. A study of melting temperatures in bismuth and antimony
  11. Short Communication
  12. Corrosion study of 430 stainless steel with cobalt electrodeposited obtained from the recycling of Li-ion batteries
  13. News
  14. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0018
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
Antimony; Bismuth; Melting temperature; Pressure; Simon relation

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Papers
  3. Predicted interfacial thermal conductance and thermal conductivity of graphite flakes/Al composites with different alloy composition
  4. Tribological behaviour of nano-sized beta phase silicon nitride: effects of the contact conditions
  5. Experimental assessment on the contact characteristics of 3D printed flexible poly lactic acid (PLA) soft fingertips
  6. Efficient natural dye sensitized solar cell from PVDF based polymer electrolyte filled with layered graphite
  7. Regulation of the photovoltaic performance of TiO2@MAPbI3 core–shell nanowire arrays
  8. Hydrothermal synthesis of CoAl2O4 spinel: effect of reaction conditions on the characteristic and morphological features
  9. Peroxymonosulfate oxidation process activated with heterogeneous amorphous Co78Si8B14 alloy for degradation of Orange II
  10. A study of melting temperatures in bismuth and antimony
  11. Short Communication
  12. Corrosion study of 430 stainless steel with cobalt electrodeposited obtained from the recycling of Li-ion batteries
  13. News
  14. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0018/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen