Startseite Technik Enhanced sensitive phase alpha plane scheme against high resistance ground faults
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Enhanced sensitive phase alpha plane scheme against high resistance ground faults

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. März 2023

Abstract

Phase-based Alpha (α) Plane Relaying (APR) scheme has numerous advantages over the Current Differential Relay (CDR) for transmission line protection. Since the large Restraining Region (RR) in the APR makes high security against CT saturation, channel delay, line charging current and synchronization error. However, the APR loses its sensitivity for high resistance ground faults, especially single line to ground faults under outfeed conditions. Also, losing its dependability under close-in low resistance three-phase faults. Thereby, the sequence-based APR provides enhanced sensitivity with the cost of computational burden and complexity. Hence, in this paper, the concept of the average value (I Avg) of both end instantaneous currents is used as an auxiliary logic. In which, the polarity of I Avg is incorporated as an add-on logic to the conventional APR to confirm high resistance internal faults. Thereby, the requirement of sequence components can be avoided (negative and zero). To validate the proposed auxiliary logic, it is tested for the WSCC (Western System Coordinating Council) 9-bus, 110 kV, 50 Hz. System. The simulated results under various fault cases found authenticated results. In addition, the comparative assessment and validation with real-world data reveal the enhanced sensitivity of the proposed logic under high-resistance ground faults.


Corresponding author: Suryanarayana Gangolu, IEEE, Electrical Engineering, NIT Uttarakhand, Srinagar Garhwal, Pauri, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

Appendix 1

(a) Transmission line (T 7-5) data (Base values are 100 MVA, 110 kV).

Parameter Value
(+) Sequence resistance R 0.0032 (pu/m)
(+) Sequence X L 0.0161 (pu/m)
(+) Sequence B 0.306 (pu/m)

(b) Equivalent source impedance data w.r.t Bus-7 and 5.

Bus-7 Bus-5
Voltage (kV) 110∠35° 110∠5°
Positive sequence impedance (pu) 0.02 +j 0.52 0.031 +j 0. 65
Zero sequence impedance (pu) 0.22 +j 5.622 0.35 +j 7.2
Rated load at Bus-5 100 MW, 25 MVAR per phase
CT ratio = 500:1 A

References

1. Novosel, D, Bartok, G, Henneberg, G, Mysore, P, Tziouvaras, D, Ward, S. IEEE PSRC report on performance of relaying during wide-area stressed conditions. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2009;25:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2035202.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Ziegler, G. Numerical differential protection: principles and applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

3. International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems. Study Committee 34. Working Group 04. In: Application guide on protection of complex transmission network configurations. Tasmania: CIGRE; 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Bozoki, B, Burzese, AA, Sante, HD, Fohey, J, Mozina, CJ, Sanford, DE, et al.. Line protection design trends in the USA and Canada. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 1988;3:1530–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.193952.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Tziouvaras, D, Roberts, J, Benmouyal, G, Hou, D. The effect of conventional instrument transformer transients on numerical relay elements. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual western protective relay conference, Spokane, WA; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Premerlani, W, Alexander, GE, Patel, SC. A new approach to current differential protection for transmission lines. New York: GE Grid Solutions; 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Almeida, MLS, Silva, KM. Transmission lines differential protection based on an alternative incremental complex power alpha plane. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2017;11:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0229.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Benmouyal, G, Mooney, JB. Advanced sequence elements for line current differential protection. Pullman, WA: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Inc.; 2006;27–36 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Dambhare, S, Soman, SA, Chandorkar, MC. Current differential protection of transmission line using the moving window averaging technique. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2009;25:610–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2032324.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Deng, X, Yuan, R, Li, T, Liu, W, Shen, Y, Xiao, Z. Digital differential protection technique of transmission line using instantaneous active current: theory, simulation and experiment. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2015;9:996–1005, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0317.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Tang, L, Dong, X, Luo, S, Shi, S, Wang, B. A new differential protection of transmission line based on equivalent travelling wave. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2016;32:1359–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2016.2568206.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Ferrer, HJA, Schweitzer, EO, editors. Modern solutions for protection, control, and monitoring of electric power systems. Pullman, WA, USA: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories; 2010:1–361 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Gangolu, S, Sarangi, S. A new differential current circle diagram based technique for long transmission line protection. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2022;15:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0300.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Xu, ZY, Du, ZQ, Ran, L, Wu, YK, Yang, QX, He, JL. A current differential relay for a 1000-kV UHV transmission line. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2007;22:1392–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2007.900274.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Dambhare, S, Soman, SA, Chandorkar, MC. Adaptive current differential protection schemes for transmission-line protection. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2009;24:1832–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2028801.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Rajić, T, Stojanović, Z. An algorithm for longitudinal differential protection of transmission lines. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2018;94:276–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Dashti, R, Daisy, M, Javadi, S, Aliabadi, MH. Proposing a new method to improve the longitudinal differential relay performance using the Clarke transformation: theory, simulation, and experiment. Measurement 2021;168:108450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108450.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Miller, H, Burger, J, Fischer, N, Kasztenny, B. Modern line current differential protection solutions. In: 2010 63rd IEEE annual conference for protective relay engineers; 2010:1–25 pp.10.1109/CPRE.2010.5469504Suche in Google Scholar

19. Xue, Y, Kasztenny, B, Taylor, D, Xia, Y. Series compensation, power swings, and inverter-based sources and their impact on line current differential protection. In: 2013 IEEE 66th annual conference for protective relay engineers; 2013:80–91 pp.10.1109/CPRE.2013.6822029Suche in Google Scholar

20. Xue, Y, Kasztenny, B, Taylor, D, Xia, Y. Line differential protection under unusual system conditions. In: Proceedings of the 39th Aannual western protective relay conference; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Silva, KM, Bainy, RG. Generalized alpha plane for numerical differential protection applications. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2016;31:2565–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2016.2581987.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Benmouyal, G. The trajectories of line current differential faults in the alpha plane. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual western protective relay conference, Spokane, WA; 2005:19 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Tziouvaras, DA, Altuve, H, Benmouyal, G, Roberts, J. Line differential protection with an enhanced characteristic. Dez: SEL: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Inc; 2004.10.1049/cp:20040150Suche in Google Scholar

24. Sarangi, S, Pradhan, AK. Adaptive α-plane line differential protection. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2017;11:2468–77. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0943.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Hossain, M, Leevongwat, I, Rastgoufard, P. Revisions on alpha plane for enhanced sensitivity of line differential protection. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2018;33:3260–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2018.2840964.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Gangolu, S, Sarangi, S. A novel complex current ratio-based technique for transmission line protection. Protect Control Mod Power Syst 2020;5:1–9, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-020-00168-6.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Gangolu, S, Raja, P, Selvan, MP, Murali, VK. Effective algorithm for fault discrimination and estimation of fault location in transmission lines. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2019;13:2789–98. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5815.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Zou, G, Huang, Q, Song, S, Tong, B, Gao, H. Novel transient-energy-based directional pilot protection method for HVDC line. Prot Control Mod Power Syst 2017;2:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-017-0047-z.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Haj-Ahmed, MA, Hawa, M. Cognitive radio-based directional comparison blocking relaying scheme. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2022;58:1879–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2022.3146112.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-27
Accepted: 2023-02-05
Published Online: 2023-03-20

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 19.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2022-0322/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen